2.18/1.46 WORST_CASE(?, O(n^1)) 2.18/1.47 proof of /export/starexec/sandbox/output/output_files/bench.koat 2.18/1.47 # AProVE Commit ID: 48fb2092695e11cc9f56e44b17a92a5f88ffb256 marcel 20180622 unpublished dirty 2.18/1.47 2.18/1.47 2.18/1.47 The runtime complexity of the given CpxIntTrs could be proven to be BOUNDS(1, n^1). 2.18/1.47 2.18/1.47 (0) CpxIntTrs 2.18/1.47 (1) Koat Proof [FINISHED, 169 ms] 2.18/1.47 (2) BOUNDS(1, n^1) 2.18/1.47 2.18/1.47 2.18/1.47 ---------------------------------------- 2.18/1.47 2.18/1.47 (0) 2.18/1.47 Obligation: 2.18/1.47 Complexity Int TRS consisting of the following rules: 2.18/1.47 eval_foo_start(v_.01, v_.02, v_.2, v_.24, v_c, v_x, v_y) -> Com_1(eval_foo_bb0_in(v_.01, v_.02, v_.2, v_.24, v_c, v_x, v_y)) :|: TRUE 2.18/1.47 eval_foo_bb0_in(v_.01, v_.02, v_.2, v_.24, v_c, v_x, v_y) -> Com_1(eval_foo_bb1_in(v_x, v_y, v_.2, v_.24, v_c, v_x, v_y)) :|: TRUE 2.18/1.47 eval_foo_bb1_in(v_.01, v_.02, v_.2, v_.24, v_c, v_x, v_y) -> Com_1(eval_foo_bb2_in(v_.01, v_.02, v_.2, v_.24, v_c, v_x, v_y)) :|: v_.01 + v_.02 > 0 2.18/1.47 eval_foo_bb1_in(v_.01, v_.02, v_.2, v_.24, v_c, v_x, v_y) -> Com_1(eval_foo_bb6_in(v_.01, v_.02, v_.2, v_.24, v_c, v_x, v_y)) :|: v_.01 + v_.02 <= 0 2.18/1.47 eval_foo_bb2_in(v_.01, v_.02, v_.2, v_.24, v_c, v_x, v_y) -> Com_1(eval_foo_bb3_in(v_.01, v_.02, v_.2, v_.24, v_c, v_x, v_y)) :|: v_.01 > v_.02 2.18/1.47 eval_foo_bb2_in(v_.01, v_.02, v_.2, v_.24, v_c, v_x, v_y) -> Com_1(eval_foo_bb4_in(v_.01, v_.02, v_.2, v_.24, v_c, v_x, v_y)) :|: v_.01 <= v_.02 2.18/1.47 eval_foo_bb3_in(v_.01, v_.02, v_.2, v_.24, v_c, v_x, v_y) -> Com_1(eval_foo_bb5_in(v_.01, v_.02, v_.01 - 1, v_.02, v_c, v_x, v_y)) :|: TRUE 2.18/1.47 eval_foo_bb4_in(v_.01, v_.02, v_.2, v_.24, v_c, v_x, v_y) -> Com_1(eval_foo_bb5_in(v_.01, v_.02, v_.01 - 1, v_.02, v_c, v_x, v_y)) :|: v_.01 >= v_.02 && v_.01 <= v_.02 2.18/1.47 eval_foo_bb4_in(v_.01, v_.02, v_.2, v_.24, v_c, v_x, v_y) -> Com_1(eval_foo_bb5_in(v_.01, v_.02, v_.01, v_.02, v_c, v_x, v_y)) :|: v_.01 >= v_.02 && v_.01 <= v_.02 && v_.01 < v_.02 2.18/1.47 eval_foo_bb4_in(v_.01, v_.02, v_.2, v_.24, v_c, v_x, v_y) -> Com_1(eval_foo_bb5_in(v_.01, v_.02, v_.01, v_.02, v_c, v_x, v_y)) :|: v_.01 >= v_.02 && v_.01 <= v_.02 && v_.01 > v_.02 2.18/1.47 eval_foo_bb4_in(v_.01, v_.02, v_.2, v_.24, v_c, v_x, v_y) -> Com_1(eval_foo_bb5_in(v_.01, v_.02, v_.01 - 1, v_.02 - 1, v_c, v_x, v_y)) :|: v_.01 < v_.02 && v_.01 >= v_.02 && v_.01 <= v_.02 2.18/1.47 eval_foo_bb4_in(v_.01, v_.02, v_.2, v_.24, v_c, v_x, v_y) -> Com_1(eval_foo_bb5_in(v_.01, v_.02, v_.01 - 1, v_.02 - 1, v_c, v_x, v_y)) :|: v_.01 > v_.02 && v_.01 >= v_.02 && v_.01 <= v_.02 2.18/1.47 eval_foo_bb4_in(v_.01, v_.02, v_.2, v_.24, v_c, v_x, v_y) -> Com_1(eval_foo_bb5_in(v_.01, v_.02, v_.01, v_.02 - 1, v_c, v_x, v_y)) :|: v_.01 < v_.02 2.18/1.47 eval_foo_bb4_in(v_.01, v_.02, v_.2, v_.24, v_c, v_x, v_y) -> Com_1(eval_foo_bb5_in(v_.01, v_.02, v_.01, v_.02 - 1, v_c, v_x, v_y)) :|: v_.01 < v_.02 && v_.01 > v_.02 2.18/1.47 eval_foo_bb4_in(v_.01, v_.02, v_.2, v_.24, v_c, v_x, v_y) -> Com_1(eval_foo_bb5_in(v_.01, v_.02, v_.01, v_.02 - 1, v_c, v_x, v_y)) :|: v_.01 > v_.02 2.18/1.47 eval_foo_bb5_in(v_.01, v_.02, v_.2, v_.24, v_c, v_x, v_y) -> Com_1(eval_foo_bb1_in(v_.2, v_.24, v_.2, v_.24, v_c, v_x, v_y)) :|: TRUE 2.18/1.47 eval_foo_bb6_in(v_.01, v_.02, v_.2, v_.24, v_c, v_x, v_y) -> Com_1(eval_foo_stop(v_.01, v_.02, v_.2, v_.24, v_c, v_x, v_y)) :|: TRUE 2.18/1.47 2.18/1.47 The start-symbols are:[eval_foo_start_7] 2.18/1.47 2.18/1.47 2.18/1.47 ---------------------------------------- 2.18/1.47 2.18/1.47 (1) Koat Proof (FINISHED) 2.18/1.47 YES(?, 9*ar_1 + 9*ar_3 + 6) 2.18/1.47 2.18/1.47 2.18/1.47 2.18/1.47 Initial complexity problem: 2.18/1.47 2.18/1.47 1: T: 2.18/1.47 2.18/1.47 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) evalfoostart(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb0in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) 2.18/1.47 2.18/1.47 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) evalfoobb0in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb1in(ar_1, ar_1, ar_3, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) 2.18/1.47 2.18/1.47 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) evalfoobb1in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb2in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) [ ar_0 + ar_2 >= 1 ] 2.18/1.47 2.18/1.47 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) evalfoobb1in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb6in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) [ 0 >= ar_0 + ar_2 ] 2.18/1.47 2.18/1.47 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) evalfoobb2in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb3in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) [ ar_0 >= ar_2 + 1 ] 2.18/1.47 2.18/1.47 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) evalfoobb2in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb4in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) [ ar_2 >= ar_0 ] 2.18/1.47 2.18/1.47 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) evalfoobb3in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb5in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_0 - 1, ar_2)) 2.18/1.47 2.18/1.47 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) evalfoobb4in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb5in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_0 - 1, ar_2)) [ ar_0 = ar_2 ] 2.18/1.47 2.18/1.47 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) evalfoobb4in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb5in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_0, ar_2)) [ 0 >= 1 /\ ar_0 = ar_2 ] 2.18/1.47 2.18/1.47 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) evalfoobb4in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb5in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_0, ar_2)) [ 0 >= 1 /\ ar_0 = ar_2 ] 2.18/1.47 2.18/1.47 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) evalfoobb4in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb5in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_0 - 1, ar_2 - 1)) [ 0 >= 1 /\ ar_0 = ar_2 ] 2.18/1.47 2.18/1.47 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) evalfoobb4in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb5in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_0 - 1, ar_2 - 1)) [ 0 >= 1 /\ ar_0 = ar_2 ] 2.18/1.47 2.18/1.47 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) evalfoobb4in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb5in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_0, ar_2 - 1)) [ ar_2 >= ar_0 + 1 ] 2.18/1.47 2.18/1.47 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) evalfoobb4in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb5in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_0, ar_2 - 1)) [ ar_2 >= ar_0 + 1 /\ ar_0 >= ar_2 + 1 ] 2.18/1.47 2.18/1.47 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) evalfoobb4in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb5in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_0, ar_2 - 1)) [ ar_0 >= ar_2 + 1 ] 2.18/1.47 2.18/1.47 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) evalfoobb5in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb1in(ar_4, ar_1, ar_5, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) 2.18/1.47 2.18/1.47 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) evalfoobb6in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoostop(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) 2.18/1.47 2.18/1.47 (Comp: 1, Cost: 0) koat_start(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoostart(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) [ 0 <= 0 ] 2.18/1.47 2.18/1.47 start location: koat_start 2.18/1.47 2.18/1.47 leaf cost: 0 2.18/1.47 2.18/1.47 2.18/1.47 2.18/1.47 Testing for reachability in the complexity graph removes the following transitions from problem 1: 2.18/1.47 2.18/1.47 evalfoobb4in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb5in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_0, ar_2)) [ 0 >= 1 /\ ar_0 = ar_2 ] 2.18/1.47 2.18/1.47 evalfoobb4in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb5in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_0, ar_2)) [ 0 >= 1 /\ ar_0 = ar_2 ] 2.18/1.47 2.18/1.47 evalfoobb4in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb5in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_0 - 1, ar_2 - 1)) [ 0 >= 1 /\ ar_0 = ar_2 ] 2.18/1.47 2.18/1.47 evalfoobb4in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb5in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_0 - 1, ar_2 - 1)) [ 0 >= 1 /\ ar_0 = ar_2 ] 2.18/1.47 2.18/1.47 evalfoobb4in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb5in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_0, ar_2 - 1)) [ ar_2 >= ar_0 + 1 /\ ar_0 >= ar_2 + 1 ] 2.18/1.47 2.18/1.47 evalfoobb4in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb5in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_0, ar_2 - 1)) [ ar_0 >= ar_2 + 1 ] 2.18/1.47 2.18/1.47 We thus obtain the following problem: 2.18/1.47 2.18/1.47 2: T: 2.18/1.47 2.18/1.47 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) evalfoobb5in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb1in(ar_4, ar_1, ar_5, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) 2.18/1.47 2.18/1.47 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) evalfoobb4in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb5in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_0, ar_2 - 1)) [ ar_2 >= ar_0 + 1 ] 2.18/1.47 2.18/1.47 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) evalfoobb4in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb5in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_0 - 1, ar_2)) [ ar_0 = ar_2 ] 2.18/1.47 2.18/1.47 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) evalfoobb3in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb5in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_0 - 1, ar_2)) 2.18/1.47 2.18/1.47 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) evalfoobb6in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoostop(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) 2.18/1.47 2.18/1.47 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) evalfoobb2in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb4in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) [ ar_2 >= ar_0 ] 2.18/1.47 2.18/1.47 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) evalfoobb2in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb3in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) [ ar_0 >= ar_2 + 1 ] 2.18/1.47 2.18/1.47 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) evalfoobb1in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb6in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) [ 0 >= ar_0 + ar_2 ] 2.18/1.47 2.18/1.47 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) evalfoobb1in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb2in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) [ ar_0 + ar_2 >= 1 ] 2.18/1.47 2.18/1.47 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) evalfoobb0in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb1in(ar_1, ar_1, ar_3, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) 2.18/1.47 2.18/1.47 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) evalfoostart(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb0in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) 2.18/1.47 2.18/1.47 (Comp: 1, Cost: 0) koat_start(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoostart(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) [ 0 <= 0 ] 2.18/1.47 2.18/1.47 start location: koat_start 2.18/1.47 2.18/1.47 leaf cost: 0 2.18/1.47 2.18/1.47 2.18/1.47 2.18/1.47 Repeatedly propagating knowledge in problem 2 produces the following problem: 2.18/1.47 2.18/1.47 3: T: 2.18/1.47 2.18/1.47 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) evalfoobb5in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb1in(ar_4, ar_1, ar_5, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) 2.18/1.47 2.18/1.47 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) evalfoobb4in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb5in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_0, ar_2 - 1)) [ ar_2 >= ar_0 + 1 ] 2.18/1.47 2.18/1.47 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) evalfoobb4in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb5in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_0 - 1, ar_2)) [ ar_0 = ar_2 ] 2.18/1.47 2.18/1.47 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) evalfoobb3in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb5in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_0 - 1, ar_2)) 2.18/1.47 2.18/1.47 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) evalfoobb6in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoostop(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) 2.18/1.47 2.18/1.47 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) evalfoobb2in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb4in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) [ ar_2 >= ar_0 ] 2.18/1.47 2.18/1.47 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) evalfoobb2in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb3in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) [ ar_0 >= ar_2 + 1 ] 2.18/1.47 2.18/1.47 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) evalfoobb1in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb6in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) [ 0 >= ar_0 + ar_2 ] 2.18/1.47 2.18/1.47 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) evalfoobb1in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb2in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) [ ar_0 + ar_2 >= 1 ] 2.18/1.47 2.18/1.47 (Comp: 1, Cost: 1) evalfoobb0in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb1in(ar_1, ar_1, ar_3, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) 2.18/1.47 2.18/1.47 (Comp: 1, Cost: 1) evalfoostart(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb0in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) 2.18/1.47 2.18/1.47 (Comp: 1, Cost: 0) koat_start(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoostart(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) [ 0 <= 0 ] 2.18/1.47 2.18/1.47 start location: koat_start 2.18/1.47 2.18/1.47 leaf cost: 0 2.18/1.47 2.18/1.47 2.18/1.47 2.18/1.47 A polynomial rank function with 2.18/1.47 2.18/1.47 Pol(evalfoobb5in) = 2 2.18/1.47 2.18/1.47 Pol(evalfoobb1in) = 2 2.18/1.47 2.18/1.47 Pol(evalfoobb4in) = 2 2.18/1.47 2.18/1.47 Pol(evalfoobb3in) = 2 2.18/1.47 2.18/1.47 Pol(evalfoobb6in) = 1 2.18/1.47 2.18/1.47 Pol(evalfoostop) = 0 2.18/1.47 2.18/1.47 Pol(evalfoobb2in) = 2 2.18/1.47 2.18/1.47 Pol(evalfoobb0in) = 2 2.18/1.47 2.18/1.47 Pol(evalfoostart) = 2 2.18/1.47 2.18/1.47 Pol(koat_start) = 2 2.18/1.47 2.18/1.47 orients all transitions weakly and the transitions 2.18/1.47 2.18/1.47 evalfoobb6in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoostop(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) 2.18/1.47 2.18/1.47 evalfoobb1in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb6in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) [ 0 >= ar_0 + ar_2 ] 2.18/1.47 2.18/1.47 strictly and produces the following problem: 2.18/1.47 2.18/1.47 4: T: 2.18/1.47 2.18/1.47 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) evalfoobb5in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb1in(ar_4, ar_1, ar_5, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) 2.18/1.47 2.18/1.47 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) evalfoobb4in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb5in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_0, ar_2 - 1)) [ ar_2 >= ar_0 + 1 ] 2.18/1.47 2.18/1.47 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) evalfoobb4in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb5in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_0 - 1, ar_2)) [ ar_0 = ar_2 ] 2.18/1.47 2.18/1.47 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) evalfoobb3in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb5in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_0 - 1, ar_2)) 2.18/1.47 2.18/1.47 (Comp: 2, Cost: 1) evalfoobb6in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoostop(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) 2.18/1.47 2.18/1.47 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) evalfoobb2in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb4in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) [ ar_2 >= ar_0 ] 2.18/1.47 2.18/1.47 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) evalfoobb2in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb3in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) [ ar_0 >= ar_2 + 1 ] 2.18/1.47 2.18/1.47 (Comp: 2, Cost: 1) evalfoobb1in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb6in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) [ 0 >= ar_0 + ar_2 ] 2.18/1.47 2.18/1.47 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) evalfoobb1in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb2in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) [ ar_0 + ar_2 >= 1 ] 2.18/1.47 2.18/1.47 (Comp: 1, Cost: 1) evalfoobb0in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb1in(ar_1, ar_1, ar_3, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) 2.18/1.47 2.18/1.47 (Comp: 1, Cost: 1) evalfoostart(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb0in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) 2.18/1.47 2.18/1.47 (Comp: 1, Cost: 0) koat_start(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoostart(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) [ 0 <= 0 ] 2.18/1.47 2.18/1.47 start location: koat_start 2.18/1.47 2.18/1.47 leaf cost: 0 2.18/1.47 2.18/1.47 2.18/1.47 2.18/1.47 A polynomial rank function with 2.18/1.47 2.18/1.47 Pol(evalfoobb5in) = V_5 + V_6 2.18/1.47 2.18/1.47 Pol(evalfoobb1in) = V_1 + V_3 2.18/1.47 2.18/1.47 Pol(evalfoobb4in) = V_1 + V_3 - 1 2.18/1.47 2.18/1.47 Pol(evalfoobb3in) = V_1 + V_3 - 1 2.18/1.47 2.18/1.47 Pol(evalfoobb6in) = V_1 + V_3 2.18/1.47 2.18/1.47 Pol(evalfoostop) = V_1 + V_3 2.18/1.47 2.18/1.47 Pol(evalfoobb2in) = V_1 + V_3 - 1 2.18/1.47 2.18/1.47 Pol(evalfoobb0in) = V_2 + V_4 2.18/1.47 2.18/1.47 Pol(evalfoostart) = V_2 + V_4 2.18/1.47 2.18/1.47 Pol(koat_start) = V_2 + V_4 2.18/1.47 2.18/1.47 orients all transitions weakly and the transition 2.18/1.47 2.18/1.47 evalfoobb1in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb2in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) [ ar_0 + ar_2 >= 1 ] 2.18/1.47 2.18/1.47 strictly and produces the following problem: 2.18/1.47 2.18/1.47 5: T: 2.18/1.47 2.18/1.47 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) evalfoobb5in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb1in(ar_4, ar_1, ar_5, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) 2.18/1.47 2.18/1.47 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) evalfoobb4in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb5in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_0, ar_2 - 1)) [ ar_2 >= ar_0 + 1 ] 2.18/1.47 2.18/1.47 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) evalfoobb4in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb5in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_0 - 1, ar_2)) [ ar_0 = ar_2 ] 2.18/1.47 2.18/1.47 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) evalfoobb3in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb5in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_0 - 1, ar_2)) 2.18/1.47 2.18/1.47 (Comp: 2, Cost: 1) evalfoobb6in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoostop(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) 2.18/1.47 2.18/1.47 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) evalfoobb2in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb4in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) [ ar_2 >= ar_0 ] 2.18/1.47 2.18/1.47 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) evalfoobb2in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb3in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) [ ar_0 >= ar_2 + 1 ] 2.18/1.47 2.18/1.47 (Comp: 2, Cost: 1) evalfoobb1in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb6in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) [ 0 >= ar_0 + ar_2 ] 2.18/1.47 2.18/1.47 (Comp: ar_1 + ar_3, Cost: 1) evalfoobb1in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb2in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) [ ar_0 + ar_2 >= 1 ] 2.18/1.47 2.18/1.47 (Comp: 1, Cost: 1) evalfoobb0in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb1in(ar_1, ar_1, ar_3, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) 2.18/1.47 2.18/1.47 (Comp: 1, Cost: 1) evalfoostart(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb0in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) 2.18/1.47 2.18/1.47 (Comp: 1, Cost: 0) koat_start(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoostart(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) [ 0 <= 0 ] 2.18/1.47 2.18/1.47 start location: koat_start 2.18/1.47 2.18/1.47 leaf cost: 0 2.18/1.47 2.18/1.47 2.18/1.47 2.18/1.47 Repeatedly propagating knowledge in problem 5 produces the following problem: 2.18/1.47 2.18/1.47 6: T: 2.18/1.47 2.18/1.47 (Comp: 3*ar_1 + 3*ar_3, Cost: 1) evalfoobb5in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb1in(ar_4, ar_1, ar_5, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) 2.18/1.47 2.18/1.47 (Comp: ar_1 + ar_3, Cost: 1) evalfoobb4in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb5in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_0, ar_2 - 1)) [ ar_2 >= ar_0 + 1 ] 2.18/1.47 2.18/1.47 (Comp: ar_1 + ar_3, Cost: 1) evalfoobb4in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb5in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_0 - 1, ar_2)) [ ar_0 = ar_2 ] 2.18/1.47 2.18/1.47 (Comp: ar_1 + ar_3, Cost: 1) evalfoobb3in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb5in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_0 - 1, ar_2)) 2.18/1.47 2.18/1.47 (Comp: 2, Cost: 1) evalfoobb6in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoostop(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) 2.18/1.47 2.18/1.47 (Comp: ar_1 + ar_3, Cost: 1) evalfoobb2in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb4in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) [ ar_2 >= ar_0 ] 2.18/1.47 2.18/1.47 (Comp: ar_1 + ar_3, Cost: 1) evalfoobb2in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb3in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) [ ar_0 >= ar_2 + 1 ] 2.18/1.47 2.18/1.47 (Comp: 2, Cost: 1) evalfoobb1in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb6in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) [ 0 >= ar_0 + ar_2 ] 2.18/1.47 2.18/1.47 (Comp: ar_1 + ar_3, Cost: 1) evalfoobb1in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb2in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) [ ar_0 + ar_2 >= 1 ] 2.18/1.47 2.18/1.47 (Comp: 1, Cost: 1) evalfoobb0in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb1in(ar_1, ar_1, ar_3, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) 2.18/1.47 2.18/1.47 (Comp: 1, Cost: 1) evalfoostart(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoobb0in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) 2.18/1.47 2.18/1.47 (Comp: 1, Cost: 0) koat_start(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5) -> Com_1(evalfoostart(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3, ar_4, ar_5)) [ 0 <= 0 ] 2.18/1.47 2.18/1.47 start location: koat_start 2.18/1.47 2.18/1.47 leaf cost: 0 2.18/1.47 2.18/1.47 2.18/1.47 2.18/1.47 Complexity upper bound 9*ar_1 + 9*ar_3 + 6 2.18/1.47 2.18/1.47 2.18/1.47 2.18/1.47 Time: 0.157 sec (SMT: 0.133 sec) 2.18/1.47 2.18/1.47 2.18/1.47 ---------------------------------------- 2.18/1.47 2.18/1.47 (2) 2.18/1.47 BOUNDS(1, n^1) 2.18/1.48 EOF