2.64/1.78	MAYBE
2.64/1.79	proof of /export/starexec/sandbox/output/output_files/bench.koat
2.64/1.79	# AProVE Commit ID: 48fb2092695e11cc9f56e44b17a92a5f88ffb256 marcel 20180622 unpublished dirty
2.64/1.79	
2.64/1.79	
2.64/1.79	The runtime complexity of the given CpxIntTrs could be proven to be BOUNDS(1, INF).
2.64/1.79	
2.64/1.79	(0) CpxIntTrs
2.64/1.79	
2.64/1.79	
2.64/1.79	----------------------------------------
2.64/1.79	
2.64/1.79	(0)
2.64/1.79	Obligation:
2.64/1.79	Complexity Int TRS consisting of the following rules:
2.64/1.79	eval_foo_start(v_.0, v_.01, v_choose, v_death, v_life, v_temp) -> Com_1(eval_foo_bb0_in(v_.0, v_.01, v_choose, v_death, v_life, v_temp)) :|: TRUE
2.64/1.79	eval_foo_bb0_in(v_.0, v_.01, v_choose, v_death, v_life, v_temp) -> Com_1(eval_foo_bb1_in(13, 17, v_choose, v_death, v_life, v_temp)) :|: TRUE
2.64/1.79	eval_foo_bb1_in(v_.0, v_.01, v_choose, v_death, v_life, v_temp) -> Com_1(eval_foo_bb2_in(v_.0, v_.01, v_choose, v_death, v_life, v_temp)) :|: v_.0 < v_.01
2.64/1.79	eval_foo_bb1_in(v_.0, v_.01, v_choose, v_death, v_life, v_temp) -> Com_1(eval_foo_bb3_in(v_.0, v_.01, v_choose, v_death, v_life, v_temp)) :|: v_.0 >= v_.01
2.64/1.79	eval_foo_bb2_in(v_.0, v_.01, v_choose, v_death, v_life, v_temp) -> Com_1(eval_foo_bb1_in(2, v_.0 + 1, v_choose, v_death, v_life, v_temp)) :|: 2 < v_.01
2.64/1.79	eval_foo_bb2_in(v_.0, v_.01, v_choose, v_death, v_life, v_temp) -> Com_1(eval_foo_bb1_in(2, v_.0 + 1, v_choose, v_death, v_life, v_temp)) :|: 2 < v_.0 + 1
2.64/1.79	eval_foo_bb2_in(v_.0, v_.01, v_choose, v_death, v_life, v_temp) -> Com_1(eval_foo_bb1_in(v_.01, v_.0 + 1, v_choose, v_death, v_life, v_temp)) :|: 2 >= v_.01 && 2 >= v_.0 + 1
2.64/1.79	eval_foo_bb3_in(v_.0, v_.01, v_choose, v_death, v_life, v_temp) -> Com_1(eval_foo_stop(v_.0, v_.01, v_choose, v_death, v_life, v_temp)) :|: TRUE
2.64/1.79	
2.64/1.79	The start-symbols are:[eval_foo_start_6]
2.64/1.79	
2.64/1.80	EOF