4.36/2.16 WORST_CASE(Omega(n^1), O(n^1)) 4.36/2.17 proof of /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.koat 4.36/2.17 # AProVE Commit ID: 48fb2092695e11cc9f56e44b17a92a5f88ffb256 marcel 20180622 unpublished dirty 4.36/2.17 4.36/2.17 4.36/2.17 The runtime complexity of the given CpxIntTrs could be proven to be BOUNDS(n^1, n^1). 4.36/2.17 4.36/2.17 (0) CpxIntTrs 4.36/2.17 (1) Koat Proof [FINISHED, 36 ms] 4.36/2.17 (2) BOUNDS(1, n^1) 4.36/2.17 (3) Loat Proof [FINISHED, 522 ms] 4.36/2.17 (4) BOUNDS(n^1, INF) 4.36/2.17 4.36/2.17 4.36/2.17 ---------------------------------------- 4.36/2.17 4.36/2.17 (0) 4.36/2.17 Obligation: 4.36/2.17 Complexity Int TRS consisting of the following rules: 4.36/2.17 eval_random1d_start(v_2, v_max, v_x_0) -> Com_1(eval_random1d_bb0_in(v_2, v_max, v_x_0)) :|: TRUE 4.36/2.17 eval_random1d_bb0_in(v_2, v_max, v_x_0) -> Com_1(eval_random1d_0(v_2, v_max, v_x_0)) :|: TRUE 4.36/2.17 eval_random1d_0(v_2, v_max, v_x_0) -> Com_1(eval_random1d_1(v_2, v_max, v_x_0)) :|: TRUE 4.36/2.17 eval_random1d_1(v_2, v_max, v_x_0) -> Com_1(eval_random1d_bb1_in(v_2, v_max, 1)) :|: v_max > 0 4.36/2.17 eval_random1d_1(v_2, v_max, v_x_0) -> Com_1(eval_random1d_bb3_in(v_2, v_max, v_x_0)) :|: v_max <= 0 4.36/2.17 eval_random1d_bb1_in(v_2, v_max, v_x_0) -> Com_1(eval_random1d_bb2_in(v_2, v_max, v_x_0)) :|: v_x_0 <= v_max 4.36/2.17 eval_random1d_bb1_in(v_2, v_max, v_x_0) -> Com_1(eval_random1d_bb3_in(v_2, v_max, v_x_0)) :|: v_x_0 > v_max 4.36/2.17 eval_random1d_bb2_in(v_2, v_max, v_x_0) -> Com_1(eval_random1d_2(v_2, v_max, v_x_0)) :|: TRUE 4.36/2.17 eval_random1d_2(v_2, v_max, v_x_0) -> Com_1(eval_random1d_3(nondef_0, v_max, v_x_0)) :|: TRUE 4.36/2.17 eval_random1d_3(v_2, v_max, v_x_0) -> Com_1(eval_random1d_bb1_in(v_2, v_max, v_x_0 + 1)) :|: v_2 > 0 4.36/2.17 eval_random1d_3(v_2, v_max, v_x_0) -> Com_1(eval_random1d_bb1_in(v_2, v_max, v_x_0 + 1)) :|: v_2 <= 0 4.36/2.17 eval_random1d_bb3_in(v_2, v_max, v_x_0) -> Com_1(eval_random1d_stop(v_2, v_max, v_x_0)) :|: TRUE 4.36/2.17 4.36/2.17 The start-symbols are:[eval_random1d_start_3] 4.36/2.17 4.36/2.17 4.36/2.17 ---------------------------------------- 4.36/2.17 4.36/2.17 (1) Koat Proof (FINISHED) 4.36/2.17 YES(?, 5*ar_0 + 19) 4.36/2.17 4.36/2.17 4.36/2.17 4.36/2.17 Initial complexity problem: 4.36/2.17 4.36/2.17 1: T: 4.36/2.17 4.36/2.17 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) evalrandom1dstart(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2) -> Com_1(evalrandom1dbb0in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2)) 4.36/2.17 4.36/2.17 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) evalrandom1dbb0in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2) -> Com_1(evalrandom1d0(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2)) 4.36/2.17 4.36/2.17 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) evalrandom1d0(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2) -> Com_1(evalrandom1d1(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2)) 4.36/2.17 4.36/2.17 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) evalrandom1d1(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2) -> Com_1(evalrandom1dbb1in(ar_0, 1, ar_2)) [ ar_0 >= 1 ] 4.36/2.17 4.36/2.17 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) evalrandom1d1(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2) -> Com_1(evalrandom1dbb3in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2)) [ 0 >= ar_0 ] 4.36/2.17 4.36/2.17 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) evalrandom1dbb1in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2) -> Com_1(evalrandom1dbb2in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2)) [ ar_0 >= ar_1 ] 4.36/2.17 4.36/2.17 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) evalrandom1dbb1in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2) -> Com_1(evalrandom1dbb3in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2)) [ ar_1 >= ar_0 + 1 ] 4.36/2.17 4.36/2.17 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) evalrandom1dbb2in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2) -> Com_1(evalrandom1d2(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2)) 4.36/2.17 4.36/2.17 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) evalrandom1d2(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2) -> Com_1(evalrandom1d3(ar_0, ar_1, d)) 4.36/2.17 4.36/2.17 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) evalrandom1d3(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2) -> Com_1(evalrandom1dbb1in(ar_0, ar_1 + 1, ar_2)) [ ar_2 >= 1 ] 4.36/2.17 4.36/2.17 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) evalrandom1d3(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2) -> Com_1(evalrandom1dbb1in(ar_0, ar_1 + 1, ar_2)) [ 0 >= ar_2 ] 4.36/2.17 4.36/2.17 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) evalrandom1dbb3in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2) -> Com_1(evalrandom1dstop(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2)) 4.36/2.17 4.36/2.17 (Comp: 1, Cost: 0) koat_start(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2) -> Com_1(evalrandom1dstart(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2)) [ 0 <= 0 ] 4.36/2.17 4.36/2.17 start location: koat_start 4.36/2.17 4.36/2.17 leaf cost: 0 4.36/2.17 4.36/2.17 4.36/2.17 4.36/2.17 Repeatedly propagating knowledge in problem 1 produces the following problem: 4.36/2.17 4.36/2.17 2: T: 4.36/2.17 4.36/2.17 (Comp: 1, Cost: 1) evalrandom1dstart(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2) -> Com_1(evalrandom1dbb0in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2)) 4.36/2.17 4.36/2.17 (Comp: 1, Cost: 1) evalrandom1dbb0in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2) -> Com_1(evalrandom1d0(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2)) 4.36/2.17 4.36/2.17 (Comp: 1, Cost: 1) evalrandom1d0(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2) -> Com_1(evalrandom1d1(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2)) 4.36/2.17 4.36/2.17 (Comp: 1, Cost: 1) evalrandom1d1(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2) -> Com_1(evalrandom1dbb1in(ar_0, 1, ar_2)) [ ar_0 >= 1 ] 4.36/2.17 4.36/2.17 (Comp: 1, Cost: 1) evalrandom1d1(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2) -> Com_1(evalrandom1dbb3in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2)) [ 0 >= ar_0 ] 4.36/2.17 4.36/2.17 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) evalrandom1dbb1in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2) -> Com_1(evalrandom1dbb2in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2)) [ ar_0 >= ar_1 ] 4.36/2.17 4.36/2.17 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) evalrandom1dbb1in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2) -> Com_1(evalrandom1dbb3in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2)) [ ar_1 >= ar_0 + 1 ] 4.36/2.17 4.36/2.17 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) evalrandom1dbb2in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2) -> Com_1(evalrandom1d2(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2)) 4.36/2.17 4.36/2.17 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) evalrandom1d2(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2) -> Com_1(evalrandom1d3(ar_0, ar_1, d)) 4.36/2.17 4.36/2.17 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) evalrandom1d3(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2) -> Com_1(evalrandom1dbb1in(ar_0, ar_1 + 1, ar_2)) [ ar_2 >= 1 ] 4.36/2.17 4.36/2.17 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) evalrandom1d3(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2) -> Com_1(evalrandom1dbb1in(ar_0, ar_1 + 1, ar_2)) [ 0 >= ar_2 ] 4.36/2.17 4.36/2.17 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) evalrandom1dbb3in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2) -> Com_1(evalrandom1dstop(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2)) 4.36/2.17 4.36/2.17 (Comp: 1, Cost: 0) koat_start(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2) -> Com_1(evalrandom1dstart(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2)) [ 0 <= 0 ] 4.36/2.17 4.36/2.17 start location: koat_start 4.36/2.17 4.36/2.17 leaf cost: 0 4.36/2.17 4.36/2.17 4.36/2.17 4.36/2.17 A polynomial rank function with 4.36/2.17 4.36/2.17 Pol(evalrandom1dstart) = 2 4.36/2.17 4.36/2.17 Pol(evalrandom1dbb0in) = 2 4.36/2.17 4.36/2.17 Pol(evalrandom1d0) = 2 4.36/2.17 4.36/2.17 Pol(evalrandom1d1) = 2 4.36/2.17 4.36/2.17 Pol(evalrandom1dbb1in) = 2 4.36/2.17 4.36/2.17 Pol(evalrandom1dbb3in) = 1 4.36/2.17 4.36/2.17 Pol(evalrandom1dbb2in) = 2 4.36/2.17 4.36/2.17 Pol(evalrandom1d2) = 2 4.36/2.17 4.36/2.17 Pol(evalrandom1d3) = 2 4.36/2.17 4.36/2.17 Pol(evalrandom1dstop) = 0 4.36/2.17 4.36/2.17 Pol(koat_start) = 2 4.36/2.17 4.36/2.17 orients all transitions weakly and the transitions 4.36/2.17 4.36/2.17 evalrandom1dbb3in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2) -> Com_1(evalrandom1dstop(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2)) 4.36/2.17 4.36/2.17 evalrandom1dbb1in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2) -> Com_1(evalrandom1dbb3in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2)) [ ar_1 >= ar_0 + 1 ] 4.36/2.17 4.36/2.17 strictly and produces the following problem: 4.36/2.17 4.36/2.17 3: T: 4.36/2.17 4.36/2.17 (Comp: 1, Cost: 1) evalrandom1dstart(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2) -> Com_1(evalrandom1dbb0in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2)) 4.36/2.17 4.36/2.17 (Comp: 1, Cost: 1) evalrandom1dbb0in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2) -> Com_1(evalrandom1d0(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2)) 4.36/2.17 4.36/2.17 (Comp: 1, Cost: 1) evalrandom1d0(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2) -> Com_1(evalrandom1d1(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2)) 4.36/2.17 4.36/2.17 (Comp: 1, Cost: 1) evalrandom1d1(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2) -> Com_1(evalrandom1dbb1in(ar_0, 1, ar_2)) [ ar_0 >= 1 ] 4.36/2.17 4.36/2.17 (Comp: 1, Cost: 1) evalrandom1d1(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2) -> Com_1(evalrandom1dbb3in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2)) [ 0 >= ar_0 ] 4.36/2.17 4.36/2.17 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) evalrandom1dbb1in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2) -> Com_1(evalrandom1dbb2in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2)) [ ar_0 >= ar_1 ] 4.36/2.17 4.36/2.17 (Comp: 2, Cost: 1) evalrandom1dbb1in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2) -> Com_1(evalrandom1dbb3in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2)) [ ar_1 >= ar_0 + 1 ] 4.36/2.17 4.36/2.17 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) evalrandom1dbb2in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2) -> Com_1(evalrandom1d2(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2)) 4.36/2.17 4.36/2.17 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) evalrandom1d2(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2) -> Com_1(evalrandom1d3(ar_0, ar_1, d)) 4.36/2.17 4.36/2.17 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) evalrandom1d3(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2) -> Com_1(evalrandom1dbb1in(ar_0, ar_1 + 1, ar_2)) [ ar_2 >= 1 ] 4.36/2.17 4.36/2.17 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) evalrandom1d3(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2) -> Com_1(evalrandom1dbb1in(ar_0, ar_1 + 1, ar_2)) [ 0 >= ar_2 ] 4.36/2.17 4.36/2.17 (Comp: 2, Cost: 1) evalrandom1dbb3in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2) -> Com_1(evalrandom1dstop(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2)) 4.36/2.17 4.36/2.17 (Comp: 1, Cost: 0) koat_start(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2) -> Com_1(evalrandom1dstart(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2)) [ 0 <= 0 ] 4.36/2.17 4.36/2.17 start location: koat_start 4.36/2.17 4.36/2.17 leaf cost: 0 4.36/2.17 4.36/2.17 4.36/2.17 4.36/2.17 A polynomial rank function with 4.36/2.17 4.36/2.17 Pol(evalrandom1dbb2in) = V_1 - V_2 4.36/2.17 4.36/2.17 Pol(evalrandom1d2) = V_1 - V_2 4.36/2.17 4.36/2.17 Pol(evalrandom1dbb1in) = V_1 - V_2 + 1 4.36/2.17 4.36/2.17 Pol(evalrandom1d3) = V_1 - V_2 4.36/2.17 4.36/2.17 and size complexities 4.36/2.17 4.36/2.17 S("koat_start(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2) -> Com_1(evalrandom1dstart(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2)) [ 0 <= 0 ]", 0-0) = ar_0 4.36/2.17 4.36/2.17 S("koat_start(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2) -> Com_1(evalrandom1dstart(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2)) [ 0 <= 0 ]", 0-1) = ar_1 4.36/2.17 4.36/2.17 S("koat_start(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2) -> Com_1(evalrandom1dstart(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2)) [ 0 <= 0 ]", 0-2) = ar_2 4.36/2.17 4.36/2.17 S("evalrandom1dbb3in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2) -> Com_1(evalrandom1dstop(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2))", 0-0) = ar_0 4.36/2.17 4.36/2.17 S("evalrandom1dbb3in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2) -> Com_1(evalrandom1dstop(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2))", 0-1) = ? 4.36/2.17 4.36/2.17 S("evalrandom1dbb3in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2) -> Com_1(evalrandom1dstop(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2))", 0-2) = ? 4.36/2.17 4.36/2.17 S("evalrandom1d3(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2) -> Com_1(evalrandom1dbb1in(ar_0, ar_1 + 1, ar_2)) [ 0 >= ar_2 ]", 0-0) = ar_0 4.36/2.17 4.36/2.17 S("evalrandom1d3(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2) -> Com_1(evalrandom1dbb1in(ar_0, ar_1 + 1, ar_2)) [ 0 >= ar_2 ]", 0-1) = ? 4.36/2.17 4.36/2.17 S("evalrandom1d3(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2) -> Com_1(evalrandom1dbb1in(ar_0, ar_1 + 1, ar_2)) [ 0 >= ar_2 ]", 0-2) = ? 4.36/2.17 4.36/2.17 S("evalrandom1d3(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2) -> Com_1(evalrandom1dbb1in(ar_0, ar_1 + 1, ar_2)) [ ar_2 >= 1 ]", 0-0) = ar_0 4.36/2.17 4.36/2.17 S("evalrandom1d3(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2) -> Com_1(evalrandom1dbb1in(ar_0, ar_1 + 1, ar_2)) [ ar_2 >= 1 ]", 0-1) = ? 4.36/2.17 4.36/2.17 S("evalrandom1d3(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2) -> Com_1(evalrandom1dbb1in(ar_0, ar_1 + 1, ar_2)) [ ar_2 >= 1 ]", 0-2) = ? 4.36/2.17 4.36/2.17 S("evalrandom1d2(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2) -> Com_1(evalrandom1d3(ar_0, ar_1, d))", 0-0) = ar_0 4.36/2.17 4.36/2.17 S("evalrandom1d2(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2) -> Com_1(evalrandom1d3(ar_0, ar_1, d))", 0-1) = ? 4.36/2.17 4.36/2.17 S("evalrandom1d2(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2) -> Com_1(evalrandom1d3(ar_0, ar_1, d))", 0-2) = ? 4.36/2.17 4.36/2.17 S("evalrandom1dbb2in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2) -> Com_1(evalrandom1d2(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2))", 0-0) = ar_0 4.36/2.17 4.36/2.17 S("evalrandom1dbb2in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2) -> Com_1(evalrandom1d2(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2))", 0-1) = ? 4.36/2.17 4.36/2.17 S("evalrandom1dbb2in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2) -> Com_1(evalrandom1d2(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2))", 0-2) = ? 4.36/2.17 4.36/2.17 S("evalrandom1dbb1in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2) -> Com_1(evalrandom1dbb3in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2)) [ ar_1 >= ar_0 + 1 ]", 0-0) = ar_0 4.36/2.17 4.36/2.17 S("evalrandom1dbb1in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2) -> Com_1(evalrandom1dbb3in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2)) [ ar_1 >= ar_0 + 1 ]", 0-1) = ? 4.36/2.17 4.36/2.17 S("evalrandom1dbb1in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2) -> Com_1(evalrandom1dbb3in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2)) [ ar_1 >= ar_0 + 1 ]", 0-2) = ? 4.36/2.17 4.36/2.17 S("evalrandom1dbb1in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2) -> Com_1(evalrandom1dbb2in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2)) [ ar_0 >= ar_1 ]", 0-0) = ar_0 4.36/2.17 4.36/2.17 S("evalrandom1dbb1in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2) -> Com_1(evalrandom1dbb2in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2)) [ ar_0 >= ar_1 ]", 0-1) = ? 4.36/2.17 4.36/2.17 S("evalrandom1dbb1in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2) -> Com_1(evalrandom1dbb2in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2)) [ ar_0 >= ar_1 ]", 0-2) = ? 4.36/2.17 4.36/2.17 S("evalrandom1d1(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2) -> Com_1(evalrandom1dbb3in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2)) [ 0 >= ar_0 ]", 0-0) = ar_0 4.36/2.17 4.36/2.17 S("evalrandom1d1(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2) -> Com_1(evalrandom1dbb3in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2)) [ 0 >= ar_0 ]", 0-1) = ar_1 4.36/2.17 4.36/2.17 S("evalrandom1d1(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2) -> Com_1(evalrandom1dbb3in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2)) [ 0 >= ar_0 ]", 0-2) = ar_2 4.36/2.17 4.36/2.17 S("evalrandom1d1(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2) -> Com_1(evalrandom1dbb1in(ar_0, 1, ar_2)) [ ar_0 >= 1 ]", 0-0) = ar_0 4.36/2.17 4.36/2.17 S("evalrandom1d1(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2) -> Com_1(evalrandom1dbb1in(ar_0, 1, ar_2)) [ ar_0 >= 1 ]", 0-1) = 1 4.36/2.17 4.36/2.17 S("evalrandom1d1(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2) -> Com_1(evalrandom1dbb1in(ar_0, 1, ar_2)) [ ar_0 >= 1 ]", 0-2) = ar_2 4.36/2.17 4.36/2.17 S("evalrandom1d0(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2) -> Com_1(evalrandom1d1(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2))", 0-0) = ar_0 4.36/2.17 4.36/2.17 S("evalrandom1d0(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2) -> Com_1(evalrandom1d1(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2))", 0-1) = ar_1 4.36/2.17 4.36/2.17 S("evalrandom1d0(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2) -> Com_1(evalrandom1d1(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2))", 0-2) = ar_2 4.36/2.17 4.36/2.17 S("evalrandom1dbb0in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2) -> Com_1(evalrandom1d0(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2))", 0-0) = ar_0 4.36/2.17 4.36/2.17 S("evalrandom1dbb0in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2) -> Com_1(evalrandom1d0(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2))", 0-1) = ar_1 4.36/2.17 4.36/2.17 S("evalrandom1dbb0in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2) -> Com_1(evalrandom1d0(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2))", 0-2) = ar_2 4.36/2.17 4.36/2.17 S("evalrandom1dstart(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2) -> Com_1(evalrandom1dbb0in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2))", 0-0) = ar_0 4.36/2.17 4.36/2.17 S("evalrandom1dstart(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2) -> Com_1(evalrandom1dbb0in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2))", 0-1) = ar_1 4.36/2.17 4.36/2.17 S("evalrandom1dstart(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2) -> Com_1(evalrandom1dbb0in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2))", 0-2) = ar_2 4.36/2.17 4.36/2.17 orients the transitions 4.36/2.17 4.36/2.17 evalrandom1dbb2in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2) -> Com_1(evalrandom1d2(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2)) 4.36/2.17 4.36/2.17 evalrandom1dbb1in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2) -> Com_1(evalrandom1dbb2in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2)) [ ar_0 >= ar_1 ] 4.36/2.17 4.36/2.17 evalrandom1d3(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2) -> Com_1(evalrandom1dbb1in(ar_0, ar_1 + 1, ar_2)) [ ar_2 >= 1 ] 4.36/2.17 4.36/2.17 evalrandom1d3(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2) -> Com_1(evalrandom1dbb1in(ar_0, ar_1 + 1, ar_2)) [ 0 >= ar_2 ] 4.36/2.17 4.36/2.17 evalrandom1d2(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2) -> Com_1(evalrandom1d3(ar_0, ar_1, d)) 4.36/2.17 4.36/2.17 weakly and the transition 4.36/2.17 4.36/2.17 evalrandom1dbb1in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2) -> Com_1(evalrandom1dbb2in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2)) [ ar_0 >= ar_1 ] 4.36/2.17 4.36/2.17 strictly and produces the following problem: 4.36/2.17 4.36/2.17 4: T: 4.36/2.17 4.36/2.17 (Comp: 1, Cost: 1) evalrandom1dstart(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2) -> Com_1(evalrandom1dbb0in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2)) 4.36/2.17 4.36/2.17 (Comp: 1, Cost: 1) evalrandom1dbb0in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2) -> Com_1(evalrandom1d0(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2)) 4.36/2.17 4.36/2.17 (Comp: 1, Cost: 1) evalrandom1d0(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2) -> Com_1(evalrandom1d1(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2)) 4.36/2.17 4.36/2.17 (Comp: 1, Cost: 1) evalrandom1d1(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2) -> Com_1(evalrandom1dbb1in(ar_0, 1, ar_2)) [ ar_0 >= 1 ] 4.36/2.17 4.36/2.17 (Comp: 1, Cost: 1) evalrandom1d1(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2) -> Com_1(evalrandom1dbb3in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2)) [ 0 >= ar_0 ] 4.36/2.17 4.36/2.17 (Comp: ar_0 + 2, Cost: 1) evalrandom1dbb1in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2) -> Com_1(evalrandom1dbb2in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2)) [ ar_0 >= ar_1 ] 4.36/2.17 4.36/2.17 (Comp: 2, Cost: 1) evalrandom1dbb1in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2) -> Com_1(evalrandom1dbb3in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2)) [ ar_1 >= ar_0 + 1 ] 4.36/2.17 4.36/2.17 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) evalrandom1dbb2in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2) -> Com_1(evalrandom1d2(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2)) 4.36/2.17 4.36/2.17 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) evalrandom1d2(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2) -> Com_1(evalrandom1d3(ar_0, ar_1, d)) 4.36/2.17 4.36/2.17 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) evalrandom1d3(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2) -> Com_1(evalrandom1dbb1in(ar_0, ar_1 + 1, ar_2)) [ ar_2 >= 1 ] 4.36/2.17 4.36/2.17 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) evalrandom1d3(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2) -> Com_1(evalrandom1dbb1in(ar_0, ar_1 + 1, ar_2)) [ 0 >= ar_2 ] 4.36/2.17 4.36/2.17 (Comp: 2, Cost: 1) evalrandom1dbb3in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2) -> Com_1(evalrandom1dstop(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2)) 4.36/2.17 4.36/2.17 (Comp: 1, Cost: 0) koat_start(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2) -> Com_1(evalrandom1dstart(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2)) [ 0 <= 0 ] 4.36/2.17 4.36/2.17 start location: koat_start 4.36/2.17 4.36/2.17 leaf cost: 0 4.36/2.17 4.36/2.17 4.36/2.17 4.36/2.17 Repeatedly propagating knowledge in problem 4 produces the following problem: 4.36/2.17 4.36/2.17 5: T: 4.36/2.17 4.36/2.17 (Comp: 1, Cost: 1) evalrandom1dstart(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2) -> Com_1(evalrandom1dbb0in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2)) 4.36/2.17 4.36/2.17 (Comp: 1, Cost: 1) evalrandom1dbb0in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2) -> Com_1(evalrandom1d0(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2)) 4.36/2.17 4.36/2.17 (Comp: 1, Cost: 1) evalrandom1d0(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2) -> Com_1(evalrandom1d1(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2)) 4.36/2.17 4.36/2.17 (Comp: 1, Cost: 1) evalrandom1d1(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2) -> Com_1(evalrandom1dbb1in(ar_0, 1, ar_2)) [ ar_0 >= 1 ] 4.36/2.17 4.36/2.17 (Comp: 1, Cost: 1) evalrandom1d1(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2) -> Com_1(evalrandom1dbb3in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2)) [ 0 >= ar_0 ] 4.36/2.17 4.36/2.17 (Comp: ar_0 + 2, Cost: 1) evalrandom1dbb1in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2) -> Com_1(evalrandom1dbb2in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2)) [ ar_0 >= ar_1 ] 4.36/2.17 4.36/2.17 (Comp: 2, Cost: 1) evalrandom1dbb1in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2) -> Com_1(evalrandom1dbb3in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2)) [ ar_1 >= ar_0 + 1 ] 4.36/2.17 4.36/2.17 (Comp: ar_0 + 2, Cost: 1) evalrandom1dbb2in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2) -> Com_1(evalrandom1d2(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2)) 4.36/2.17 4.36/2.17 (Comp: ar_0 + 2, Cost: 1) evalrandom1d2(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2) -> Com_1(evalrandom1d3(ar_0, ar_1, d)) 4.36/2.17 4.36/2.17 (Comp: ar_0 + 2, Cost: 1) evalrandom1d3(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2) -> Com_1(evalrandom1dbb1in(ar_0, ar_1 + 1, ar_2)) [ ar_2 >= 1 ] 4.36/2.17 4.36/2.17 (Comp: ar_0 + 2, Cost: 1) evalrandom1d3(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2) -> Com_1(evalrandom1dbb1in(ar_0, ar_1 + 1, ar_2)) [ 0 >= ar_2 ] 4.36/2.17 4.36/2.17 (Comp: 2, Cost: 1) evalrandom1dbb3in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2) -> Com_1(evalrandom1dstop(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2)) 4.36/2.17 4.36/2.17 (Comp: 1, Cost: 0) koat_start(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2) -> Com_1(evalrandom1dstart(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2)) [ 0 <= 0 ] 4.36/2.17 4.36/2.17 start location: koat_start 4.36/2.17 4.36/2.17 leaf cost: 0 4.36/2.17 4.36/2.17 4.36/2.17 4.36/2.17 Complexity upper bound 5*ar_0 + 19 4.36/2.17 4.36/2.17 4.36/2.17 4.36/2.17 Time: 0.093 sec (SMT: 0.080 sec) 4.36/2.17 4.36/2.17 4.36/2.17 ---------------------------------------- 4.36/2.17 4.36/2.17 (2) 4.36/2.17 BOUNDS(1, n^1) 4.36/2.17 4.36/2.17 ---------------------------------------- 4.36/2.17 4.36/2.17 (3) Loat Proof (FINISHED) 4.36/2.17 4.36/2.17 4.36/2.17 ### Pre-processing the ITS problem ### 4.36/2.17 4.36/2.17 4.36/2.17 4.36/2.17 Initial linear ITS problem 4.36/2.17 4.36/2.17 Start location: evalrandom1dstart 4.36/2.17 4.36/2.17 0: evalrandom1dstart -> evalrandom1dbb0in : [], cost: 1 4.36/2.17 4.36/2.17 1: evalrandom1dbb0in -> evalrandom1d0 : [], cost: 1 4.36/2.17 4.36/2.17 2: evalrandom1d0 -> evalrandom1d1 : [], cost: 1 4.36/2.17 4.36/2.17 3: evalrandom1d1 -> evalrandom1dbb1in : B'=1, [ A>=1 ], cost: 1 4.36/2.17 4.36/2.17 4: evalrandom1d1 -> evalrandom1dbb3in : [ 0>=A ], cost: 1 4.36/2.17 4.36/2.17 5: evalrandom1dbb1in -> evalrandom1dbb2in : [ A>=B ], cost: 1 4.36/2.17 4.36/2.17 6: evalrandom1dbb1in -> evalrandom1dbb3in : [ B>=1+A ], cost: 1 4.36/2.17 4.36/2.17 7: evalrandom1dbb2in -> evalrandom1d2 : [], cost: 1 4.36/2.17 4.36/2.17 8: evalrandom1d2 -> evalrandom1d3 : C'=free, [], cost: 1 4.36/2.17 4.36/2.17 9: evalrandom1d3 -> evalrandom1dbb1in : B'=1+B, [ C>=1 ], cost: 1 4.36/2.17 4.36/2.17 10: evalrandom1d3 -> evalrandom1dbb1in : B'=1+B, [ 0>=C ], cost: 1 4.36/2.17 4.36/2.17 11: evalrandom1dbb3in -> evalrandom1dstop : [], cost: 1 4.36/2.17 4.36/2.17 4.36/2.17 4.36/2.17 Removed unreachable and leaf rules: 4.36/2.17 4.36/2.17 Start location: evalrandom1dstart 4.36/2.17 4.36/2.17 0: evalrandom1dstart -> evalrandom1dbb0in : [], cost: 1 4.36/2.17 4.36/2.17 1: evalrandom1dbb0in -> evalrandom1d0 : [], cost: 1 4.36/2.17 4.36/2.17 2: evalrandom1d0 -> evalrandom1d1 : [], cost: 1 4.36/2.17 4.36/2.17 3: evalrandom1d1 -> evalrandom1dbb1in : B'=1, [ A>=1 ], cost: 1 4.36/2.17 4.36/2.17 5: evalrandom1dbb1in -> evalrandom1dbb2in : [ A>=B ], cost: 1 4.36/2.17 4.36/2.17 7: evalrandom1dbb2in -> evalrandom1d2 : [], cost: 1 4.36/2.17 4.36/2.17 8: evalrandom1d2 -> evalrandom1d3 : C'=free, [], cost: 1 4.36/2.17 4.36/2.17 9: evalrandom1d3 -> evalrandom1dbb1in : B'=1+B, [ C>=1 ], cost: 1 4.36/2.17 4.36/2.17 10: evalrandom1d3 -> evalrandom1dbb1in : B'=1+B, [ 0>=C ], cost: 1 4.36/2.17 4.36/2.17 4.36/2.17 4.36/2.17 ### Simplification by acceleration and chaining ### 4.36/2.17 4.36/2.17 4.36/2.17 4.36/2.17 Eliminated locations (on linear paths): 4.36/2.17 4.36/2.17 Start location: evalrandom1dstart 4.36/2.17 4.36/2.17 14: evalrandom1dstart -> evalrandom1dbb1in : B'=1, [ A>=1 ], cost: 4 4.36/2.17 4.36/2.17 16: evalrandom1dbb1in -> evalrandom1d3 : C'=free, [ A>=B ], cost: 3 4.36/2.17 4.36/2.17 9: evalrandom1d3 -> evalrandom1dbb1in : B'=1+B, [ C>=1 ], cost: 1 4.36/2.17 4.36/2.17 10: evalrandom1d3 -> evalrandom1dbb1in : B'=1+B, [ 0>=C ], cost: 1 4.36/2.17 4.36/2.17 4.36/2.17 4.36/2.17 Eliminated locations (on tree-shaped paths): 4.36/2.17 4.36/2.17 Start location: evalrandom1dstart 4.36/2.17 4.36/2.17 14: evalrandom1dstart -> evalrandom1dbb1in : B'=1, [ A>=1 ], cost: 4 4.36/2.17 4.36/2.17 17: evalrandom1dbb1in -> evalrandom1dbb1in : B'=1+B, C'=free, [ A>=B && free>=1 ], cost: 4 4.36/2.17 4.36/2.17 18: evalrandom1dbb1in -> evalrandom1dbb1in : B'=1+B, C'=free, [ A>=B && 0>=free ], cost: 4 4.36/2.17 4.36/2.17 4.36/2.17 4.36/2.17 Accelerating simple loops of location 4. 4.36/2.17 4.36/2.17 Accelerating the following rules: 4.36/2.17 4.36/2.17 17: evalrandom1dbb1in -> evalrandom1dbb1in : B'=1+B, C'=free, [ A>=B && free>=1 ], cost: 4 4.36/2.17 4.36/2.17 18: evalrandom1dbb1in -> evalrandom1dbb1in : B'=1+B, C'=free, [ A>=B && 0>=free ], cost: 4 4.36/2.17 4.36/2.17 4.36/2.17 4.36/2.17 Accelerated rule 17 with metering function 1+A-B, yielding the new rule 19. 4.36/2.17 4.36/2.17 Accelerated rule 18 with metering function 1+A-B, yielding the new rule 20. 4.36/2.17 4.36/2.17 Removing the simple loops: 17 18. 4.36/2.17 4.36/2.17 4.36/2.17 4.36/2.17 Accelerated all simple loops using metering functions (where possible): 4.36/2.17 4.36/2.17 Start location: evalrandom1dstart 4.36/2.17 4.36/2.17 14: evalrandom1dstart -> evalrandom1dbb1in : B'=1, [ A>=1 ], cost: 4 4.36/2.17 4.36/2.17 19: evalrandom1dbb1in -> evalrandom1dbb1in : B'=1+A, C'=free, [ A>=B && free>=1 ], cost: 4+4*A-4*B 4.36/2.18 4.36/2.18 20: evalrandom1dbb1in -> evalrandom1dbb1in : B'=1+A, C'=free, [ A>=B && 0>=free ], cost: 4+4*A-4*B 4.36/2.18 4.36/2.18 4.36/2.18 4.36/2.18 Chained accelerated rules (with incoming rules): 4.36/2.18 4.36/2.18 Start location: evalrandom1dstart 4.36/2.18 4.36/2.18 14: evalrandom1dstart -> evalrandom1dbb1in : B'=1, [ A>=1 ], cost: 4 4.36/2.18 4.36/2.18 21: evalrandom1dstart -> evalrandom1dbb1in : B'=1+A, C'=free, [ A>=1 && free>=1 ], cost: 4+4*A 4.36/2.18 4.36/2.18 22: evalrandom1dstart -> evalrandom1dbb1in : B'=1+A, C'=free, [ A>=1 && 0>=free ], cost: 4+4*A 4.36/2.18 4.36/2.18 4.36/2.18 4.36/2.18 Removed unreachable locations (and leaf rules with constant cost): 4.36/2.18 4.36/2.18 Start location: evalrandom1dstart 4.36/2.18 4.36/2.18 21: evalrandom1dstart -> evalrandom1dbb1in : B'=1+A, C'=free, [ A>=1 && free>=1 ], cost: 4+4*A 4.36/2.18 4.36/2.18 22: evalrandom1dstart -> evalrandom1dbb1in : B'=1+A, C'=free, [ A>=1 && 0>=free ], cost: 4+4*A 4.36/2.18 4.36/2.18 4.36/2.18 4.36/2.18 ### Computing asymptotic complexity ### 4.36/2.18 4.36/2.18 4.36/2.18 4.36/2.18 Fully simplified ITS problem 4.36/2.18 4.36/2.18 Start location: evalrandom1dstart 4.36/2.18 4.36/2.18 21: evalrandom1dstart -> evalrandom1dbb1in : B'=1+A, C'=free, [ A>=1 && free>=1 ], cost: 4+4*A 4.36/2.18 4.36/2.18 22: evalrandom1dstart -> evalrandom1dbb1in : B'=1+A, C'=free, [ A>=1 && 0>=free ], cost: 4+4*A 4.36/2.18 4.36/2.18 4.36/2.18 4.36/2.18 Computing asymptotic complexity for rule 21 4.36/2.18 4.36/2.18 Solved the limit problem by the following transformations: 4.36/2.18 4.36/2.18 Created initial limit problem: 4.36/2.18 4.36/2.18 A (+/+!), free (+/+!), 4+4*A (+) [not solved] 4.36/2.18 4.36/2.18 4.36/2.18 4.36/2.18 removing all constraints (solved by SMT) 4.36/2.18 4.36/2.18 resulting limit problem: [solved] 4.36/2.18 4.36/2.18 4.36/2.18 4.36/2.18 applying transformation rule (C) using substitution {A==n,free==1} 4.36/2.18 4.36/2.18 resulting limit problem: 4.36/2.18 4.36/2.18 [solved] 4.36/2.18 4.36/2.18 4.36/2.18 4.36/2.18 Solution: 4.36/2.18 4.36/2.18 A / n 4.36/2.18 4.36/2.18 free / 1 4.36/2.18 4.36/2.18 Resulting cost 4+4*n has complexity: Poly(n^1) 4.36/2.18 4.36/2.18 4.36/2.18 4.36/2.18 Found new complexity Poly(n^1). 4.36/2.18 4.36/2.18 4.36/2.18 4.36/2.18 Obtained the following overall complexity (w.r.t. the length of the input n): 4.36/2.18 4.36/2.18 Complexity: Poly(n^1) 4.36/2.18 4.36/2.18 Cpx degree: 1 4.36/2.18 4.36/2.18 Solved cost: 4+4*n 4.36/2.18 4.36/2.18 Rule cost: 4+4*A 4.36/2.18 4.36/2.18 Rule guard: [ A>=1 && free>=1 ] 4.36/2.18 4.36/2.18 4.36/2.18 4.36/2.18 WORST_CASE(Omega(n^1),?) 4.36/2.18 4.36/2.18 4.36/2.18 ---------------------------------------- 4.36/2.18 4.36/2.18 (4) 4.36/2.18 BOUNDS(n^1, INF) 4.56/2.19 EOF