4.76/2.28 WORST_CASE(Omega(n^1), O(n^1)) 4.95/2.28 proof of /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.koat 4.95/2.28 # AProVE Commit ID: 48fb2092695e11cc9f56e44b17a92a5f88ffb256 marcel 20180622 unpublished dirty 4.95/2.28 4.95/2.28 4.95/2.28 The runtime complexity of the given CpxIntTrs could be proven to be BOUNDS(n^1, n^1). 4.95/2.28 4.95/2.28 (0) CpxIntTrs 4.95/2.28 (1) Koat Proof [FINISHED, 80 ms] 4.95/2.28 (2) BOUNDS(1, n^1) 4.95/2.28 (3) Loat Proof [FINISHED, 607 ms] 4.95/2.28 (4) BOUNDS(n^1, INF) 4.95/2.28 4.95/2.28 4.95/2.28 ---------------------------------------- 4.95/2.28 4.95/2.28 (0) 4.95/2.28 Obligation: 4.95/2.28 Complexity Int TRS consisting of the following rules: 4.95/2.28 eval_start_start(v__0, v__1, v_y, v_z) -> Com_1(eval_start_bb0_in(v__0, v__1, v_y, v_z)) :|: TRUE 4.95/2.28 eval_start_bb0_in(v__0, v__1, v_y, v_z) -> Com_1(eval_start_0(v__0, v__1, v_y, v_z)) :|: TRUE 4.95/2.28 eval_start_0(v__0, v__1, v_y, v_z) -> Com_1(eval_start_1(v__0, v__1, v_y, v_z)) :|: TRUE 4.95/2.28 eval_start_1(v__0, v__1, v_y, v_z) -> Com_1(eval_start_2(v__0, v__1, v_y, v_z)) :|: TRUE 4.95/2.28 eval_start_2(v__0, v__1, v_y, v_z) -> Com_1(eval_start_3(v__0, v__1, v_y, v_z)) :|: TRUE 4.95/2.28 eval_start_3(v__0, v__1, v_y, v_z) -> Com_1(eval_start_bb1_in(v_y, v__1, v_y, v_z)) :|: TRUE 4.95/2.28 eval_start_bb1_in(v__0, v__1, v_y, v_z) -> Com_1(eval_start_bb2_in(v__0, v__1, v_y, v_z)) :|: v_z > v__0 4.95/2.28 eval_start_bb1_in(v__0, v__1, v_y, v_z) -> Com_1(eval_start_bb3_in(v__0, v__0, v_y, v_z)) :|: v_z <= v__0 4.95/2.28 eval_start_bb2_in(v__0, v__1, v_y, v_z) -> Com_1(eval_start_bb1_in(v__0 + 1, v__1, v_y, v_z)) :|: TRUE 4.95/2.28 eval_start_bb3_in(v__0, v__1, v_y, v_z) -> Com_1(eval_start_bb4_in(v__0, v__1, v_y, v_z)) :|: v__1 > 2 4.95/2.28 eval_start_bb3_in(v__0, v__1, v_y, v_z) -> Com_1(eval_start_bb5_in(v__0, v__1, v_y, v_z)) :|: v__1 <= 2 4.95/2.28 eval_start_bb4_in(v__0, v__1, v_y, v_z) -> Com_1(eval_start_bb3_in(v__0, v__1 - 3, v_y, v_z)) :|: TRUE 4.95/2.28 eval_start_bb5_in(v__0, v__1, v_y, v_z) -> Com_1(eval_start_stop(v__0, v__1, v_y, v_z)) :|: TRUE 4.95/2.28 4.95/2.28 The start-symbols are:[eval_start_start_4] 4.95/2.28 4.95/2.28 4.95/2.28 ---------------------------------------- 4.95/2.28 4.95/2.28 (1) Koat Proof (FINISHED) 4.95/2.28 YES(?, 14*ar_1 + 14*ar_2 + 15) 4.95/2.28 4.95/2.28 4.95/2.28 4.95/2.28 Initial complexity problem: 4.95/2.28 4.95/2.28 1: T: 4.95/2.28 4.95/2.28 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) evalstartstart(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3) -> Com_1(evalstartbb0in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3)) 4.95/2.28 4.95/2.28 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) evalstartbb0in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3) -> Com_1(evalstart0(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3)) 4.95/2.28 4.95/2.28 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) evalstart0(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3) -> Com_1(evalstart1(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3)) 4.95/2.28 4.95/2.28 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) evalstart1(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3) -> Com_1(evalstart2(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3)) 4.95/2.28 4.95/2.28 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) evalstart2(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3) -> Com_1(evalstart3(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3)) 4.95/2.28 4.95/2.28 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) evalstart3(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3) -> Com_1(evalstartbb1in(ar_1, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3)) 4.95/2.28 4.95/2.28 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) evalstartbb1in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3) -> Com_1(evalstartbb2in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3)) [ ar_2 >= ar_0 + 1 ] 4.95/2.28 4.95/2.28 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) evalstartbb1in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3) -> Com_1(evalstartbb3in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_0)) [ ar_0 >= ar_2 ] 4.95/2.28 4.95/2.28 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) evalstartbb2in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3) -> Com_1(evalstartbb1in(ar_0 + 1, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3)) 4.95/2.28 4.95/2.28 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) evalstartbb3in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3) -> Com_1(evalstartbb4in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3)) [ ar_3 >= 3 ] 4.95/2.28 4.95/2.28 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) evalstartbb3in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3) -> Com_1(evalstartbb5in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3)) [ 2 >= ar_3 ] 4.95/2.28 4.95/2.28 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) evalstartbb4in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3) -> Com_1(evalstartbb3in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3 - 3)) 4.95/2.28 4.95/2.28 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) evalstartbb5in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3) -> Com_1(evalstartstop(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3)) 4.95/2.28 4.95/2.28 (Comp: 1, Cost: 0) koat_start(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3) -> Com_1(evalstartstart(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3)) [ 0 <= 0 ] 4.95/2.28 4.95/2.28 start location: koat_start 4.95/2.28 4.95/2.28 leaf cost: 0 4.95/2.28 4.95/2.28 4.95/2.28 4.95/2.28 Repeatedly propagating knowledge in problem 1 produces the following problem: 4.95/2.28 4.95/2.28 2: T: 4.95/2.28 4.95/2.28 (Comp: 1, Cost: 1) evalstartstart(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3) -> Com_1(evalstartbb0in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3)) 4.95/2.28 4.95/2.28 (Comp: 1, Cost: 1) evalstartbb0in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3) -> Com_1(evalstart0(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3)) 4.95/2.28 4.95/2.28 (Comp: 1, Cost: 1) evalstart0(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3) -> Com_1(evalstart1(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3)) 4.95/2.28 4.95/2.28 (Comp: 1, Cost: 1) evalstart1(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3) -> Com_1(evalstart2(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3)) 4.95/2.28 4.95/2.28 (Comp: 1, Cost: 1) evalstart2(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3) -> Com_1(evalstart3(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3)) 4.95/2.28 4.95/2.28 (Comp: 1, Cost: 1) evalstart3(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3) -> Com_1(evalstartbb1in(ar_1, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3)) 4.95/2.28 4.95/2.28 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) evalstartbb1in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3) -> Com_1(evalstartbb2in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3)) [ ar_2 >= ar_0 + 1 ] 4.95/2.28 4.95/2.28 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) evalstartbb1in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3) -> Com_1(evalstartbb3in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_0)) [ ar_0 >= ar_2 ] 4.95/2.28 4.95/2.28 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) evalstartbb2in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3) -> Com_1(evalstartbb1in(ar_0 + 1, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3)) 4.95/2.28 4.95/2.28 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) evalstartbb3in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3) -> Com_1(evalstartbb4in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3)) [ ar_3 >= 3 ] 4.95/2.28 4.95/2.28 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) evalstartbb3in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3) -> Com_1(evalstartbb5in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3)) [ 2 >= ar_3 ] 4.95/2.28 4.95/2.28 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) evalstartbb4in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3) -> Com_1(evalstartbb3in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3 - 3)) 4.95/2.28 4.95/2.28 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) evalstartbb5in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3) -> Com_1(evalstartstop(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3)) 4.95/2.28 4.95/2.28 (Comp: 1, Cost: 0) koat_start(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3) -> Com_1(evalstartstart(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3)) [ 0 <= 0 ] 4.95/2.28 4.95/2.28 start location: koat_start 4.95/2.28 4.95/2.28 leaf cost: 0 4.95/2.28 4.95/2.28 4.95/2.28 4.95/2.28 A polynomial rank function with 4.95/2.28 4.95/2.28 Pol(evalstartstart) = 3 4.95/2.28 4.95/2.28 Pol(evalstartbb0in) = 3 4.95/2.28 4.95/2.28 Pol(evalstart0) = 3 4.95/2.28 4.95/2.28 Pol(evalstart1) = 3 4.95/2.28 4.95/2.28 Pol(evalstart2) = 3 4.95/2.28 4.95/2.28 Pol(evalstart3) = 3 4.95/2.28 4.95/2.28 Pol(evalstartbb1in) = 3 4.95/2.28 4.95/2.28 Pol(evalstartbb2in) = 3 4.95/2.28 4.95/2.28 Pol(evalstartbb3in) = 2 4.95/2.28 4.95/2.28 Pol(evalstartbb4in) = 2 4.95/2.28 4.95/2.28 Pol(evalstartbb5in) = 1 4.95/2.28 4.95/2.28 Pol(evalstartstop) = 0 4.95/2.28 4.95/2.28 Pol(koat_start) = 3 4.95/2.28 4.95/2.28 orients all transitions weakly and the transitions 4.95/2.28 4.95/2.28 evalstartbb5in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3) -> Com_1(evalstartstop(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3)) 4.95/2.28 4.95/2.28 evalstartbb3in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3) -> Com_1(evalstartbb5in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3)) [ 2 >= ar_3 ] 4.95/2.28 4.95/2.28 evalstartbb1in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3) -> Com_1(evalstartbb3in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_0)) [ ar_0 >= ar_2 ] 4.95/2.28 4.95/2.28 strictly and produces the following problem: 4.95/2.28 4.95/2.28 3: T: 4.95/2.28 4.95/2.28 (Comp: 1, Cost: 1) evalstartstart(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3) -> Com_1(evalstartbb0in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3)) 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 (Comp: 1, Cost: 1) evalstartbb0in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3) -> Com_1(evalstart0(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3)) 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 (Comp: 1, Cost: 1) evalstart0(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3) -> Com_1(evalstart1(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3)) 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 (Comp: 1, Cost: 1) evalstart1(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3) -> Com_1(evalstart2(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3)) 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 (Comp: 1, Cost: 1) evalstart2(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3) -> Com_1(evalstart3(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3)) 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 (Comp: 1, Cost: 1) evalstart3(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3) -> Com_1(evalstartbb1in(ar_1, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3)) 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) evalstartbb1in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3) -> Com_1(evalstartbb2in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3)) [ ar_2 >= ar_0 + 1 ] 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 (Comp: 3, Cost: 1) evalstartbb1in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3) -> Com_1(evalstartbb3in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_0)) [ ar_0 >= ar_2 ] 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) evalstartbb2in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3) -> Com_1(evalstartbb1in(ar_0 + 1, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3)) 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) evalstartbb3in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3) -> Com_1(evalstartbb4in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3)) [ ar_3 >= 3 ] 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 (Comp: 3, Cost: 1) evalstartbb3in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3) -> Com_1(evalstartbb5in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3)) [ 2 >= ar_3 ] 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) evalstartbb4in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3) -> Com_1(evalstartbb3in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3 - 3)) 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 (Comp: 3, Cost: 1) evalstartbb5in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3) -> Com_1(evalstartstop(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3)) 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 (Comp: 1, Cost: 0) koat_start(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3) -> Com_1(evalstartstart(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3)) [ 0 <= 0 ] 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 start location: koat_start 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 leaf cost: 0 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 A polynomial rank function with 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 Pol(evalstartstart) = -V_2 + V_3 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 Pol(evalstartbb0in) = -V_2 + V_3 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 Pol(evalstart0) = -V_2 + V_3 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 Pol(evalstart1) = -V_2 + V_3 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 Pol(evalstart2) = -V_2 + V_3 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 Pol(evalstart3) = -V_2 + V_3 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 Pol(evalstartbb1in) = -V_1 + V_3 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 Pol(evalstartbb2in) = -V_1 + V_3 - 1 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 Pol(evalstartbb3in) = -V_1 + V_3 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 Pol(evalstartbb4in) = -V_1 + V_3 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 Pol(evalstartbb5in) = -V_1 + V_3 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 Pol(evalstartstop) = -V_1 + V_3 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 Pol(koat_start) = -V_2 + V_3 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 orients all transitions weakly and the transition 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 evalstartbb1in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3) -> Com_1(evalstartbb2in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3)) [ ar_2 >= ar_0 + 1 ] 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 strictly and produces the following problem: 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 4: T: 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 (Comp: 1, Cost: 1) evalstartstart(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3) -> Com_1(evalstartbb0in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3)) 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 (Comp: 1, Cost: 1) evalstartbb0in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3) -> Com_1(evalstart0(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3)) 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 (Comp: 1, Cost: 1) evalstart0(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3) -> Com_1(evalstart1(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3)) 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 (Comp: 1, Cost: 1) evalstart1(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3) -> Com_1(evalstart2(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3)) 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 (Comp: 1, Cost: 1) evalstart2(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3) -> Com_1(evalstart3(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3)) 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 (Comp: 1, Cost: 1) evalstart3(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3) -> Com_1(evalstartbb1in(ar_1, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3)) 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 (Comp: ar_1 + ar_2, Cost: 1) evalstartbb1in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3) -> Com_1(evalstartbb2in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3)) [ ar_2 >= ar_0 + 1 ] 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 (Comp: 3, Cost: 1) evalstartbb1in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3) -> Com_1(evalstartbb3in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_0)) [ ar_0 >= ar_2 ] 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) evalstartbb2in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3) -> Com_1(evalstartbb1in(ar_0 + 1, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3)) 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) evalstartbb3in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3) -> Com_1(evalstartbb4in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3)) [ ar_3 >= 3 ] 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 (Comp: 3, Cost: 1) evalstartbb3in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3) -> Com_1(evalstartbb5in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3)) [ 2 >= ar_3 ] 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) evalstartbb4in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3) -> Com_1(evalstartbb3in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3 - 3)) 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 (Comp: 3, Cost: 1) evalstartbb5in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3) -> Com_1(evalstartstop(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3)) 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 (Comp: 1, Cost: 0) koat_start(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3) -> Com_1(evalstartstart(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3)) [ 0 <= 0 ] 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 start location: koat_start 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 leaf cost: 0 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 Repeatedly propagating knowledge in problem 4 produces the following problem: 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 5: T: 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 (Comp: 1, Cost: 1) evalstartstart(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3) -> Com_1(evalstartbb0in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3)) 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 (Comp: 1, Cost: 1) evalstartbb0in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3) -> Com_1(evalstart0(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3)) 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 (Comp: 1, Cost: 1) evalstart0(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3) -> Com_1(evalstart1(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3)) 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 (Comp: 1, Cost: 1) evalstart1(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3) -> Com_1(evalstart2(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3)) 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 (Comp: 1, Cost: 1) evalstart2(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3) -> Com_1(evalstart3(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3)) 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 (Comp: 1, Cost: 1) evalstart3(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3) -> Com_1(evalstartbb1in(ar_1, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3)) 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 (Comp: ar_1 + ar_2, Cost: 1) evalstartbb1in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3) -> Com_1(evalstartbb2in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3)) [ ar_2 >= ar_0 + 1 ] 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 (Comp: 3, Cost: 1) evalstartbb1in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3) -> Com_1(evalstartbb3in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_0)) [ ar_0 >= ar_2 ] 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 (Comp: ar_1 + ar_2, Cost: 1) evalstartbb2in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3) -> Com_1(evalstartbb1in(ar_0 + 1, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3)) 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) evalstartbb3in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3) -> Com_1(evalstartbb4in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3)) [ ar_3 >= 3 ] 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 (Comp: 3, Cost: 1) evalstartbb3in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3) -> Com_1(evalstartbb5in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3)) [ 2 >= ar_3 ] 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) evalstartbb4in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3) -> Com_1(evalstartbb3in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3 - 3)) 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 (Comp: 3, Cost: 1) evalstartbb5in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3) -> Com_1(evalstartstop(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3)) 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 (Comp: 1, Cost: 0) koat_start(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3) -> Com_1(evalstartstart(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3)) [ 0 <= 0 ] 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 start location: koat_start 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 leaf cost: 0 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 A polynomial rank function with 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 Pol(evalstartbb4in) = V_4 - 3 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 Pol(evalstartbb3in) = V_4 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 and size complexities 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 S("koat_start(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3) -> Com_1(evalstartstart(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3)) [ 0 <= 0 ]", 0-0) = ar_0 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 S("koat_start(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3) -> Com_1(evalstartstart(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3)) [ 0 <= 0 ]", 0-1) = ar_1 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 S("koat_start(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3) -> Com_1(evalstartstart(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3)) [ 0 <= 0 ]", 0-2) = ar_2 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 S("koat_start(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3) -> Com_1(evalstartstart(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3)) [ 0 <= 0 ]", 0-3) = ar_3 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 S("evalstartbb5in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3) -> Com_1(evalstartstop(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3))", 0-0) = 2*ar_1 + 2*ar_2 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 S("evalstartbb5in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3) -> Com_1(evalstartstop(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3))", 0-1) = ar_1 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 S("evalstartbb5in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3) -> Com_1(evalstartstop(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3))", 0-2) = ar_2 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 S("evalstartbb5in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3) -> Com_1(evalstartstop(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3))", 0-3) = ? 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 S("evalstartbb4in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3) -> Com_1(evalstartbb3in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3 - 3))", 0-0) = 2*ar_1 + 2*ar_2 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 S("evalstartbb4in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3) -> Com_1(evalstartbb3in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3 - 3))", 0-1) = ar_1 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 S("evalstartbb4in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3) -> Com_1(evalstartbb3in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3 - 3))", 0-2) = ar_2 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 S("evalstartbb4in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3) -> Com_1(evalstartbb3in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3 - 3))", 0-3) = ? 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 S("evalstartbb3in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3) -> Com_1(evalstartbb5in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3)) [ 2 >= ar_3 ]", 0-0) = 2*ar_1 + 2*ar_2 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 S("evalstartbb3in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3) -> Com_1(evalstartbb5in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3)) [ 2 >= ar_3 ]", 0-1) = ar_1 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 S("evalstartbb3in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3) -> Com_1(evalstartbb5in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3)) [ 2 >= ar_3 ]", 0-2) = ar_2 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 S("evalstartbb3in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3) -> Com_1(evalstartbb5in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3)) [ 2 >= ar_3 ]", 0-3) = ? 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 S("evalstartbb3in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3) -> Com_1(evalstartbb4in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3)) [ ar_3 >= 3 ]", 0-0) = 2*ar_1 + 2*ar_2 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 S("evalstartbb3in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3) -> Com_1(evalstartbb4in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3)) [ ar_3 >= 3 ]", 0-1) = ar_1 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 S("evalstartbb3in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3) -> Com_1(evalstartbb4in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3)) [ ar_3 >= 3 ]", 0-2) = ar_2 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 S("evalstartbb3in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3) -> Com_1(evalstartbb4in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3)) [ ar_3 >= 3 ]", 0-3) = ? 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 S("evalstartbb2in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3) -> Com_1(evalstartbb1in(ar_0 + 1, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3))", 0-0) = 2*ar_1 + 2*ar_2 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 S("evalstartbb2in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3) -> Com_1(evalstartbb1in(ar_0 + 1, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3))", 0-1) = ar_1 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 S("evalstartbb2in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3) -> Com_1(evalstartbb1in(ar_0 + 1, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3))", 0-2) = ar_2 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 S("evalstartbb2in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3) -> Com_1(evalstartbb1in(ar_0 + 1, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3))", 0-3) = ar_3 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 S("evalstartbb1in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3) -> Com_1(evalstartbb3in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_0)) [ ar_0 >= ar_2 ]", 0-0) = 2*ar_1 + 2*ar_2 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 S("evalstartbb1in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3) -> Com_1(evalstartbb3in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_0)) [ ar_0 >= ar_2 ]", 0-1) = ar_1 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 S("evalstartbb1in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3) -> Com_1(evalstartbb3in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_0)) [ ar_0 >= ar_2 ]", 0-2) = ar_2 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 S("evalstartbb1in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3) -> Com_1(evalstartbb3in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_0)) [ ar_0 >= ar_2 ]", 0-3) = 2*ar_1 + 2*ar_2 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 S("evalstartbb1in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3) -> Com_1(evalstartbb2in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3)) [ ar_2 >= ar_0 + 1 ]", 0-0) = 2*ar_1 + 2*ar_2 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 S("evalstartbb1in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3) -> Com_1(evalstartbb2in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3)) [ ar_2 >= ar_0 + 1 ]", 0-1) = ar_1 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 S("evalstartbb1in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3) -> Com_1(evalstartbb2in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3)) [ ar_2 >= ar_0 + 1 ]", 0-2) = ar_2 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 S("evalstartbb1in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3) -> Com_1(evalstartbb2in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3)) [ ar_2 >= ar_0 + 1 ]", 0-3) = ar_3 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 S("evalstart3(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3) -> Com_1(evalstartbb1in(ar_1, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3))", 0-0) = ar_1 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 S("evalstart3(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3) -> Com_1(evalstartbb1in(ar_1, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3))", 0-1) = ar_1 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 S("evalstart3(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3) -> Com_1(evalstartbb1in(ar_1, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3))", 0-2) = ar_2 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 S("evalstart3(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3) -> Com_1(evalstartbb1in(ar_1, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3))", 0-3) = ar_3 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 S("evalstart2(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3) -> Com_1(evalstart3(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3))", 0-0) = ar_0 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 S("evalstart2(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3) -> Com_1(evalstart3(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3))", 0-1) = ar_1 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 S("evalstart2(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3) -> Com_1(evalstart3(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3))", 0-2) = ar_2 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 S("evalstart2(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3) -> Com_1(evalstart3(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3))", 0-3) = ar_3 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 S("evalstart1(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3) -> Com_1(evalstart2(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3))", 0-0) = ar_0 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 S("evalstart1(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3) -> Com_1(evalstart2(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3))", 0-1) = ar_1 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 S("evalstart1(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3) -> Com_1(evalstart2(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3))", 0-2) = ar_2 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 S("evalstart1(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3) -> Com_1(evalstart2(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3))", 0-3) = ar_3 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 S("evalstart0(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3) -> Com_1(evalstart1(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3))", 0-0) = ar_0 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 S("evalstart0(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3) -> Com_1(evalstart1(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3))", 0-1) = ar_1 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 S("evalstart0(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3) -> Com_1(evalstart1(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3))", 0-2) = ar_2 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 S("evalstart0(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3) -> Com_1(evalstart1(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3))", 0-3) = ar_3 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 S("evalstartbb0in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3) -> Com_1(evalstart0(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3))", 0-0) = ar_0 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 S("evalstartbb0in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3) -> Com_1(evalstart0(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3))", 0-1) = ar_1 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 S("evalstartbb0in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3) -> Com_1(evalstart0(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3))", 0-2) = ar_2 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 S("evalstartbb0in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3) -> Com_1(evalstart0(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3))", 0-3) = ar_3 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 S("evalstartstart(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3) -> Com_1(evalstartbb0in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3))", 0-0) = ar_0 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 S("evalstartstart(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3) -> Com_1(evalstartbb0in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3))", 0-1) = ar_1 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 S("evalstartstart(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3) -> Com_1(evalstartbb0in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3))", 0-2) = ar_2 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 S("evalstartstart(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3) -> Com_1(evalstartbb0in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3))", 0-3) = ar_3 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 orients the transitions 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 evalstartbb4in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3) -> Com_1(evalstartbb3in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3 - 3)) 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 evalstartbb3in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3) -> Com_1(evalstartbb4in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3)) [ ar_3 >= 3 ] 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 weakly and the transition 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 evalstartbb3in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3) -> Com_1(evalstartbb4in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3)) [ ar_3 >= 3 ] 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 strictly and produces the following problem: 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 6: T: 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 (Comp: 1, Cost: 1) evalstartstart(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3) -> Com_1(evalstartbb0in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3)) 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 (Comp: 1, Cost: 1) evalstartbb0in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3) -> Com_1(evalstart0(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3)) 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 (Comp: 1, Cost: 1) evalstart0(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3) -> Com_1(evalstart1(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3)) 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 (Comp: 1, Cost: 1) evalstart1(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3) -> Com_1(evalstart2(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3)) 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 (Comp: 1, Cost: 1) evalstart2(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3) -> Com_1(evalstart3(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3)) 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 (Comp: 1, Cost: 1) evalstart3(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3) -> Com_1(evalstartbb1in(ar_1, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3)) 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 (Comp: ar_1 + ar_2, Cost: 1) evalstartbb1in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3) -> Com_1(evalstartbb2in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3)) [ ar_2 >= ar_0 + 1 ] 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 (Comp: 3, Cost: 1) evalstartbb1in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3) -> Com_1(evalstartbb3in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_0)) [ ar_0 >= ar_2 ] 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 (Comp: ar_1 + ar_2, Cost: 1) evalstartbb2in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3) -> Com_1(evalstartbb1in(ar_0 + 1, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3)) 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 (Comp: 6*ar_1 + 6*ar_2, Cost: 1) evalstartbb3in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3) -> Com_1(evalstartbb4in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3)) [ ar_3 >= 3 ] 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 (Comp: 3, Cost: 1) evalstartbb3in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3) -> Com_1(evalstartbb5in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3)) [ 2 >= ar_3 ] 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) evalstartbb4in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3) -> Com_1(evalstartbb3in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3 - 3)) 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 (Comp: 3, Cost: 1) evalstartbb5in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3) -> Com_1(evalstartstop(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3)) 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 (Comp: 1, Cost: 0) koat_start(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3) -> Com_1(evalstartstart(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3)) [ 0 <= 0 ] 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 start location: koat_start 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 leaf cost: 0 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 Repeatedly propagating knowledge in problem 6 produces the following problem: 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 7: T: 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 (Comp: 1, Cost: 1) evalstartstart(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3) -> Com_1(evalstartbb0in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3)) 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 (Comp: 1, Cost: 1) evalstartbb0in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3) -> Com_1(evalstart0(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3)) 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 (Comp: 1, Cost: 1) evalstart0(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3) -> Com_1(evalstart1(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3)) 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 (Comp: 1, Cost: 1) evalstart1(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3) -> Com_1(evalstart2(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3)) 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 (Comp: 1, Cost: 1) evalstart2(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3) -> Com_1(evalstart3(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3)) 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 (Comp: 1, Cost: 1) evalstart3(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3) -> Com_1(evalstartbb1in(ar_1, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3)) 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 (Comp: ar_1 + ar_2, Cost: 1) evalstartbb1in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3) -> Com_1(evalstartbb2in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3)) [ ar_2 >= ar_0 + 1 ] 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 (Comp: 3, Cost: 1) evalstartbb1in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3) -> Com_1(evalstartbb3in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_0)) [ ar_0 >= ar_2 ] 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 (Comp: ar_1 + ar_2, Cost: 1) evalstartbb2in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3) -> Com_1(evalstartbb1in(ar_0 + 1, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3)) 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 (Comp: 6*ar_1 + 6*ar_2, Cost: 1) evalstartbb3in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3) -> Com_1(evalstartbb4in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3)) [ ar_3 >= 3 ] 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 (Comp: 3, Cost: 1) evalstartbb3in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3) -> Com_1(evalstartbb5in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3)) [ 2 >= ar_3 ] 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 (Comp: 6*ar_1 + 6*ar_2, Cost: 1) evalstartbb4in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3) -> Com_1(evalstartbb3in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3 - 3)) 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 (Comp: 3, Cost: 1) evalstartbb5in(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3) -> Com_1(evalstartstop(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3)) 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 (Comp: 1, Cost: 0) koat_start(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3) -> Com_1(evalstartstart(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3)) [ 0 <= 0 ] 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 start location: koat_start 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 leaf cost: 0 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 Complexity upper bound 14*ar_1 + 14*ar_2 + 15 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 Time: 0.143 sec (SMT: 0.121 sec) 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 ---------------------------------------- 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 (2) 4.95/2.29 BOUNDS(1, n^1) 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 ---------------------------------------- 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 (3) Loat Proof (FINISHED) 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 ### Pre-processing the ITS problem ### 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 Initial linear ITS problem 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 Start location: evalstartstart 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 0: evalstartstart -> evalstartbb0in : [], cost: 1 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 1: evalstartbb0in -> evalstart0 : [], cost: 1 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 2: evalstart0 -> evalstart1 : [], cost: 1 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 3: evalstart1 -> evalstart2 : [], cost: 1 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 4: evalstart2 -> evalstart3 : [], cost: 1 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 5: evalstart3 -> evalstartbb1in : A'=B, [], cost: 1 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 6: evalstartbb1in -> evalstartbb2in : [ C>=1+A ], cost: 1 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 7: evalstartbb1in -> evalstartbb3in : D'=A, [ A>=C ], cost: 1 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 8: evalstartbb2in -> evalstartbb1in : A'=1+A, [], cost: 1 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 9: evalstartbb3in -> evalstartbb4in : [ D>=3 ], cost: 1 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 10: evalstartbb3in -> evalstartbb5in : [ 2>=D ], cost: 1 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 11: evalstartbb4in -> evalstartbb3in : D'=-3+D, [], cost: 1 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 12: evalstartbb5in -> evalstartstop : [], cost: 1 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 Removed unreachable and leaf rules: 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 Start location: evalstartstart 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 0: evalstartstart -> evalstartbb0in : [], cost: 1 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 1: evalstartbb0in -> evalstart0 : [], cost: 1 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 2: evalstart0 -> evalstart1 : [], cost: 1 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 3: evalstart1 -> evalstart2 : [], cost: 1 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 4: evalstart2 -> evalstart3 : [], cost: 1 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 5: evalstart3 -> evalstartbb1in : A'=B, [], cost: 1 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 6: evalstartbb1in -> evalstartbb2in : [ C>=1+A ], cost: 1 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 7: evalstartbb1in -> evalstartbb3in : D'=A, [ A>=C ], cost: 1 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 8: evalstartbb2in -> evalstartbb1in : A'=1+A, [], cost: 1 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 9: evalstartbb3in -> evalstartbb4in : [ D>=3 ], cost: 1 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 11: evalstartbb4in -> evalstartbb3in : D'=-3+D, [], cost: 1 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 ### Simplification by acceleration and chaining ### 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 Eliminated locations (on linear paths): 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 Start location: evalstartstart 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 17: evalstartstart -> evalstartbb1in : A'=B, [], cost: 6 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 7: evalstartbb1in -> evalstartbb3in : D'=A, [ A>=C ], cost: 1 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 18: evalstartbb1in -> evalstartbb1in : A'=1+A, [ C>=1+A ], cost: 2 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 19: evalstartbb3in -> evalstartbb3in : D'=-3+D, [ D>=3 ], cost: 2 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 Accelerating simple loops of location 6. 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 Accelerating the following rules: 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 18: evalstartbb1in -> evalstartbb1in : A'=1+A, [ C>=1+A ], cost: 2 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 Accelerated rule 18 with metering function C-A, yielding the new rule 20. 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 Removing the simple loops: 18. 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 Accelerating simple loops of location 8. 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 Accelerating the following rules: 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 19: evalstartbb3in -> evalstartbb3in : D'=-3+D, [ D>=3 ], cost: 2 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 Accelerated rule 19 with metering function meter (where 3*meter==-2+D), yielding the new rule 21. 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 Removing the simple loops: 19. 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 Accelerated all simple loops using metering functions (where possible): 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 Start location: evalstartstart 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 17: evalstartstart -> evalstartbb1in : A'=B, [], cost: 6 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 7: evalstartbb1in -> evalstartbb3in : D'=A, [ A>=C ], cost: 1 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 20: evalstartbb1in -> evalstartbb1in : A'=C, [ C>=1+A ], cost: 2*C-2*A 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 21: evalstartbb3in -> evalstartbb3in : D'=D-3*meter, [ D>=3 && 3*meter==-2+D && meter>=1 ], cost: 2*meter 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 Chained accelerated rules (with incoming rules): 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 Start location: evalstartstart 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 17: evalstartstart -> evalstartbb1in : A'=B, [], cost: 6 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 22: evalstartstart -> evalstartbb1in : A'=C, [ C>=1+B ], cost: 6+2*C-2*B 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 7: evalstartbb1in -> evalstartbb3in : D'=A, [ A>=C ], cost: 1 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 23: evalstartbb1in -> evalstartbb3in : D'=A-3*meter, [ A>=C && A>=3 && 3*meter==-2+A && meter>=1 ], cost: 1+2*meter 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 Removed unreachable locations (and leaf rules with constant cost): 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 Start location: evalstartstart 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 17: evalstartstart -> evalstartbb1in : A'=B, [], cost: 6 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 22: evalstartstart -> evalstartbb1in : A'=C, [ C>=1+B ], cost: 6+2*C-2*B 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 23: evalstartbb1in -> evalstartbb3in : D'=A-3*meter, [ A>=C && A>=3 && 3*meter==-2+A && meter>=1 ], cost: 1+2*meter 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 Eliminated locations (on tree-shaped paths): 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 Start location: evalstartstart 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 24: evalstartstart -> evalstartbb3in : A'=B, D'=-3*meter+B, [ B>=C && B>=3 && 3*meter==-2+B && meter>=1 ], cost: 7+2*meter 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 25: evalstartstart -> evalstartbb3in : A'=C, D'=C-3*meter, [ C>=1+B && C>=3 && 3*meter==-2+C && meter>=1 ], cost: 7+2*C+2*meter-2*B 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 ### Computing asymptotic complexity ### 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 Fully simplified ITS problem 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 Start location: evalstartstart 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 24: evalstartstart -> evalstartbb3in : A'=B, D'=-3*meter+B, [ B>=C && B>=3 && 3*meter==-2+B && meter>=1 ], cost: 7+2*meter 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 25: evalstartstart -> evalstartbb3in : A'=C, D'=C-3*meter, [ C>=1+B && C>=3 && 3*meter==-2+C && meter>=1 ], cost: 7+2*C+2*meter-2*B 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 Computing asymptotic complexity for rule 24 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 Solved the limit problem by the following transformations: 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 Created initial limit problem: 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 3+3*meter-B (+/+!), 1-C+B (+/+!), -2+B (+/+!), 7+2*meter (+), -1-3*meter+B (+/+!) [not solved] 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 applying transformation rule (C) using substitution {B==2+3*meter} 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 resulting limit problem: 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 3-C+3*meter (+/+!), 1 (+/+!), 7+2*meter (+), 3*meter (+/+!) [not solved] 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 applying transformation rule (B), deleting 1 (+/+!) 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 resulting limit problem: 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 3-C+3*meter (+/+!), 7+2*meter (+), 3*meter (+/+!) [not solved] 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 removing all constraints (solved by SMT) 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 resulting limit problem: [solved] 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 applying transformation rule (C) using substitution {C==0,meter==n} 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 resulting limit problem: 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 [solved] 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 Solved the limit problem by the following transformations: 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 Created initial limit problem: 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 3+3*meter-B (+/+!), 1-C+B (+/+!), -2+B (+/+!), 7+2*meter (+), -1-3*meter+B (+/+!) [not solved] 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 applying transformation rule (C) using substitution {B==2+3*meter} 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 resulting limit problem: 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 3-C+3*meter (+/+!), 1 (+/+!), 7+2*meter (+), 3*meter (+/+!) [not solved] 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 applying transformation rule (B), deleting 1 (+/+!) 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 resulting limit problem: 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 3-C+3*meter (+/+!), 7+2*meter (+), 3*meter (+/+!) [not solved] 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 removing all constraints (solved by SMT) 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 resulting limit problem: [solved] 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 applying transformation rule (C) using substitution {C==0,meter==n} 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 resulting limit problem: 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 [solved] 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 Solution: 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 C / 0 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 meter / n 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 B / 2+3*n 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 Resulting cost 7+2*n has complexity: Poly(n^1) 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 Found new complexity Poly(n^1). 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 Computing asymptotic complexity for rule 25 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 Solved the limit problem by the following transformations: 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 Created initial limit problem: 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 3-C+3*meter (+/+!), -2+C (+/+!), 7+2*C+2*meter-2*B (+), -1+C-3*meter (+/+!), C-B (+/+!) [not solved] 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 applying transformation rule (C) using substitution {C==2+3*meter} 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 resulting limit problem: 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 1 (+/+!), 2+3*meter-B (+/+!), 11+8*meter-2*B (+), 3*meter (+/+!) [not solved] 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 applying transformation rule (B), deleting 1 (+/+!) 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 resulting limit problem: 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 2+3*meter-B (+/+!), 11+8*meter-2*B (+), 3*meter (+/+!) [not solved] 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 removing all constraints (solved by SMT) 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 resulting limit problem: [solved] 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 applying transformation rule (C) using substitution {meter==n,B==0} 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 resulting limit problem: 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 [solved] 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 Solved the limit problem by the following transformations: 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 Created initial limit problem: 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 3-C+3*meter (+/+!), -2+C (+/+!), 7+2*C+2*meter-2*B (+), -1+C-3*meter (+/+!), C-B (+/+!) [not solved] 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 applying transformation rule (C) using substitution {C==2+3*meter} 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 resulting limit problem: 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 1 (+/+!), 2+3*meter-B (+/+!), 11+8*meter-2*B (+), 3*meter (+/+!) [not solved] 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 applying transformation rule (B), deleting 1 (+/+!) 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 resulting limit problem: 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 2+3*meter-B (+/+!), 11+8*meter-2*B (+), 3*meter (+/+!) [not solved] 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 removing all constraints (solved by SMT) 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 resulting limit problem: [solved] 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 applying transformation rule (C) using substitution {meter==n,B==0} 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 resulting limit problem: 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 [solved] 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 Solution: 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 C / 2+3*n 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 meter / n 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 B / 0 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 Resulting cost 11+8*n has complexity: Poly(n^1) 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 Obtained the following overall complexity (w.r.t. the length of the input n): 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 Complexity: Poly(n^1) 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 Cpx degree: 1 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 Solved cost: 7+2*n 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 Rule cost: 7+2*meter 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 Rule guard: [ B>=C && B>=3 && 3*meter==-2+B ] 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 WORST_CASE(Omega(n^1),?) 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 ---------------------------------------- 4.95/2.29 4.95/2.29 (4) 4.95/2.29 BOUNDS(n^1, INF) 4.96/2.67 EOF