3.84/1.87 WORST_CASE(?, O(1)) 3.84/1.88 proof of /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.koat 3.84/1.88 # AProVE Commit ID: 48fb2092695e11cc9f56e44b17a92a5f88ffb256 marcel 20180622 unpublished dirty 3.84/1.88 3.84/1.88 3.84/1.88 The runtime complexity of the given CpxIntTrs could be proven to be BOUNDS(1, 1). 3.84/1.88 3.84/1.88 (0) CpxIntTrs 3.84/1.88 (1) Koat Proof [FINISHED, 156 ms] 3.84/1.88 (2) BOUNDS(1, 1) 3.84/1.88 3.84/1.88 3.84/1.88 ---------------------------------------- 3.84/1.88 3.84/1.88 (0) 3.84/1.88 Obligation: 3.84/1.88 Complexity Int TRS consisting of the following rules: 3.84/1.88 f0(A, B, C) -> Com_1(f8(0, B, C)) :|: TRUE 3.84/1.88 f8(A, B, C) -> Com_1(f14(A, A, C)) :|: 99 >= A && 99 >= D 3.84/1.88 f8(A, B, C) -> Com_1(f14(A, A, C)) :|: 99 >= A 3.84/1.88 f23(A, B, C) -> Com_1(f28(A, B, D)) :|: 99 >= A && 0 >= E + 1 3.84/1.88 f23(A, B, C) -> Com_1(f28(A, B, D)) :|: 99 >= A 3.84/1.88 f23(A, B, C) -> Com_1(f23(A + 1, B, C)) :|: 99 >= A 3.84/1.88 f28(A, B, C) -> Com_1(f23(A + 1, B, C)) :|: TRUE 3.84/1.88 f28(A, B, C) -> Com_1(f23(A + 1, B, C)) :|: 98 >= D 3.84/1.88 f23(A, B, C) -> Com_1(f38(A, B, C)) :|: A >= 100 3.84/1.88 f8(A, B, C) -> Com_1(f8(A + 1, A, C)) :|: 99 >= A 3.84/1.88 f14(A, B, C) -> Com_1(f8(A + 1, B, C)) :|: TRUE 3.84/1.88 f14(A, B, C) -> Com_1(f8(A + 1, B, C)) :|: 98 >= D 3.84/1.88 f8(A, B, C) -> Com_1(f23(0, B, C)) :|: A >= 100 3.84/1.88 3.84/1.88 The start-symbols are:[f0_3] 3.84/1.88 3.84/1.88 3.84/1.88 ---------------------------------------- 3.84/1.88 3.84/1.88 (1) Koat Proof (FINISHED) 3.84/1.88 YES(?, 1405) 3.84/1.88 3.84/1.88 3.84/1.88 3.84/1.88 Initial complexity problem: 3.84/1.88 3.84/1.88 1: T: 3.84/1.88 3.84/1.88 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) f0(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2) -> Com_1(f8(0, ar_1, ar_2)) 3.84/1.88 3.84/1.88 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) f8(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2) -> Com_1(f14(ar_0, ar_0, ar_2)) [ 99 >= ar_0 /\ 99 >= d ] 3.84/1.88 3.84/1.88 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) f8(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2) -> Com_1(f14(ar_0, ar_0, ar_2)) [ 99 >= ar_0 ] 3.84/1.88 3.84/1.88 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) f23(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2) -> Com_1(f28(ar_0, ar_1, d)) [ 99 >= ar_0 /\ 0 >= e + 1 ] 3.84/1.88 3.84/1.88 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) f23(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2) -> Com_1(f28(ar_0, ar_1, d)) [ 99 >= ar_0 ] 3.84/1.88 3.84/1.88 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) f23(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2) -> Com_1(f23(ar_0 + 1, ar_1, ar_2)) [ 99 >= ar_0 ] 3.84/1.88 3.84/1.88 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) f28(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2) -> Com_1(f23(ar_0 + 1, ar_1, ar_2)) 3.84/1.88 3.84/1.88 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) f28(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2) -> Com_1(f23(ar_0 + 1, ar_1, ar_2)) [ 98 >= d ] 3.84/1.88 3.84/1.88 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) f23(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2) -> Com_1(f38(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2)) [ ar_0 >= 100 ] 3.84/1.88 3.84/1.88 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) f8(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2) -> Com_1(f8(ar_0 + 1, ar_0, ar_2)) [ 99 >= ar_0 ] 3.84/1.88 3.84/1.88 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) f14(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2) -> Com_1(f8(ar_0 + 1, ar_1, ar_2)) 3.84/1.88 3.84/1.88 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) f14(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2) -> Com_1(f8(ar_0 + 1, ar_1, ar_2)) [ 98 >= d ] 3.84/1.88 3.84/1.88 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) f8(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2) -> Com_1(f23(0, ar_1, ar_2)) [ ar_0 >= 100 ] 3.84/1.88 3.84/1.88 (Comp: 1, Cost: 0) koat_start(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2) -> Com_1(f0(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2)) [ 0 <= 0 ] 3.84/1.88 3.84/1.88 start location: koat_start 3.84/1.88 3.84/1.88 leaf cost: 0 3.84/1.88 3.84/1.88 3.84/1.88 3.84/1.88 Slicing away variables that do not contribute to conditions from problem 1 leaves variables [ar_0]. 3.84/1.88 3.84/1.88 We thus obtain the following problem: 3.84/1.88 3.84/1.88 2: T: 3.84/1.88 3.84/1.88 (Comp: 1, Cost: 0) koat_start(ar_0) -> Com_1(f0(ar_0)) [ 0 <= 0 ] 3.84/1.88 3.84/1.88 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) f8(ar_0) -> Com_1(f23(0)) [ ar_0 >= 100 ] 3.84/1.88 3.84/1.88 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) f14(ar_0) -> Com_1(f8(ar_0 + 1)) [ 98 >= d ] 3.84/1.88 3.84/1.88 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) f14(ar_0) -> Com_1(f8(ar_0 + 1)) 3.84/1.88 3.84/1.88 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) f8(ar_0) -> Com_1(f8(ar_0 + 1)) [ 99 >= ar_0 ] 3.84/1.88 3.84/1.88 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) f23(ar_0) -> Com_1(f38(ar_0)) [ ar_0 >= 100 ] 3.84/1.88 3.84/1.88 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) f28(ar_0) -> Com_1(f23(ar_0 + 1)) [ 98 >= d ] 3.84/1.88 3.84/1.88 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) f28(ar_0) -> Com_1(f23(ar_0 + 1)) 3.84/1.88 3.84/1.88 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) f23(ar_0) -> Com_1(f23(ar_0 + 1)) [ 99 >= ar_0 ] 3.84/1.88 3.84/1.88 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) f23(ar_0) -> Com_1(f28(ar_0)) [ 99 >= ar_0 ] 3.84/1.88 3.84/1.88 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) f23(ar_0) -> Com_1(f28(ar_0)) [ 99 >= ar_0 /\ 0 >= e + 1 ] 3.84/1.88 3.84/1.88 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) f8(ar_0) -> Com_1(f14(ar_0)) [ 99 >= ar_0 ] 3.84/1.88 3.84/1.88 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) f8(ar_0) -> Com_1(f14(ar_0)) [ 99 >= ar_0 /\ 99 >= d ] 3.84/1.88 3.84/1.88 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) f0(ar_0) -> Com_1(f8(0)) 3.84/1.88 3.84/1.88 start location: koat_start 3.84/1.88 3.84/1.88 leaf cost: 0 3.84/1.88 3.84/1.88 3.84/1.88 3.84/1.88 Repeatedly propagating knowledge in problem 2 produces the following problem: 3.84/1.88 3.84/1.88 3: T: 3.84/1.88 3.84/1.88 (Comp: 1, Cost: 0) koat_start(ar_0) -> Com_1(f0(ar_0)) [ 0 <= 0 ] 3.84/1.88 3.84/1.88 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) f8(ar_0) -> Com_1(f23(0)) [ ar_0 >= 100 ] 3.84/1.88 3.84/1.88 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) f14(ar_0) -> Com_1(f8(ar_0 + 1)) [ 98 >= d ] 3.84/1.88 3.84/1.88 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) f14(ar_0) -> Com_1(f8(ar_0 + 1)) 3.84/1.88 3.84/1.88 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) f8(ar_0) -> Com_1(f8(ar_0 + 1)) [ 99 >= ar_0 ] 3.84/1.88 3.84/1.88 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) f23(ar_0) -> Com_1(f38(ar_0)) [ ar_0 >= 100 ] 3.84/1.88 3.84/1.88 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) f28(ar_0) -> Com_1(f23(ar_0 + 1)) [ 98 >= d ] 3.84/1.88 3.84/1.88 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) f28(ar_0) -> Com_1(f23(ar_0 + 1)) 3.84/1.88 3.84/1.88 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) f23(ar_0) -> Com_1(f23(ar_0 + 1)) [ 99 >= ar_0 ] 3.84/1.88 3.84/1.88 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) f23(ar_0) -> Com_1(f28(ar_0)) [ 99 >= ar_0 ] 3.84/1.88 3.84/1.88 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) f23(ar_0) -> Com_1(f28(ar_0)) [ 99 >= ar_0 /\ 0 >= e + 1 ] 3.84/1.88 3.84/1.88 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) f8(ar_0) -> Com_1(f14(ar_0)) [ 99 >= ar_0 ] 3.84/1.88 3.84/1.88 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) f8(ar_0) -> Com_1(f14(ar_0)) [ 99 >= ar_0 /\ 99 >= d ] 3.84/1.88 3.84/1.88 (Comp: 1, Cost: 1) f0(ar_0) -> Com_1(f8(0)) 3.84/1.88 3.84/1.88 start location: koat_start 3.84/1.88 3.84/1.88 leaf cost: 0 3.84/1.88 3.84/1.88 3.84/1.88 3.84/1.88 A polynomial rank function with 3.84/1.88 3.84/1.88 Pol(koat_start) = 2 3.84/1.88 3.84/1.88 Pol(f0) = 2 3.84/1.88 3.84/1.88 Pol(f8) = 2 3.84/1.88 3.84/1.88 Pol(f23) = 1 3.84/1.88 3.84/1.88 Pol(f14) = 2 3.84/1.88 3.84/1.88 Pol(f38) = 0 3.84/1.88 3.84/1.88 Pol(f28) = 1 3.84/1.88 3.84/1.88 orients all transitions weakly and the transitions 3.84/1.88 3.84/1.88 f8(ar_0) -> Com_1(f23(0)) [ ar_0 >= 100 ] 3.84/1.88 3.84/1.88 f23(ar_0) -> Com_1(f38(ar_0)) [ ar_0 >= 100 ] 3.84/1.88 3.84/1.88 strictly and produces the following problem: 3.84/1.88 3.84/1.88 4: T: 3.84/1.88 3.84/1.88 (Comp: 1, Cost: 0) koat_start(ar_0) -> Com_1(f0(ar_0)) [ 0 <= 0 ] 3.84/1.88 3.84/1.88 (Comp: 2, Cost: 1) f8(ar_0) -> Com_1(f23(0)) [ ar_0 >= 100 ] 3.84/1.88 3.84/1.88 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) f14(ar_0) -> Com_1(f8(ar_0 + 1)) [ 98 >= d ] 3.84/1.88 3.84/1.88 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) f14(ar_0) -> Com_1(f8(ar_0 + 1)) 3.84/1.88 3.84/1.88 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) f8(ar_0) -> Com_1(f8(ar_0 + 1)) [ 99 >= ar_0 ] 3.84/1.88 3.84/1.88 (Comp: 2, Cost: 1) f23(ar_0) -> Com_1(f38(ar_0)) [ ar_0 >= 100 ] 3.84/1.88 3.84/1.88 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) f28(ar_0) -> Com_1(f23(ar_0 + 1)) [ 98 >= d ] 3.84/1.88 3.84/1.88 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) f28(ar_0) -> Com_1(f23(ar_0 + 1)) 3.84/1.88 3.84/1.88 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) f23(ar_0) -> Com_1(f23(ar_0 + 1)) [ 99 >= ar_0 ] 3.84/1.88 3.84/1.88 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) f23(ar_0) -> Com_1(f28(ar_0)) [ 99 >= ar_0 ] 3.84/1.88 3.84/1.88 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) f23(ar_0) -> Com_1(f28(ar_0)) [ 99 >= ar_0 /\ 0 >= e + 1 ] 3.84/1.88 3.84/1.88 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) f8(ar_0) -> Com_1(f14(ar_0)) [ 99 >= ar_0 ] 3.84/1.88 3.84/1.88 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) f8(ar_0) -> Com_1(f14(ar_0)) [ 99 >= ar_0 /\ 99 >= d ] 3.84/1.88 3.84/1.88 (Comp: 1, Cost: 1) f0(ar_0) -> Com_1(f8(0)) 3.84/1.88 3.84/1.88 start location: koat_start 3.84/1.88 3.84/1.88 leaf cost: 0 3.84/1.88 3.84/1.88 3.84/1.88 3.84/1.88 A polynomial rank function with 3.84/1.88 3.84/1.88 Pol(koat_start) = 100 3.84/1.88 3.84/1.88 Pol(f0) = 100 3.84/1.88 3.84/1.88 Pol(f8) = 100 3.84/1.88 3.84/1.88 Pol(f23) = -V_1 + 100 3.84/1.88 3.84/1.88 Pol(f14) = 100 3.84/1.88 3.84/1.88 Pol(f38) = -V_1 3.84/1.88 3.84/1.88 Pol(f28) = -V_1 + 99 3.84/1.88 3.84/1.88 orients all transitions weakly and the transitions 3.84/1.88 3.84/1.88 f23(ar_0) -> Com_1(f28(ar_0)) [ 99 >= ar_0 /\ 0 >= e + 1 ] 3.84/1.88 3.84/1.88 f23(ar_0) -> Com_1(f28(ar_0)) [ 99 >= ar_0 ] 3.84/1.88 3.84/1.88 f23(ar_0) -> Com_1(f23(ar_0 + 1)) [ 99 >= ar_0 ] 3.84/1.88 3.84/1.88 strictly and produces the following problem: 3.84/1.88 3.84/1.88 5: T: 3.84/1.88 3.84/1.88 (Comp: 1, Cost: 0) koat_start(ar_0) -> Com_1(f0(ar_0)) [ 0 <= 0 ] 3.84/1.88 3.84/1.88 (Comp: 2, Cost: 1) f8(ar_0) -> Com_1(f23(0)) [ ar_0 >= 100 ] 3.84/1.88 3.84/1.88 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) f14(ar_0) -> Com_1(f8(ar_0 + 1)) [ 98 >= d ] 3.84/1.88 3.84/1.88 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) f14(ar_0) -> Com_1(f8(ar_0 + 1)) 3.84/1.88 3.84/1.88 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) f8(ar_0) -> Com_1(f8(ar_0 + 1)) [ 99 >= ar_0 ] 3.84/1.88 3.84/1.88 (Comp: 2, Cost: 1) f23(ar_0) -> Com_1(f38(ar_0)) [ ar_0 >= 100 ] 3.84/1.88 3.84/1.88 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) f28(ar_0) -> Com_1(f23(ar_0 + 1)) [ 98 >= d ] 3.84/1.88 3.84/1.88 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) f28(ar_0) -> Com_1(f23(ar_0 + 1)) 3.84/1.88 3.84/1.88 (Comp: 100, Cost: 1) f23(ar_0) -> Com_1(f23(ar_0 + 1)) [ 99 >= ar_0 ] 3.84/1.88 3.84/1.88 (Comp: 100, Cost: 1) f23(ar_0) -> Com_1(f28(ar_0)) [ 99 >= ar_0 ] 3.84/1.88 3.84/1.88 (Comp: 100, Cost: 1) f23(ar_0) -> Com_1(f28(ar_0)) [ 99 >= ar_0 /\ 0 >= e + 1 ] 3.84/1.88 3.84/1.88 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) f8(ar_0) -> Com_1(f14(ar_0)) [ 99 >= ar_0 ] 3.84/1.88 3.84/1.88 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) f8(ar_0) -> Com_1(f14(ar_0)) [ 99 >= ar_0 /\ 99 >= d ] 3.84/1.88 3.84/1.88 (Comp: 1, Cost: 1) f0(ar_0) -> Com_1(f8(0)) 3.84/1.88 3.84/1.88 start location: koat_start 3.84/1.88 3.84/1.88 leaf cost: 0 3.84/1.88 3.84/1.88 3.84/1.88 3.84/1.88 Repeatedly propagating knowledge in problem 5 produces the following problem: 3.84/1.88 3.84/1.88 6: T: 3.84/1.88 3.84/1.88 (Comp: 1, Cost: 0) koat_start(ar_0) -> Com_1(f0(ar_0)) [ 0 <= 0 ] 3.84/1.88 3.84/1.88 (Comp: 2, Cost: 1) f8(ar_0) -> Com_1(f23(0)) [ ar_0 >= 100 ] 3.84/1.88 3.84/1.88 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) f14(ar_0) -> Com_1(f8(ar_0 + 1)) [ 98 >= d ] 3.84/1.88 3.84/1.88 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) f14(ar_0) -> Com_1(f8(ar_0 + 1)) 3.84/1.88 3.84/1.88 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) f8(ar_0) -> Com_1(f8(ar_0 + 1)) [ 99 >= ar_0 ] 3.84/1.88 3.84/1.88 (Comp: 2, Cost: 1) f23(ar_0) -> Com_1(f38(ar_0)) [ ar_0 >= 100 ] 3.84/1.88 3.84/1.88 (Comp: 200, Cost: 1) f28(ar_0) -> Com_1(f23(ar_0 + 1)) [ 98 >= d ] 3.84/1.88 3.84/1.88 (Comp: 200, Cost: 1) f28(ar_0) -> Com_1(f23(ar_0 + 1)) 3.84/1.88 3.84/1.88 (Comp: 100, Cost: 1) f23(ar_0) -> Com_1(f23(ar_0 + 1)) [ 99 >= ar_0 ] 3.84/1.88 3.84/1.88 (Comp: 100, Cost: 1) f23(ar_0) -> Com_1(f28(ar_0)) [ 99 >= ar_0 ] 3.84/1.88 3.84/1.88 (Comp: 100, Cost: 1) f23(ar_0) -> Com_1(f28(ar_0)) [ 99 >= ar_0 /\ 0 >= e + 1 ] 3.84/1.88 3.84/1.88 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) f8(ar_0) -> Com_1(f14(ar_0)) [ 99 >= ar_0 ] 3.84/1.88 3.84/1.88 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) f8(ar_0) -> Com_1(f14(ar_0)) [ 99 >= ar_0 /\ 99 >= d ] 3.84/1.88 3.84/1.88 (Comp: 1, Cost: 1) f0(ar_0) -> Com_1(f8(0)) 3.84/1.88 3.84/1.88 start location: koat_start 3.84/1.88 3.84/1.88 leaf cost: 0 3.84/1.88 3.84/1.88 3.84/1.88 3.84/1.88 A polynomial rank function with 3.84/1.88 3.84/1.88 Pol(f8) = -V_1 + 100 3.84/1.88 3.84/1.88 Pol(f14) = -V_1 + 99 3.84/1.88 3.84/1.88 and size complexities 3.84/1.88 3.84/1.88 S("f0(ar_0) -> Com_1(f8(0))", 0-0) = 0 3.84/1.88 3.84/1.88 S("f8(ar_0) -> Com_1(f14(ar_0)) [ 99 >= ar_0 /\\ 99 >= d ]", 0-0) = ? 3.84/1.88 3.84/1.88 S("f8(ar_0) -> Com_1(f14(ar_0)) [ 99 >= ar_0 ]", 0-0) = ? 3.84/1.88 3.84/1.88 S("f23(ar_0) -> Com_1(f28(ar_0)) [ 99 >= ar_0 /\\ 0 >= e + 1 ]", 0-0) = 500 3.84/1.88 3.84/1.88 S("f23(ar_0) -> Com_1(f28(ar_0)) [ 99 >= ar_0 ]", 0-0) = 500 3.84/1.88 3.84/1.88 S("f23(ar_0) -> Com_1(f23(ar_0 + 1)) [ 99 >= ar_0 ]", 0-0) = 500 3.84/1.88 3.84/1.88 S("f28(ar_0) -> Com_1(f23(ar_0 + 1))", 0-0) = 500 3.84/1.88 3.84/1.88 S("f28(ar_0) -> Com_1(f23(ar_0 + 1)) [ 98 >= d ]", 0-0) = 500 3.84/1.88 3.84/1.88 S("f23(ar_0) -> Com_1(f38(ar_0)) [ ar_0 >= 100 ]", 0-0) = 500 3.84/1.88 3.84/1.88 S("f8(ar_0) -> Com_1(f8(ar_0 + 1)) [ 99 >= ar_0 ]", 0-0) = ? 3.84/1.88 3.84/1.88 S("f14(ar_0) -> Com_1(f8(ar_0 + 1))", 0-0) = ? 3.84/1.88 3.84/1.88 S("f14(ar_0) -> Com_1(f8(ar_0 + 1)) [ 98 >= d ]", 0-0) = ? 3.84/1.88 3.84/1.88 S("f8(ar_0) -> Com_1(f23(0)) [ ar_0 >= 100 ]", 0-0) = 0 3.84/1.88 3.84/1.88 S("koat_start(ar_0) -> Com_1(f0(ar_0)) [ 0 <= 0 ]", 0-0) = ar_0 3.84/1.88 3.84/1.88 orients the transitions 3.84/1.88 3.84/1.88 f8(ar_0) -> Com_1(f8(ar_0 + 1)) [ 99 >= ar_0 ] 3.84/1.88 3.84/1.88 f8(ar_0) -> Com_1(f14(ar_0)) [ 99 >= ar_0 /\ 99 >= d ] 3.84/1.88 3.84/1.88 f8(ar_0) -> Com_1(f14(ar_0)) [ 99 >= ar_0 ] 3.84/1.88 3.84/1.88 f14(ar_0) -> Com_1(f8(ar_0 + 1)) [ 98 >= d ] 3.84/1.88 3.84/1.88 f14(ar_0) -> Com_1(f8(ar_0 + 1)) 3.84/1.88 3.84/1.88 weakly and the transitions 3.84/1.88 3.84/1.88 f8(ar_0) -> Com_1(f8(ar_0 + 1)) [ 99 >= ar_0 ] 3.84/1.88 3.84/1.88 f8(ar_0) -> Com_1(f14(ar_0)) [ 99 >= ar_0 /\ 99 >= d ] 3.84/1.88 3.84/1.88 f8(ar_0) -> Com_1(f14(ar_0)) [ 99 >= ar_0 ] 3.84/1.88 3.84/1.88 strictly and produces the following problem: 3.84/1.88 3.84/1.88 7: T: 3.84/1.88 3.84/1.88 (Comp: 1, Cost: 0) koat_start(ar_0) -> Com_1(f0(ar_0)) [ 0 <= 0 ] 3.84/1.88 3.84/1.88 (Comp: 2, Cost: 1) f8(ar_0) -> Com_1(f23(0)) [ ar_0 >= 100 ] 3.84/1.88 3.84/1.88 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) f14(ar_0) -> Com_1(f8(ar_0 + 1)) [ 98 >= d ] 3.84/1.88 3.84/1.88 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) f14(ar_0) -> Com_1(f8(ar_0 + 1)) 3.84/1.88 3.84/1.88 (Comp: 100, Cost: 1) f8(ar_0) -> Com_1(f8(ar_0 + 1)) [ 99 >= ar_0 ] 3.84/1.88 3.84/1.88 (Comp: 2, Cost: 1) f23(ar_0) -> Com_1(f38(ar_0)) [ ar_0 >= 100 ] 3.84/1.88 3.84/1.88 (Comp: 200, Cost: 1) f28(ar_0) -> Com_1(f23(ar_0 + 1)) [ 98 >= d ] 3.84/1.88 3.84/1.88 (Comp: 200, Cost: 1) f28(ar_0) -> Com_1(f23(ar_0 + 1)) 3.84/1.88 3.84/1.88 (Comp: 100, Cost: 1) f23(ar_0) -> Com_1(f23(ar_0 + 1)) [ 99 >= ar_0 ] 3.84/1.88 3.84/1.88 (Comp: 100, Cost: 1) f23(ar_0) -> Com_1(f28(ar_0)) [ 99 >= ar_0 ] 3.84/1.88 3.84/1.88 (Comp: 100, Cost: 1) f23(ar_0) -> Com_1(f28(ar_0)) [ 99 >= ar_0 /\ 0 >= e + 1 ] 3.84/1.88 3.84/1.88 (Comp: 100, Cost: 1) f8(ar_0) -> Com_1(f14(ar_0)) [ 99 >= ar_0 ] 3.84/1.88 3.84/1.88 (Comp: 100, Cost: 1) f8(ar_0) -> Com_1(f14(ar_0)) [ 99 >= ar_0 /\ 99 >= d ] 3.84/1.88 3.84/1.88 (Comp: 1, Cost: 1) f0(ar_0) -> Com_1(f8(0)) 3.84/1.88 3.84/1.88 start location: koat_start 3.84/1.88 3.84/1.88 leaf cost: 0 3.84/1.88 3.84/1.88 3.84/1.88 3.84/1.88 Repeatedly propagating knowledge in problem 7 produces the following problem: 3.84/1.88 3.84/1.88 8: T: 3.84/1.88 3.84/1.88 (Comp: 1, Cost: 0) koat_start(ar_0) -> Com_1(f0(ar_0)) [ 0 <= 0 ] 3.84/1.88 3.84/1.88 (Comp: 2, Cost: 1) f8(ar_0) -> Com_1(f23(0)) [ ar_0 >= 100 ] 3.84/1.88 3.84/1.88 (Comp: 200, Cost: 1) f14(ar_0) -> Com_1(f8(ar_0 + 1)) [ 98 >= d ] 3.84/1.88 3.84/1.88 (Comp: 200, Cost: 1) f14(ar_0) -> Com_1(f8(ar_0 + 1)) 3.84/1.88 3.84/1.88 (Comp: 100, Cost: 1) f8(ar_0) -> Com_1(f8(ar_0 + 1)) [ 99 >= ar_0 ] 3.84/1.88 3.84/1.88 (Comp: 2, Cost: 1) f23(ar_0) -> Com_1(f38(ar_0)) [ ar_0 >= 100 ] 3.84/1.88 3.84/1.88 (Comp: 200, Cost: 1) f28(ar_0) -> Com_1(f23(ar_0 + 1)) [ 98 >= d ] 3.84/1.88 3.84/1.88 (Comp: 200, Cost: 1) f28(ar_0) -> Com_1(f23(ar_0 + 1)) 3.84/1.88 3.84/1.88 (Comp: 100, Cost: 1) f23(ar_0) -> Com_1(f23(ar_0 + 1)) [ 99 >= ar_0 ] 3.84/1.88 3.84/1.88 (Comp: 100, Cost: 1) f23(ar_0) -> Com_1(f28(ar_0)) [ 99 >= ar_0 ] 3.84/1.88 3.84/1.88 (Comp: 100, Cost: 1) f23(ar_0) -> Com_1(f28(ar_0)) [ 99 >= ar_0 /\ 0 >= e + 1 ] 3.84/1.88 3.84/1.88 (Comp: 100, Cost: 1) f8(ar_0) -> Com_1(f14(ar_0)) [ 99 >= ar_0 ] 3.84/1.88 3.84/1.88 (Comp: 100, Cost: 1) f8(ar_0) -> Com_1(f14(ar_0)) [ 99 >= ar_0 /\ 99 >= d ] 3.84/1.88 3.84/1.88 (Comp: 1, Cost: 1) f0(ar_0) -> Com_1(f8(0)) 3.84/1.88 3.84/1.88 start location: koat_start 3.84/1.88 3.84/1.88 leaf cost: 0 3.84/1.88 3.84/1.88 3.84/1.88 3.84/1.88 Complexity upper bound 1405 3.84/1.88 3.84/1.88 3.84/1.88 3.84/1.88 Time: 0.155 sec (SMT: 0.146 sec) 3.84/1.88 3.84/1.88 3.84/1.88 ---------------------------------------- 3.84/1.88 3.84/1.88 (2) 3.84/1.88 BOUNDS(1, 1) 3.84/1.90 EOF