3.45/1.74 WORST_CASE(?, O(1)) 3.73/1.75 proof of /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.koat 3.73/1.75 # AProVE Commit ID: 48fb2092695e11cc9f56e44b17a92a5f88ffb256 marcel 20180622 unpublished dirty 3.73/1.75 3.73/1.75 3.73/1.75 The runtime complexity of the given CpxIntTrs could be proven to be BOUNDS(1, 1). 3.73/1.75 3.73/1.75 (0) CpxIntTrs 3.73/1.75 (1) Koat Proof [FINISHED, 98 ms] 3.73/1.75 (2) BOUNDS(1, 1) 3.73/1.75 3.73/1.75 3.73/1.75 ---------------------------------------- 3.73/1.75 3.73/1.75 (0) 3.73/1.75 Obligation: 3.73/1.75 Complexity Int TRS consisting of the following rules: 3.73/1.75 f0(A, B, C, D) -> Com_1(f8(0, B, C, D)) :|: TRUE 3.73/1.75 f8(A, B, C, D) -> Com_1(f8(A + 1, B, C, D)) :|: 3 >= A 3.73/1.75 f8(A, B, C, D) -> Com_1(f8(A + 1, A, A + 1, E)) :|: 3 >= A 3.73/1.75 f8(A, B, C, D) -> Com_1(f23(A, B, C, D)) :|: A >= 4 && 0 >= E + 1 3.73/1.75 f8(A, B, C, D) -> Com_1(f23(A, B, C, D)) :|: A >= 4 3.73/1.75 3.73/1.75 The start-symbols are:[f0_4] 3.73/1.75 3.73/1.75 3.73/1.75 ---------------------------------------- 3.73/1.75 3.73/1.75 (1) Koat Proof (FINISHED) 3.73/1.75 YES(?, 11) 3.73/1.75 3.73/1.75 3.73/1.75 3.73/1.75 Initial complexity problem: 3.73/1.75 3.73/1.75 1: T: 3.73/1.75 3.73/1.75 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) f0(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3) -> Com_1(f8(0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3)) 3.73/1.75 3.73/1.75 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) f8(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3) -> Com_1(f8(ar_0 + 1, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3)) [ 3 >= ar_0 ] 3.73/1.75 3.73/1.75 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) f8(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3) -> Com_1(f8(ar_0 + 1, ar_0, ar_0 + 1, e)) [ 3 >= ar_0 ] 3.73/1.75 3.73/1.75 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) f8(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3) -> Com_1(f23(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3)) [ ar_0 >= 4 /\ 0 >= e + 1 ] 3.73/1.75 3.73/1.75 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) f8(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3) -> Com_1(f23(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3)) [ ar_0 >= 4 ] 3.73/1.75 3.73/1.75 (Comp: 1, Cost: 0) koat_start(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3) -> Com_1(f0(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3)) [ 0 <= 0 ] 3.73/1.75 3.73/1.75 start location: koat_start 3.73/1.75 3.73/1.75 leaf cost: 0 3.73/1.75 3.73/1.75 3.73/1.75 3.73/1.75 Repeatedly propagating knowledge in problem 1 produces the following problem: 3.73/1.75 3.73/1.75 2: T: 3.73/1.75 3.73/1.75 (Comp: 1, Cost: 1) f0(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3) -> Com_1(f8(0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3)) 3.73/1.75 3.73/1.75 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) f8(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3) -> Com_1(f8(ar_0 + 1, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3)) [ 3 >= ar_0 ] 3.73/1.75 3.73/1.75 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) f8(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3) -> Com_1(f8(ar_0 + 1, ar_0, ar_0 + 1, e)) [ 3 >= ar_0 ] 3.73/1.75 3.73/1.75 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) f8(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3) -> Com_1(f23(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3)) [ ar_0 >= 4 /\ 0 >= e + 1 ] 3.73/1.75 3.73/1.75 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) f8(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3) -> Com_1(f23(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3)) [ ar_0 >= 4 ] 3.73/1.75 3.73/1.75 (Comp: 1, Cost: 0) koat_start(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3) -> Com_1(f0(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3)) [ 0 <= 0 ] 3.73/1.75 3.73/1.75 start location: koat_start 3.73/1.75 3.73/1.75 leaf cost: 0 3.73/1.75 3.73/1.75 3.73/1.75 3.73/1.75 A polynomial rank function with 3.73/1.75 3.73/1.75 Pol(f0) = 1 3.73/1.75 3.73/1.75 Pol(f8) = 1 3.73/1.75 3.73/1.75 Pol(f23) = 0 3.73/1.75 3.73/1.75 Pol(koat_start) = 1 3.73/1.75 3.73/1.75 orients all transitions weakly and the transitions 3.73/1.75 3.73/1.75 f8(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3) -> Com_1(f23(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3)) [ ar_0 >= 4 /\ 0 >= e + 1 ] 3.73/1.75 3.73/1.75 f8(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3) -> Com_1(f23(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3)) [ ar_0 >= 4 ] 3.73/1.75 3.73/1.75 strictly and produces the following problem: 3.73/1.75 3.73/1.75 3: T: 3.73/1.75 3.73/1.75 (Comp: 1, Cost: 1) f0(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3) -> Com_1(f8(0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3)) 3.73/1.75 3.73/1.75 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) f8(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3) -> Com_1(f8(ar_0 + 1, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3)) [ 3 >= ar_0 ] 3.73/1.75 3.73/1.75 (Comp: ?, Cost: 1) f8(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3) -> Com_1(f8(ar_0 + 1, ar_0, ar_0 + 1, e)) [ 3 >= ar_0 ] 3.73/1.75 3.73/1.75 (Comp: 1, Cost: 1) f8(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3) -> Com_1(f23(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3)) [ ar_0 >= 4 /\ 0 >= e + 1 ] 3.73/1.75 3.73/1.75 (Comp: 1, Cost: 1) f8(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3) -> Com_1(f23(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3)) [ ar_0 >= 4 ] 3.73/1.75 3.73/1.75 (Comp: 1, Cost: 0) koat_start(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3) -> Com_1(f0(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3)) [ 0 <= 0 ] 3.73/1.75 3.73/1.75 start location: koat_start 3.73/1.75 3.73/1.75 leaf cost: 0 3.73/1.75 3.73/1.75 3.73/1.75 3.73/1.75 A polynomial rank function with 3.73/1.75 3.73/1.75 Pol(f0) = 4 3.73/1.75 3.73/1.75 Pol(f8) = -V_1 + 4 3.73/1.75 3.73/1.75 Pol(f23) = -V_1 3.73/1.75 3.73/1.75 Pol(koat_start) = 4 3.73/1.75 3.73/1.75 orients all transitions weakly and the transitions 3.73/1.75 3.73/1.75 f8(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3) -> Com_1(f8(ar_0 + 1, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3)) [ 3 >= ar_0 ] 3.73/1.75 3.73/1.75 f8(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3) -> Com_1(f8(ar_0 + 1, ar_0, ar_0 + 1, e)) [ 3 >= ar_0 ] 3.73/1.75 3.73/1.75 strictly and produces the following problem: 3.73/1.75 3.73/1.75 4: T: 3.73/1.75 3.73/1.75 (Comp: 1, Cost: 1) f0(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3) -> Com_1(f8(0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3)) 3.73/1.75 3.73/1.75 (Comp: 4, Cost: 1) f8(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3) -> Com_1(f8(ar_0 + 1, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3)) [ 3 >= ar_0 ] 3.73/1.75 3.73/1.75 (Comp: 4, Cost: 1) f8(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3) -> Com_1(f8(ar_0 + 1, ar_0, ar_0 + 1, e)) [ 3 >= ar_0 ] 3.73/1.75 3.73/1.75 (Comp: 1, Cost: 1) f8(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3) -> Com_1(f23(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3)) [ ar_0 >= 4 /\ 0 >= e + 1 ] 3.73/1.75 3.73/1.75 (Comp: 1, Cost: 1) f8(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3) -> Com_1(f23(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3)) [ ar_0 >= 4 ] 3.73/1.75 3.73/1.75 (Comp: 1, Cost: 0) koat_start(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3) -> Com_1(f0(ar_0, ar_1, ar_2, ar_3)) [ 0 <= 0 ] 3.73/1.75 3.73/1.75 start location: koat_start 3.73/1.75 3.73/1.75 leaf cost: 0 3.73/1.75 3.73/1.75 3.73/1.75 3.73/1.75 Complexity upper bound 11 3.73/1.75 3.73/1.75 3.73/1.75 3.73/1.75 Time: 0.108 sec (SMT: 0.100 sec) 3.73/1.75 3.73/1.75 3.73/1.75 ---------------------------------------- 3.73/1.75 3.73/1.75 (2) 3.73/1.75 BOUNDS(1, 1) 3.73/1.77 EOF