2.61/1.34 YES 2.61/1.34 proof of /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml 2.61/1.34 # AProVE Commit ID: 48fb2092695e11cc9f56e44b17a92a5f88ffb256 marcel 20180622 unpublished dirty 2.61/1.34 2.61/1.34 2.61/1.34 Termination of the given CSR could be proven: 2.61/1.34 2.61/1.34 (0) CSR 2.61/1.34 (1) CSRRRRProof [EQUIVALENT, 26 ms] 2.61/1.34 (2) CSR 2.61/1.34 (3) CSRRRRProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] 2.61/1.34 (4) CSR 2.61/1.34 (5) CSRRRRProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] 2.61/1.34 (6) CSR 2.61/1.34 (7) RisEmptyProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] 2.61/1.34 (8) YES 2.61/1.34 2.61/1.34 2.61/1.34 ---------------------------------------- 2.61/1.34 2.61/1.34 (0) 2.61/1.34 Obligation: 2.61/1.34 Context-sensitive rewrite system: 2.61/1.34 The TRS R consists of the following rules: 2.61/1.34 2.61/1.34 f_1(x) -> g_1(f_1(x)) 2.61/1.34 g_1(f_1(x)) -> x 2.61/1.34 g_1(x) -> a_0 2.61/1.34 2.61/1.34 The replacement map contains the following entries: 2.61/1.34 2.61/1.34 f_1: empty set 2.61/1.34 g_1: empty set 2.61/1.34 a_0: empty set 2.61/1.34 2.61/1.34 ---------------------------------------- 2.61/1.34 2.61/1.34 (1) CSRRRRProof (EQUIVALENT) 2.61/1.34 The following CSR is given: Context-sensitive rewrite system: 2.61/1.34 The TRS R consists of the following rules: 2.61/1.34 2.61/1.34 f_1(x) -> g_1(f_1(x)) 2.61/1.34 g_1(f_1(x)) -> x 2.61/1.34 g_1(x) -> a_0 2.61/1.34 2.61/1.34 The replacement map contains the following entries: 2.61/1.34 2.61/1.34 f_1: empty set 2.61/1.34 g_1: empty set 2.61/1.34 a_0: empty set 2.61/1.34 Used ordering: 2.61/1.34 Polynomial interpretation [POLO]: 2.61/1.34 2.61/1.34 POL(a_0) = 0 2.61/1.34 POL(f_1(x_1)) = 1 + 2*x_1 2.61/1.34 POL(g_1(x_1)) = x_1 2.61/1.34 With this ordering the following rules can be removed by the rule removal processor [LPAR04] because they are oriented strictly: 2.61/1.34 2.61/1.34 g_1(f_1(x)) -> x 2.61/1.34 2.61/1.34 2.61/1.34 2.61/1.34 2.61/1.34 ---------------------------------------- 2.61/1.34 2.61/1.34 (2) 2.61/1.34 Obligation: 2.61/1.34 Context-sensitive rewrite system: 2.61/1.34 The TRS R consists of the following rules: 2.61/1.34 2.61/1.34 f_1(x) -> g_1(f_1(x)) 2.61/1.34 g_1(x) -> a_0 2.61/1.34 2.61/1.34 The replacement map contains the following entries: 2.61/1.34 2.61/1.34 f_1: empty set 2.61/1.34 g_1: empty set 2.61/1.34 a_0: empty set 2.61/1.34 2.61/1.34 ---------------------------------------- 2.61/1.34 2.61/1.34 (3) CSRRRRProof (EQUIVALENT) 2.61/1.34 The following CSR is given: Context-sensitive rewrite system: 2.61/1.34 The TRS R consists of the following rules: 2.61/1.34 2.61/1.34 f_1(x) -> g_1(f_1(x)) 2.61/1.34 g_1(x) -> a_0 2.61/1.34 2.61/1.34 The replacement map contains the following entries: 2.61/1.34 2.61/1.34 f_1: empty set 2.61/1.34 g_1: empty set 2.61/1.34 a_0: empty set 2.61/1.34 Used ordering: 2.61/1.34 Polynomial interpretation [POLO]: 2.61/1.34 2.61/1.34 POL(a_0) = 0 2.61/1.34 POL(f_1(x_1)) = 1 + x_1 2.61/1.34 POL(g_1(x_1)) = 1 2.61/1.34 With this ordering the following rules can be removed by the rule removal processor [LPAR04] because they are oriented strictly: 2.61/1.34 2.61/1.34 g_1(x) -> a_0 2.61/1.34 2.61/1.34 2.61/1.34 2.61/1.34 2.61/1.34 ---------------------------------------- 2.61/1.34 2.61/1.34 (4) 2.61/1.34 Obligation: 2.61/1.34 Context-sensitive rewrite system: 2.61/1.34 The TRS R consists of the following rules: 2.61/1.34 2.61/1.34 f_1(x) -> g_1(f_1(x)) 2.61/1.34 2.61/1.34 The replacement map contains the following entries: 2.61/1.34 2.61/1.34 f_1: empty set 2.61/1.34 g_1: empty set 2.61/1.34 2.61/1.34 ---------------------------------------- 2.61/1.34 2.61/1.34 (5) CSRRRRProof (EQUIVALENT) 2.61/1.34 The following CSR is given: Context-sensitive rewrite system: 2.61/1.34 The TRS R consists of the following rules: 2.61/1.34 2.61/1.34 f_1(x) -> g_1(f_1(x)) 2.61/1.34 2.61/1.34 The replacement map contains the following entries: 2.61/1.34 2.61/1.34 f_1: empty set 2.61/1.34 g_1: empty set 2.61/1.34 Used ordering: 2.61/1.34 Polynomial interpretation [POLO]: 2.61/1.34 2.61/1.34 POL(f_1(x_1)) = 1 + 2*x_1 2.61/1.34 POL(g_1(x_1)) = 0 2.61/1.34 With this ordering the following rules can be removed by the rule removal processor [LPAR04] because they are oriented strictly: 2.61/1.34 2.61/1.34 f_1(x) -> g_1(f_1(x)) 2.61/1.34 2.61/1.34 2.61/1.34 2.61/1.34 2.61/1.34 ---------------------------------------- 2.61/1.34 2.61/1.34 (6) 2.61/1.34 Obligation: 2.61/1.34 Context-sensitive rewrite system: 2.61/1.34 R is empty. 2.61/1.34 2.61/1.34 ---------------------------------------- 2.61/1.34 2.61/1.34 (7) RisEmptyProof (EQUIVALENT) 2.61/1.34 The CSR R is empty. Hence, termination is trivially proven. 2.61/1.34 ---------------------------------------- 2.61/1.34 2.61/1.34 (8) 2.61/1.34 YES 2.61/1.36 EOF