15.70/8.65	NO
15.70/8.65	
15.70/8.65	Solver Timeout: 4
15.70/8.65	Global Timeout: 300
15.70/8.65	Maximum number of concurrent processes: 900
15.70/8.65	*******************************************************************************************
15.70/8.65	*********************** UNPROCESSED TRANSITION SYSTEMS PER FUNCTION ***********************
15.70/8.65	*******************************************************************************************
15.70/8.65	
15.70/8.65	
15.70/8.65	List of LLVMGraphs + assumeNodes + staticAssertNodes [1] :
15.70/8.65	
15.70/8.65	+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ main +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
15.70/8.65	+                                                                  +
15.70/8.65	Init Location: 0
15.70/8.65	Transitions:
15.70/8.65	<l0, l1, true, seq{main__func_return_ -> 0, main_am -> main_a, main_bm -> main_b}>
15.70/8.65	<l1, l2, true>
15.70/8.65	<l2, l9, (main_am = main_bm)>
15.70/8.65	<l2, l3, not((main_am = main_bm))>
15.70/8.65	<l3, l4, (main_am > main_bm)>
15.70/8.65	<l3, l6, not((main_am > main_bm))>
15.70/8.65	<l4, l5, true, seq{main_bm -> (main_bm + main_b)}>
15.70/8.65	<l5, l8, true>
15.70/8.65	<l6, l7, true, seq{main_am -> (main_am + main_a)}>
15.70/8.65	<l7, l8, true>
15.70/8.65	<l8, l2, true>
15.70/8.65	<l9, l10, true, seq{main__func_return_ -> 0}>
15.70/8.65	
15.70/8.65	Fresh variables:
15.70/8.65	
15.70/8.65	Undef variables:
15.70/8.65	
15.70/8.65	Abstraction variables:
15.70/8.65	
15.70/8.65	Exit nodes:
15.70/8.65	
15.70/8.65	Accepting locations:
15.70/8.65	
15.70/8.65	Asserts:
15.70/8.65	
15.70/8.65	+ Assume Nodes [0]: ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
15.70/8.65	       
15.70/8.65	+ Static Assert Nodes [0]: +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
15.70/8.65	       
15.70/8.65	+ After preprocess (paralelization): ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
15.70/8.65	
15.70/8.65	Init Location: 0
15.70/8.65	Transitions:
15.70/8.65	<l0, l1, true, seq{main__func_return_ -> 0, main_am -> main_a, main_bm -> main_b}>
15.70/8.65	<l1, l2, true>
15.70/8.65	<l2, l9, (main_am = main_bm)>
15.70/8.65	<l2, l3, not((main_am = main_bm))>
15.70/8.65	<l3, l4, (main_am > main_bm)>
15.70/8.65	<l3, l6, not((main_am > main_bm))>
15.70/8.65	<l4, l5, true, seq{main_bm -> (main_bm + main_b)}>
15.70/8.65	<l5, l8, true>
15.70/8.65	<l6, l7, true, seq{main_am -> (main_am + main_a)}>
15.70/8.65	<l7, l8, true>
15.70/8.65	<l8, l2, true>
15.70/8.65	<l9, l10, true, seq{main__func_return_ -> 0}>
15.70/8.65	
15.70/8.65	Fresh variables:
15.70/8.65	
15.70/8.65	Undef variables:
15.70/8.65	
15.70/8.65	Abstraction variables:
15.70/8.65	
15.70/8.65	Exit nodes:
15.70/8.65	10, 
15.70/8.65	Accepting locations:
15.70/8.65	
15.70/8.65	Asserts:
15.70/8.65	
15.70/8.65	+                                                                  +
15.70/8.65	+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ main +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
15.70/8.65	
15.70/8.65	
15.70/8.65	Function Return and Parameters Information [1 functions]:
15.70/8.65	    function name: main [1 return + 0 parameters]        demangled: main
15.70/8.65	        main__func_return_      [function result] : int
15.70/8.65	
15.70/8.65	
15.70/8.65	AST Ident Scanner Information [6 idents]:
15.70/8.65	__VERIFIER_nondet_int | function | [integer, ()] | <line: 3, col: 1>
15.70/8.65	main | function | [integer, ()] | <line: 5, col: 1>
15.70/8.65	a | local variable | integer | <line: 6, col: 5> | <line: 10, col: 10> <line: 17, col: 21>
15.70/8.65	b | local variable | integer | <line: 7, col: 5> | <line: 11, col: 10> <line: 15, col: 21>
15.70/8.65	am | local variable | integer | <line: 8, col: 5> | <line: 10, col: 5> <line: 13, col: 12> <line: 14, col: 13> <line: 17, col: 13> <line: 17, col: 18>
15.70/8.65	bm | local variable | integer | <line: 9, col: 5> | <line: 11, col: 5> <line: 13, col: 18> <line: 14, col: 18> <line: 15, col: 13> <line: 15, col: 18>
15.70/8.65	
15.70/8.65	Main function: main
15.70/8.65	Preprocessed LLVMGraph
15.70/8.65	Init Location: 0
15.70/8.65	Transitions:
15.70/8.65	<l0, l2, (main_am = main_a) /\ (main_bm = main_b)>
15.70/8.65	<l2, l10, (main_am = main_bm)>
15.70/8.65	<l2, l2, (main_am < main_bm) /\ not((main_am > main_bm)), par{main_am -> (main_am + main_a)}>
15.70/8.65	<l2, l2, (main_am > main_bm) /\ (main_am > main_bm), par{main_bm -> (main_bm + main_b)}>
15.70/8.65	
15.70/8.65	Fresh variables:
15.70/8.65	
15.70/8.65	Undef variables:
15.70/8.65	
15.70/8.65	Abstraction variables:
15.70/8.65	
15.70/8.65	Exit nodes:
15.70/8.65	10, 
15.70/8.65	Accepting locations:
15.70/8.65	
15.70/8.65	Asserts:
15.70/8.65	
15.70/8.65	*************************************************************
15.70/8.65	*******************************************************************************************
15.70/8.65	***********************       WORKING TRANSITION SYSTEM (DAG)       ***********************
15.70/8.65	*******************************************************************************************
15.70/8.65	
15.70/8.65	Init Location: 0
15.70/8.65	Graph 0:
15.70/8.65	Transitions:
15.70/8.65	Variables:
15.70/8.65	
15.70/8.65	Graph 1:
15.70/8.65	Transitions:
15.70/8.65	<l2, l2, 1 + main_am <= main_bm, {main_am -> main_a + main_am, rest remain the same}>
15.70/8.65	<l2, l2, 1 + main_bm <= main_am, {main_bm -> main_b + main_bm, rest remain the same}>
15.70/8.65	Variables:
15.70/8.65	main_a, main_am, main_bm, main_b
15.70/8.65	
15.70/8.65	Graph 2:
15.70/8.65	Transitions:
15.70/8.65	Variables:
15.70/8.65	
15.70/8.65	Precedence: 
15.70/8.65	Graph 0
15.70/8.65	
15.70/8.65	Graph 1
15.70/8.65	<l0, l2, main_a = main_am /\ main_b = main_bm, {all remain the same}>
15.70/8.65	
15.70/8.65	Graph 2
15.70/8.65	<l2, l10, main_am = main_bm, {all remain the same}>
15.70/8.65	
15.70/8.65	Map Locations to Subgraph:
15.70/8.65	( 0 , 0 )
15.70/8.65	( 2 , 1 )
15.70/8.65	( 10 , 2 )
15.70/8.65	
15.70/8.65	*******************************************************************************************
15.70/8.65	********************************    CHECKING ASSERTIONS    ********************************
15.70/8.65	*******************************************************************************************
15.70/8.65	
15.70/8.65	Proving termination of subgraph 0
15.70/8.65	Proving termination of subgraph 1
15.70/8.65	Checking unfeasibility...
15.70/8.65	Time used: 0.005853
15.70/8.65	
15.70/8.65	Checking conditional termination of SCC {l2}...
15.70/8.65	
15.70/8.65	LOG: CALL solveLinear
15.70/8.65	
15.70/8.65	LOG: RETURN solveLinear - Elapsed time: 0.001626s
15.70/8.65	
15.70/8.65	LOG: CALL solveLinear
15.70/8.65	
15.70/8.65	LOG: RETURN solveLinear - Elapsed time: 0.003861s
15.70/8.65	[23189 : 23191]
15.70/8.65	[23189 : 23192]
15.70/8.65	Successful child: 23191
15.70/8.65	[ Invariant Graph ]
15.70/8.65	Strengthening and disabling transitions...
15.70/8.65	
15.70/8.65	LOG: CALL solverLinear in Graph for feasibility
15.70/8.65	
15.70/8.65	LOG: RETURN solveLinear in Graph for feasibility
15.70/8.65	Strengthening transition (result): 
15.70/8.65	<l2, l2, main_a <= 0 /\ main_am <= main_a + main_b + main_bm /\ 1 + main_am <= main_bm, {main_am -> main_a + main_am, rest remain the same}>
15.70/8.65	
15.70/8.65	LOG: CALL solverLinear in Graph for feasibility
15.70/8.65	
15.70/8.65	LOG: RETURN solveLinear in Graph for feasibility
15.70/8.65	Strengthening transition (result): 
15.70/8.65	<l2, l2, main_a <= 0 /\ main_am <= main_a + main_b + main_bm /\ 1 + main_bm <= main_am, {main_bm -> main_b + main_bm, rest remain the same}>
15.70/8.65	[ Termination Graph ]
15.70/8.65	Strengthening and disabling transitions...
15.70/8.65	
15.70/8.65	LOG: CALL solverLinear in Graph for feasibility
15.70/8.65	
15.70/8.65	LOG: RETURN solveLinear in Graph for feasibility
15.70/8.65	Strengthening transition (result): 
15.70/8.65	<l2, l2, main_a <= 0 /\ main_am <= main_a + main_b + main_bm /\ 1 + main_am <= main_bm, {main_am -> main_a + main_am, rest remain the same}>
15.70/8.65	
15.70/8.65	LOG: CALL solverLinear in Graph for feasibility
15.70/8.65	
15.70/8.65	LOG: RETURN solveLinear in Graph for feasibility
15.70/8.65	Strengthening transition (result): 
15.70/8.65	<l2, l2, main_a <= 0 /\ main_am <= main_a + main_b + main_bm /\ 1 + main_bm <= main_am, {main_bm -> main_b + main_bm, rest remain the same}>
15.70/8.65	Ranking function: 1 + main_a + main_b + main_am - main_bm
15.70/8.65	New Graphs: 
15.70/8.65	Transitions:
15.70/8.65	<l2, l2, main_a <= 0 /\ main_am <= main_a + main_b + main_bm /\ 1 + main_am <= main_bm, {main_am -> main_a + main_am, rest remain the same}>
15.70/8.65	Variables:
15.70/8.65	main_a, main_b, main_am, main_bm
15.70/8.65	Checking conditional termination of SCC {l2}...
15.70/8.65	
15.70/8.65	LOG: CALL solveLinear
15.70/8.65	
15.70/8.65	LOG: RETURN solveLinear - Elapsed time: 0.000767s
15.70/8.65	
15.70/8.65	LOG: CALL solveLinear
15.70/8.65	
15.70/8.65	LOG: RETURN solveLinear - Elapsed time: 0.002851s
15.70/8.65	[23189 : 23196]
15.70/8.65	[23189 : 23197]
15.70/8.65	Successful child: 23196
15.70/8.65	[ Invariant Graph ]
15.70/8.65	Strengthening and disabling transitions...
15.70/8.65	
15.70/8.65	LOG: CALL solverLinear in Graph for feasibility
15.70/8.65	
15.70/8.65	LOG: RETURN solveLinear in Graph for feasibility
15.70/8.65	It's unfeasible. Removing transition: 
15.70/8.65	<l2, l2, main_a <= 0 /\ main_am <= main_a + main_b + main_bm /\ 1 + main_am <= main_bm, {main_am -> main_a + main_am, rest remain the same}>
15.70/8.65	
15.70/8.65	LOG: CALL solverLinear in Graph for feasibility
15.70/8.65	
15.70/8.65	LOG: RETURN solveLinear in Graph for feasibility
15.70/8.65	It's unfeasible. Removing transition: 
15.70/8.65	<l2, l2, main_a <= 0 /\ main_am <= main_a + main_b + main_bm /\ 1 + main_bm <= main_am, {main_bm -> main_b + main_bm, rest remain the same}>
15.70/8.65	[ Termination Graph ]
15.70/8.65	Strengthening and disabling transitions...
15.70/8.65	
15.70/8.65	LOG: CALL solverLinear in Graph for feasibility
15.70/8.65	
15.70/8.65	LOG: RETURN solveLinear in Graph for feasibility
15.70/8.65	It's unfeasible. Removing transition: 
15.70/8.65	<l2, l2, main_a <= 0 /\ main_am <= main_a + main_b + main_bm /\ 1 + main_am <= main_bm, {main_am -> main_a + main_am, rest remain the same}>
15.70/8.65	New Graphs: 
15.70/8.65	[23189 : 23201]
15.70/8.65	[23189 : 23202]
15.70/8.65	INVARIANTS: 
15.70/8.65	2: 
15.70/8.65	Quasi-INVARIANTS to narrow Graph: 
15.70/8.65	2: main_a <= 0 , main_am <= main_a + main_b + main_bm , 
15.70/8.65	
15.70/8.65	LOG: CALL check - Post:main_b <= main_a - Process 1
15.70/8.65	* Exit transition: <l0, l2, main_a = main_am /\ main_b = main_bm, {all remain the same}>
15.70/8.65	* Postcondition  : main_b <= main_a
15.70/8.65	
15.70/8.65	LOG: CALL solveLinear
15.70/8.65	
15.70/8.65	LOG: RETURN solveLinear - Elapsed time: 0.000784s
15.70/8.65	> Postcondition is not implied!
15.70/8.65	
15.70/8.65	LOG: RETURN check - Elapsed time: 0.000890s
15.70/8.65	INVARIANTS: 
15.70/8.65	2: 
15.70/8.65	Quasi-INVARIANTS to narrow Graph: 
15.70/8.65	2: main_a + main_bm <= main_b + main_am , main_b <= main_a , 
15.70/8.65	Narrowing transition: 
15.70/8.65	<l2, l2, 1 + main_am <= main_bm, {main_am -> main_a + main_am, rest remain the same}>
15.70/8.65	
15.70/8.65	LOG: Narrow transition size 4
15.70/8.65	Narrowing transition: 
15.70/8.65	<l2, l2, 1 + main_bm <= main_am, {main_bm -> main_b + main_bm, rest remain the same}>
15.70/8.65	
15.70/8.65	LOG: Narrow transition size 4
15.70/8.65	invGraph after Narrowing: 
15.70/8.65	Transitions:
15.70/8.65	<l2, l2, main_a <= 0 /\ main_a + main_bm <= main_b + main_am /\ 1 + main_a <= main_b /\ 1 + main_am <= main_bm, {main_am -> main_a + main_am, rest remain the same}>
15.70/8.65	<l2, l2, main_a <= 0 /\ 1 + main_b + main_am <= main_a + main_bm /\ 1 + main_am <= main_bm, {main_am -> main_a + main_am, rest remain the same}>
15.70/8.65	<l2, l2, 1 <= main_a /\ 1 + main_am <= main_bm, {main_am -> main_a + main_am, rest remain the same}>
15.70/8.65	<l2, l2, main_a <= 0 /\ main_a + main_bm <= main_b + main_am /\ main_b <= main_a /\ 1 + main_a + main_b + main_bm <= main_am /\ 1 + main_bm <= main_am, {main_bm -> main_b + main_bm, rest remain the same}>
15.70/8.65	<l2, l2, main_a <= 0 /\ main_a + main_bm <= main_b + main_am /\ 1 + main_a <= main_b /\ 1 + main_bm <= main_am, {main_bm -> main_b + main_bm, rest remain the same}>
15.70/8.65	<l2, l2, main_a <= 0 /\ 1 + main_b + main_am <= main_a + main_bm /\ 1 + main_bm <= main_am, {main_bm -> main_b + main_bm, rest remain the same}>
15.70/8.65	<l2, l2, 1 <= main_a /\ 1 + main_bm <= main_am, {main_bm -> main_b + main_bm, rest remain the same}>
15.70/8.65	Variables:
15.70/8.65	main_a, main_am, main_bm, main_b
15.70/8.65	Checking conditional termination of SCC {l2}...
15.70/8.65	
15.70/8.65	LOG: CALL solveLinear
15.70/8.65	
15.70/8.65	LOG: RETURN solveLinear - Elapsed time: 0.004148s
15.70/8.65	
15.70/8.65	LOG: CALL solveLinear
15.70/8.65	
15.70/8.65	LOG: RETURN solveLinear - Elapsed time: 0.058179s
15.70/8.65	[23189 : 23203]
15.70/8.65	[23189 : 23204]
15.70/8.65	Successful child: 23203
15.70/8.65	[ Invariant Graph ]
15.70/8.65	Strengthening and disabling transitions...
15.70/8.65	
15.70/8.65	LOG: CALL solverLinear in Graph for feasibility
15.70/8.65	
15.70/8.65	LOG: RETURN solveLinear in Graph for feasibility
15.70/8.65	Strengthening transition (result): 
15.70/8.65	<l2, l2, main_a <= 0 /\ main_a + main_bm <= main_b + main_am /\ 1 + main_a <= main_b /\ 1 + main_am <= main_bm, {main_am -> main_a + main_am, rest remain the same}>
15.70/8.65	
15.70/8.65	LOG: CALL solverLinear in Graph for feasibility
15.70/8.65	
15.70/8.65	LOG: RETURN solveLinear in Graph for feasibility
15.70/8.65	Strengthening transition (result): 
15.70/8.65	<l2, l2, main_a <= 0 /\ 1 + main_b + main_am <= main_a + main_bm /\ 1 + main_am <= main_bm, {main_am -> main_a + main_am, rest remain the same}>
15.70/8.65	
15.70/8.65	LOG: CALL solverLinear in Graph for feasibility
15.70/8.65	
15.70/8.65	LOG: RETURN solveLinear in Graph for feasibility
15.70/8.65	It's unfeasible. Removing transition: 
15.70/8.65	<l2, l2, 1 <= main_a /\ 1 + main_am <= main_bm, {main_am -> main_a + main_am, rest remain the same}>
15.70/8.65	
15.70/8.65	LOG: CALL solverLinear in Graph for feasibility
15.70/8.65	
15.70/8.65	LOG: RETURN solveLinear in Graph for feasibility
15.70/8.65	Strengthening transition (result): 
15.70/8.65	<l2, l2, main_a <= 0 /\ main_a + main_bm <= main_b + main_am /\ main_b <= main_a /\ 1 + main_a + main_b + main_bm <= main_am /\ 1 + main_bm <= main_am, {main_bm -> main_b + main_bm, rest remain the same}>
15.70/8.65	
15.70/8.65	LOG: CALL solverLinear in Graph for feasibility
15.70/8.65	
15.70/8.65	LOG: RETURN solveLinear in Graph for feasibility
15.70/8.65	Strengthening transition (result): 
15.70/8.65	<l2, l2, main_a <= 0 /\ main_a + main_bm <= main_b + main_am /\ 1 + main_a <= main_b /\ 1 + main_bm <= main_am, {main_bm -> main_b + main_bm, rest remain the same}>
15.70/8.65	
15.70/8.65	LOG: CALL solverLinear in Graph for feasibility
15.70/8.65	
15.70/8.65	LOG: RETURN solveLinear in Graph for feasibility
15.70/8.65	Strengthening transition (result): 
15.70/8.65	<l2, l2, main_a <= 0 /\ 1 + main_b + main_am <= main_a + main_bm /\ 1 + main_bm <= main_am, {main_bm -> main_b + main_bm, rest remain the same}>
15.70/8.65	
15.70/8.65	LOG: CALL solverLinear in Graph for feasibility
15.70/8.65	
15.70/8.65	LOG: RETURN solveLinear in Graph for feasibility
15.70/8.65	It's unfeasible. Removing transition: 
15.70/8.65	<l2, l2, 1 <= main_a /\ 1 + main_bm <= main_am, {main_bm -> main_b + main_bm, rest remain the same}>
15.70/8.65	[ Termination Graph ]
15.70/8.65	Strengthening and disabling transitions...
15.70/8.65	> It's unfeasible. Removing transition: 
15.70/8.65	<l2, l2, 1 <= main_a /\ 1 + main_bm <= main_am, {main_bm -> main_b + main_bm, rest remain the same}>
15.70/8.65	
15.70/8.65	LOG: CALL solverLinear in Graph for feasibility
15.70/8.65	
15.70/8.65	LOG: RETURN solveLinear in Graph for feasibility
15.70/8.65	Strengthening transition (result): 
15.70/8.65	<l2, l2, main_a <= 0 /\ main_a + main_bm <= main_b + main_am /\ 1 + main_a <= main_b /\ 1 + main_am <= main_bm, {main_am -> main_a + main_am, rest remain the same}>
15.70/8.65	
15.70/8.65	LOG: CALL solverLinear in Graph for feasibility
15.70/8.65	
15.70/8.65	LOG: RETURN solveLinear in Graph for feasibility
15.70/8.65	Strengthening transition (result): 
15.70/8.65	<l2, l2, main_a <= 0 /\ 1 + main_b + main_am <= main_a + main_bm /\ 1 + main_am <= main_bm, {main_am -> main_a + main_am, rest remain the same}>
15.70/8.65	
15.70/8.65	LOG: CALL solverLinear in Graph for feasibility
15.70/8.65	
15.70/8.65	LOG: RETURN solveLinear in Graph for feasibility
15.70/8.65	It's unfeasible. Removing transition: 
15.70/8.65	<l2, l2, 1 <= main_a /\ 1 + main_am <= main_bm, {main_am -> main_a + main_am, rest remain the same}>
15.70/8.65	
15.70/8.65	LOG: CALL solverLinear in Graph for feasibility
15.70/8.65	
15.70/8.65	LOG: RETURN solveLinear in Graph for feasibility
15.70/8.65	Strengthening transition (result): 
15.70/8.65	<l2, l2, main_a <= 0 /\ main_a + main_bm <= main_b + main_am /\ main_b <= main_a /\ 1 + main_a + main_b + main_bm <= main_am /\ 1 + main_bm <= main_am, {main_bm -> main_b + main_bm, rest remain the same}>
15.70/8.65	
15.70/8.65	LOG: CALL solverLinear in Graph for feasibility
15.70/8.65	
15.70/8.65	LOG: RETURN solveLinear in Graph for feasibility
15.70/8.65	Strengthening transition (result): 
15.70/8.65	<l2, l2, main_a <= 0 /\ main_a + main_bm <= main_b + main_am /\ 1 + main_a <= main_b /\ 1 + main_bm <= main_am, {main_bm -> main_b + main_bm, rest remain the same}>
15.70/8.65	
15.70/8.65	LOG: CALL solverLinear in Graph for feasibility
15.70/8.65	
15.70/8.65	LOG: RETURN solveLinear in Graph for feasibility
15.70/8.65	Strengthening transition (result): 
15.70/8.65	<l2, l2, main_a <= 0 /\ 1 + main_b + main_am <= main_a + main_bm /\ 1 + main_bm <= main_am, {main_bm -> main_b + main_bm, rest remain the same}>
15.70/8.65	New Graphs: 
15.70/8.65	Transitions:
15.70/8.65	<l2, l2, main_a <= 0 /\ main_a + main_bm <= main_b + main_am /\ 1 + main_a <= main_b /\ 1 + main_am <= main_bm, {main_am -> main_a + main_am, rest remain the same}>
15.70/8.65	<l2, l2, main_a <= 0 /\ 1 + main_b + main_am <= main_a + main_bm /\ 1 + main_am <= main_bm, {main_am -> main_a + main_am, rest remain the same}>
15.70/8.65	<l2, l2, main_a <= 0 /\ main_a + main_bm <= main_b + main_am /\ main_b <= main_a /\ 1 + main_a + main_b + main_bm <= main_am /\ 1 + main_bm <= main_am, {main_bm -> main_b + main_bm, rest remain the same}>
15.70/8.65	<l2, l2, main_a <= 0 /\ main_a + main_bm <= main_b + main_am /\ 1 + main_a <= main_b /\ 1 + main_bm <= main_am, {main_bm -> main_b + main_bm, rest remain the same}>
15.70/8.65	<l2, l2, main_a <= 0 /\ 1 + main_b + main_am <= main_a + main_bm /\ 1 + main_bm <= main_am, {main_bm -> main_b + main_bm, rest remain the same}>
15.70/8.65	Variables:
15.70/8.65	main_a, main_b, main_am, main_bm
15.70/8.65	Checking conditional termination of SCC {l2}...
15.70/8.65	
15.70/8.65	LOG: CALL solveLinear
15.70/8.65	
15.70/8.65	LOG: RETURN solveLinear - Elapsed time: 0.003233s
15.70/8.65	
15.70/8.65	LOG: CALL solveLinear
15.70/8.65	
15.70/8.65	LOG: RETURN solveLinear - Elapsed time: 0.055364s
15.70/8.65	[23189 : 23208]
15.70/8.65	[23189 : 23209]
15.70/8.65	Successful child: 23208
15.70/8.65	[ Invariant Graph ]
15.70/8.65	Strengthening and disabling transitions...
15.70/8.65	
15.70/8.65	LOG: CALL solverLinear in Graph for feasibility
15.70/8.65	
15.70/8.65	LOG: RETURN solveLinear in Graph for feasibility
15.70/8.65	It's unfeasible. Removing transition: 
15.70/8.65	<l2, l2, main_a <= 0 /\ main_a + main_bm <= main_b + main_am /\ 1 + main_a <= main_b /\ 1 + main_am <= main_bm, {main_am -> main_a + main_am, rest remain the same}>
15.70/8.65	
15.70/8.65	LOG: CALL solverLinear in Graph for feasibility
15.70/8.65	
15.70/8.65	LOG: RETURN solveLinear in Graph for feasibility
15.70/8.65	Strengthening transition (result): 
15.70/8.65	<l2, l2, main_a <= 0 /\ main_b <= main_a /\ 1 + main_b + main_am <= main_a + main_bm /\ 1 + main_am <= main_bm, {main_am -> main_a + main_am, rest remain the same}>
15.70/8.65	
15.70/8.65	LOG: CALL solverLinear in Graph for feasibility
15.70/8.65	
15.70/8.65	LOG: RETURN solveLinear in Graph for feasibility
15.70/8.65	Strengthening transition (result): 
15.70/8.65	<l2, l2, main_a <= 0 /\ main_a + main_bm <= main_b + main_am /\ main_b <= main_a /\ 1 + main_a + main_b + main_bm <= main_am /\ 1 + main_bm <= main_am, {main_bm -> main_b + main_bm, rest remain the same}>
15.70/8.65	
15.70/8.65	LOG: CALL solverLinear in Graph for feasibility
15.70/8.65	
15.70/8.65	LOG: RETURN solveLinear in Graph for feasibility
15.70/8.65	It's unfeasible. Removing transition: 
15.70/8.65	<l2, l2, main_a <= 0 /\ main_a + main_bm <= main_b + main_am /\ 1 + main_a <= main_b /\ 1 + main_bm <= main_am, {main_bm -> main_b + main_bm, rest remain the same}>
15.70/8.65	
15.70/8.65	LOG: CALL solverLinear in Graph for feasibility
15.70/8.65	
15.70/8.65	LOG: RETURN solveLinear in Graph for feasibility
15.70/8.65	Strengthening transition (result): 
15.70/8.65	<l2, l2, main_a <= 0 /\ main_b <= main_a /\ 1 + main_b + main_am <= main_a + main_bm /\ 1 + main_bm <= main_am, {main_bm -> main_b + main_bm, rest remain the same}>
15.70/8.65	[ Termination Graph ]
15.70/8.65	Strengthening and disabling transitions...
15.70/8.65	> It's unfeasible. Removing transition: 
15.70/8.65	<l2, l2, main_a <= 0 /\ main_a + main_bm <= main_b + main_am /\ 1 + main_a <= main_b /\ 1 + main_bm <= main_am, {main_bm -> main_b + main_bm, rest remain the same}>
15.70/8.65	
15.70/8.65	LOG: CALL solverLinear in Graph for feasibility
15.70/8.65	
15.70/8.65	LOG: RETURN solveLinear in Graph for feasibility
15.70/8.65	It's unfeasible. Removing transition: 
15.70/8.65	<l2, l2, main_a <= 0 /\ main_a + main_bm <= main_b + main_am /\ 1 + main_a <= main_b /\ 1 + main_am <= main_bm, {main_am -> main_a + main_am, rest remain the same}>
15.70/8.65	
15.70/8.65	LOG: CALL solverLinear in Graph for feasibility
15.70/8.65	
15.70/8.65	LOG: RETURN solveLinear in Graph for feasibility
15.70/8.65	Strengthening transition (result): 
15.70/8.65	<l2, l2, main_a <= 0 /\ main_b <= main_a /\ 1 + main_b + main_am <= main_a + main_bm /\ 1 + main_am <= main_bm, {main_am -> main_a + main_am, rest remain the same}>
15.70/8.65	
15.70/8.65	LOG: CALL solverLinear in Graph for feasibility
15.70/8.65	
15.70/8.65	LOG: RETURN solveLinear in Graph for feasibility
15.70/8.65	Strengthening transition (result): 
15.70/8.65	<l2, l2, main_a <= 0 /\ main_a + main_bm <= main_b + main_am /\ main_b <= main_a /\ 1 + main_a + main_b + main_bm <= main_am /\ 1 + main_bm <= main_am, {main_bm -> main_b + main_bm, rest remain the same}>
15.70/8.65	
15.70/8.65	LOG: CALL solverLinear in Graph for feasibility
15.70/8.65	
15.70/8.65	LOG: RETURN solveLinear in Graph for feasibility
15.70/8.65	Strengthening transition (result): 
15.70/8.65	<l2, l2, main_a <= 0 /\ main_b <= main_a /\ 1 + main_b + main_am <= main_a + main_bm /\ 1 + main_bm <= main_am, {main_bm -> main_b + main_bm, rest remain the same}>
15.70/8.65	New Graphs: 
15.70/8.65	Transitions:
15.70/8.65	<l2, l2, main_a <= 0 /\ main_b <= main_a /\ 1 + main_b + main_am <= main_a + main_bm /\ 1 + main_am <= main_bm, {main_am -> main_a + main_am, rest remain the same}>
15.70/8.65	<l2, l2, main_a <= 0 /\ main_a + main_bm <= main_b + main_am /\ main_b <= main_a /\ 1 + main_a + main_b + main_bm <= main_am /\ 1 + main_bm <= main_am, {main_bm -> main_b + main_bm, rest remain the same}>
15.70/8.65	<l2, l2, main_a <= 0 /\ main_b <= main_a /\ 1 + main_b + main_am <= main_a + main_bm /\ 1 + main_bm <= main_am, {main_bm -> main_b + main_bm, rest remain the same}>
15.70/8.65	Variables:
15.70/8.65	main_a, main_b, main_am, main_bm
15.70/8.65	Checking conditional termination of SCC {l2}...
15.70/8.65	
15.70/8.65	LOG: CALL solveLinear
15.70/8.65	
15.70/8.65	LOG: RETURN solveLinear - Elapsed time: 0.002206s
15.70/8.65	
15.70/8.65	LOG: CALL solveLinear
15.70/8.65	
15.70/8.65	LOG: RETURN solveLinear - Elapsed time: 0.020321s
15.70/8.65	Piecewise ranking function: min(0,2*main_a - 2*main_b - 2*main_am + 2*main_bm)
15.70/8.65	New Graphs: 
15.70/8.65	Transitions:
15.70/8.65	<l2, l2, main_a <= 0 /\ main_b <= main_a /\ 1 + main_b + main_am <= main_a + main_bm /\ 1 + main_am <= main_bm, {main_am -> main_a + main_am, rest remain the same}>
15.70/8.65	<l2, l2, main_a <= 0 /\ main_a + main_bm <= main_b + main_am /\ main_b <= main_a /\ 1 + main_a + main_b + main_bm <= main_am /\ 1 + main_bm <= main_am, {main_bm -> main_b + main_bm, rest remain the same}>
15.70/8.65	Variables:
15.70/8.65	main_a, main_b, main_am, main_bm
15.70/8.65	Checking conditional termination of SCC {l2}...
15.70/8.65	
15.70/8.65	LOG: CALL solveLinear
15.70/8.65	
15.70/8.65	LOG: RETURN solveLinear - Elapsed time: 0.001553s
15.70/8.65	
15.70/8.65	LOG: CALL solveLinear
15.70/8.65	
15.70/8.65	LOG: RETURN solveLinear - Elapsed time: 0.007731s
15.70/8.65	[23189 : 23213]
15.70/8.65	[23189 : 23214]
15.70/8.65	Successful child: 23213
15.70/8.65	[ Invariant Graph ]
15.70/8.65	Strengthening and disabling transitions...
15.70/8.65	
15.70/8.65	LOG: CALL solverLinear in Graph for feasibility
15.70/8.65	
15.70/8.65	LOG: RETURN solveLinear in Graph for feasibility
15.70/8.65	It's unfeasible. Removing transition: 
15.70/8.65	<l2, l2, main_a <= 0 /\ main_b <= main_a /\ 1 + main_b + main_am <= main_a + main_bm /\ 1 + main_am <= main_bm, {main_am -> main_a + main_am, rest remain the same}>
15.70/8.65	
15.70/8.65	LOG: CALL solverLinear in Graph for feasibility
15.70/8.65	
15.70/8.65	LOG: RETURN solveLinear in Graph for feasibility
15.70/8.65	Strengthening transition (result): 
15.70/8.65	<l2, l2, main_a <= 0 /\ main_a + main_bm <= main_b + main_am /\ main_b <= main_a /\ 1 + main_a + main_b + main_bm <= main_am /\ 1 + main_bm <= main_am, {main_bm -> main_b + main_bm, rest remain the same}>
15.70/8.65	
15.70/8.65	LOG: CALL solverLinear in Graph for feasibility
15.70/8.65	
15.70/8.65	LOG: RETURN solveLinear in Graph for feasibility
15.70/8.65	It's unfeasible. Removing transition: 
15.70/8.65	<l2, l2, main_a <= 0 /\ main_b <= main_a /\ 1 + main_b + main_am <= main_a + main_bm /\ 1 + main_bm <= main_am, {main_bm -> main_b + main_bm, rest remain the same}>
15.70/8.65	[ Termination Graph ]
15.70/8.65	Strengthening and disabling transitions...
15.70/8.65	> It's unfeasible. Removing transition: 
15.70/8.65	<l2, l2, main_a <= 0 /\ main_b <= main_a /\ 1 + main_b + main_am <= main_a + main_bm /\ 1 + main_am <= main_bm, {main_am -> main_a + main_am, rest remain the same}>
15.70/8.65	
15.70/8.65	LOG: CALL solverLinear in Graph for feasibility
15.70/8.65	
15.70/8.65	LOG: RETURN solveLinear in Graph for feasibility
15.70/8.65	Strengthening transition (result): 
15.70/8.65	<l2, l2, main_a <= 0 /\ main_a + main_bm <= main_b + main_am /\ main_b <= main_a /\ 1 + main_a + main_b + main_bm <= main_am /\ 1 + main_bm <= main_am, {main_bm -> main_b + main_bm, rest remain the same}>
15.70/8.65	New Graphs: 
15.70/8.65	Transitions:
15.70/8.65	<l2, l2, main_a <= 0 /\ main_a + main_bm <= main_b + main_am /\ main_b <= main_a /\ 1 + main_a + main_b + main_bm <= main_am /\ 1 + main_bm <= main_am, {main_bm -> main_b + main_bm, rest remain the same}>
15.70/8.65	Variables:
15.70/8.65	main_a, main_b, main_am, main_bm
15.70/8.65	Checking conditional termination of SCC {l2}...
15.70/8.65	
15.70/8.65	LOG: CALL solveLinear
15.70/8.65	
15.70/8.65	LOG: RETURN solveLinear - Elapsed time: 0.000946s
15.70/8.65	
15.70/8.65	LOG: CALL solveLinear
15.70/8.65	
15.70/8.65	LOG: RETURN solveLinear - Elapsed time: 0.003673s
15.70/8.65	[23189 : 23218]
15.70/8.65	[23189 : 23219]
15.70/8.65	Successful child: 23218
15.70/8.65	[ Invariant Graph ]
15.70/8.65	Strengthening and disabling transitions...
15.70/8.65	
15.70/8.65	LOG: CALL solverLinear in Graph for feasibility
15.70/8.65	
15.70/8.65	LOG: RETURN solveLinear in Graph for feasibility
15.70/8.65	It's unfeasible. Removing transition: 
15.70/8.65	<l2, l2, main_a <= 0 /\ main_a + main_bm <= main_b + main_am /\ main_b <= main_a /\ 1 + main_a + main_b + main_bm <= main_am /\ 1 + main_bm <= main_am, {main_bm -> main_b + main_bm, rest remain the same}>
15.70/8.65	[ Termination Graph ]
15.70/8.65	Strengthening and disabling transitions...
15.70/8.65	> It's unfeasible. Removing transition: 
15.70/8.65	<l2, l2, main_a <= 0 /\ main_a + main_bm <= main_b + main_am /\ main_b <= main_a /\ 1 + main_a + main_b + main_bm <= main_am /\ 1 + main_bm <= main_am, {main_bm -> main_b + main_bm, rest remain the same}>
15.70/8.65	New Graphs: 
15.70/8.65	
15.70/8.65	LOG: CALL check - Post:main_a <= 0 - Process 2
15.70/8.65	* Exit transition: <l0, l2, 1 <= main_a /\ main_a = main_am /\ main_b = main_bm, {all remain the same}>
15.70/8.65	* Postcondition  : main_a <= 0
15.70/8.65	
15.70/8.65	LOG: CALL solveLinear
15.70/8.65	
15.70/8.65	LOG: RETURN solveLinear - Elapsed time: 0.001139s
15.70/8.65	> Postcondition is not implied!
15.70/8.65	
15.70/8.65	LOG: RETURN check - Elapsed time: 0.001235s
15.70/8.65	INVARIANTS: 
15.70/8.65	2: 
15.70/8.65	Quasi-INVARIANTS to narrow Graph: 
15.70/8.65	2: main_a <= 0 , 
15.70/8.65	[23189 : 23223]
15.70/8.65	[23189 : 23224]
15.70/8.65	INVARIANTS: 
15.70/8.65	2: 
15.70/8.65	Quasi-INVARIANTS to narrow Graph: 
15.70/8.65	2: main_b <= main_a , 
15.70/8.65	INVARIANTS: 
15.70/8.65	2: main_a + main_bm <= main_b + main_am , 
15.70/8.65	Quasi-INVARIANTS to narrow Graph: 
15.70/8.65	2: 
15.70/8.65	[23189 : 23225]
15.70/8.65	[23189 : 23226]
15.70/8.65	INVARIANTS: 
15.70/8.65	2: 
15.70/8.65	Quasi-INVARIANTS to narrow Graph: 
15.70/8.65	2: main_am <= main_bm , 
15.70/8.65	Narrowing transition: 
15.70/8.65	<l2, l2, main_a <= 0 /\ main_a + main_bm <= main_b + main_am /\ 1 + main_a <= main_b /\ 1 + main_am <= main_bm, {main_am -> main_a + main_am, rest remain the same}>
15.70/8.65	
15.70/8.65	LOG: Narrow transition size 3
15.70/8.65	It's unfeasible. Removing transition: 
15.70/8.65	<l2, l2, main_a <= 0 /\ 1 + main_b + main_am <= main_a + main_bm /\ 1 + main_am <= main_bm, {main_am -> main_a + main_am, rest remain the same}>
15.70/8.65	Narrowing transition: 
15.70/8.65	<l2, l2, 1 <= main_a /\ 1 + main_am <= main_bm, {main_am -> main_a + main_am, rest remain the same}>
15.70/8.65	
15.70/8.65	LOG: Narrow transition size 3
15.70/8.65	Narrowing transition: 
15.70/8.65	<l2, l2, main_a <= 0 /\ main_a + main_bm <= main_b + main_am /\ main_b <= main_a /\ 1 + main_a + main_b + main_bm <= main_am /\ 1 + main_bm <= main_am, {main_bm -> main_b + main_bm, rest remain the same}>
15.70/8.65	
15.70/8.65	LOG: Narrow transition size 3
15.70/8.65	Narrowing transition: 
15.70/8.65	<l2, l2, main_a <= 0 /\ main_a + main_bm <= main_b + main_am /\ 1 + main_a <= main_b /\ 1 + main_bm <= main_am, {main_bm -> main_b + main_bm, rest remain the same}>
15.70/8.65	
15.70/8.65	LOG: Narrow transition size 3
15.70/8.65	It's unfeasible. Removing transition: 
15.70/8.65	<l2, l2, main_a <= 0 /\ 1 + main_b + main_am <= main_a + main_bm /\ 1 + main_bm <= main_am, {main_bm -> main_b + main_bm, rest remain the same}>
15.70/8.65	Narrowing transition: 
15.70/8.65	<l2, l2, 1 <= main_a /\ 1 + main_bm <= main_am, {main_bm -> main_b + main_bm, rest remain the same}>
15.70/8.65	
15.70/8.65	LOG: Narrow transition size 3
15.70/8.65	invGraph after Narrowing: 
15.70/8.65	Transitions:
15.70/8.65	<l2, l2, main_a <= 0 /\ main_a + main_bm <= main_b + main_am /\ 1 + main_a <= main_b /\ 1 + main_am <= main_bm, {main_am -> main_a + main_am, rest remain the same}>
15.70/8.65	<l2, l2, main_a + main_bm <= main_b + main_am /\ 1 <= main_a /\ 1 + main_am <= main_bm, {main_am -> main_a + main_am, rest remain the same}>
15.70/8.65	<l2, l2, main_a <= 0 /\ main_a + main_bm <= main_b + main_am /\ main_b <= main_a /\ 1 + main_a + main_b + main_bm <= main_am /\ 1 + main_bm <= main_am, {main_bm -> main_b + main_bm, rest remain the same}>
15.70/8.65	<l2, l2, main_a <= 0 /\ main_a + main_bm <= main_b + main_am /\ 1 + main_a <= main_b /\ 1 + main_bm <= main_am, {main_bm -> main_b + main_bm, rest remain the same}>
15.70/8.65	<l2, l2, main_a + main_bm <= main_b + main_am /\ 1 <= main_a /\ 1 + main_bm <= main_am, {main_bm -> main_b + main_bm, rest remain the same}>
15.70/8.65	Variables:
15.70/8.65	main_a, main_am, main_bm, main_b
15.70/8.65	Checking conditional termination of SCC {l2}...
15.70/8.65	
15.70/8.65	LOG: CALL solveLinear
15.70/8.65	
15.70/8.65	LOG: RETURN solveLinear - Elapsed time: 0.003425s
15.70/8.65	
15.70/8.65	LOG: CALL solveLinear
15.70/8.65	
15.70/8.65	LOG: RETURN solveLinear - Elapsed time: 0.052022s
15.70/8.65	[23189 : 23227]
15.70/8.65	[23189 : 23228]
15.70/8.65	Successful child: 23227
15.70/8.65	[ Invariant Graph ]
15.70/8.65	Strengthening and disabling transitions...
15.70/8.65	
15.70/8.65	LOG: CALL solverLinear in Graph for feasibility
15.70/8.65	
15.70/8.65	LOG: RETURN solveLinear in Graph for feasibility
15.70/8.65	Strengthening transition (result): 
15.70/8.65	<l2, l2, main_a <= 0 /\ main_a + main_bm <= main_b + main_am /\ 1 + main_a <= main_b /\ 1 + main_am <= main_bm, {main_am -> main_a + main_am, rest remain the same}>
15.70/8.65	
15.70/8.65	LOG: CALL solverLinear in Graph for feasibility
15.70/8.65	
15.70/8.65	LOG: RETURN solveLinear in Graph for feasibility
15.70/8.65	It's unfeasible. Removing transition: 
15.70/8.65	<l2, l2, main_a + main_bm <= main_b + main_am /\ 1 <= main_a /\ 1 + main_am <= main_bm, {main_am -> main_a + main_am, rest remain the same}>
15.70/8.65	
15.70/8.65	LOG: CALL solverLinear in Graph for feasibility
15.70/8.65	
15.70/8.65	LOG: RETURN solveLinear in Graph for feasibility
15.70/8.65	Strengthening transition (result): 
15.70/8.65	<l2, l2, main_a <= 0 /\ main_a + main_bm <= main_b + main_am /\ main_b <= main_a /\ 1 + main_a + main_b + main_bm <= main_am /\ 1 + main_bm <= main_am, {main_bm -> main_b + main_bm, rest remain the same}>
15.70/8.65	
15.70/8.65	LOG: CALL solverLinear in Graph for feasibility
15.70/8.65	
15.70/8.65	LOG: RETURN solveLinear in Graph for feasibility
15.70/8.65	Strengthening transition (result): 
15.70/8.65	<l2, l2, main_a <= 0 /\ main_a + main_bm <= main_b + main_am /\ 1 + main_a <= main_b /\ 1 + main_bm <= main_am, {main_bm -> main_b + main_bm, rest remain the same}>
15.70/8.65	
15.70/8.65	LOG: CALL solverLinear in Graph for feasibility
15.70/8.65	
15.70/8.65	LOG: RETURN solveLinear in Graph for feasibility
15.70/8.65	It's unfeasible. Removing transition: 
15.70/8.65	<l2, l2, main_a + main_bm <= main_b + main_am /\ 1 <= main_a /\ 1 + main_bm <= main_am, {main_bm -> main_b + main_bm, rest remain the same}>
15.70/8.65	[ Termination Graph ]
15.70/8.65	Strengthening and disabling transitions...
15.70/8.65	
15.70/8.65	LOG: CALL solverLinear in Graph for feasibility
15.70/8.65	
15.70/8.65	LOG: RETURN solveLinear in Graph for feasibility
15.70/8.65	Strengthening transition (result): 
15.70/8.65	<l2, l2, main_a <= 0 /\ main_a + main_bm <= main_b + main_am /\ 1 + main_a <= main_b /\ 1 + main_am <= main_bm, {main_am -> main_a + main_am, rest remain the same}>
15.70/8.65	
15.70/8.65	LOG: CALL solverLinear in Graph for feasibility
15.70/8.65	
15.70/8.65	LOG: RETURN solveLinear in Graph for feasibility
15.70/8.65	It's unfeasible. Removing transition: 
15.70/8.65	<l2, l2, main_a + main_bm <= main_b + main_am /\ 1 <= main_a /\ 1 + main_am <= main_bm, {main_am -> main_a + main_am, rest remain the same}>
15.70/8.65	
15.70/8.65	LOG: CALL solverLinear in Graph for feasibility
15.70/8.65	
15.70/8.65	LOG: RETURN solveLinear in Graph for feasibility
15.70/8.65	Strengthening transition (result): 
15.70/8.65	<l2, l2, main_a <= 0 /\ main_a + main_bm <= main_b + main_am /\ main_b <= main_a /\ 1 + main_a + main_b + main_bm <= main_am /\ 1 + main_bm <= main_am, {main_bm -> main_b + main_bm, rest remain the same}>
15.70/8.65	
15.70/8.65	LOG: CALL solverLinear in Graph for feasibility
15.70/8.65	
15.70/8.65	LOG: RETURN solveLinear in Graph for feasibility
15.70/8.65	Strengthening transition (result): 
15.70/8.65	<l2, l2, main_a <= 0 /\ main_a + main_bm <= main_b + main_am /\ 1 + main_a <= main_b /\ 1 + main_bm <= main_am, {main_bm -> main_b + main_bm, rest remain the same}>
15.70/8.65	
15.70/8.65	LOG: CALL solverLinear in Graph for feasibility
15.70/8.65	
15.70/8.65	LOG: RETURN solveLinear in Graph for feasibility
15.70/8.65	It's unfeasible. Removing transition: 
15.70/8.65	<l2, l2, main_a + main_bm <= main_b + main_am /\ 1 <= main_a /\ 1 + main_bm <= main_am, {main_bm -> main_b + main_bm, rest remain the same}>
15.70/8.65	New Graphs: 
15.70/8.65	Transitions:
15.70/8.65	<l2, l2, main_a <= 0 /\ main_a + main_bm <= main_b + main_am /\ 1 + main_a <= main_b /\ 1 + main_am <= main_bm, {main_am -> main_a + main_am, rest remain the same}>
15.70/8.65	<l2, l2, main_a <= 0 /\ main_a + main_bm <= main_b + main_am /\ main_b <= main_a /\ 1 + main_a + main_b + main_bm <= main_am /\ 1 + main_bm <= main_am, {main_bm -> main_b + main_bm, rest remain the same}>
15.70/8.65	<l2, l2, main_a <= 0 /\ main_a + main_bm <= main_b + main_am /\ 1 + main_a <= main_b /\ 1 + main_bm <= main_am, {main_bm -> main_b + main_bm, rest remain the same}>
15.70/8.65	Variables:
15.70/8.65	main_a, main_b, main_am, main_bm
15.70/8.65	Checking conditional termination of SCC {l2}...
15.70/8.65	
15.70/8.65	LOG: CALL solveLinear
15.70/8.65	
15.70/8.65	LOG: RETURN solveLinear - Elapsed time: 0.002332s
15.70/8.65	
15.70/8.65	LOG: CALL solveLinear
15.70/8.65	
15.70/8.65	LOG: RETURN solveLinear - Elapsed time: 0.015685s
15.70/8.65	[23189 : 23232]
15.70/8.65	[23189 : 23233]
15.70/8.65	Successful child: 23232
15.70/8.65	[ Invariant Graph ]
15.70/8.65	Strengthening and disabling transitions...
15.70/8.65	
15.70/8.65	LOG: CALL solverLinear in Graph for feasibility
15.70/8.65	
15.70/8.65	LOG: RETURN solveLinear in Graph for feasibility
15.70/8.65	It's unfeasible. Removing transition: 
15.70/8.65	<l2, l2, main_a <= 0 /\ main_a + main_bm <= main_b + main_am /\ 1 + main_a <= main_b /\ 1 + main_am <= main_bm, {main_am -> main_a + main_am, rest remain the same}>
15.70/8.65	
15.70/8.65	LOG: CALL solverLinear in Graph for feasibility
15.70/8.65	
15.70/8.65	LOG: RETURN solveLinear in Graph for feasibility
15.70/8.65	Strengthening transition (result): 
15.70/8.65	<l2, l2, main_a <= 0 /\ main_a + main_bm <= main_b + main_am /\ main_b <= main_a /\ 1 + main_a + main_b + main_bm <= main_am /\ 1 + main_bm <= main_am, {main_bm -> main_b + main_bm, rest remain the same}>
15.70/8.65	
15.70/8.65	LOG: CALL solverLinear in Graph for feasibility
15.70/8.65	
15.70/8.65	LOG: RETURN solveLinear in Graph for feasibility
15.70/8.65	It's unfeasible. Removing transition: 
15.70/8.65	<l2, l2, main_a <= 0 /\ main_a + main_bm <= main_b + main_am /\ 1 + main_a <= main_b /\ 1 + main_bm <= main_am, {main_bm -> main_b + main_bm, rest remain the same}>
15.70/8.65	[ Termination Graph ]
15.70/8.65	Strengthening and disabling transitions...
15.70/8.65	
15.70/8.65	LOG: CALL solverLinear in Graph for feasibility
15.70/8.65	
15.70/8.65	LOG: RETURN solveLinear in Graph for feasibility
15.70/8.65	It's unfeasible. Removing transition: 
15.70/8.65	<l2, l2, main_a <= 0 /\ main_a + main_bm <= main_b + main_am /\ 1 + main_a <= main_b /\ 1 + main_am <= main_bm, {main_am -> main_a + main_am, rest remain the same}>
15.70/8.65	
15.70/8.65	LOG: CALL solverLinear in Graph for feasibility
15.70/8.65	
15.70/8.65	LOG: RETURN solveLinear in Graph for feasibility
15.70/8.65	Strengthening transition (result): 
15.70/8.65	<l2, l2, main_a <= 0 /\ main_a + main_bm <= main_b + main_am /\ main_b <= main_a /\ 1 + main_a + main_b + main_bm <= main_am /\ 1 + main_bm <= main_am, {main_bm -> main_b + main_bm, rest remain the same}>
15.70/8.65	
15.70/8.65	LOG: CALL solverLinear in Graph for feasibility
15.70/8.65	
15.70/8.65	LOG: RETURN solveLinear in Graph for feasibility
15.70/8.65	It's unfeasible. Removing transition: 
15.70/8.65	<l2, l2, main_a <= 0 /\ main_a + main_bm <= main_b + main_am /\ 1 + main_a <= main_b /\ 1 + main_bm <= main_am, {main_bm -> main_b + main_bm, rest remain the same}>
15.70/8.65	New Graphs: 
15.70/8.65	Transitions:
15.70/8.65	<l2, l2, main_a <= 0 /\ main_a + main_bm <= main_b + main_am /\ main_b <= main_a /\ 1 + main_a + main_b + main_bm <= main_am /\ 1 + main_bm <= main_am, {main_bm -> main_b + main_bm, rest remain the same}>
15.70/8.65	Variables:
15.70/8.65	main_a, main_b, main_am, main_bm
15.70/8.65	Checking conditional termination of SCC {l2}...
15.70/8.65	
15.70/8.65	LOG: CALL solveLinear
15.70/8.65	
15.70/8.65	LOG: RETURN solveLinear - Elapsed time: 0.000952s
15.70/8.65	
15.70/8.65	LOG: CALL solveLinear
15.70/8.65	
15.70/8.65	LOG: RETURN solveLinear - Elapsed time: 0.003742s
15.70/8.65	[23189 : 23237]
15.70/8.65	[23189 : 23238]
15.70/8.65	Solving with 1 template(s).
15.70/8.65	
15.70/8.65	LOG: CALL solveNonLinearGetFirstSolution
15.70/8.65	
15.70/8.65	LOG: RETURN solveNonLinearGetFirstSolution - Elapsed time: 0.012784s
15.70/8.65	Time used: 0.011867
15.70/8.65	
15.70/8.65	[23189 : 23242]
15.70/8.65	[23189 : 23246]
15.70/8.65	Successful child: 23242
15.70/8.65	
15.70/8.65	Program does NOT terminate
15.70/8.66	EOF