4.52/1.97 YES 4.52/1.98 proof of /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.c 4.52/1.98 # AProVE Commit ID: 48fb2092695e11cc9f56e44b17a92a5f88ffb256 marcel 20180622 unpublished dirty 4.52/1.98 4.52/1.98 4.52/1.98 Termination of the given C Problem could be proven: 4.52/1.98 4.52/1.98 (0) C Problem 4.52/1.98 (1) CToIRSProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] 4.52/1.98 (2) IntTRS 4.52/1.98 (3) TerminationGraphProcessor [SOUND, 46 ms] 4.52/1.98 (4) IntTRS 4.52/1.98 (5) IntTRSCompressionProof [EQUIVALENT, 28 ms] 4.52/1.98 (6) IntTRS 4.52/1.98 (7) IntTRSUnneededArgumentFilterProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] 4.52/1.98 (8) IntTRS 4.52/1.98 (9) PolynomialOrderProcessor [EQUIVALENT, 15 ms] 4.52/1.98 (10) YES 4.52/1.98 4.52/1.98 4.52/1.98 ---------------------------------------- 4.52/1.98 4.52/1.98 (0) 4.52/1.98 Obligation: 4.52/1.98 c file /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.c 4.52/1.98 ---------------------------------------- 4.52/1.98 4.52/1.98 (1) CToIRSProof (EQUIVALENT) 4.52/1.98 Parsed C Integer Program as IRS. 4.52/1.98 ---------------------------------------- 4.52/1.98 4.52/1.98 (2) 4.52/1.98 Obligation: 4.52/1.98 Rules: 4.52/1.98 f1(x, y) -> f2(x_1, y) :|: TRUE 4.52/1.98 f2(x1, x2) -> f3(x1, x3) :|: TRUE 4.52/1.98 f4(x4, x5) -> f5(arith, x5) :|: TRUE && arith = x4 - x5 4.52/1.98 f5(x6, x7) -> f6(x6, x8) :|: TRUE 4.52/1.98 f3(x9, x10) -> f4(x9, x10) :|: x9 > x10 && x10 >= 1 && x10 <= 2 4.52/1.98 f6(x11, x12) -> f3(x11, x12) :|: TRUE 4.52/1.98 f3(x13, x14) -> f7(x13, x14) :|: x14 > 2 4.52/1.98 f3(x15, x16) -> f7(x15, x16) :|: x15 <= x16 4.52/1.98 f3(x17, x18) -> f7(x17, x18) :|: x18 < 1 4.52/1.98 Start term: f1(x, y) 4.52/1.98 4.52/1.98 ---------------------------------------- 4.52/1.98 4.52/1.98 (3) TerminationGraphProcessor (SOUND) 4.52/1.98 Constructed the termination graph and obtained one non-trivial SCC. 4.52/1.98 4.52/1.98 ---------------------------------------- 4.52/1.98 4.52/1.98 (4) 4.52/1.98 Obligation: 4.52/1.98 Rules: 4.52/1.98 f3(x9, x10) -> f4(x9, x10) :|: x9 > x10 && x10 >= 1 && x10 <= 2 4.52/1.98 f6(x11, x12) -> f3(x11, x12) :|: TRUE 4.52/1.98 f5(x6, x7) -> f6(x6, x8) :|: TRUE 4.52/1.98 f4(x4, x5) -> f5(arith, x5) :|: TRUE && arith = x4 - x5 4.52/1.98 4.52/1.98 ---------------------------------------- 4.52/1.98 4.52/1.98 (5) IntTRSCompressionProof (EQUIVALENT) 4.52/1.98 Compressed rules. 4.52/1.98 ---------------------------------------- 4.52/1.98 4.52/1.98 (6) 4.52/1.98 Obligation: 4.52/1.98 Rules: 4.52/1.98 f5(x6:0, x7:0) -> f5(x6:0 - x8:0, x8:0) :|: x8:0 < x6:0 && x8:0 > 0 && x8:0 < 3 4.52/1.98 4.52/1.98 ---------------------------------------- 4.52/1.98 4.52/1.98 (7) IntTRSUnneededArgumentFilterProof (EQUIVALENT) 4.52/1.98 Some arguments are removed because they cannot influence termination. We removed arguments according to the following replacements: 4.52/1.98 4.52/1.98 f5(x1, x2) -> f5(x1) 4.52/1.98 4.52/1.98 ---------------------------------------- 4.52/1.98 4.52/1.98 (8) 4.52/1.98 Obligation: 4.52/1.98 Rules: 4.52/1.98 f5(x6:0) -> f5(x6:0 - x8:0) :|: x8:0 < x6:0 && x8:0 > 0 && x8:0 < 3 4.52/1.98 4.52/1.98 ---------------------------------------- 4.52/1.98 4.52/1.98 (9) PolynomialOrderProcessor (EQUIVALENT) 4.52/1.98 Found the following polynomial interpretation: 4.52/1.98 [f5(x)] = x 4.52/1.98 4.52/1.98 The following rules are decreasing: 4.52/1.98 f5(x6:0) -> f5(x6:0 - x8:0) :|: x8:0 < x6:0 && x8:0 > 0 && x8:0 < 3 4.52/1.98 The following rules are bounded: 4.52/1.98 f5(x6:0) -> f5(x6:0 - x8:0) :|: x8:0 < x6:0 && x8:0 > 0 && x8:0 < 3 4.52/1.98 4.52/1.98 ---------------------------------------- 4.52/1.98 4.52/1.98 (10) 4.52/1.98 YES 4.52/1.99 EOF