18.80/18.87	NO
18.80/18.87	
18.80/18.87	Solver Timeout: 4
18.80/18.87	Global Timeout: 300
18.80/18.87	No parsing errors!
18.80/18.87	Init Location: 0
18.80/18.87	Transitions:
18.80/18.87	<l0, l4, true>
18.80/18.87	<l1, l2, ((1 + y^0) <= (0 + __const_2000^0)) /\ (undef5 = ((0 + __const_1000^0) + x^0)) /\ ((1 + __const_110^0) <= (0 + undef5)), par{x^0 -> undef5}>
18.80/18.87	<l2, l1, true>
18.80/18.87	<l3, l1, true, par{y^0 -> (0 + __const_3000^0)}>
18.80/18.87	<l4, l3, true>
18.80/18.87	
18.80/18.87	Fresh variables:
18.80/18.87	undef5, 
18.80/18.87	
18.80/18.87	Undef variables:
18.80/18.87	undef5, 
18.80/18.87	
18.80/18.87	Abstraction variables:
18.80/18.87	
18.80/18.87	Exit nodes:
18.80/18.87	
18.80/18.87	Accepting locations:
18.80/18.87	
18.80/18.87	Asserts:
18.80/18.87	
18.80/18.87	Preprocessed LLVMGraph
18.80/18.87	Init Location: 0
18.80/18.87	Transitions:
18.80/18.87	<l0, l1, (y^0 = (0 + y^0))>
18.80/18.87	<l1, l1, ((1 + y^0) <= (0 + __const_2000^0)) /\ (undef5 = ((0 + __const_1000^0) + x^0)) /\ ((1 + __const_110^0) <= (0 + undef5)), par{x^0 -> undef5}>
18.80/18.87	
18.80/18.87	Fresh variables:
18.80/18.87	undef5, 
18.80/18.87	
18.80/18.87	Undef variables:
18.80/18.87	undef5, 
18.80/18.87	
18.80/18.87	Abstraction variables:
18.80/18.87	
18.80/18.87	Exit nodes:
18.80/18.87	
18.80/18.87	Accepting locations:
18.80/18.87	
18.80/18.87	Asserts:
18.80/18.87	
18.80/18.87	*************************************************************
18.80/18.87	*******************************************************************************************
18.80/18.87	***********************       WORKING TRANSITION SYSTEM (DAG)       ***********************
18.80/18.87	*******************************************************************************************
18.80/18.87	
18.80/18.87	Init Location: 0
18.80/18.87	Graph 0:
18.80/18.87	Transitions:
18.80/18.87	Variables:
18.80/18.87	
18.80/18.87	Graph 1:
18.80/18.87	Transitions:
18.80/18.87	<l1, l1, 1 + __const_110^0 <= undef5 /\ 1 + y^0 <= __const_2000^0 /\ __const_1000^0 + x^0 = undef5, {x^0 -> undef5, rest remain the same}>
18.80/18.87	Variables:
18.80/18.87	__const_1000^0, __const_110^0, __const_2000^0, x^0, y^0
18.80/18.87	
18.80/18.87	Precedence: 
18.80/18.87	Graph 0
18.80/18.87	
18.80/18.87	Graph 1
18.80/18.87	<l0, l1, true, {all remain the same}>
18.80/18.87	
18.80/18.87	Map Locations to Subgraph:
18.80/18.87	( 0 , 0 )
18.80/18.87	( 1 , 1 )
18.80/18.87	
18.80/18.87	*******************************************************************************************
18.80/18.87	********************************    CHECKING ASSERTIONS    ********************************
18.80/18.87	*******************************************************************************************
18.80/18.87	
18.80/18.87	Proving termination of subgraph 0
18.80/18.87	Proving termination of subgraph 1
18.80/18.87	Checking unfeasibility...
18.80/18.87	Time used: 0.003256
18.80/18.87	
18.80/18.87	Checking conditional termination of SCC {l1}...
18.80/18.87	
18.80/18.87	LOG: CALL solveLinear
18.80/18.87	
18.80/18.87	LOG: RETURN solveLinear - Elapsed time: 0.000786s
18.80/18.87	
18.80/18.87	LOG: CALL solveLinear
18.80/18.87	
18.80/18.87	LOG: RETURN solveLinear - Elapsed time: 0.003133s
18.80/18.87	Trying to remove transition: <l1, l1, 1 + __const_110^0 <= undef5 /\ 1 + y^0 <= __const_2000^0 /\ __const_1000^0 + x^0 = undef5, {x^0 -> undef5, rest remain the same}>
18.80/18.87	Solving with 1 template(s).
18.80/18.87	
18.80/18.87	LOG: CALL solveNonLinearGetFirstSolution
18.80/18.87	
18.80/18.87	LOG: RETURN solveNonLinearGetFirstSolution - Elapsed time: 0.011988s
18.80/18.87	Time used: 0.011755
18.80/18.87	Solving with 1 template(s).
18.80/18.87	
18.80/18.87	LOG: CALL solveNonLinearGetFirstSolution
18.80/18.87	
18.80/18.87	LOG: RETURN solveNonLinearGetFirstSolution - Elapsed time: 0.013382s
18.80/18.87	Time used: 0.012666
18.80/18.87	Improving Solution with cost 1 ...
18.80/18.87	
18.80/18.87	LOG: CALL solveNonLinearGetNextSolution
18.80/18.87	
18.80/18.87	LOG: RETURN solveNonLinearGetNextSolution - Elapsed time: 0.018273s
18.80/18.87	Time used: 0.018265
18.80/18.87	
18.80/18.87	LOG: SAT solveNonLinear - Elapsed time: 0.031655s
18.80/18.87	Cost: 1; Total time: 0.030931
18.80/18.87	Failed at location 1: __const_2000^0 <= y^0
18.80/18.87	Before Improving: 
18.80/18.87	Quasi-invariant at l1: __const_2000^0 <= y^0
18.80/18.87	Optimizing invariants...
18.80/18.87	
18.80/18.87	LOG: CALL solveLinear
18.80/18.87	
18.80/18.87	LOG: RETURN solveLinear - Elapsed time: 0.003410s
18.80/18.87	Remaining time after improvement: 0.998589
18.80/18.87	Termination implied by a set of quasi-invariant(s):
18.80/18.87	Quasi-invariant at l1: __const_2000^0 <= y^0
18.80/18.87	[ Invariant Graph ]
18.80/18.87	Strengthening and disabling transitions...
18.80/18.87	
18.80/18.87	LOG: CALL solverLinear in Graph for feasibility
18.80/18.87	
18.80/18.87	LOG: RETURN solveLinear in Graph for feasibility
18.80/18.87	It's unfeasible. Removing transition: 
18.80/18.87	<l1, l1, 1 + __const_110^0 <= undef5 /\ 1 + y^0 <= __const_2000^0 /\ __const_1000^0 + x^0 = undef5, {x^0 -> undef5, rest remain the same}>
18.80/18.87	[ Termination Graph ]
18.80/18.87	Strengthening and disabling transitions...
18.80/18.87	> It's unfeasible. Removing transition: 
18.80/18.87	<l1, l1, 1 + __const_110^0 <= undef5 /\ 1 + y^0 <= __const_2000^0 /\ __const_1000^0 + x^0 = undef5, {x^0 -> undef5, rest remain the same}>
18.80/18.87	New Graphs: 
18.80/18.87	Calling Safety with literal __const_2000^0 <= y^0 and entry <l0, l1, true, {all remain the same}>
18.80/18.87	
18.80/18.87	LOG: CALL check - Post:__const_2000^0 <= y^0 - Process 1
18.80/18.87	* Exit transition: <l0, l1, true, {all remain the same}>
18.80/18.87	* Postcondition  : __const_2000^0 <= y^0
18.80/18.87	
18.80/18.87	LOG: CALL solveLinear
18.80/18.87	
18.80/18.87	LOG: RETURN solveLinear - Elapsed time: 0.000452s
18.80/18.87	> Postcondition is not implied!
18.80/18.87	
18.80/18.87	LOG: RETURN check - Elapsed time: 0.000538s
18.80/18.87	INVARIANTS: 
18.80/18.87	1: 
18.80/18.87	Quasi-INVARIANTS to narrow Graph: 
18.80/18.87	1: __const_2000^0 <= y^0 , 
18.80/18.87	Narrowing transition: 
18.80/18.87	<l1, l1, 1 + __const_110^0 <= undef5 /\ 1 + y^0 <= __const_2000^0 /\ __const_1000^0 + x^0 = undef5, {x^0 -> undef5, rest remain the same}>
18.80/18.87	
18.80/18.87	LOG: Narrow transition size 1
18.80/18.87	invGraph after Narrowing: 
18.80/18.87	Transitions:
18.80/18.87	<l1, l1, 1 + __const_110^0 <= undef5 /\ 1 + y^0 <= __const_2000^0 /\ __const_1000^0 + x^0 = undef5, {x^0 -> undef5, rest remain the same}>
18.80/18.87	Variables:
18.80/18.87	__const_1000^0, __const_110^0, __const_2000^0, x^0, y^0
18.80/18.87	Checking conditional termination of SCC {l1}...
18.80/18.87	
18.80/18.87	LOG: CALL solveLinear
18.80/18.87	
18.80/18.87	LOG: RETURN solveLinear - Elapsed time: 0.000711s
18.80/18.87	
18.80/18.87	LOG: CALL solveLinear
18.80/18.87	
18.80/18.87	LOG: RETURN solveLinear - Elapsed time: 0.003000s
18.80/18.87	Trying to remove transition: <l1, l1, 1 + __const_110^0 <= undef5 /\ 1 + y^0 <= __const_2000^0 /\ __const_1000^0 + x^0 = undef5, {x^0 -> undef5, rest remain the same}>
18.80/18.87	Solving with 1 template(s).
18.80/18.87	
18.80/18.87	LOG: CALL solveNonLinearGetFirstSolution
18.80/18.87	
18.80/18.87	LOG: RETURN solveNonLinearGetFirstSolution - Elapsed time: 0.010081s
18.80/18.87	Time used: 0.009888
18.80/18.87	Solving with 1 template(s).
18.80/18.87	
18.80/18.87	LOG: CALL solveNonLinearGetFirstSolution
18.80/18.87	
18.80/18.87	LOG: RETURN solveNonLinearGetFirstSolution - Elapsed time: 0.012605s
18.80/18.87	Time used: 0.011795
18.80/18.87	Improving Solution with cost 1 ...
18.80/18.87	
18.80/18.87	LOG: CALL solveNonLinearGetNextSolution
18.80/18.87	
18.80/18.87	LOG: RETURN solveNonLinearGetNextSolution - Elapsed time: 0.016956s
18.80/18.87	Time used: 0.016949
18.80/18.87	
18.80/18.87	LOG: SAT solveNonLinear - Elapsed time: 0.029562s
18.80/18.87	Cost: 1; Total time: 0.028744
18.80/18.87	Failed at location 1: __const_1000^0 + __const_2000^0 <= y^0
18.80/18.87	Before Improving: 
18.80/18.87	Quasi-invariant at l1: __const_1000^0 + __const_2000^0 <= y^0
18.80/18.87	Optimizing invariants...
18.80/18.87	
18.80/18.87	LOG: CALL solveLinear
18.80/18.87	
18.80/18.87	LOG: RETURN solveLinear - Elapsed time: 0.003377s
18.80/18.87	Remaining time after improvement: 0.998556
18.80/18.87	Termination implied by a set of quasi-invariant(s):
18.80/18.87	Quasi-invariant at l1: __const_1000^0 + __const_2000^0 <= y^0
18.80/18.87	[ Invariant Graph ]
18.80/18.87	Strengthening and disabling transitions...
18.80/18.87	
18.80/18.87	LOG: CALL solverLinear in Graph for feasibility
18.80/18.87	
18.80/18.87	LOG: RETURN solveLinear in Graph for feasibility
18.80/18.87	Strengthening transition (result): 
18.80/18.87	<l1, l1, 1 + __const_110^0 <= undef5 /\ 1 + y^0 <= __const_2000^0 /\ __const_1000^0 + __const_2000^0 <= y^0 /\ __const_1000^0 + x^0 = undef5, {x^0 -> undef5, rest remain the same}>
18.80/18.87	[ Termination Graph ]
18.80/18.87	Strengthening and disabling transitions...
18.80/18.87	
18.80/18.87	LOG: CALL solverLinear in Graph for feasibility
18.80/18.87	
18.80/18.87	LOG: RETURN solveLinear in Graph for feasibility
18.80/18.87	Strengthening transition (result): 
18.80/18.87	<l1, l1, 1 + __const_110^0 <= undef5 /\ 1 + y^0 <= __const_2000^0 /\ __const_1000^0 + __const_2000^0 <= y^0 /\ __const_1000^0 + x^0 = undef5, {x^0 -> undef5, rest remain the same}>
18.80/18.87	Ranking function: __const_1000^0 - __const_110^0 + x^0
18.80/18.87	New Graphs: 
18.80/18.87	Calling Safety with literal __const_1000^0 + __const_2000^0 <= y^0 and entry <l0, l1, 1 + y^0 <= __const_2000^0, {all remain the same}>
18.80/18.87	
18.80/18.87	LOG: CALL check - Post:__const_1000^0 + __const_2000^0 <= y^0 - Process 2
18.80/18.87	* Exit transition: <l0, l1, 1 + y^0 <= __const_2000^0, {all remain the same}>
18.80/18.87	* Postcondition  : __const_1000^0 + __const_2000^0 <= y^0
18.80/18.87	
18.80/18.87	LOG: CALL solveLinear
18.80/18.87	
18.80/18.87	LOG: RETURN solveLinear - Elapsed time: 0.000416s
18.80/18.87	> Postcondition is not implied!
18.80/18.87	
18.80/18.87	LOG: RETURN check - Elapsed time: 0.000502s
18.80/18.87	INVARIANTS: 
18.80/18.87	1: 
18.80/18.87	Quasi-INVARIANTS to narrow Graph: 
18.80/18.87	1: __const_1000^0 + __const_2000^0 <= y^0 , 
18.80/18.87	Narrowing transition: 
18.80/18.87	<l1, l1, 1 + __const_110^0 <= undef5 /\ 1 + y^0 <= __const_2000^0 /\ __const_1000^0 + x^0 = undef5, {x^0 -> undef5, rest remain the same}>
18.80/18.87	
18.80/18.87	LOG: Narrow transition size 1
18.80/18.87	invGraph after Narrowing: 
18.80/18.87	Transitions:
18.80/18.87	<l1, l1, 1 + y^0 <= __const_1000^0 + __const_2000^0 /\ 1 + __const_110^0 <= undef5 /\ 1 + y^0 <= __const_2000^0 /\ __const_1000^0 + x^0 = undef5, {x^0 -> undef5, rest remain the same}>
18.80/18.87	Variables:
18.80/18.87	__const_1000^0, __const_110^0, __const_2000^0, x^0, y^0
18.80/18.87	Checking conditional termination of SCC {l1}...
18.80/18.87	
18.80/18.87	LOG: CALL solveLinear
18.80/18.87	
18.80/18.87	LOG: RETURN solveLinear - Elapsed time: 0.000820s
18.80/18.87	
18.80/18.87	LOG: CALL solveLinear
18.80/18.87	
18.80/18.87	LOG: RETURN solveLinear - Elapsed time: 0.003538s
18.80/18.87	Trying to remove transition: <l1, l1, 1 + y^0 <= __const_1000^0 + __const_2000^0 /\ 1 + __const_110^0 <= undef5 /\ 1 + y^0 <= __const_2000^0 /\ __const_1000^0 + x^0 = undef5, {x^0 -> undef5, rest remain the same}>
18.80/18.87	Solving with 1 template(s).
18.80/18.87	
18.80/18.87	LOG: CALL solveNonLinearGetFirstSolution
18.80/18.87	
18.80/18.87	LOG: RETURN solveNonLinearGetFirstSolution - Elapsed time: 0.009946s
18.80/18.87	Time used: 0.009734
18.80/18.87	Solving with 1 template(s).
18.80/18.87	
18.80/18.87	LOG: CALL solveNonLinearGetFirstSolution
18.80/18.87	
18.80/18.87	LOG: RETURN solveNonLinearGetFirstSolution - Elapsed time: 0.017980s
18.80/18.87	Time used: 0.017169
18.80/18.87	Improving Solution with cost 1 ...
18.80/18.87	
18.80/18.87	LOG: CALL solveNonLinearGetNextSolution
18.80/18.87	
18.80/18.87	LOG: RETURN solveNonLinearGetNextSolution - Elapsed time: 0.014848s
18.80/18.87	Time used: 0.014841
18.80/18.87	
18.80/18.87	LOG: SAT solveNonLinear - Elapsed time: 0.032828s
18.80/18.87	Cost: 1; Total time: 0.03201
18.80/18.87	Failed at location 1: __const_1000^0 + __const_2000^0 + x^0 <= 1 + __const_110^0 + y^0
18.80/18.87	Before Improving: 
18.80/18.87	Quasi-invariant at l1: __const_1000^0 + __const_2000^0 + x^0 <= 1 + __const_110^0 + y^0
18.80/18.87	Optimizing invariants...
18.80/18.87	
18.80/18.87	LOG: CALL solveLinear
18.80/18.87	
18.80/18.87	LOG: RETURN solveLinear - Elapsed time: 0.003658s
18.80/18.87	Remaining time after improvement: 0.998286
18.80/18.87	Termination implied by a set of quasi-invariant(s):
18.80/18.87	Quasi-invariant at l1: __const_1000^0 + __const_2000^0 + x^0 <= 1 + __const_110^0 + y^0
18.80/18.87	[ Invariant Graph ]
18.80/18.87	Strengthening and disabling transitions...
18.80/18.87	
18.80/18.87	LOG: CALL solverLinear in Graph for feasibility
18.80/18.87	
18.80/18.87	LOG: RETURN solveLinear in Graph for feasibility
18.80/18.87	It's unfeasible. Removing transition: 
18.80/18.87	<l1, l1, 1 + y^0 <= __const_1000^0 + __const_2000^0 /\ 1 + __const_110^0 <= undef5 /\ 1 + y^0 <= __const_2000^0 /\ __const_1000^0 + x^0 = undef5, {x^0 -> undef5, rest remain the same}>
18.80/18.87	[ Termination Graph ]
18.80/18.87	Strengthening and disabling transitions...
18.80/18.87	
18.80/18.87	LOG: CALL solverLinear in Graph for feasibility
18.80/18.87	
18.80/18.87	LOG: RETURN solveLinear in Graph for feasibility
18.80/18.87	It's unfeasible. Removing transition: 
18.80/18.87	<l1, l1, 1 + y^0 <= __const_1000^0 + __const_2000^0 /\ 1 + __const_110^0 <= undef5 /\ 1 + y^0 <= __const_2000^0 /\ __const_1000^0 + x^0 = undef5, {x^0 -> undef5, rest remain the same}>
18.80/18.87	New Graphs: 
18.80/18.87	Calling Safety with literal __const_1000^0 + __const_2000^0 + x^0 <= 1 + __const_110^0 + y^0 and entry <l0, l1, 1 + y^0 <= __const_1000^0 + __const_2000^0 /\ 1 + y^0 <= __const_2000^0, {all remain the same}>
18.80/18.87	
18.80/18.87	LOG: CALL check - Post:__const_1000^0 + __const_2000^0 + x^0 <= 1 + __const_110^0 + y^0 - Process 3
18.80/18.87	* Exit transition: <l0, l1, 1 + y^0 <= __const_1000^0 + __const_2000^0 /\ 1 + y^0 <= __const_2000^0, {all remain the same}>
18.80/18.87	* Postcondition  : __const_1000^0 + __const_2000^0 + x^0 <= 1 + __const_110^0 + y^0
18.80/18.87	
18.80/18.87	LOG: CALL solveLinear
18.80/18.87	
18.80/18.87	LOG: RETURN solveLinear - Elapsed time: 0.000577s
18.80/18.87	> Postcondition is not implied!
18.80/18.87	
18.80/18.87	LOG: RETURN check - Elapsed time: 0.000692s
18.80/18.87	INVARIANTS: 
18.80/18.87	1: 
18.80/18.87	Quasi-INVARIANTS to narrow Graph: 
18.80/18.87	1: __const_1000^0 + __const_2000^0 + x^0 <= 1 + __const_110^0 + y^0 , 
18.80/18.87	Narrowing transition: 
18.80/18.87	<l1, l1, 1 + y^0 <= __const_1000^0 + __const_2000^0 /\ 1 + __const_110^0 <= undef5 /\ 1 + y^0 <= __const_2000^0 /\ __const_1000^0 + x^0 = undef5, {x^0 -> undef5, rest remain the same}>
18.80/18.87	
18.80/18.87	LOG: Narrow transition size 1
18.80/18.87	invGraph after Narrowing: 
18.80/18.87	Transitions:
18.80/18.87	<l1, l1, 1 + y^0 <= __const_1000^0 + __const_2000^0 /\ 1 + __const_110^0 <= undef5 /\ 1 + y^0 <= __const_2000^0 /\ 2 + __const_110^0 + y^0 <= __const_1000^0 + __const_2000^0 + x^0 /\ __const_1000^0 + x^0 = undef5, {x^0 -> undef5, rest remain the same}>
18.80/18.87	Variables:
18.80/18.87	__const_1000^0, __const_110^0, __const_2000^0, x^0, y^0
18.80/18.87	Checking conditional termination of SCC {l1}...
18.80/18.87	
18.80/18.87	LOG: CALL solveLinear
18.80/18.87	
18.80/18.87	LOG: RETURN solveLinear - Elapsed time: 0.000962s
18.80/18.87	
18.80/18.87	LOG: CALL solveLinear
18.80/18.87	
18.80/18.87	LOG: RETURN solveLinear - Elapsed time: 0.004110s
18.80/18.87	Trying to remove transition: <l1, l1, 1 + y^0 <= __const_1000^0 + __const_2000^0 /\ 1 + __const_110^0 <= undef5 /\ 1 + y^0 <= __const_2000^0 /\ 2 + __const_110^0 + y^0 <= __const_1000^0 + __const_2000^0 + x^0 /\ __const_1000^0 + x^0 = undef5, {x^0 -> undef5, rest remain the same}>
18.80/18.87	Solving with 1 template(s).
18.80/18.87	
18.80/18.87	LOG: CALL solveNonLinearGetFirstSolution
18.80/18.87	
18.80/18.87	LOG: RETURN solveNonLinearGetFirstSolution - Elapsed time: 0.011015s
18.80/18.87	Time used: 0.010787
18.80/18.87	Solving with 1 template(s).
18.80/18.87	
18.80/18.87	LOG: CALL solveNonLinearGetFirstSolution
18.80/18.87	
18.80/18.87	LOG: RETURN solveNonLinearGetFirstSolution - Elapsed time: 0.014808s
18.80/18.87	Time used: 0.013945
18.80/18.87	Improving Solution with cost 1 ...
18.80/18.87	
18.80/18.87	LOG: CALL solveNonLinearGetNextSolution
18.80/18.87	
18.80/18.87	LOG: RETURN solveNonLinearGetNextSolution - Elapsed time: 0.020594s
18.80/18.87	Time used: 0.020587
18.80/18.87	
18.80/18.87	LOG: SAT solveNonLinear - Elapsed time: 0.035403s
18.80/18.87	Cost: 1; Total time: 0.034532
18.80/18.87	Failed at location 1: 1 + __const_1000^0 <= 0
18.80/18.87	Before Improving: 
18.80/18.87	Quasi-invariant at l1: 1 + __const_1000^0 <= 0
18.80/18.87	Optimizing invariants...
18.80/18.87	
18.80/18.87	LOG: CALL solveLinear
18.80/18.87	
18.80/18.87	LOG: RETURN solveLinear - Elapsed time: 0.004041s
18.80/18.87	Remaining time after improvement: 0.998014
18.80/18.87	Termination implied by a set of quasi-invariant(s):
18.80/18.87	Quasi-invariant at l1: 1 + __const_1000^0 <= 0
18.80/18.87	[ Invariant Graph ]
18.80/18.87	Strengthening and disabling transitions...
18.80/18.87	
18.80/18.87	LOG: CALL solverLinear in Graph for feasibility
18.80/18.87	
18.80/18.87	LOG: RETURN solveLinear in Graph for feasibility
18.80/18.87	Strengthening transition (result): 
18.80/18.87	<l1, l1, 1 + __const_1000^0 <= 0 /\ 1 + y^0 <= __const_1000^0 + __const_2000^0 /\ 1 + __const_110^0 <= undef5 /\ 1 + y^0 <= __const_2000^0 /\ 2 + __const_110^0 + y^0 <= __const_1000^0 + __const_2000^0 + x^0 /\ __const_1000^0 + x^0 = undef5, {x^0 -> undef5, rest remain the same}>
18.80/18.87	[ Termination Graph ]
18.80/18.87	Strengthening and disabling transitions...
18.80/18.87	
18.80/18.87	LOG: CALL solverLinear in Graph for feasibility
18.80/18.87	
18.80/18.87	LOG: RETURN solveLinear in Graph for feasibility
18.80/18.87	Strengthening transition (result): 
18.80/18.87	<l1, l1, 1 + __const_1000^0 <= 0 /\ 1 + y^0 <= __const_1000^0 + __const_2000^0 /\ 1 + __const_110^0 <= undef5 /\ 1 + y^0 <= __const_2000^0 /\ 2 + __const_110^0 + y^0 <= __const_1000^0 + __const_2000^0 + x^0 /\ __const_1000^0 + x^0 = undef5, {x^0 -> undef5, rest remain the same}>
18.80/18.87	Ranking function: __const_1000^0 - __const_110^0 + x^0
18.80/18.87	New Graphs: 
18.80/18.87	Calling Safety with literal 1 + __const_1000^0 <= 0 and entry <l0, l1, 1 + y^0 <= __const_1000^0 + __const_2000^0 /\ 1 + y^0 <= __const_2000^0 /\ 2 + __const_110^0 + y^0 <= __const_1000^0 + __const_2000^0 + x^0, {all remain the same}>
18.80/18.87	
18.80/18.87	LOG: CALL check - Post:1 + __const_1000^0 <= 0 - Process 4
18.80/18.87	* Exit transition: <l0, l1, 1 + y^0 <= __const_1000^0 + __const_2000^0 /\ 1 + y^0 <= __const_2000^0 /\ 2 + __const_110^0 + y^0 <= __const_1000^0 + __const_2000^0 + x^0, {all remain the same}>
18.80/18.87	* Postcondition  : 1 + __const_1000^0 <= 0
18.80/18.87	
18.80/18.87	LOG: CALL solveLinear
18.80/18.87	
18.80/18.87	LOG: RETURN solveLinear - Elapsed time: 0.000554s
18.80/18.87	> Postcondition is not implied!
18.80/18.87	
18.80/18.87	LOG: RETURN check - Elapsed time: 0.000651s
18.80/18.87	INVARIANTS: 
18.80/18.87	1: 
18.80/18.87	Quasi-INVARIANTS to narrow Graph: 
18.80/18.87	1: 1 + __const_1000^0 <= 0 , 
18.80/18.87	Narrowing transition: 
18.80/18.87	<l1, l1, 1 + y^0 <= __const_1000^0 + __const_2000^0 /\ 1 + __const_110^0 <= undef5 /\ 1 + y^0 <= __const_2000^0 /\ 2 + __const_110^0 + y^0 <= __const_1000^0 + __const_2000^0 + x^0 /\ __const_1000^0 + x^0 = undef5, {x^0 -> undef5, rest remain the same}>
18.80/18.87	
18.80/18.87	LOG: Narrow transition size 1
18.80/18.87	invGraph after Narrowing: 
18.80/18.87	Transitions:
18.80/18.87	<l1, l1, 1 + y^0 <= __const_1000^0 + __const_2000^0 /\ 1 + __const_110^0 <= undef5 /\ 1 + y^0 <= __const_2000^0 /\ 0 <= __const_1000^0 /\ 2 + __const_110^0 + y^0 <= __const_1000^0 + __const_2000^0 + x^0 /\ __const_1000^0 + x^0 = undef5, {x^0 -> undef5, rest remain the same}>
18.80/18.87	Variables:
18.80/18.87	__const_1000^0, __const_110^0, __const_2000^0, x^0, y^0
18.80/18.87	Checking conditional termination of SCC {l1}...
18.80/18.87	
18.80/18.87	LOG: CALL solveLinear
18.80/18.87	
18.80/18.87	LOG: RETURN solveLinear - Elapsed time: 0.001019s
18.80/18.87	
18.80/18.87	LOG: CALL solveLinear
18.80/18.87	
18.80/18.87	LOG: RETURN solveLinear - Elapsed time: 0.004361s
18.80/18.87	Trying to remove transition: <l1, l1, 1 + y^0 <= __const_1000^0 + __const_2000^0 /\ 1 + __const_110^0 <= undef5 /\ 1 + y^0 <= __const_2000^0 /\ 0 <= __const_1000^0 /\ 2 + __const_110^0 + y^0 <= __const_1000^0 + __const_2000^0 + x^0 /\ __const_1000^0 + x^0 = undef5, {x^0 -> undef5, rest remain the same}>
18.80/18.87	Solving with 1 template(s).
18.80/18.87	
18.80/18.87	LOG: CALL solveNonLinearGetFirstSolution
18.80/18.87	
18.80/18.87	LOG: RETURN solveNonLinearGetFirstSolution - Elapsed time: 0.010761s
18.80/18.87	Time used: 0.010535
18.80/18.87	Solving with 1 template(s).
18.80/18.87	
18.80/18.87	LOG: CALL solveNonLinearGetFirstSolution
18.80/18.87	
18.80/18.87	LOG: RETURN solveNonLinearGetFirstSolution - Elapsed time: 0.016690s
18.80/18.87	Time used: 0.015872
18.80/18.87	Improving Solution with cost 1 ...
18.80/18.87	
18.80/18.87	LOG: CALL solveNonLinearGetNextSolution
18.80/18.87	
18.80/18.87	LOG: RETURN solveNonLinearGetNextSolution - Elapsed time: 0.022430s
18.80/18.87	Time used: 0.022423
18.80/18.87	
18.80/18.87	LOG: SAT solveNonLinear - Elapsed time: 0.039120s
18.80/18.87	Cost: 1; Total time: 0.038295
18.80/18.87	Failed at location 1: __const_1000^0 + x^0 <= __const_110^0
18.80/18.87	Before Improving: 
18.80/18.87	Quasi-invariant at l1: __const_1000^0 + x^0 <= __const_110^0
18.80/18.87	Optimizing invariants...
18.80/18.87	
18.80/18.87	LOG: CALL solveLinear
18.80/18.87	
18.80/18.87	LOG: RETURN solveLinear - Elapsed time: 0.004360s
18.80/18.87	Remaining time after improvement: 0.997749
18.80/18.87	Termination implied by a set of quasi-invariant(s):
18.80/18.87	Quasi-invariant at l1: __const_1000^0 + x^0 <= __const_110^0
18.80/18.87	[ Invariant Graph ]
18.80/18.87	Strengthening and disabling transitions...
18.80/18.87	
18.80/18.87	LOG: CALL solverLinear in Graph for feasibility
18.80/18.87	
18.80/18.87	LOG: RETURN solveLinear in Graph for feasibility
18.80/18.87	It's unfeasible. Removing transition: 
18.80/18.87	<l1, l1, 1 + y^0 <= __const_1000^0 + __const_2000^0 /\ 1 + __const_110^0 <= undef5 /\ 1 + y^0 <= __const_2000^0 /\ 0 <= __const_1000^0 /\ 2 + __const_110^0 + y^0 <= __const_1000^0 + __const_2000^0 + x^0 /\ __const_1000^0 + x^0 = undef5, {x^0 -> undef5, rest remain the same}>
18.80/18.87	[ Termination Graph ]
18.80/18.87	Strengthening and disabling transitions...
18.80/18.87	> It's unfeasible. Removing transition: 
18.80/18.87	<l1, l1, 1 + y^0 <= __const_1000^0 + __const_2000^0 /\ 1 + __const_110^0 <= undef5 /\ 1 + y^0 <= __const_2000^0 /\ 0 <= __const_1000^0 /\ 2 + __const_110^0 + y^0 <= __const_1000^0 + __const_2000^0 + x^0 /\ __const_1000^0 + x^0 = undef5, {x^0 -> undef5, rest remain the same}>
18.80/18.87	New Graphs: 
18.80/18.87	Calling Safety with literal __const_1000^0 + x^0 <= __const_110^0 and entry <l0, l1, 1 + y^0 <= __const_1000^0 + __const_2000^0 /\ 1 + y^0 <= __const_2000^0 /\ 0 <= __const_1000^0 /\ 2 + __const_110^0 + y^0 <= __const_1000^0 + __const_2000^0 + x^0, {all remain the same}>
18.80/18.87	
18.80/18.87	LOG: CALL check - Post:__const_1000^0 + x^0 <= __const_110^0 - Process 5
18.80/18.87	* Exit transition: <l0, l1, 1 + y^0 <= __const_1000^0 + __const_2000^0 /\ 1 + y^0 <= __const_2000^0 /\ 0 <= __const_1000^0 /\ 2 + __const_110^0 + y^0 <= __const_1000^0 + __const_2000^0 + x^0, {all remain the same}>
18.80/18.87	* Postcondition  : __const_1000^0 + x^0 <= __const_110^0
18.80/18.87	
18.80/18.87	LOG: CALL solveLinear
18.80/18.87	
18.80/18.87	LOG: RETURN solveLinear - Elapsed time: 0.000752s
18.80/18.87	> Postcondition is not implied!
18.80/18.87	
18.80/18.87	LOG: RETURN check - Elapsed time: 0.000892s
18.80/18.87	INVARIANTS: 
18.80/18.87	1: 
18.80/18.87	Quasi-INVARIANTS to narrow Graph: 
18.80/18.87	1: __const_1000^0 + x^0 <= __const_110^0 , 
18.80/18.87	Narrowing transition: 
18.80/18.87	<l1, l1, 1 + y^0 <= __const_1000^0 + __const_2000^0 /\ 1 + __const_110^0 <= undef5 /\ 1 + y^0 <= __const_2000^0 /\ 0 <= __const_1000^0 /\ 2 + __const_110^0 + y^0 <= __const_1000^0 + __const_2000^0 + x^0 /\ __const_1000^0 + x^0 = undef5, {x^0 -> undef5, rest remain the same}>
18.80/18.87	
18.80/18.87	LOG: Narrow transition size 1
18.80/18.87	invGraph after Narrowing: 
18.80/18.87	Transitions:
18.80/18.87	<l1, l1, 1 + __const_110^0 <= __const_1000^0 + x^0 /\ 1 + y^0 <= __const_1000^0 + __const_2000^0 /\ 1 + __const_110^0 <= undef5 /\ 1 + y^0 <= __const_2000^0 /\ 0 <= __const_1000^0 /\ 2 + __const_110^0 + y^0 <= __const_1000^0 + __const_2000^0 + x^0 /\ __const_1000^0 + x^0 = undef5, {x^0 -> undef5, rest remain the same}>
18.80/18.87	Variables:
18.80/18.87	__const_1000^0, __const_110^0, __const_2000^0, x^0, y^0
18.80/18.87	Checking conditional termination of SCC {l1}...
18.80/18.87	
18.80/18.87	LOG: CALL solveLinear
18.80/18.87	
18.80/18.87	LOG: RETURN solveLinear - Elapsed time: 0.001132s
18.80/18.87	
18.80/18.87	LOG: CALL solveLinear
18.80/18.87	
18.80/18.87	LOG: RETURN solveLinear - Elapsed time: 0.004740s
18.80/18.87	Trying to remove transition: <l1, l1, 1 + __const_110^0 <= __const_1000^0 + x^0 /\ 1 + y^0 <= __const_1000^0 + __const_2000^0 /\ 1 + __const_110^0 <= undef5 /\ 1 + y^0 <= __const_2000^0 /\ 0 <= __const_1000^0 /\ 2 + __const_110^0 + y^0 <= __const_1000^0 + __const_2000^0 + x^0 /\ __const_1000^0 + x^0 = undef5, {x^0 -> undef5, rest remain the same}>
18.80/18.87	Solving with 1 template(s).
18.80/18.87	
18.80/18.87	LOG: CALL solveNonLinearGetFirstSolution
18.80/18.87	
18.80/18.87	LOG: RETURN solveNonLinearGetFirstSolution - Elapsed time: 0.011168s
18.80/18.87	Time used: 0.010933
18.80/18.87	Solving with 1 template(s).
18.80/18.87	
18.80/18.87	LOG: CALL solveNonLinearGetFirstSolution
18.80/18.87	
18.80/18.87	LOG: RETURN solveNonLinearGetFirstSolution - Elapsed time: 0.025710s
18.80/18.87	Time used: 0.024978
18.80/18.87	Solving with 2 template(s).
18.80/18.87	
18.80/18.87	LOG: CALL solveNonLinearGetFirstSolution
18.80/18.87	
18.80/18.87	LOG: RETURN solveNonLinearGetFirstSolution - Elapsed time: 4.001509s
18.80/18.87	Time used: 4.00003
18.80/18.87	Solving with 3 template(s).
18.80/18.87	
18.80/18.87	LOG: CALL solveNonLinearGetFirstSolution
18.80/18.87	
18.80/18.87	LOG: RETURN solveNonLinearGetFirstSolution - Elapsed time: 1.006351s
18.80/18.87	Time used: 1.00009
18.80/18.87	Solving with 1 template(s).
18.80/18.87	
18.80/18.87	LOG: CALL solveNonLinearGetFirstSolution
18.80/18.87	
18.80/18.87	LOG: RETURN solveNonLinearGetFirstSolution - Elapsed time: 0.027731s
18.80/18.87	Time used: 0.014761
18.80/18.87	
18.80/18.87	Proving non-termination of subgraph 1
18.80/18.87	Transitions:
18.80/18.87	<l1, l1, 1 + __const_110^0 <= __const_1000^0 + x^0 /\ 1 + y^0 <= __const_1000^0 + __const_2000^0 /\ 1 + __const_110^0 <= undef5 /\ 1 + y^0 <= __const_2000^0 /\ 0 <= __const_1000^0 /\ 2 + __const_110^0 + y^0 <= __const_1000^0 + __const_2000^0 + x^0 /\ __const_1000^0 + x^0 = undef5, {x^0 -> undef5, rest remain the same}>
18.80/18.87	Variables:
18.80/18.87	__const_1000^0, __const_110^0, __const_2000^0, x^0, y^0
18.80/18.87	
18.80/18.87	Checking that every undef value has an assignment...
18.80/18.87	
18.80/18.87	LOG: CALL solveLinear
18.80/18.87	
18.80/18.87	LOG: RETURN solveLinear - Elapsed time: 0.002226s
18.80/18.87	Checking conditional non-termination of SCC {l1}...
18.80/18.87	EXIT TRANSITIONS:
18.80/18.87	<l1, end, 1 + __const_1000^0 <= 0 /\ 1 + __const_110^0 <= __const_1000^0 + x^0 /\ 1 + y^0 <= __const_1000^0 + __const_2000^0 /\ 1 + y^0 <= __const_2000^0 /\ 2 + __const_110^0 + y^0 <= __const_1000^0 + __const_2000^0 + x^0, {all remain the same}>
18.80/18.87	<l1, end, 1 + __const_110^0 <= __const_1000^0 + x^0 /\ 1 + y^0 <= __const_1000^0 + __const_2000^0 /\ 0 <= __const_1000^0 /\ __const_2000^0 <= y^0, {all remain the same}>
18.80/18.87	<l1, end, 1 + __const_1000^0 <= 0 /\ 1 + __const_110^0 <= __const_1000^0 + x^0 /\ 1 + y^0 <= __const_2000^0 /\ __const_1000^0 + __const_2000^0 <= y^0 /\ 2 + __const_110^0 + y^0 <= __const_1000^0 + __const_2000^0 + x^0, {all remain the same}>
18.80/18.87	<l1, end, 1 + __const_110^0 <= __const_1000^0 + x^0 /\ __const_1000^0 + __const_2000^0 <= y^0 /\ __const_2000^0 <= y^0, {all remain the same}>
18.80/18.87	<l1, end, 1 + y^0 <= __const_1000^0 + __const_2000^0 /\ 1 + y^0 <= __const_2000^0 /\ __const_1000^0 + x^0 <= __const_110^0, {all remain the same}>
18.80/18.87	<l1, end, 1 + y^0 <= __const_1000^0 + __const_2000^0 /\ __const_1000^0 + x^0 <= __const_110^0 /\ 0 <= __const_1000^0 /\ __const_2000^0 <= y^0 /\ __const_1000^0 + __const_2000^0 + x^0 <= 1 + __const_110^0 + y^0, {all remain the same}>
18.80/18.87	<l1, end, 1 + __const_1000^0 <= 0 /\ 1 + y^0 <= __const_2000^0 /\ __const_1000^0 + x^0 <= __const_110^0 /\ __const_1000^0 + __const_2000^0 <= y^0, {all remain the same}>
18.80/18.87	<l1, end, __const_1000^0 + x^0 <= __const_110^0 /\ __const_1000^0 + __const_2000^0 <= y^0 /\ __const_2000^0 <= y^0 /\ __const_1000^0 + __const_2000^0 + x^0 <= 1 + __const_110^0 + y^0, {all remain the same}>
18.80/18.87	
18.80/18.87	Solving with 1 template(s).
18.80/18.87	
18.80/18.87	LOG: CALL solveNonLinearGetFirstSolution
18.80/18.87	
18.80/18.87	LOG: RETURN solveNonLinearGetFirstSolution - Elapsed time: 0.084170s
18.80/18.87	Time used: 0.083575
18.80/18.87	Improving Solution with cost 8 ...
18.80/18.87	
18.80/18.87	LOG: CALL solveNonLinearGetNextSolution
18.80/18.87	
18.80/18.87	LOG: RETURN solveNonLinearGetNextSolution - Elapsed time: 0.237842s
18.80/18.87	Time used: 0.237785
18.80/18.87	
18.80/18.87	LOG: SAT solveNonLinear - Elapsed time: 0.322011s
18.80/18.87	Cost: 8; Total time: 0.32136
18.80/18.87	Failed at location 1: 1 + y^0 <= __const_1000^0 + __const_2000^0
18.80/18.87	Before Improving: 
18.80/18.87	Quasi-invariant at l1: 1 + y^0 <= __const_1000^0 + __const_2000^0
18.80/18.87	Optimizing invariants...
18.80/18.87	
18.80/18.87	LOG: CALL solveLinear
18.80/18.87	
18.80/18.87	LOG: RETURN solveLinear - Elapsed time: 0.024703s
18.80/18.87	Remaining time after improvement: 0.99563
18.80/18.87	Minimizing number of undef constraints...
18.80/18.87	
18.80/18.87	LOG: CALL solveNonLinear
18.80/18.87	
18.80/18.87	LOG: RETURN solveNonLinear - Elapsed time: 0.008153s
18.80/18.87	Number of undef constraints reduced!
18.80/18.87	
18.80/18.87	Non-termination implied by a set of quasi-invariant(s):
18.80/18.87	Quasi-invariant at l1: 1 + y^0 <= __const_1000^0 + __const_2000^0
18.80/18.87	
18.80/18.87	Strengthening and disabling EXIT transitions...
18.80/18.87	Closed exits from l1: 4
18.80/18.87	Strengthening exit transition (result): 
18.80/18.87	<l1, end, 1 + __const_1000^0 <= 0 /\ 1 + __const_110^0 <= __const_1000^0 + x^0 /\ 1 + y^0 <= __const_1000^0 + __const_2000^0 /\ 1 + y^0 <= __const_2000^0 /\ 2 + __const_110^0 + y^0 <= __const_1000^0 + __const_2000^0 + x^0, {all remain the same}>
18.80/18.87	Strengthening exit transition (result): 
18.80/18.87	<l1, end, 1 + __const_110^0 <= __const_1000^0 + x^0 /\ 1 + y^0 <= __const_1000^0 + __const_2000^0 /\ 0 <= __const_1000^0 /\ __const_2000^0 <= y^0, {all remain the same}>
18.80/18.87	Strengthening exit transition (result): 
18.80/18.87	<l1, end, 1 + y^0 <= __const_1000^0 + __const_2000^0 /\ 1 + y^0 <= __const_2000^0 /\ __const_1000^0 + x^0 <= __const_110^0, {all remain the same}>
18.80/18.87	Strengthening exit transition (result): 
18.80/18.87	<l1, end, 1 + y^0 <= __const_1000^0 + __const_2000^0 /\ __const_1000^0 + x^0 <= __const_110^0 /\ 0 <= __const_1000^0 /\ __const_2000^0 <= y^0 /\ __const_1000^0 + __const_2000^0 + x^0 <= 1 + __const_110^0 + y^0, {all remain the same}>
18.80/18.87	
18.80/18.87	Strengthening and disabling transitions...
18.80/18.87	
18.80/18.87	LOG: CALL solverLinear in Graph for feasibility
18.80/18.87	
18.80/18.87	LOG: RETURN solveLinear in Graph for feasibility
18.80/18.87	Strengthening transition (result): 
18.80/18.87	<l1, l1, 1 + __const_110^0 <= __const_1000^0 + x^0 /\ 1 + y^0 <= __const_1000^0 + __const_2000^0 /\ 1 + __const_110^0 <= undef5 /\ 1 + y^0 <= __const_2000^0 /\ 0 <= __const_1000^0 /\ 2 + __const_110^0 + y^0 <= __const_1000^0 + __const_2000^0 + x^0 /\ __const_1000^0 + x^0 = undef5, {x^0 -> undef5, rest remain the same}>
18.80/18.87	
18.80/18.87	Checking conditional non-termination of SCC {l1}...
18.80/18.87	EXIT TRANSITIONS:
18.80/18.87	<l1, end, 1 + __const_1000^0 <= 0 /\ 1 + __const_110^0 <= __const_1000^0 + x^0 /\ 1 + y^0 <= __const_1000^0 + __const_2000^0 /\ 1 + y^0 <= __const_2000^0 /\ 2 + __const_110^0 + y^0 <= __const_1000^0 + __const_2000^0 + x^0, {all remain the same}>
18.80/18.87	<l1, end, 1 + __const_110^0 <= __const_1000^0 + x^0 /\ 1 + y^0 <= __const_1000^0 + __const_2000^0 /\ 0 <= __const_1000^0 /\ __const_2000^0 <= y^0, {all remain the same}>
18.80/18.87	<l1, end, 1 + y^0 <= __const_1000^0 + __const_2000^0 /\ 1 + y^0 <= __const_2000^0 /\ __const_1000^0 + x^0 <= __const_110^0, {all remain the same}>
18.80/18.87	<l1, end, 1 + y^0 <= __const_1000^0 + __const_2000^0 /\ __const_1000^0 + x^0 <= __const_110^0 /\ 0 <= __const_1000^0 /\ __const_2000^0 <= y^0 /\ __const_1000^0 + __const_2000^0 + x^0 <= 1 + __const_110^0 + y^0, {all remain the same}>
18.80/18.87	
18.80/18.87	Solving with 1 template(s).
18.80/18.87	
18.80/18.87	LOG: CALL solveNonLinearGetFirstSolution
18.80/18.87	
18.80/18.87	LOG: RETURN solveNonLinearGetFirstSolution - Elapsed time: 5.001673s
18.80/18.87	Time used: 5.00057
18.80/18.87	Solving with 2 template(s).
18.80/18.87	
18.80/18.87	LOG: CALL solveNonLinearGetFirstSolution
18.80/18.87	
18.80/18.87	LOG: RETURN solveNonLinearGetFirstSolution - Elapsed time: 1.667857s
18.80/18.87	Time used: 1.51836
18.80/18.87	Improving Solution with cost 3 ...
18.80/18.87	
18.80/18.87	LOG: CALL solveNonLinearGetNextSolution
18.80/18.87	
18.80/18.87	LOG: RETURN solveNonLinearGetNextSolution - Elapsed time: 1.001652s
18.80/18.87	Time used: 1.0014
18.80/18.87	
18.80/18.87	LOG: SAT solveNonLinear - Elapsed time: 2.669509s
18.80/18.87	Cost: 3; Total time: 2.51976
18.80/18.87	Failed at location 1: __const_1000^0 <= 0
18.80/18.87	Failed at location 1: 1 + __const_110^0 <= __const_1000^0 + x^0
18.80/18.87	Before Improving: 
18.80/18.87	Quasi-invariant at l1: __const_1000^0 <= 0
18.80/18.87	Quasi-invariant at l1: 1 + __const_110^0 <= __const_1000^0 + x^0
18.80/18.87	Optimizing invariants...
18.80/18.87	
18.80/18.87	LOG: CALL solveLinear
18.80/18.87	
18.80/18.87	LOG: RETURN solveLinear - Elapsed time: 0.007477s
18.80/18.87	Remaining time after improvement: 0.996057
18.80/18.87	Minimizing number of undef constraints...
18.80/18.87	
18.80/18.87	LOG: CALL solveNonLinear
18.80/18.87	
18.80/18.87	LOG: RETURN solveNonLinear - Elapsed time: 0.008431s
18.80/18.87	Number of undef constraints reduced!
18.80/18.87	
18.80/18.87	Non-termination implied by a set of quasi-invariant(s):
18.80/18.87	Quasi-invariant at l1: __const_1000^0 <= 0
18.80/18.87	Quasi-invariant at l1: 1 + __const_110^0 <= __const_1000^0 + x^0
18.80/18.87	
18.80/18.87	Strengthening and disabling EXIT transitions...
18.80/18.87	Closed exits from l1: 3
18.80/18.87	Strengthening exit transition (result): 
18.80/18.87	<l1, end, 1 + __const_1000^0 <= 0 /\ 1 + __const_110^0 <= __const_1000^0 + x^0 /\ 1 + y^0 <= __const_1000^0 + __const_2000^0 /\ 1 + y^0 <= __const_2000^0 /\ 2 + __const_110^0 + y^0 <= __const_1000^0 + __const_2000^0 + x^0, {all remain the same}>
18.80/18.87	
18.80/18.87	Strengthening and disabling transitions...
18.80/18.87	
18.80/18.87	LOG: CALL solverLinear in Graph for feasibility
18.80/18.87	
18.80/18.87	LOG: RETURN solveLinear in Graph for feasibility
18.80/18.87	Strengthening transition (result): 
18.80/18.87	<l1, l1, 1 + __const_110^0 <= __const_1000^0 + x^0 /\ 1 + y^0 <= __const_1000^0 + __const_2000^0 /\ 1 + __const_110^0 <= undef5 /\ 1 + y^0 <= __const_2000^0 /\ 2 + __const_110^0 + y^0 <= __const_1000^0 + __const_2000^0 + x^0 /\ __const_1000^0 = 0 /\ __const_1000^0 + x^0 = undef5, {x^0 -> undef5, rest remain the same}>
18.80/18.87	
18.80/18.87	Checking conditional non-termination of SCC {l1}...
18.80/18.87	EXIT TRANSITIONS:
18.80/18.87	<l1, end, 1 + __const_1000^0 <= 0 /\ 1 + __const_110^0 <= __const_1000^0 + x^0 /\ 1 + y^0 <= __const_1000^0 + __const_2000^0 /\ 1 + y^0 <= __const_2000^0 /\ 2 + __const_110^0 + y^0 <= __const_1000^0 + __const_2000^0 + x^0, {all remain the same}>
18.80/18.87	
18.80/18.87	Solving with 1 template(s).
18.80/18.87	
18.80/18.87	LOG: CALL solveNonLinearGetFirstSolution
18.80/18.87	
18.80/18.87	LOG: RETURN solveNonLinearGetFirstSolution - Elapsed time: 5.010943s
18.80/18.87	Time used: 5.00991
18.80/18.87	Solving with 2 template(s).
18.80/18.87	
18.80/18.87	LOG: CALL solveNonLinearGetFirstSolution
18.80/18.87	
18.80/18.87	LOG: RETURN solveNonLinearGetFirstSolution - Elapsed time: 0.181010s
18.80/18.87	Time used: 0.072516
18.80/18.87	Improving Solution with cost 1 ...
18.80/18.87	
18.80/18.87	LOG: CALL solveNonLinearGetNextSolution
18.80/18.87	
18.80/18.87	LOG: RETURN solveNonLinearGetNextSolution - Elapsed time: 0.091044s
18.80/18.87	Time used: 0.09103
18.80/18.87	
18.80/18.87	LOG: SAT solveNonLinear - Elapsed time: 0.272054s
18.80/18.87	Cost: 1; Total time: 0.163546
18.80/18.87	Failed at location 1: 0 <= __const_1000^0
18.80/18.87	Before Improving: 
18.80/18.87	Quasi-invariant at l1: 0 <= __const_1000^0
18.80/18.87	Optimizing invariants...
18.80/18.87	
18.80/18.87	LOG: CALL solveLinear
18.80/18.87	
18.80/18.87	LOG: RETURN solveLinear - Elapsed time: 0.034103s
18.80/18.87	Remaining time after improvement: 0.996154
18.80/18.87	Minimizing number of undef constraints...
18.80/18.87	
18.80/18.87	LOG: CALL solveNonLinear
18.80/18.87	
18.80/18.87	LOG: RETURN solveNonLinear - Elapsed time: 0.006758s
18.80/18.87	Number of undef constraints reduced!
18.80/18.87	
18.80/18.87	Non-termination implied by a set of quasi-invariant(s):
18.80/18.87	Quasi-invariant at l1: 0 <= __const_1000^0
18.80/18.87	
18.80/18.87	Strengthening and disabling EXIT transitions...
18.80/18.87	Closed exits from l1: 1
18.80/18.87	
18.80/18.87	Strengthening and disabling transitions...
18.80/18.87	
18.80/18.87	LOG: CALL solverLinear in Graph for feasibility
18.80/18.87	
18.80/18.87	LOG: RETURN solveLinear in Graph for feasibility
18.80/18.87	Strengthening transition (result): 
18.80/18.87	<l1, l1, 1 + __const_110^0 <= __const_1000^0 + x^0 /\ 1 + y^0 <= __const_1000^0 + __const_2000^0 /\ 1 + __const_110^0 <= undef5 /\ 1 + y^0 <= __const_2000^0 /\ 2 + __const_110^0 + y^0 <= __const_1000^0 + __const_2000^0 + x^0 /\ __const_1000^0 = 0 /\ __const_1000^0 + x^0 = undef5, {x^0 -> undef5, rest remain the same}>
18.80/18.87	
18.80/18.87	Calling reachability with...
18.80/18.87	Transition: <l1, end, true, {all remain the same}>
18.80/18.87	Conditions: 1 + y^0 <= __const_1000^0 + __const_2000^0, __const_1000^0 <= 0, 1 + __const_110^0 <= __const_1000^0 + x^0, 0 <= __const_1000^0, 
18.80/18.87	OPEN EXITS: 
18.80/18.87	<l1, end, 1 + __const_110^0 <= __const_1000^0 + x^0, {all remain the same}> (condsUp: 1 + y^0 <= __const_1000^0 + __const_2000^0, __const_1000^0 <= 0, 0 <= __const_1000^0)
18.80/18.87	
18.80/18.87	--- Reachability graph ---
18.80/18.87	> Graph without transitions.
18.80/18.87	
18.80/18.87	Calling reachability with...
18.80/18.87	Transition: <l0, l1, true, {all remain the same}>
18.80/18.87	Conditions: 1 + __const_110^0 <= __const_1000^0 + x^0, 1 + y^0 <= __const_1000^0 + __const_2000^0, __const_1000^0 <= 0, 0 <= __const_1000^0, 
18.80/18.87	OPEN EXITS: 
18.80/18.87	<l0, l1, 1 + __const_110^0 <= __const_1000^0 + x^0 /\ 1 + y^0 <= __const_1000^0 + __const_2000^0 /\ __const_1000^0 = 0, {all remain the same}>
18.80/18.87	
18.80/18.87	> Conditions are reachable!
18.80/18.87	
18.80/18.87	Program does NOT terminate
18.80/18.87	/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/starexec_run_termcomp2019_ITS: line 26: delete: command not found
18.80/18.87	/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/starexec_run_termcomp2019_ITS: line 27: edit: command not found
18.80/18.87	EOF