6.38/2.41	NO
6.74/2.45	proof of /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml
6.74/2.45	# AProVE Commit ID: 48fb2092695e11cc9f56e44b17a92a5f88ffb256 marcel 20180622 unpublished dirty
6.74/2.45	
6.74/2.45	
6.74/2.45	Termination w.r.t. Q of the given QTRS could be disproven:
6.74/2.45	
6.74/2.45	(0) QTRS
6.74/2.45	(1) NonTerminationProof [COMPLETE, 358 ms]
6.74/2.45	(2) NO
6.74/2.45	
6.74/2.45	
6.74/2.45	----------------------------------------
6.74/2.45	
6.74/2.45	(0)
6.74/2.45	Obligation:
6.74/2.45	Q restricted rewrite system:
6.74/2.45	The TRS R consists of the following rules:
6.74/2.45	
6.74/2.45	   0(0(0(0(x1)))) -> 0(1(1(0(x1))))
6.74/2.45	   1(0(0(1(x1)))) -> 0(0(1(0(x1))))
6.74/2.45	
6.74/2.45	Q is empty.
6.74/2.45	
6.74/2.45	----------------------------------------
6.74/2.45	
6.74/2.45	(1) NonTerminationProof (COMPLETE)
6.74/2.45	We used the non-termination processor [OPPELT08] to show that the SRS problem is infinite.
6.74/2.45	
6.74/2.45	Found the self-embedding DerivationStructure: 
6.74/2.45	"0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 -> 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0"
6.74/2.45	0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 -> 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0
6.74/2.45	by OverlapClosure OC 3"0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 -> 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0
6.74/2.45	by OverlapClosure OC 3"0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 -> 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0
6.74/2.45	by OverlapClosure OC 2"0 0 0 0 -> 0 1 1 0
6.74/2.45	by original rule (OC 1)""1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 -> 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0
6.74/2.45	by OverlapClosure OC 3"1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 -> 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0
6.74/2.45	by OverlapClosure OC 3"1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 -> 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0
6.74/2.45	by OverlapClosure OC 3"1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 -> 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0
6.74/2.45	by OverlapClosure OC 3"1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 -> 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0
6.74/2.45	by OverlapClosure OC 3"1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 -> 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0
6.74/2.45	by OverlapClosure OC 2"1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 -> 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
6.74/2.45	by OverlapClosure OC 3"1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 -> 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0
6.74/2.45	by OverlapClosure OC 3"1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 -> 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0
6.74/2.45	by OverlapClosure OC 3"1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 -> 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0
6.74/2.45	by OverlapClosure OC 2"1 0 0 1 -> 0 0 1 0
6.74/2.45	by original rule (OC 1)""1 0 0 1 0 1 -> 0 0 0 0 1 0
6.74/2.45	by OverlapClosure OC 2"1 0 0 1 -> 0 0 1 0
6.74/2.45	by original rule (OC 1)""1 0 0 1 -> 0 0 1 0
6.74/2.45	by original rule (OC 1)""""0 0 0 0 -> 0 1 1 0
6.74/2.45	by original rule (OC 1)"""1 0 0 1 -> 0 0 1 0
6.74/2.45	by original rule (OC 1)"""1 0 0 1 -> 0 0 1 0
6.74/2.45	by original rule (OC 1)"""0 0 0 0 -> 0 1 1 0
6.74/2.45	by original rule (OC 1)"""1 0 0 1 -> 0 0 1 0
6.74/2.45	by original rule (OC 1)"""0 0 0 0 -> 0 1 1 0
6.74/2.45	by original rule (OC 1)"""1 0 0 1 -> 0 0 1 0
6.74/2.45	by original rule (OC 1)"""1 0 0 1 -> 0 0 1 0
6.74/2.45	by original rule (OC 1)"""0 0 0 0 -> 0 1 1 0
6.74/2.45	by original rule (OC 1)""""1 0 0 1 -> 0 0 1 0
6.74/2.45	by original rule (OC 1)"""1 0 0 1 -> 0 0 1 0
6.74/2.45	by original rule (OC 1)"
6.74/2.45	
6.74/2.45	----------------------------------------
6.74/2.45	
6.74/2.45	(2)
6.74/2.45	NO
6.85/2.51	EOF