4.21/1.90	NO
4.50/1.91	proof of /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml
4.50/1.91	# AProVE Commit ID: 48fb2092695e11cc9f56e44b17a92a5f88ffb256 marcel 20180622 unpublished dirty
4.50/1.91	
4.50/1.91	
4.50/1.91	Termination w.r.t. Q of the given QTRS could be disproven:
4.50/1.91	
4.50/1.91	(0) QTRS
4.50/1.91	(1) NonTerminationProof [COMPLETE, 154 ms]
4.50/1.91	(2) NO
4.50/1.91	
4.50/1.91	
4.50/1.91	----------------------------------------
4.50/1.91	
4.50/1.91	(0)
4.50/1.91	Obligation:
4.50/1.91	Q restricted rewrite system:
4.50/1.91	The TRS R consists of the following rules:
4.50/1.91	
4.50/1.91	   b(c(x1)) -> a(b(b(x1)))
4.50/1.91	   b(a(x1)) -> a(c(b(x1)))
4.50/1.91	
4.50/1.91	Q is empty.
4.50/1.91	
4.50/1.91	----------------------------------------
4.50/1.91	
4.50/1.91	(1) NonTerminationProof (COMPLETE)
4.50/1.91	We used the non-termination processor [OPPELT08] to show that the SRS problem is infinite.
4.50/1.91	
4.50/1.91	Found the self-embedding DerivationStructure: 
4.50/1.91	"b c a a c a -> a a c a b a c b c a a c a b b b"
4.50/1.91	b c a a c a -> a a c a b a c b c a a c a b b b
4.50/1.91	by OverlapClosure OC 2"b c a a -> a a c a b a c b c b
4.50/1.91	by OverlapClosure OC 3"b c a a -> a a c a b b a c b
4.50/1.91	by OverlapClosure OC 2"b c a -> a a c a b b b
4.50/1.91	by OverlapClosure OC 3"b c a -> a a c b c b
4.50/1.91	by OverlapClosure OC 3"b c a -> a b a c b
4.50/1.91	by OverlapClosure OC 2"b c -> a b b
4.50/1.91	by original rule (OC 1)""b a -> a c b
4.50/1.91	by original rule (OC 1)"""b a -> a c b
4.50/1.91	by original rule (OC 1)"""b c -> a b b
4.50/1.91	by original rule (OC 1)"""b a -> a c b
4.50/1.91	by original rule (OC 1)"""b a -> a c b
4.50/1.91	by original rule (OC 1)"""b c a -> a a c a b b b
4.50/1.91	by OverlapClosure OC 3"b c a -> a a c b c b
4.50/1.91	by OverlapClosure OC 3"b c a -> a b a c b
4.50/1.91	by OverlapClosure OC 2"b c -> a b b
4.50/1.91	by original rule (OC 1)""b a -> a c b
4.50/1.91	by original rule (OC 1)"""b a -> a c b
4.50/1.91	by original rule (OC 1)"""b c -> a b b
4.50/1.91	by original rule (OC 1)""
4.50/1.91	
4.50/1.91	----------------------------------------
4.50/1.91	
4.50/1.91	(2)
4.50/1.91	NO
4.50/1.96	EOF