70.41/18.74 NO 70.41/18.77 proof of /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml 70.41/18.77 # AProVE Commit ID: 48fb2092695e11cc9f56e44b17a92a5f88ffb256 marcel 20180622 unpublished dirty 70.41/18.77 70.41/18.77 70.41/18.77 Termination w.r.t. Q of the given QTRS could be disproven: 70.41/18.77 70.41/18.77 (0) QTRS 70.41/18.77 (1) NonTerminationProof [COMPLETE, 2991 ms] 70.41/18.77 (2) NO 70.41/18.77 70.41/18.77 70.41/18.77 ---------------------------------------- 70.41/18.77 70.41/18.77 (0) 70.41/18.77 Obligation: 70.41/18.77 Q restricted rewrite system: 70.41/18.77 The TRS R consists of the following rules: 70.41/18.77 70.41/18.77 a(x1) -> b(x1) 70.41/18.77 a(b(c(x1))) -> c(c(b(a(a(x1))))) 70.41/18.77 c(c(x1)) -> x1 70.41/18.77 70.41/18.77 Q is empty. 70.41/18.77 70.41/18.77 ---------------------------------------- 70.41/18.77 70.41/18.77 (1) NonTerminationProof (COMPLETE) 70.41/18.77 We used the non-termination processor [OPPELT08] to show that the SRS problem is infinite. 70.41/18.77 70.41/18.77 Found the self-embedding DerivationStructure: 70.41/18.77 "a b c b c c b c c -> b b a b c b c c b c c b a a b a a" 70.41/18.77 a b c b c c b c c -> b b a b c b c c b c c b a a b a a 70.41/18.77 by OverlapClosure OC 3"a b c b c c b c c -> b b a b c b c c b a b c b a a 70.41/18.77 by OverlapClosure OC 3"a b c b c c b c c -> b b a b c b c c b a a c b a a 70.41/18.77 by OverlapClosure OC 3"a b c b c c b c c -> b b a b c b a b c c b a a 70.41/18.77 by OverlapClosure OC 2"a b c b c c b c -> b b a b c b a b a b 70.41/18.77 by OverlapClosure OC 2"a b c b c c -> b b a b c b a a 70.41/18.77 by OverlapClosure OC 3"a b c b c c -> b c c b a b c b a a 70.41/18.77 by OverlapClosure OC 3"a b c b c c -> b c c b a a c b a a 70.41/18.77 by OverlapClosure OC 3"a b c b c c -> b a b c c b a a 70.41/18.77 by OverlapClosure OC 2"a b c b c -> b a b a b 70.41/18.77 by OverlapClosure OC 2"a b c -> b a a 70.41/18.77 by OverlapClosure OC 3"a b c -> c c b a a 70.41/18.77 by original rule (OC 1)""c c -> 70.41/18.77 by original rule (OC 1)"""a b c -> b a b 70.41/18.77 by OverlapClosure OC 3"a b c -> c c b a b 70.41/18.77 by OverlapClosure OC 2"a b c -> c c b a a 70.41/18.77 by original rule (OC 1)""a -> b 70.41/18.77 by original rule (OC 1)"""c c -> 70.41/18.77 by original rule (OC 1)""""a b c -> c c b a a 70.41/18.77 by original rule (OC 1)"""a b c -> c c b a a 70.41/18.77 by original rule (OC 1)"""a -> b 70.41/18.77 by original rule (OC 1)"""c c -> 70.41/18.77 by original rule (OC 1)"""a b c -> b a b 70.41/18.77 by OverlapClosure OC 3"a b c -> c c b a b 70.41/18.77 by OverlapClosure OC 2"a b c -> c c b a a 70.41/18.77 by original rule (OC 1)""a -> b 70.41/18.77 by original rule (OC 1)"""c c -> 70.41/18.77 by original rule (OC 1)""""a b c -> c c b a a 70.41/18.77 by original rule (OC 1)"""a b c -> c c b a a 70.41/18.77 by original rule (OC 1)"""a -> b 70.41/18.77 by original rule (OC 1)"""a b c -> c c b a a 70.41/18.77 by original rule (OC 1)" 70.41/18.77 70.41/18.77 ---------------------------------------- 70.41/18.77 70.41/18.77 (2) 70.41/18.77 NO 70.88/18.82 EOF