7.28/2.68 NO 7.28/2.72 proof of /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml 7.28/2.72 # AProVE Commit ID: 48fb2092695e11cc9f56e44b17a92a5f88ffb256 marcel 20180622 unpublished dirty 7.28/2.72 7.28/2.72 7.28/2.72 Termination w.r.t. Q of the given QTRS could be disproven: 7.28/2.72 7.28/2.72 (0) QTRS 7.28/2.72 (1) NonTerminationProof [COMPLETE, 368 ms] 7.28/2.72 (2) NO 7.28/2.72 7.28/2.72 7.28/2.72 ---------------------------------------- 7.28/2.72 7.28/2.72 (0) 7.28/2.72 Obligation: 7.28/2.72 Q restricted rewrite system: 7.28/2.72 The TRS R consists of the following rules: 7.28/2.72 7.28/2.72 a(x1) -> x1 7.28/2.72 a(x1) -> b(x1) 7.28/2.72 a(b(c(x1))) -> c(b(a(c(a(x1))))) 7.28/2.72 c(x1) -> x1 7.28/2.72 7.28/2.72 Q is empty. 7.28/2.72 7.28/2.72 ---------------------------------------- 7.28/2.72 7.28/2.72 (1) NonTerminationProof (COMPLETE) 7.28/2.72 We used the non-termination processor [OPPELT08] to show that the SRS problem is infinite. 7.28/2.72 7.28/2.72 Found the self-embedding DerivationStructure: 7.28/2.72 "a b c b c c b c -> b a b c b c c b c" 7.28/2.72 a b c b c c b c -> b a b c b c c b c 7.28/2.72 by OverlapClosure OC 3"a b c b c c b c -> b a b c b c c b a c 7.28/2.72 by OverlapClosure OC 2"a b c b c c -> b a b c b c a 7.28/2.72 by OverlapClosure OC 3"a b c b c c -> b a c b c b c a 7.28/2.72 by OverlapClosure OC 2"a b c -> b a c a 7.28/2.72 by OverlapClosure OC 3"a b c -> c b a c a 7.28/2.72 by original rule (OC 1)""c -> 7.28/2.72 by original rule (OC 1)"""a b c c -> b c b c a 7.28/2.72 by OverlapClosure OC 2"a b c -> b a b 7.28/2.72 by OverlapClosure OC 3"a b c -> b a c b 7.28/2.72 by OverlapClosure OC 2"a b c -> b a c a 7.28/2.72 by OverlapClosure OC 3"a b c -> c b a c a 7.28/2.72 by original rule (OC 1)""c -> 7.28/2.72 by original rule (OC 1)"""a -> b 7.28/2.72 by original rule (OC 1)"""c -> 7.28/2.72 by original rule (OC 1)"""a b c -> c b c a 7.28/2.72 by OverlapClosure OC 3"a b c -> c b a c a 7.28/2.72 by original rule (OC 1)""a -> 7.28/2.72 by original rule (OC 1)"""""c -> 7.28/2.72 by original rule (OC 1)"""a b c -> c b a c 7.28/2.72 by OverlapClosure OC 2"a b c -> c b a c a 7.28/2.72 by original rule (OC 1)""a -> 7.28/2.72 by original rule (OC 1)""""a -> 7.28/2.72 by original rule (OC 1)" 7.28/2.72 7.28/2.72 ---------------------------------------- 7.28/2.72 7.28/2.72 (2) 7.28/2.72 NO 7.58/2.77 EOF