7.71/2.85	NO
7.98/2.94	proof of /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml
7.98/2.94	# AProVE Commit ID: 48fb2092695e11cc9f56e44b17a92a5f88ffb256 marcel 20180622 unpublished dirty
7.98/2.94	
7.98/2.94	
7.98/2.94	Termination w.r.t. Q of the given QTRS could be disproven:
7.98/2.94	
7.98/2.94	(0) QTRS
7.98/2.94	(1) NonTerminationProof [COMPLETE, 529 ms]
7.98/2.94	(2) NO
7.98/2.94	
7.98/2.94	
7.98/2.94	----------------------------------------
7.98/2.94	
7.98/2.94	(0)
7.98/2.94	Obligation:
7.98/2.94	Q restricted rewrite system:
7.98/2.94	The TRS R consists of the following rules:
7.98/2.94	
7.98/2.94	   a(x1) -> b(x1)
7.98/2.94	   a(b(c(x1))) -> c(c(a(a(x1))))
7.98/2.94	   c(c(x1)) -> b(x1)
7.98/2.94	
7.98/2.94	Q is empty.
7.98/2.94	
7.98/2.94	----------------------------------------
7.98/2.94	
7.98/2.94	(1) NonTerminationProof (COMPLETE)
7.98/2.94	We used the non-termination processor [OPPELT08] to show that the SRS problem is infinite.
7.98/2.94	
7.98/2.94	Found the self-embedding DerivationStructure: 
7.98/2.94	"a b c b c c c c c -> b a b c b c c c c c a a"
7.98/2.94	a b c b c c c c c -> b a b c b c c c c c a a
7.98/2.94	by OverlapClosure OC 2"a b c b c c c c -> b a b c b c c c a b
7.98/2.94	by OverlapClosure OC 2"a b c -> b a a
7.98/2.94	by OverlapClosure OC 3"a b c -> c c a a
7.98/2.94	by original rule (OC 1)""c c -> b
7.98/2.94	by original rule (OC 1)"""a b c c c c -> b c b c c c a b
7.98/2.94	by OverlapClosure OC 2"a b c c c c -> b c b c c c a a
7.98/2.94	by OverlapClosure OC 2"a b c c c -> b c b c a b
7.98/2.94	by OverlapClosure OC 2"a b c c c -> b c b c a a
7.98/2.94	by OverlapClosure OC 3"a b c c c -> b c c c c a a
7.98/2.94	by OverlapClosure OC 2"a b c c -> b c c a b
7.98/2.94	by OverlapClosure OC 2"a b c c -> b c c a a
7.98/2.94	by OverlapClosure OC 2"a b c -> b a b
7.98/2.94	by OverlapClosure OC 2"a b c -> b a a
7.98/2.94	by OverlapClosure OC 3"a b c -> c c a a
7.98/2.94	by original rule (OC 1)""c c -> b
7.98/2.94	by original rule (OC 1)"""a -> b
7.98/2.94	by original rule (OC 1)"""a b c -> c c a a
7.98/2.94	by original rule (OC 1)"""a -> b
7.98/2.94	by original rule (OC 1)"""a b c -> c c a a
7.98/2.94	by original rule (OC 1)"""c c -> b
7.98/2.94	by original rule (OC 1)"""a -> b
7.98/2.94	by original rule (OC 1)"""a b c -> c c a a
7.98/2.94	by original rule (OC 1)"""a -> b
7.98/2.94	by original rule (OC 1)""""a b c -> c c a a
7.98/2.94	by original rule (OC 1)"
7.98/2.94	
7.98/2.94	----------------------------------------
7.98/2.94	
7.98/2.94	(2)
7.98/2.94	NO
8.29/3.03	EOF