16.91/5.25 YES 17.57/5.42 proof of /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml 17.57/5.42 # AProVE Commit ID: 48fb2092695e11cc9f56e44b17a92a5f88ffb256 marcel 20180622 unpublished dirty 17.57/5.42 17.57/5.42 17.57/5.42 Termination w.r.t. Q of the given QTRS could be proven: 17.57/5.42 17.57/5.42 (0) QTRS 17.57/5.42 (1) QTRS Reverse [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] 17.57/5.42 (2) QTRS 17.57/5.42 (3) FlatCCProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] 17.57/5.42 (4) QTRS 17.57/5.42 (5) RootLabelingProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] 17.57/5.42 (6) QTRS 17.57/5.42 (7) QTRSRRRProof [EQUIVALENT, 40 ms] 17.57/5.42 (8) QTRS 17.57/5.42 (9) DependencyPairsProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] 17.57/5.42 (10) QDP 17.57/5.42 (11) DependencyGraphProof [EQUIVALENT, 4 ms] 17.57/5.42 (12) QDP 17.57/5.42 (13) QDPOrderProof [EQUIVALENT, 200 ms] 17.57/5.42 (14) QDP 17.57/5.42 (15) DependencyGraphProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] 17.57/5.42 (16) TRUE 17.57/5.42 17.57/5.42 17.57/5.42 ---------------------------------------- 17.57/5.42 17.57/5.42 (0) 17.57/5.42 Obligation: 17.57/5.42 Q restricted rewrite system: 17.57/5.42 The TRS R consists of the following rules: 17.57/5.42 17.57/5.42 a(x1) -> x1 17.57/5.42 a(b(x1)) -> b(c(a(x1))) 17.57/5.42 c(c(a(x1))) -> a(b(a(x1))) 17.57/5.42 17.57/5.42 Q is empty. 17.57/5.42 17.57/5.42 ---------------------------------------- 17.57/5.42 17.57/5.42 (1) QTRS Reverse (EQUIVALENT) 17.57/5.42 We applied the QTRS Reverse Processor [REVERSE]. 17.57/5.42 ---------------------------------------- 17.57/5.42 17.57/5.42 (2) 17.57/5.42 Obligation: 17.57/5.42 Q restricted rewrite system: 17.57/5.42 The TRS R consists of the following rules: 17.57/5.42 17.57/5.42 a(x1) -> x1 17.57/5.42 b(a(x1)) -> a(c(b(x1))) 17.57/5.42 a(c(c(x1))) -> a(b(a(x1))) 17.57/5.42 17.57/5.42 Q is empty. 17.57/5.42 17.57/5.42 ---------------------------------------- 17.57/5.42 17.57/5.42 (3) FlatCCProof (EQUIVALENT) 17.57/5.42 We used flat context closure [ROOTLAB] 17.57/5.42 As Q is empty the flat context closure was sound AND complete. 17.57/5.42 17.57/5.42 ---------------------------------------- 17.57/5.42 17.57/5.42 (4) 17.57/5.42 Obligation: 17.57/5.42 Q restricted rewrite system: 17.57/5.42 The TRS R consists of the following rules: 17.57/5.42 17.57/5.42 a(c(c(x1))) -> a(b(a(x1))) 17.57/5.42 a(a(x1)) -> a(x1) 17.57/5.42 b(a(x1)) -> b(x1) 17.57/5.42 c(a(x1)) -> c(x1) 17.57/5.42 a(b(a(x1))) -> a(a(c(b(x1)))) 17.57/5.42 b(b(a(x1))) -> b(a(c(b(x1)))) 17.57/5.42 c(b(a(x1))) -> c(a(c(b(x1)))) 17.57/5.42 17.57/5.42 Q is empty. 17.57/5.42 17.57/5.42 ---------------------------------------- 17.57/5.42 17.57/5.42 (5) RootLabelingProof (EQUIVALENT) 17.57/5.42 We used plain root labeling [ROOTLAB] with the following heuristic: 17.57/5.42 LabelAll: All function symbols get labeled 17.57/5.42 17.57/5.42 As Q is empty the root labeling was sound AND complete. 17.57/5.42 17.57/5.42 ---------------------------------------- 17.57/5.42 17.57/5.42 (6) 17.57/5.42 Obligation: 17.57/5.42 Q restricted rewrite system: 17.57/5.42 The TRS R consists of the following rules: 17.57/5.42 17.57/5.42 a_{c_1}(c_{c_1}(c_{a_1}(x1))) -> a_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(x1))) 17.57/5.42 a_{c_1}(c_{c_1}(c_{c_1}(x1))) -> a_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{c_1}(x1))) 17.57/5.42 a_{c_1}(c_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(x1))) -> a_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(x1))) 17.57/5.42 a_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(x1)) -> a_{a_1}(x1) 17.57/5.42 a_{a_1}(a_{c_1}(x1)) -> a_{c_1}(x1) 17.57/5.42 a_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(x1)) -> a_{b_1}(x1) 17.57/5.42 b_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(x1)) -> b_{a_1}(x1) 17.57/5.42 b_{a_1}(a_{c_1}(x1)) -> b_{c_1}(x1) 17.57/5.42 b_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(x1)) -> b_{b_1}(x1) 17.57/5.42 c_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(x1)) -> c_{a_1}(x1) 17.57/5.42 c_{a_1}(a_{c_1}(x1)) -> c_{c_1}(x1) 17.57/5.42 c_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(x1)) -> c_{b_1}(x1) 17.57/5.42 a_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(x1))) -> a_{a_1}(a_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(x1)))) 17.57/5.42 a_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{c_1}(x1))) -> a_{a_1}(a_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(b_{c_1}(x1)))) 17.57/5.42 a_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(x1))) -> a_{a_1}(a_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(x1)))) 17.57/5.42 b_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(x1))) -> b_{a_1}(a_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(x1)))) 17.57/5.42 b_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{c_1}(x1))) -> b_{a_1}(a_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(b_{c_1}(x1)))) 17.57/5.42 b_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(x1))) -> b_{a_1}(a_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(x1)))) 17.57/5.42 c_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(x1))) -> c_{a_1}(a_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(x1)))) 17.57/5.42 c_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{c_1}(x1))) -> c_{a_1}(a_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(b_{c_1}(x1)))) 17.57/5.42 c_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(x1))) -> c_{a_1}(a_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(x1)))) 17.57/5.42 17.57/5.42 Q is empty. 17.57/5.42 17.57/5.42 ---------------------------------------- 17.57/5.42 17.57/5.42 (7) QTRSRRRProof (EQUIVALENT) 17.57/5.42 Used ordering: 17.57/5.42 Polynomial interpretation [POLO]: 17.57/5.42 17.57/5.42 POL(a_{a_1}(x_1)) = 1 + x_1 17.57/5.42 POL(a_{b_1}(x_1)) = x_1 17.57/5.42 POL(a_{c_1}(x_1)) = x_1 17.57/5.42 POL(b_{a_1}(x_1)) = 1 + x_1 17.57/5.42 POL(b_{b_1}(x_1)) = x_1 17.57/5.42 POL(b_{c_1}(x_1)) = x_1 17.57/5.42 POL(c_{a_1}(x_1)) = 1 + x_1 17.57/5.42 POL(c_{b_1}(x_1)) = x_1 17.57/5.42 POL(c_{c_1}(x_1)) = 1 + x_1 17.57/5.42 With this ordering the following rules can be removed by the rule removal processor [LPAR04] because they are oriented strictly: 17.57/5.42 17.57/5.42 a_{c_1}(c_{c_1}(c_{c_1}(x1))) -> a_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{c_1}(x1))) 17.57/5.42 a_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(x1)) -> a_{a_1}(x1) 17.57/5.42 a_{a_1}(a_{c_1}(x1)) -> a_{c_1}(x1) 17.57/5.42 a_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(x1)) -> a_{b_1}(x1) 17.57/5.42 b_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(x1)) -> b_{a_1}(x1) 17.57/5.42 b_{a_1}(a_{c_1}(x1)) -> b_{c_1}(x1) 17.57/5.42 b_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(x1)) -> b_{b_1}(x1) 17.57/5.42 c_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(x1)) -> c_{a_1}(x1) 17.57/5.42 c_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(x1)) -> c_{b_1}(x1) 17.57/5.42 17.57/5.42 17.57/5.42 17.57/5.42 17.57/5.42 ---------------------------------------- 17.57/5.42 17.57/5.42 (8) 17.57/5.42 Obligation: 17.57/5.42 Q restricted rewrite system: 17.57/5.42 The TRS R consists of the following rules: 17.57/5.42 17.57/5.42 a_{c_1}(c_{c_1}(c_{a_1}(x1))) -> a_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(x1))) 17.57/5.42 a_{c_1}(c_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(x1))) -> a_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(x1))) 17.57/5.42 c_{a_1}(a_{c_1}(x1)) -> c_{c_1}(x1) 17.57/5.42 a_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(x1))) -> a_{a_1}(a_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(x1)))) 17.57/5.42 a_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{c_1}(x1))) -> a_{a_1}(a_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(b_{c_1}(x1)))) 17.57/5.42 a_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(x1))) -> a_{a_1}(a_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(x1)))) 17.57/5.42 b_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(x1))) -> b_{a_1}(a_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(x1)))) 17.57/5.42 b_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{c_1}(x1))) -> b_{a_1}(a_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(b_{c_1}(x1)))) 17.57/5.42 b_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(x1))) -> b_{a_1}(a_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(x1)))) 17.57/5.42 c_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(x1))) -> c_{a_1}(a_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(x1)))) 17.57/5.42 c_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{c_1}(x1))) -> c_{a_1}(a_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(b_{c_1}(x1)))) 17.57/5.42 c_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(x1))) -> c_{a_1}(a_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(x1)))) 17.57/5.42 17.57/5.42 Q is empty. 17.57/5.42 17.57/5.42 ---------------------------------------- 17.57/5.42 17.57/5.42 (9) DependencyPairsProof (EQUIVALENT) 17.57/5.42 Using Dependency Pairs [AG00,LPAR04] we result in the following initial DP problem. 17.57/5.42 ---------------------------------------- 17.57/5.42 17.57/5.42 (10) 17.57/5.42 Obligation: 17.57/5.42 Q DP problem: 17.57/5.42 The TRS P consists of the following rules: 17.57/5.42 17.57/5.42 A_{C_1}(c_{c_1}(c_{a_1}(x1))) -> A_{B_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(x1))) 17.57/5.42 A_{C_1}(c_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(x1))) -> A_{B_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(x1))) 17.57/5.42 A_{C_1}(c_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(x1))) -> A_{B_1}(x1) 17.57/5.42 A_{B_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(x1))) -> A_{C_1}(c_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(x1))) 17.57/5.42 A_{B_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(x1))) -> C_{B_1}(b_{a_1}(x1)) 17.57/5.42 A_{B_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{c_1}(x1))) -> A_{C_1}(c_{b_1}(b_{c_1}(x1))) 17.57/5.42 A_{B_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{c_1}(x1))) -> C_{B_1}(b_{c_1}(x1)) 17.57/5.42 A_{B_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(x1))) -> A_{C_1}(c_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(x1))) 17.57/5.42 A_{B_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(x1))) -> C_{B_1}(b_{b_1}(x1)) 17.57/5.42 A_{B_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(x1))) -> B_{B_1}(x1) 17.57/5.42 B_{B_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(x1))) -> A_{C_1}(c_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(x1))) 17.57/5.42 B_{B_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(x1))) -> C_{B_1}(b_{a_1}(x1)) 17.57/5.42 B_{B_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{c_1}(x1))) -> A_{C_1}(c_{b_1}(b_{c_1}(x1))) 17.57/5.42 B_{B_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{c_1}(x1))) -> C_{B_1}(b_{c_1}(x1)) 17.57/5.42 B_{B_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(x1))) -> A_{C_1}(c_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(x1))) 17.57/5.42 B_{B_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(x1))) -> C_{B_1}(b_{b_1}(x1)) 17.57/5.42 B_{B_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(x1))) -> B_{B_1}(x1) 17.57/5.42 C_{B_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(x1))) -> C_{A_1}(a_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(x1)))) 17.57/5.42 C_{B_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(x1))) -> A_{C_1}(c_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(x1))) 17.57/5.42 C_{B_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(x1))) -> C_{B_1}(b_{a_1}(x1)) 17.57/5.42 C_{B_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{c_1}(x1))) -> C_{A_1}(a_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(b_{c_1}(x1)))) 17.57/5.42 C_{B_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{c_1}(x1))) -> A_{C_1}(c_{b_1}(b_{c_1}(x1))) 17.57/5.42 C_{B_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{c_1}(x1))) -> C_{B_1}(b_{c_1}(x1)) 17.57/5.42 C_{B_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(x1))) -> C_{A_1}(a_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(x1)))) 17.57/5.42 C_{B_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(x1))) -> A_{C_1}(c_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(x1))) 17.57/5.42 C_{B_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(x1))) -> C_{B_1}(b_{b_1}(x1)) 17.57/5.42 C_{B_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(x1))) -> B_{B_1}(x1) 17.57/5.42 17.57/5.42 The TRS R consists of the following rules: 17.57/5.42 17.57/5.42 a_{c_1}(c_{c_1}(c_{a_1}(x1))) -> a_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(x1))) 17.57/5.42 a_{c_1}(c_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(x1))) -> a_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(x1))) 17.57/5.42 c_{a_1}(a_{c_1}(x1)) -> c_{c_1}(x1) 17.57/5.42 a_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(x1))) -> a_{a_1}(a_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(x1)))) 17.57/5.42 a_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{c_1}(x1))) -> a_{a_1}(a_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(b_{c_1}(x1)))) 17.57/5.42 a_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(x1))) -> a_{a_1}(a_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(x1)))) 17.57/5.42 b_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(x1))) -> b_{a_1}(a_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(x1)))) 17.57/5.42 b_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{c_1}(x1))) -> b_{a_1}(a_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(b_{c_1}(x1)))) 17.57/5.42 b_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(x1))) -> b_{a_1}(a_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(x1)))) 17.57/5.42 c_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(x1))) -> c_{a_1}(a_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(x1)))) 17.57/5.42 c_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{c_1}(x1))) -> c_{a_1}(a_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(b_{c_1}(x1)))) 17.57/5.42 c_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(x1))) -> c_{a_1}(a_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(x1)))) 17.57/5.42 17.57/5.42 Q is empty. 17.57/5.42 We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains. 17.57/5.42 ---------------------------------------- 17.57/5.42 17.57/5.42 (11) DependencyGraphProof (EQUIVALENT) 17.57/5.42 The approximation of the Dependency Graph [LPAR04,FROCOS05,EDGSTAR] contains 1 SCC with 9 less nodes. 17.57/5.42 ---------------------------------------- 17.57/5.42 17.57/5.42 (12) 17.57/5.42 Obligation: 17.57/5.42 Q DP problem: 17.57/5.42 The TRS P consists of the following rules: 17.57/5.42 17.57/5.42 A_{B_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(x1))) -> A_{C_1}(c_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(x1))) 17.57/5.42 A_{C_1}(c_{c_1}(c_{a_1}(x1))) -> A_{B_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(x1))) 17.57/5.42 A_{B_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(x1))) -> C_{B_1}(b_{a_1}(x1)) 17.57/5.42 C_{B_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(x1))) -> A_{C_1}(c_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(x1))) 17.57/5.42 A_{C_1}(c_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(x1))) -> A_{B_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(x1))) 17.57/5.42 A_{B_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(x1))) -> A_{C_1}(c_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(x1))) 17.57/5.42 A_{C_1}(c_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(x1))) -> A_{B_1}(x1) 17.57/5.42 A_{B_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(x1))) -> C_{B_1}(b_{b_1}(x1)) 17.57/5.42 C_{B_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(x1))) -> C_{B_1}(b_{a_1}(x1)) 17.57/5.42 C_{B_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(x1))) -> A_{C_1}(c_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(x1))) 17.57/5.42 C_{B_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(x1))) -> C_{B_1}(b_{b_1}(x1)) 17.57/5.42 C_{B_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(x1))) -> B_{B_1}(x1) 17.57/5.42 B_{B_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(x1))) -> A_{C_1}(c_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(x1))) 17.57/5.42 B_{B_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(x1))) -> C_{B_1}(b_{a_1}(x1)) 17.57/5.42 B_{B_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(x1))) -> A_{C_1}(c_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(x1))) 17.57/5.42 B_{B_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(x1))) -> C_{B_1}(b_{b_1}(x1)) 17.57/5.42 B_{B_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(x1))) -> B_{B_1}(x1) 17.57/5.42 A_{B_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(x1))) -> B_{B_1}(x1) 17.57/5.42 17.57/5.42 The TRS R consists of the following rules: 17.57/5.42 17.57/5.42 a_{c_1}(c_{c_1}(c_{a_1}(x1))) -> a_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(x1))) 17.57/5.42 a_{c_1}(c_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(x1))) -> a_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(x1))) 17.57/5.42 c_{a_1}(a_{c_1}(x1)) -> c_{c_1}(x1) 17.57/5.42 a_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(x1))) -> a_{a_1}(a_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(x1)))) 17.57/5.42 a_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{c_1}(x1))) -> a_{a_1}(a_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(b_{c_1}(x1)))) 17.57/5.42 a_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(x1))) -> a_{a_1}(a_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(x1)))) 17.57/5.42 b_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(x1))) -> b_{a_1}(a_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(x1)))) 17.57/5.42 b_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{c_1}(x1))) -> b_{a_1}(a_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(b_{c_1}(x1)))) 17.57/5.42 b_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(x1))) -> b_{a_1}(a_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(x1)))) 17.57/5.42 c_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(x1))) -> c_{a_1}(a_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(x1)))) 17.57/5.42 c_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{c_1}(x1))) -> c_{a_1}(a_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(b_{c_1}(x1)))) 17.57/5.42 c_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(x1))) -> c_{a_1}(a_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(x1)))) 17.57/5.42 17.57/5.42 Q is empty. 17.57/5.42 We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains. 17.57/5.42 ---------------------------------------- 17.57/5.42 17.57/5.42 (13) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT) 17.57/5.42 We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04,JAR06]. 17.57/5.42 17.57/5.42 17.57/5.42 The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted. 17.57/5.42 17.57/5.42 A_{B_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(x1))) -> A_{C_1}(c_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(x1))) 17.57/5.42 A_{C_1}(c_{c_1}(c_{a_1}(x1))) -> A_{B_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(x1))) 17.57/5.42 A_{B_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(x1))) -> C_{B_1}(b_{a_1}(x1)) 17.57/5.42 A_{C_1}(c_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(x1))) -> A_{B_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(x1))) 17.57/5.42 A_{B_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(x1))) -> A_{C_1}(c_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(x1))) 17.57/5.42 A_{C_1}(c_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(x1))) -> A_{B_1}(x1) 17.57/5.42 A_{B_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(x1))) -> C_{B_1}(b_{b_1}(x1)) 17.57/5.42 C_{B_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(x1))) -> C_{B_1}(b_{a_1}(x1)) 17.57/5.42 C_{B_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(x1))) -> C_{B_1}(b_{b_1}(x1)) 17.57/5.42 B_{B_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(x1))) -> A_{C_1}(c_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(x1))) 17.57/5.42 B_{B_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(x1))) -> C_{B_1}(b_{a_1}(x1)) 17.57/5.42 B_{B_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(x1))) -> A_{C_1}(c_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(x1))) 17.57/5.42 B_{B_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(x1))) -> C_{B_1}(b_{b_1}(x1)) 17.57/5.42 B_{B_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(x1))) -> B_{B_1}(x1) 17.57/5.42 A_{B_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(x1))) -> B_{B_1}(x1) 17.57/5.42 The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly. 17.57/5.42 Used ordering: Polynomial Order [NEGPOLO,POLO] with Interpretation: 17.57/5.42 17.57/5.42 POL( A_{C_1}_1(x_1) ) = x_1 + 2 17.57/5.42 POL( C_{B_1}_1(x_1) ) = max{0, 2x_1 - 2} 17.57/5.42 POL( a_{c_1}_1(x_1) ) = x_1 + 1 17.57/5.42 POL( b_{a_1}_1(x_1) ) = 2x_1 17.57/5.42 POL( A_{B_1}_1(x_1) ) = x_1 + 1 17.57/5.42 POL( a_{a_1}_1(x_1) ) = 2x_1 + 1 17.57/5.42 POL( c_{b_1}_1(x_1) ) = x_1 17.57/5.42 POL( c_{a_1}_1(x_1) ) = 2x_1 17.57/5.42 POL( b_{c_1}_1(x_1) ) = 0 17.57/5.42 POL( a_{b_1}_1(x_1) ) = x_1 + 1 17.57/5.42 POL( b_{b_1}_1(x_1) ) = x_1 17.57/5.42 POL( c_{c_1}_1(x_1) ) = 2x_1 + 2 17.57/5.42 POL( B_{B_1}_1(x_1) ) = 2x_1 + 2 17.57/5.42 17.57/5.42 The following usable rules [FROCOS05] with respect to the argument filtering of the ordering [JAR06] were oriented: 17.57/5.42 17.57/5.42 c_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(x1))) -> c_{a_1}(a_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(x1)))) 17.57/5.42 c_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{c_1}(x1))) -> c_{a_1}(a_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(b_{c_1}(x1)))) 17.57/5.42 c_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(x1))) -> c_{a_1}(a_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(x1)))) 17.57/5.42 a_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(x1))) -> a_{a_1}(a_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(x1)))) 17.57/5.42 a_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{c_1}(x1))) -> a_{a_1}(a_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(b_{c_1}(x1)))) 17.57/5.42 a_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(x1))) -> a_{a_1}(a_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(x1)))) 17.57/5.42 b_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(x1))) -> b_{a_1}(a_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(x1)))) 17.57/5.42 b_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{c_1}(x1))) -> b_{a_1}(a_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(b_{c_1}(x1)))) 17.57/5.42 b_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(x1))) -> b_{a_1}(a_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(x1)))) 17.57/5.42 a_{c_1}(c_{c_1}(c_{a_1}(x1))) -> a_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(x1))) 17.57/5.42 a_{c_1}(c_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(x1))) -> a_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(x1))) 17.57/5.42 c_{a_1}(a_{c_1}(x1)) -> c_{c_1}(x1) 17.57/5.42 17.57/5.42 17.57/5.42 ---------------------------------------- 17.57/5.42 17.57/5.42 (14) 17.57/5.42 Obligation: 17.57/5.42 Q DP problem: 17.57/5.42 The TRS P consists of the following rules: 17.57/5.42 17.57/5.42 C_{B_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(x1))) -> A_{C_1}(c_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(x1))) 17.57/5.42 C_{B_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(x1))) -> A_{C_1}(c_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(x1))) 17.57/5.42 C_{B_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(x1))) -> B_{B_1}(x1) 17.57/5.42 17.57/5.42 The TRS R consists of the following rules: 17.57/5.42 17.57/5.42 a_{c_1}(c_{c_1}(c_{a_1}(x1))) -> a_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(x1))) 17.57/5.42 a_{c_1}(c_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(x1))) -> a_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(x1))) 17.57/5.42 c_{a_1}(a_{c_1}(x1)) -> c_{c_1}(x1) 17.57/5.42 a_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(x1))) -> a_{a_1}(a_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(x1)))) 17.57/5.42 a_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{c_1}(x1))) -> a_{a_1}(a_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(b_{c_1}(x1)))) 17.57/5.42 a_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(x1))) -> a_{a_1}(a_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(x1)))) 17.57/5.42 b_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(x1))) -> b_{a_1}(a_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(x1)))) 17.57/5.42 b_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{c_1}(x1))) -> b_{a_1}(a_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(b_{c_1}(x1)))) 17.57/5.42 b_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(x1))) -> b_{a_1}(a_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(x1)))) 17.57/5.42 c_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(x1))) -> c_{a_1}(a_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(x1)))) 17.57/5.42 c_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{c_1}(x1))) -> c_{a_1}(a_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(b_{c_1}(x1)))) 17.57/5.42 c_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(x1))) -> c_{a_1}(a_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(x1)))) 17.57/5.42 17.57/5.42 Q is empty. 17.57/5.42 We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains. 17.57/5.42 ---------------------------------------- 17.57/5.42 17.57/5.42 (15) DependencyGraphProof (EQUIVALENT) 17.57/5.42 The approximation of the Dependency Graph [LPAR04,FROCOS05,EDGSTAR] contains 0 SCCs with 3 less nodes. 17.57/5.42 ---------------------------------------- 17.57/5.42 17.57/5.42 (16) 17.57/5.42 TRUE 18.11/5.52 EOF