33.80/9.57 YES 33.80/9.58 proof of /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml 33.80/9.58 # AProVE Commit ID: 48fb2092695e11cc9f56e44b17a92a5f88ffb256 marcel 20180622 unpublished dirty 33.80/9.58 33.80/9.58 33.80/9.58 Termination w.r.t. Q of the given QTRS could be proven: 33.80/9.58 33.80/9.58 (0) QTRS 33.80/9.58 (1) QTRS Reverse [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] 33.80/9.58 (2) QTRS 33.80/9.58 (3) FlatCCProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] 33.80/9.58 (4) QTRS 33.80/9.58 (5) RootLabelingProof [EQUIVALENT, 1 ms] 33.80/9.58 (6) QTRS 33.80/9.58 (7) QTRSRRRProof [EQUIVALENT, 60 ms] 33.80/9.58 (8) QTRS 33.80/9.58 (9) DependencyPairsProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] 33.80/9.58 (10) QDP 33.80/9.58 (11) DependencyGraphProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] 33.80/9.58 (12) QDP 33.80/9.58 (13) QDPOrderProof [EQUIVALENT, 223 ms] 33.80/9.58 (14) QDP 33.80/9.58 (15) DependencyGraphProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] 33.80/9.58 (16) AND 33.80/9.58 (17) QDP 33.80/9.58 (18) UsableRulesProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] 33.80/9.58 (19) QDP 33.80/9.58 (20) QDPSizeChangeProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] 33.80/9.58 (21) YES 33.80/9.58 (22) QDP 33.80/9.58 (23) UsableRulesProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] 33.80/9.58 (24) QDP 33.80/9.58 (25) QDPSizeChangeProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] 33.80/9.58 (26) YES 33.80/9.58 33.80/9.58 33.80/9.58 ---------------------------------------- 33.80/9.58 33.80/9.58 (0) 33.80/9.58 Obligation: 33.80/9.58 Q restricted rewrite system: 33.80/9.58 The TRS R consists of the following rules: 33.80/9.58 33.80/9.58 a(x1) -> x1 33.80/9.58 a(x1) -> b(c(x1)) 33.80/9.58 b(b(x1)) -> a(a(x1)) 33.80/9.58 c(c(c(x1))) -> b(x1) 33.80/9.58 33.80/9.58 Q is empty. 33.80/9.58 33.80/9.58 ---------------------------------------- 33.80/9.58 33.80/9.58 (1) QTRS Reverse (EQUIVALENT) 33.80/9.58 We applied the QTRS Reverse Processor [REVERSE]. 33.80/9.58 ---------------------------------------- 33.80/9.58 33.80/9.58 (2) 33.80/9.58 Obligation: 33.80/9.58 Q restricted rewrite system: 33.80/9.58 The TRS R consists of the following rules: 33.80/9.58 33.80/9.58 a(x1) -> x1 33.80/9.58 a(x1) -> c(b(x1)) 33.80/9.58 b(b(x1)) -> a(a(x1)) 33.80/9.58 c(c(c(x1))) -> b(x1) 33.80/9.58 33.80/9.58 Q is empty. 33.80/9.58 33.80/9.58 ---------------------------------------- 33.80/9.58 33.80/9.58 (3) FlatCCProof (EQUIVALENT) 33.80/9.58 We used flat context closure [ROOTLAB] 33.80/9.58 As Q is empty the flat context closure was sound AND complete. 33.80/9.58 33.80/9.58 ---------------------------------------- 33.80/9.58 33.80/9.58 (4) 33.80/9.58 Obligation: 33.80/9.58 Q restricted rewrite system: 33.80/9.58 The TRS R consists of the following rules: 33.80/9.58 33.80/9.58 a(a(x1)) -> a(x1) 33.80/9.58 c(a(x1)) -> c(x1) 33.80/9.58 b(a(x1)) -> b(x1) 33.80/9.58 a(a(x1)) -> a(c(b(x1))) 33.80/9.58 c(a(x1)) -> c(c(b(x1))) 33.80/9.58 b(a(x1)) -> b(c(b(x1))) 33.80/9.58 a(b(b(x1))) -> a(a(a(x1))) 33.80/9.58 c(b(b(x1))) -> c(a(a(x1))) 33.80/9.58 b(b(b(x1))) -> b(a(a(x1))) 33.80/9.58 a(c(c(c(x1)))) -> a(b(x1)) 33.80/9.58 c(c(c(c(x1)))) -> c(b(x1)) 33.80/9.58 b(c(c(c(x1)))) -> b(b(x1)) 33.80/9.58 33.80/9.58 Q is empty. 33.80/9.58 33.80/9.58 ---------------------------------------- 33.80/9.58 33.80/9.58 (5) RootLabelingProof (EQUIVALENT) 33.80/9.58 We used plain root labeling [ROOTLAB] with the following heuristic: 33.80/9.58 LabelAll: All function symbols get labeled 33.80/9.58 33.80/9.58 As Q is empty the root labeling was sound AND complete. 33.80/9.58 33.80/9.58 ---------------------------------------- 33.80/9.58 33.80/9.58 (6) 33.80/9.58 Obligation: 33.80/9.58 Q restricted rewrite system: 33.80/9.58 The TRS R consists of the following rules: 33.80/9.58 33.80/9.58 a_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(x1)) -> a_{a_1}(x1) 33.80/9.58 a_{a_1}(a_{c_1}(x1)) -> a_{c_1}(x1) 33.80/9.58 a_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(x1)) -> a_{b_1}(x1) 33.80/9.58 c_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(x1)) -> c_{a_1}(x1) 33.80/9.58 c_{a_1}(a_{c_1}(x1)) -> c_{c_1}(x1) 33.80/9.58 c_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(x1)) -> c_{b_1}(x1) 33.80/9.58 b_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(x1)) -> b_{a_1}(x1) 33.80/9.58 b_{a_1}(a_{c_1}(x1)) -> b_{c_1}(x1) 33.80/9.58 b_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(x1)) -> b_{b_1}(x1) 33.80/9.58 a_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(x1)) -> a_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(x1))) 33.80/9.58 a_{a_1}(a_{c_1}(x1)) -> a_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(b_{c_1}(x1))) 33.80/9.58 a_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(x1)) -> a_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(x1))) 33.80/9.58 c_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(x1)) -> c_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(x1))) 33.80/9.58 c_{a_1}(a_{c_1}(x1)) -> c_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(b_{c_1}(x1))) 33.80/9.58 c_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(x1)) -> c_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(x1))) 33.80/9.58 b_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(x1)) -> b_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(x1))) 33.80/9.58 b_{a_1}(a_{c_1}(x1)) -> b_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(b_{c_1}(x1))) 33.80/9.58 b_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(x1)) -> b_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(x1))) 33.80/9.58 a_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(x1))) -> a_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(x1))) 33.80/9.58 a_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(b_{c_1}(x1))) -> a_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{c_1}(x1))) 33.80/9.58 a_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(x1))) -> a_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(x1))) 33.80/9.58 c_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(x1))) -> c_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(x1))) 33.80/9.58 c_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(b_{c_1}(x1))) -> c_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{c_1}(x1))) 33.80/9.58 c_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(x1))) -> c_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(x1))) 33.80/9.58 b_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(x1))) -> b_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(x1))) 33.80/9.58 b_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(b_{c_1}(x1))) -> b_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{c_1}(x1))) 33.80/9.58 b_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(x1))) -> b_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(x1))) 33.80/9.58 a_{c_1}(c_{c_1}(c_{c_1}(c_{a_1}(x1)))) -> a_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(x1)) 33.80/9.58 a_{c_1}(c_{c_1}(c_{c_1}(c_{c_1}(x1)))) -> a_{b_1}(b_{c_1}(x1)) 33.80/9.58 a_{c_1}(c_{c_1}(c_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(x1)))) -> a_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(x1)) 33.80/9.58 c_{c_1}(c_{c_1}(c_{c_1}(c_{a_1}(x1)))) -> c_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(x1)) 33.80/9.58 c_{c_1}(c_{c_1}(c_{c_1}(c_{c_1}(x1)))) -> c_{b_1}(b_{c_1}(x1)) 33.80/9.58 c_{c_1}(c_{c_1}(c_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(x1)))) -> c_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(x1)) 33.80/9.58 b_{c_1}(c_{c_1}(c_{c_1}(c_{a_1}(x1)))) -> b_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(x1)) 33.80/9.58 b_{c_1}(c_{c_1}(c_{c_1}(c_{c_1}(x1)))) -> b_{b_1}(b_{c_1}(x1)) 33.80/9.58 b_{c_1}(c_{c_1}(c_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(x1)))) -> b_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(x1)) 33.80/9.58 33.80/9.58 Q is empty. 33.80/9.58 33.80/9.58 ---------------------------------------- 33.80/9.58 33.80/9.58 (7) QTRSRRRProof (EQUIVALENT) 33.80/9.58 Used ordering: 33.80/9.58 Polynomial interpretation [POLO]: 33.80/9.58 33.80/9.58 POL(a_{a_1}(x_1)) = x_1 33.80/9.58 POL(a_{b_1}(x_1)) = 1 + x_1 33.80/9.58 POL(a_{c_1}(x_1)) = x_1 33.80/9.58 POL(b_{a_1}(x_1)) = x_1 33.80/9.58 POL(b_{b_1}(x_1)) = 1 + x_1 33.80/9.58 POL(b_{c_1}(x_1)) = x_1 33.80/9.58 POL(c_{a_1}(x_1)) = 1 + x_1 33.80/9.58 POL(c_{b_1}(x_1)) = x_1 33.80/9.58 POL(c_{c_1}(x_1)) = 1 + x_1 33.80/9.58 With this ordering the following rules can be removed by the rule removal processor [LPAR04] because they are oriented strictly: 33.80/9.58 33.80/9.58 c_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(x1)) -> c_{b_1}(x1) 33.80/9.58 a_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(x1))) -> a_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(x1))) 33.80/9.58 a_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(b_{c_1}(x1))) -> a_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{c_1}(x1))) 33.80/9.58 a_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(x1))) -> a_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(x1))) 33.80/9.58 b_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(x1))) -> b_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(x1))) 33.80/9.58 b_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(b_{c_1}(x1))) -> b_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{c_1}(x1))) 33.80/9.58 b_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(x1))) -> b_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(x1))) 33.80/9.58 a_{c_1}(c_{c_1}(c_{c_1}(c_{a_1}(x1)))) -> a_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(x1)) 33.80/9.58 a_{c_1}(c_{c_1}(c_{c_1}(c_{c_1}(x1)))) -> a_{b_1}(b_{c_1}(x1)) 33.80/9.58 c_{c_1}(c_{c_1}(c_{c_1}(c_{a_1}(x1)))) -> c_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(x1)) 33.80/9.58 c_{c_1}(c_{c_1}(c_{c_1}(c_{c_1}(x1)))) -> c_{b_1}(b_{c_1}(x1)) 33.80/9.58 c_{c_1}(c_{c_1}(c_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(x1)))) -> c_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(x1)) 33.80/9.58 b_{c_1}(c_{c_1}(c_{c_1}(c_{a_1}(x1)))) -> b_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(x1)) 33.80/9.58 b_{c_1}(c_{c_1}(c_{c_1}(c_{c_1}(x1)))) -> b_{b_1}(b_{c_1}(x1)) 33.80/9.58 33.80/9.58 33.80/9.58 33.80/9.58 33.80/9.58 ---------------------------------------- 33.80/9.58 33.80/9.58 (8) 33.80/9.58 Obligation: 33.80/9.58 Q restricted rewrite system: 33.80/9.58 The TRS R consists of the following rules: 33.80/9.58 33.80/9.58 a_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(x1)) -> a_{a_1}(x1) 33.80/9.58 a_{a_1}(a_{c_1}(x1)) -> a_{c_1}(x1) 33.80/9.58 a_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(x1)) -> a_{b_1}(x1) 33.80/9.58 c_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(x1)) -> c_{a_1}(x1) 33.80/9.58 c_{a_1}(a_{c_1}(x1)) -> c_{c_1}(x1) 33.80/9.58 b_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(x1)) -> b_{a_1}(x1) 33.80/9.58 b_{a_1}(a_{c_1}(x1)) -> b_{c_1}(x1) 33.80/9.58 b_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(x1)) -> b_{b_1}(x1) 33.80/9.58 a_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(x1)) -> a_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(x1))) 33.80/9.58 a_{a_1}(a_{c_1}(x1)) -> a_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(b_{c_1}(x1))) 33.80/9.58 a_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(x1)) -> a_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(x1))) 33.80/9.58 c_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(x1)) -> c_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(x1))) 33.80/9.58 c_{a_1}(a_{c_1}(x1)) -> c_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(b_{c_1}(x1))) 33.80/9.58 c_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(x1)) -> c_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(x1))) 33.80/9.58 b_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(x1)) -> b_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(x1))) 33.80/9.58 b_{a_1}(a_{c_1}(x1)) -> b_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(b_{c_1}(x1))) 33.80/9.58 b_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(x1)) -> b_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(x1))) 33.80/9.58 c_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(x1))) -> c_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(x1))) 33.80/9.58 c_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(b_{c_1}(x1))) -> c_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{c_1}(x1))) 33.80/9.58 c_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(x1))) -> c_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(x1))) 33.80/9.58 a_{c_1}(c_{c_1}(c_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(x1)))) -> a_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(x1)) 33.80/9.58 b_{c_1}(c_{c_1}(c_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(x1)))) -> b_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(x1)) 33.80/9.58 33.80/9.58 Q is empty. 33.80/9.58 33.80/9.58 ---------------------------------------- 33.80/9.58 33.80/9.58 (9) DependencyPairsProof (EQUIVALENT) 33.80/9.58 Using Dependency Pairs [AG00,LPAR04] we result in the following initial DP problem. 33.80/9.58 ---------------------------------------- 33.80/9.58 33.80/9.58 (10) 33.80/9.58 Obligation: 33.80/9.58 Q DP problem: 33.80/9.58 The TRS P consists of the following rules: 33.80/9.58 33.80/9.58 C_{A_1}(a_{a_1}(x1)) -> C_{A_1}(x1) 33.80/9.58 B_{A_1}(a_{a_1}(x1)) -> B_{A_1}(x1) 33.80/9.58 B_{A_1}(a_{c_1}(x1)) -> B_{C_1}(x1) 33.80/9.58 A_{A_1}(a_{a_1}(x1)) -> A_{C_1}(c_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(x1))) 33.80/9.58 A_{A_1}(a_{a_1}(x1)) -> C_{B_1}(b_{a_1}(x1)) 33.80/9.58 A_{A_1}(a_{a_1}(x1)) -> B_{A_1}(x1) 33.80/9.58 A_{A_1}(a_{c_1}(x1)) -> A_{C_1}(c_{b_1}(b_{c_1}(x1))) 33.80/9.58 A_{A_1}(a_{c_1}(x1)) -> C_{B_1}(b_{c_1}(x1)) 33.80/9.58 A_{A_1}(a_{c_1}(x1)) -> B_{C_1}(x1) 33.80/9.58 A_{A_1}(a_{b_1}(x1)) -> A_{C_1}(c_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(x1))) 33.80/9.58 A_{A_1}(a_{b_1}(x1)) -> C_{B_1}(b_{b_1}(x1)) 33.80/9.58 C_{A_1}(a_{a_1}(x1)) -> C_{B_1}(b_{a_1}(x1)) 33.80/9.58 C_{A_1}(a_{a_1}(x1)) -> B_{A_1}(x1) 33.80/9.58 C_{A_1}(a_{c_1}(x1)) -> C_{B_1}(b_{c_1}(x1)) 33.80/9.58 C_{A_1}(a_{c_1}(x1)) -> B_{C_1}(x1) 33.80/9.58 C_{A_1}(a_{b_1}(x1)) -> C_{B_1}(b_{b_1}(x1)) 33.80/9.58 B_{A_1}(a_{a_1}(x1)) -> B_{C_1}(c_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(x1))) 33.80/9.58 B_{A_1}(a_{a_1}(x1)) -> C_{B_1}(b_{a_1}(x1)) 33.80/9.58 B_{A_1}(a_{c_1}(x1)) -> B_{C_1}(c_{b_1}(b_{c_1}(x1))) 33.80/9.58 B_{A_1}(a_{c_1}(x1)) -> C_{B_1}(b_{c_1}(x1)) 33.80/9.58 B_{A_1}(a_{b_1}(x1)) -> B_{C_1}(c_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(x1))) 33.80/9.58 B_{A_1}(a_{b_1}(x1)) -> C_{B_1}(b_{b_1}(x1)) 33.80/9.58 C_{B_1}(b_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(x1))) -> C_{A_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(x1))) 33.80/9.58 C_{B_1}(b_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(x1))) -> A_{A_1}(a_{a_1}(x1)) 33.80/9.58 C_{B_1}(b_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(x1))) -> A_{A_1}(x1) 33.80/9.58 C_{B_1}(b_{b_1}(b_{c_1}(x1))) -> C_{A_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{c_1}(x1))) 33.80/9.58 C_{B_1}(b_{b_1}(b_{c_1}(x1))) -> A_{A_1}(a_{c_1}(x1)) 33.80/9.58 C_{B_1}(b_{b_1}(b_{c_1}(x1))) -> A_{C_1}(x1) 33.80/9.58 C_{B_1}(b_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(x1))) -> C_{A_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(x1))) 33.80/9.58 C_{B_1}(b_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(x1))) -> A_{A_1}(a_{b_1}(x1)) 33.80/9.58 33.80/9.58 The TRS R consists of the following rules: 33.80/9.58 33.80/9.58 a_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(x1)) -> a_{a_1}(x1) 33.80/9.58 a_{a_1}(a_{c_1}(x1)) -> a_{c_1}(x1) 33.80/9.58 a_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(x1)) -> a_{b_1}(x1) 33.80/9.58 c_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(x1)) -> c_{a_1}(x1) 33.80/9.58 c_{a_1}(a_{c_1}(x1)) -> c_{c_1}(x1) 33.80/9.58 b_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(x1)) -> b_{a_1}(x1) 33.80/9.58 b_{a_1}(a_{c_1}(x1)) -> b_{c_1}(x1) 33.80/9.58 b_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(x1)) -> b_{b_1}(x1) 33.80/9.58 a_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(x1)) -> a_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(x1))) 33.80/9.58 a_{a_1}(a_{c_1}(x1)) -> a_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(b_{c_1}(x1))) 33.80/9.58 a_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(x1)) -> a_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(x1))) 33.80/9.58 c_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(x1)) -> c_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(x1))) 33.80/9.58 c_{a_1}(a_{c_1}(x1)) -> c_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(b_{c_1}(x1))) 33.80/9.58 c_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(x1)) -> c_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(x1))) 33.80/9.58 b_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(x1)) -> b_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(x1))) 33.80/9.58 b_{a_1}(a_{c_1}(x1)) -> b_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(b_{c_1}(x1))) 33.80/9.58 b_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(x1)) -> b_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(x1))) 33.80/9.58 c_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(x1))) -> c_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(x1))) 33.80/9.58 c_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(b_{c_1}(x1))) -> c_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{c_1}(x1))) 33.80/9.58 c_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(x1))) -> c_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(x1))) 33.80/9.58 a_{c_1}(c_{c_1}(c_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(x1)))) -> a_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(x1)) 33.80/9.58 b_{c_1}(c_{c_1}(c_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(x1)))) -> b_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(x1)) 33.80/9.58 33.80/9.58 Q is empty. 33.80/9.58 We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains. 33.80/9.58 ---------------------------------------- 33.80/9.58 33.80/9.58 (11) DependencyGraphProof (EQUIVALENT) 33.80/9.58 The approximation of the Dependency Graph [LPAR04,FROCOS05,EDGSTAR] contains 1 SCC with 10 less nodes. 33.80/9.58 ---------------------------------------- 33.80/9.58 33.80/9.58 (12) 33.80/9.58 Obligation: 33.80/9.58 Q DP problem: 33.80/9.58 The TRS P consists of the following rules: 33.80/9.58 33.80/9.58 C_{A_1}(a_{a_1}(x1)) -> C_{B_1}(b_{a_1}(x1)) 33.80/9.58 C_{B_1}(b_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(x1))) -> C_{A_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(x1))) 33.80/9.58 C_{A_1}(a_{a_1}(x1)) -> C_{A_1}(x1) 33.80/9.58 C_{A_1}(a_{a_1}(x1)) -> B_{A_1}(x1) 33.80/9.58 B_{A_1}(a_{a_1}(x1)) -> B_{A_1}(x1) 33.80/9.58 B_{A_1}(a_{a_1}(x1)) -> C_{B_1}(b_{a_1}(x1)) 33.80/9.58 C_{B_1}(b_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(x1))) -> A_{A_1}(a_{a_1}(x1)) 33.80/9.58 A_{A_1}(a_{a_1}(x1)) -> C_{B_1}(b_{a_1}(x1)) 33.80/9.58 C_{B_1}(b_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(x1))) -> A_{A_1}(x1) 33.80/9.58 A_{A_1}(a_{a_1}(x1)) -> B_{A_1}(x1) 33.80/9.58 B_{A_1}(a_{c_1}(x1)) -> C_{B_1}(b_{c_1}(x1)) 33.80/9.58 C_{B_1}(b_{b_1}(b_{c_1}(x1))) -> C_{A_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{c_1}(x1))) 33.80/9.58 C_{A_1}(a_{c_1}(x1)) -> C_{B_1}(b_{c_1}(x1)) 33.80/9.58 C_{B_1}(b_{b_1}(b_{c_1}(x1))) -> A_{A_1}(a_{c_1}(x1)) 33.80/9.58 A_{A_1}(a_{c_1}(x1)) -> C_{B_1}(b_{c_1}(x1)) 33.80/9.58 C_{B_1}(b_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(x1))) -> C_{A_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(x1))) 33.80/9.58 C_{A_1}(a_{b_1}(x1)) -> C_{B_1}(b_{b_1}(x1)) 33.80/9.58 C_{B_1}(b_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(x1))) -> A_{A_1}(a_{b_1}(x1)) 33.80/9.58 A_{A_1}(a_{b_1}(x1)) -> C_{B_1}(b_{b_1}(x1)) 33.80/9.58 B_{A_1}(a_{b_1}(x1)) -> C_{B_1}(b_{b_1}(x1)) 33.80/9.58 33.80/9.58 The TRS R consists of the following rules: 33.80/9.58 33.80/9.58 a_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(x1)) -> a_{a_1}(x1) 33.80/9.58 a_{a_1}(a_{c_1}(x1)) -> a_{c_1}(x1) 33.80/9.58 a_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(x1)) -> a_{b_1}(x1) 33.80/9.58 c_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(x1)) -> c_{a_1}(x1) 33.80/9.58 c_{a_1}(a_{c_1}(x1)) -> c_{c_1}(x1) 33.80/9.58 b_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(x1)) -> b_{a_1}(x1) 33.80/9.58 b_{a_1}(a_{c_1}(x1)) -> b_{c_1}(x1) 33.80/9.58 b_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(x1)) -> b_{b_1}(x1) 33.80/9.58 a_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(x1)) -> a_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(x1))) 33.80/9.58 a_{a_1}(a_{c_1}(x1)) -> a_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(b_{c_1}(x1))) 33.80/9.58 a_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(x1)) -> a_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(x1))) 33.80/9.58 c_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(x1)) -> c_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(x1))) 33.80/9.58 c_{a_1}(a_{c_1}(x1)) -> c_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(b_{c_1}(x1))) 33.80/9.58 c_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(x1)) -> c_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(x1))) 33.80/9.58 b_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(x1)) -> b_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(x1))) 33.80/9.58 b_{a_1}(a_{c_1}(x1)) -> b_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(b_{c_1}(x1))) 33.80/9.58 b_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(x1)) -> b_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(x1))) 33.80/9.58 c_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(x1))) -> c_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(x1))) 33.80/9.58 c_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(b_{c_1}(x1))) -> c_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{c_1}(x1))) 33.80/9.58 c_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(x1))) -> c_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(x1))) 33.80/9.58 a_{c_1}(c_{c_1}(c_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(x1)))) -> a_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(x1)) 33.80/9.58 b_{c_1}(c_{c_1}(c_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(x1)))) -> b_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(x1)) 33.80/9.58 33.80/9.58 Q is empty. 33.80/9.58 We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains. 33.80/9.58 ---------------------------------------- 33.80/9.58 33.80/9.58 (13) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT) 33.80/9.58 We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04,JAR06]. 33.80/9.58 33.80/9.58 33.80/9.58 The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted. 33.80/9.58 33.80/9.58 C_{B_1}(b_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(x1))) -> C_{A_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(x1))) 33.80/9.58 C_{B_1}(b_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(x1))) -> A_{A_1}(a_{a_1}(x1)) 33.80/9.58 C_{B_1}(b_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(x1))) -> A_{A_1}(x1) 33.80/9.58 C_{B_1}(b_{b_1}(b_{c_1}(x1))) -> C_{A_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{c_1}(x1))) 33.80/9.58 C_{B_1}(b_{b_1}(b_{c_1}(x1))) -> A_{A_1}(a_{c_1}(x1)) 33.80/9.58 C_{B_1}(b_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(x1))) -> C_{A_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(x1))) 33.80/9.58 C_{B_1}(b_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(x1))) -> A_{A_1}(a_{b_1}(x1)) 33.80/9.58 The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly. 33.80/9.58 Used ordering: Polynomial Order [NEGPOLO,POLO] with Interpretation: 33.80/9.58 33.80/9.58 POL( C_{B_1}_1(x_1) ) = 2x_1 + 2 33.80/9.58 POL( A_{A_1}_1(x_1) ) = 2x_1 + 2 33.80/9.58 POL( a_{c_1}_1(x_1) ) = x_1 33.80/9.58 POL( c_{b_1}_1(x_1) ) = x_1 33.80/9.58 POL( C_{A_1}_1(x_1) ) = 2x_1 + 2 33.80/9.58 POL( b_{a_1}_1(x_1) ) = x_1 33.80/9.58 POL( a_{a_1}_1(x_1) ) = x_1 33.80/9.58 POL( b_{c_1}_1(x_1) ) = x_1 33.80/9.58 POL( a_{b_1}_1(x_1) ) = 2x_1 + 2 33.80/9.58 POL( b_{b_1}_1(x_1) ) = 2x_1 + 2 33.80/9.58 POL( c_{a_1}_1(x_1) ) = 2x_1 + 2 33.80/9.58 POL( c_{c_1}_1(x_1) ) = 2x_1 + 2 33.80/9.58 POL( B_{A_1}_1(x_1) ) = 2x_1 + 2 33.80/9.58 33.80/9.58 The following usable rules [FROCOS05] with respect to the argument filtering of the ordering [JAR06] were oriented: 33.80/9.58 33.80/9.58 b_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(x1)) -> b_{a_1}(x1) 33.80/9.58 b_{a_1}(a_{c_1}(x1)) -> b_{c_1}(x1) 33.80/9.58 b_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(x1)) -> b_{b_1}(x1) 33.80/9.58 b_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(x1)) -> b_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(x1))) 33.80/9.58 b_{a_1}(a_{c_1}(x1)) -> b_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(b_{c_1}(x1))) 33.80/9.58 b_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(x1)) -> b_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(x1))) 33.80/9.58 a_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(x1)) -> a_{a_1}(x1) 33.80/9.58 a_{a_1}(a_{c_1}(x1)) -> a_{c_1}(x1) 33.80/9.58 a_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(x1)) -> a_{b_1}(x1) 33.80/9.58 a_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(x1)) -> a_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(x1))) 33.80/9.58 a_{a_1}(a_{c_1}(x1)) -> a_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(b_{c_1}(x1))) 33.80/9.58 a_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(x1)) -> a_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(x1))) 33.80/9.58 b_{c_1}(c_{c_1}(c_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(x1)))) -> b_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(x1)) 33.80/9.58 a_{c_1}(c_{c_1}(c_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(x1)))) -> a_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(x1)) 33.80/9.58 c_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(x1))) -> c_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(x1))) 33.80/9.58 c_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(b_{c_1}(x1))) -> c_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{c_1}(x1))) 33.80/9.58 c_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(x1))) -> c_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(x1))) 33.80/9.58 c_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(x1)) -> c_{a_1}(x1) 33.80/9.58 c_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(x1)) -> c_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(x1))) 33.80/9.58 c_{a_1}(a_{c_1}(x1)) -> c_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(b_{c_1}(x1))) 33.80/9.58 c_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(x1)) -> c_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(x1))) 33.80/9.58 c_{a_1}(a_{c_1}(x1)) -> c_{c_1}(x1) 33.80/9.58 33.80/9.58 33.80/9.58 ---------------------------------------- 33.80/9.58 33.80/9.58 (14) 33.80/9.58 Obligation: 33.80/9.58 Q DP problem: 33.80/9.58 The TRS P consists of the following rules: 33.80/9.58 33.80/9.58 C_{A_1}(a_{a_1}(x1)) -> C_{B_1}(b_{a_1}(x1)) 33.80/9.58 C_{A_1}(a_{a_1}(x1)) -> C_{A_1}(x1) 33.80/9.58 C_{A_1}(a_{a_1}(x1)) -> B_{A_1}(x1) 33.80/9.58 B_{A_1}(a_{a_1}(x1)) -> B_{A_1}(x1) 33.80/9.58 B_{A_1}(a_{a_1}(x1)) -> C_{B_1}(b_{a_1}(x1)) 33.80/9.58 A_{A_1}(a_{a_1}(x1)) -> C_{B_1}(b_{a_1}(x1)) 33.80/9.58 A_{A_1}(a_{a_1}(x1)) -> B_{A_1}(x1) 33.80/9.58 B_{A_1}(a_{c_1}(x1)) -> C_{B_1}(b_{c_1}(x1)) 33.80/9.58 C_{A_1}(a_{c_1}(x1)) -> C_{B_1}(b_{c_1}(x1)) 33.80/9.58 A_{A_1}(a_{c_1}(x1)) -> C_{B_1}(b_{c_1}(x1)) 33.80/9.58 C_{A_1}(a_{b_1}(x1)) -> C_{B_1}(b_{b_1}(x1)) 33.80/9.58 A_{A_1}(a_{b_1}(x1)) -> C_{B_1}(b_{b_1}(x1)) 33.80/9.58 B_{A_1}(a_{b_1}(x1)) -> C_{B_1}(b_{b_1}(x1)) 33.80/9.58 33.80/9.58 The TRS R consists of the following rules: 33.80/9.58 33.80/9.58 a_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(x1)) -> a_{a_1}(x1) 33.80/9.58 a_{a_1}(a_{c_1}(x1)) -> a_{c_1}(x1) 33.80/9.58 a_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(x1)) -> a_{b_1}(x1) 33.80/9.58 c_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(x1)) -> c_{a_1}(x1) 33.80/9.58 c_{a_1}(a_{c_1}(x1)) -> c_{c_1}(x1) 33.80/9.58 b_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(x1)) -> b_{a_1}(x1) 33.80/9.58 b_{a_1}(a_{c_1}(x1)) -> b_{c_1}(x1) 33.80/9.58 b_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(x1)) -> b_{b_1}(x1) 33.80/9.58 a_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(x1)) -> a_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(x1))) 33.80/9.58 a_{a_1}(a_{c_1}(x1)) -> a_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(b_{c_1}(x1))) 33.80/9.58 a_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(x1)) -> a_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(x1))) 33.80/9.58 c_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(x1)) -> c_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(x1))) 33.80/9.58 c_{a_1}(a_{c_1}(x1)) -> c_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(b_{c_1}(x1))) 33.80/9.58 c_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(x1)) -> c_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(x1))) 33.80/9.58 b_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(x1)) -> b_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(x1))) 33.80/9.58 b_{a_1}(a_{c_1}(x1)) -> b_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(b_{c_1}(x1))) 33.80/9.58 b_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(x1)) -> b_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(x1))) 33.80/9.58 c_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(x1))) -> c_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(x1))) 33.80/9.58 c_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(b_{c_1}(x1))) -> c_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{c_1}(x1))) 33.80/9.58 c_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(x1))) -> c_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(x1))) 33.80/9.58 a_{c_1}(c_{c_1}(c_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(x1)))) -> a_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(x1)) 33.80/9.58 b_{c_1}(c_{c_1}(c_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(x1)))) -> b_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(x1)) 33.80/9.58 33.80/9.58 Q is empty. 33.80/9.58 We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains. 33.80/9.58 ---------------------------------------- 33.80/9.58 33.80/9.58 (15) DependencyGraphProof (EQUIVALENT) 33.80/9.58 The approximation of the Dependency Graph [LPAR04,FROCOS05,EDGSTAR] contains 2 SCCs with 11 less nodes. 33.80/9.58 ---------------------------------------- 33.80/9.58 33.80/9.58 (16) 33.80/9.58 Complex Obligation (AND) 33.80/9.58 33.80/9.58 ---------------------------------------- 33.80/9.58 33.80/9.58 (17) 33.80/9.58 Obligation: 33.80/9.58 Q DP problem: 33.80/9.58 The TRS P consists of the following rules: 33.80/9.58 33.80/9.58 B_{A_1}(a_{a_1}(x1)) -> B_{A_1}(x1) 33.80/9.58 33.80/9.58 The TRS R consists of the following rules: 33.80/9.58 33.80/9.58 a_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(x1)) -> a_{a_1}(x1) 33.80/9.58 a_{a_1}(a_{c_1}(x1)) -> a_{c_1}(x1) 33.80/9.58 a_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(x1)) -> a_{b_1}(x1) 33.80/9.58 c_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(x1)) -> c_{a_1}(x1) 33.80/9.58 c_{a_1}(a_{c_1}(x1)) -> c_{c_1}(x1) 33.80/9.58 b_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(x1)) -> b_{a_1}(x1) 33.80/9.58 b_{a_1}(a_{c_1}(x1)) -> b_{c_1}(x1) 33.80/9.58 b_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(x1)) -> b_{b_1}(x1) 33.80/9.58 a_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(x1)) -> a_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(x1))) 33.80/9.58 a_{a_1}(a_{c_1}(x1)) -> a_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(b_{c_1}(x1))) 33.80/9.58 a_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(x1)) -> a_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(x1))) 33.80/9.58 c_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(x1)) -> c_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(x1))) 33.80/9.58 c_{a_1}(a_{c_1}(x1)) -> c_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(b_{c_1}(x1))) 33.80/9.58 c_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(x1)) -> c_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(x1))) 33.80/9.58 b_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(x1)) -> b_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(x1))) 33.80/9.58 b_{a_1}(a_{c_1}(x1)) -> b_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(b_{c_1}(x1))) 33.80/9.58 b_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(x1)) -> b_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(x1))) 33.80/9.58 c_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(x1))) -> c_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(x1))) 33.80/9.58 c_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(b_{c_1}(x1))) -> c_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{c_1}(x1))) 33.80/9.58 c_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(x1))) -> c_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(x1))) 33.80/9.58 a_{c_1}(c_{c_1}(c_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(x1)))) -> a_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(x1)) 33.80/9.58 b_{c_1}(c_{c_1}(c_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(x1)))) -> b_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(x1)) 33.80/9.58 33.80/9.58 Q is empty. 33.80/9.58 We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains. 33.80/9.58 ---------------------------------------- 33.80/9.58 33.80/9.58 (18) UsableRulesProof (EQUIVALENT) 33.80/9.58 We can use the usable rules and reduction pair processor [LPAR04] with the Ce-compatible extension of the polynomial order that maps every function symbol to the sum of its arguments. Then, we can delete all non-usable rules [FROCOS05] from R. 33.80/9.58 ---------------------------------------- 33.80/9.58 33.80/9.58 (19) 33.80/9.58 Obligation: 33.80/9.58 Q DP problem: 33.80/9.58 The TRS P consists of the following rules: 33.80/9.58 33.80/9.58 B_{A_1}(a_{a_1}(x1)) -> B_{A_1}(x1) 33.80/9.58 33.80/9.58 R is empty. 33.80/9.58 Q is empty. 33.80/9.58 We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains. 33.80/9.58 ---------------------------------------- 33.80/9.58 33.80/9.58 (20) QDPSizeChangeProof (EQUIVALENT) 33.80/9.58 By using the subterm criterion [SUBTERM_CRITERION] together with the size-change analysis [AAECC05] we have proven that there are no infinite chains for this DP problem. 33.80/9.58 33.80/9.58 From the DPs we obtained the following set of size-change graphs: 33.80/9.58 *B_{A_1}(a_{a_1}(x1)) -> B_{A_1}(x1) 33.80/9.58 The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1 33.80/9.58 33.80/9.58 33.80/9.58 ---------------------------------------- 33.80/9.58 33.80/9.58 (21) 33.80/9.58 YES 33.80/9.58 33.80/9.58 ---------------------------------------- 33.80/9.58 33.80/9.58 (22) 33.80/9.58 Obligation: 33.80/9.58 Q DP problem: 33.80/9.58 The TRS P consists of the following rules: 33.80/9.58 33.80/9.58 C_{A_1}(a_{a_1}(x1)) -> C_{A_1}(x1) 33.80/9.58 33.80/9.58 The TRS R consists of the following rules: 33.80/9.58 33.80/9.58 a_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(x1)) -> a_{a_1}(x1) 33.80/9.58 a_{a_1}(a_{c_1}(x1)) -> a_{c_1}(x1) 33.80/9.58 a_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(x1)) -> a_{b_1}(x1) 33.80/9.58 c_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(x1)) -> c_{a_1}(x1) 33.80/9.58 c_{a_1}(a_{c_1}(x1)) -> c_{c_1}(x1) 33.80/9.58 b_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(x1)) -> b_{a_1}(x1) 33.80/9.58 b_{a_1}(a_{c_1}(x1)) -> b_{c_1}(x1) 33.80/9.58 b_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(x1)) -> b_{b_1}(x1) 33.80/9.58 a_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(x1)) -> a_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(x1))) 33.80/9.58 a_{a_1}(a_{c_1}(x1)) -> a_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(b_{c_1}(x1))) 33.80/9.58 a_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(x1)) -> a_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(x1))) 33.80/9.58 c_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(x1)) -> c_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(x1))) 33.80/9.58 c_{a_1}(a_{c_1}(x1)) -> c_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(b_{c_1}(x1))) 33.80/9.58 c_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(x1)) -> c_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(x1))) 33.80/9.58 b_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(x1)) -> b_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(x1))) 33.80/9.58 b_{a_1}(a_{c_1}(x1)) -> b_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(b_{c_1}(x1))) 33.80/9.58 b_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(x1)) -> b_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(x1))) 33.80/9.58 c_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(x1))) -> c_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(x1))) 33.80/9.58 c_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(b_{c_1}(x1))) -> c_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{c_1}(x1))) 33.80/9.58 c_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(x1))) -> c_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(x1))) 33.80/9.58 a_{c_1}(c_{c_1}(c_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(x1)))) -> a_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(x1)) 33.80/9.58 b_{c_1}(c_{c_1}(c_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(x1)))) -> b_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(x1)) 33.80/9.58 33.80/9.58 Q is empty. 33.80/9.58 We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains. 33.80/9.58 ---------------------------------------- 33.80/9.58 33.80/9.58 (23) UsableRulesProof (EQUIVALENT) 33.80/9.58 We can use the usable rules and reduction pair processor [LPAR04] with the Ce-compatible extension of the polynomial order that maps every function symbol to the sum of its arguments. Then, we can delete all non-usable rules [FROCOS05] from R. 33.80/9.58 ---------------------------------------- 33.80/9.58 33.80/9.58 (24) 33.80/9.58 Obligation: 33.80/9.58 Q DP problem: 33.80/9.58 The TRS P consists of the following rules: 33.80/9.58 33.80/9.58 C_{A_1}(a_{a_1}(x1)) -> C_{A_1}(x1) 33.80/9.58 33.80/9.58 R is empty. 33.80/9.58 Q is empty. 33.80/9.58 We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains. 33.80/9.58 ---------------------------------------- 33.80/9.58 33.80/9.58 (25) QDPSizeChangeProof (EQUIVALENT) 33.80/9.58 By using the subterm criterion [SUBTERM_CRITERION] together with the size-change analysis [AAECC05] we have proven that there are no infinite chains for this DP problem. 33.80/9.58 33.80/9.58 From the DPs we obtained the following set of size-change graphs: 33.80/9.58 *C_{A_1}(a_{a_1}(x1)) -> C_{A_1}(x1) 33.80/9.58 The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1 33.80/9.58 33.80/9.58 33.80/9.58 ---------------------------------------- 33.80/9.58 33.80/9.58 (26) 33.80/9.58 YES 33.89/9.62 EOF