24.16/7.16	YES
24.16/7.17	proof of /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml
24.16/7.17	# AProVE Commit ID: 48fb2092695e11cc9f56e44b17a92a5f88ffb256 marcel 20180622 unpublished dirty
24.16/7.17	
24.16/7.17	
24.16/7.17	Termination w.r.t. Q of the given QTRS could be proven:
24.16/7.17	
24.16/7.17	(0) QTRS
24.16/7.17	(1) DependencyPairsProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms]
24.16/7.17	(2) QDP
24.16/7.17	(3) QDPOrderProof [EQUIVALENT, 288 ms]
24.16/7.17	(4) QDP
24.16/7.17	(5) QDPOrderProof [EQUIVALENT, 133 ms]
24.16/7.17	(6) QDP
24.16/7.17	(7) PisEmptyProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms]
24.16/7.17	(8) YES
24.16/7.17	
24.16/7.17	
24.16/7.17	----------------------------------------
24.16/7.17	
24.16/7.17	(0)
24.16/7.17	Obligation:
24.16/7.17	Q restricted rewrite system:
24.16/7.17	The TRS R consists of the following rules:
24.16/7.17	
24.16/7.17	   a(a(x1)) -> x1
24.16/7.17	   a(b(b(a(x1)))) -> a(a(b(a(b(b(x1))))))
24.16/7.17	
24.16/7.17	Q is empty.
24.16/7.17	
24.16/7.17	----------------------------------------
24.16/7.17	
24.16/7.17	(1) DependencyPairsProof (EQUIVALENT)
24.16/7.17	Using Dependency Pairs [AG00,LPAR04] we result in the following initial DP problem.
24.16/7.17	----------------------------------------
24.16/7.17	
24.16/7.17	(2)
24.16/7.17	Obligation:
24.16/7.17	Q DP problem:
24.16/7.17	The TRS P consists of the following rules:
24.16/7.17	
24.16/7.17	   A(b(b(a(x1)))) -> A(a(b(a(b(b(x1))))))
24.16/7.17	   A(b(b(a(x1)))) -> A(b(a(b(b(x1)))))
24.16/7.17	   A(b(b(a(x1)))) -> A(b(b(x1)))
24.16/7.17	
24.16/7.17	The TRS R consists of the following rules:
24.16/7.17	
24.16/7.17	   a(a(x1)) -> x1
24.16/7.17	   a(b(b(a(x1)))) -> a(a(b(a(b(b(x1))))))
24.16/7.17	
24.16/7.17	Q is empty.
24.16/7.17	We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
24.16/7.17	----------------------------------------
24.16/7.17	
24.16/7.17	(3) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT)
24.16/7.17	We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04,JAR06].
24.16/7.17	
24.16/7.17	
24.16/7.17	The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.
24.16/7.17	
24.16/7.17	   A(b(b(a(x1)))) -> A(b(a(b(b(x1)))))
24.16/7.17	   A(b(b(a(x1)))) -> A(b(b(x1)))
24.16/7.17	The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
24.16/7.17	Used ordering:  Matrix interpretation [MATRO] with arctic natural numbers [ARCTIC]:
24.16/7.17	
24.16/7.17	   <<<
24.16/7.17	 POL(A(x_1)) =  	[[0A]] 	 +  	[[-I, 0A, -I]] 	* 	x_1
24.16/7.17	>>>
24.16/7.17	
24.16/7.17	   <<<
24.16/7.17	 POL(b(x_1)) =  	[[0A], [-I], [-I]] 	 +  	[[0A, 0A, 0A], [-I, -I, 0A], [-I, 0A, -I]] 	* 	x_1
24.16/7.17	>>>
24.16/7.17	
24.16/7.17	   <<<
24.16/7.17	 POL(a(x_1)) =  	[[0A], [1A], [-I]] 	 +  	[[0A, 0A, 0A], [-I, 1A, 0A], [-I, 0A, -I]] 	* 	x_1
24.16/7.17	>>>
24.16/7.17	
24.16/7.17	
24.16/7.17	The following usable rules [FROCOS05] with respect to the argument filtering of the ordering [JAR06] were oriented:
24.16/7.17	
24.16/7.17	   a(b(b(a(x1)))) -> a(a(b(a(b(b(x1))))))
24.16/7.17	   a(a(x1)) -> x1
24.16/7.17	
24.16/7.17	
24.16/7.17	----------------------------------------
24.16/7.17	
24.16/7.17	(4)
24.16/7.17	Obligation:
24.16/7.17	Q DP problem:
24.16/7.17	The TRS P consists of the following rules:
24.16/7.17	
24.16/7.17	   A(b(b(a(x1)))) -> A(a(b(a(b(b(x1))))))
24.16/7.17	
24.16/7.17	The TRS R consists of the following rules:
24.16/7.17	
24.16/7.17	   a(a(x1)) -> x1
24.16/7.17	   a(b(b(a(x1)))) -> a(a(b(a(b(b(x1))))))
24.16/7.17	
24.16/7.17	Q is empty.
24.16/7.17	We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
24.16/7.17	----------------------------------------
24.16/7.17	
24.16/7.17	(5) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT)
24.16/7.17	We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04,JAR06].
24.16/7.17	
24.16/7.17	
24.16/7.17	The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.
24.16/7.17	
24.16/7.17	   A(b(b(a(x1)))) -> A(a(b(a(b(b(x1))))))
24.16/7.17	The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
24.16/7.17	Used ordering:  Matrix interpretation [MATRO] with arctic natural numbers [ARCTIC]:
24.16/7.17	
24.16/7.17	   <<<
24.16/7.17	 POL(A(x_1)) =  	[[0A]] 	 +  	[[-I, 0A, 0A]] 	* 	x_1
24.16/7.17	>>>
24.16/7.17	
24.16/7.17	   <<<
24.16/7.17	 POL(b(x_1)) =  	[[0A], [0A], [0A]] 	 +  	[[-I, -I, 0A], [-I, -I, 0A], [0A, -I, -I]] 	* 	x_1
24.16/7.17	>>>
24.16/7.17	
24.16/7.17	   <<<
24.16/7.17	 POL(a(x_1)) =  	[[1A], [0A], [-I]] 	 +  	[[1A, 0A, 0A], [0A, 0A, -I], [0A, 0A, -I]] 	* 	x_1
24.16/7.17	>>>
24.16/7.17	
24.16/7.17	
24.16/7.17	The following usable rules [FROCOS05] with respect to the argument filtering of the ordering [JAR06] were oriented:
24.16/7.17	
24.16/7.17	   a(b(b(a(x1)))) -> a(a(b(a(b(b(x1))))))
24.16/7.17	   a(a(x1)) -> x1
24.16/7.17	
24.16/7.17	
24.16/7.17	----------------------------------------
24.16/7.17	
24.16/7.17	(6)
24.16/7.17	Obligation:
24.16/7.17	Q DP problem:
24.16/7.17	P is empty.
24.16/7.17	The TRS R consists of the following rules:
24.16/7.17	
24.16/7.17	   a(a(x1)) -> x1
24.16/7.17	   a(b(b(a(x1)))) -> a(a(b(a(b(b(x1))))))
24.16/7.17	
24.16/7.17	Q is empty.
24.16/7.17	We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
24.16/7.17	----------------------------------------
24.16/7.17	
24.16/7.17	(7) PisEmptyProof (EQUIVALENT)
24.16/7.17	The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.
24.16/7.17	----------------------------------------
24.16/7.17	
24.16/7.17	(8)
24.16/7.17	YES
24.34/7.22	EOF