4.79/2.02	NO
5.36/2.16	proof of /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml
5.36/2.16	# AProVE Commit ID: 48fb2092695e11cc9f56e44b17a92a5f88ffb256 marcel 20180622 unpublished dirty
5.36/2.16	
5.36/2.16	
5.36/2.16	Termination w.r.t. Q of the given QTRS could be disproven:
5.36/2.16	
5.36/2.16	(0) QTRS
5.36/2.16	(1) NonTerminationProof [COMPLETE, 174 ms]
5.36/2.16	(2) NO
5.36/2.16	
5.36/2.16	
5.36/2.16	----------------------------------------
5.36/2.16	
5.36/2.16	(0)
5.36/2.16	Obligation:
5.36/2.16	Q restricted rewrite system:
5.36/2.16	The TRS R consists of the following rules:
5.36/2.16	
5.36/2.16	   a(x1) -> x1
5.36/2.16	   a(b(x1)) -> b(a(c(b(a(x1)))))
5.36/2.16	   b(x1) -> x1
5.36/2.16	   c(c(x1)) -> x1
5.36/2.16	
5.36/2.16	Q is empty.
5.36/2.16	
5.36/2.16	----------------------------------------
5.36/2.16	
5.36/2.16	(1) NonTerminationProof (COMPLETE)
5.36/2.16	We used the non-termination processor [OPPELT08] to show that the SRS problem is infinite.
5.36/2.16	
5.36/2.16	Found the self-embedding DerivationStructure: 
5.36/2.16	"a b b b c b -> a b b b c b"
5.36/2.16	a b b b c b -> a b b b c b
5.36/2.16	by OverlapClosure OC 3"a b b b c b -> a b b b a c b
5.36/2.16	by OverlapClosure OC 2"a b b b c -> a b b a
5.36/2.16	by OverlapClosure OC 3"a b b b c -> b a b b a
5.36/2.16	by OverlapClosure OC 2"a b b b -> b a b b a c
5.36/2.16	by OverlapClosure OC 2"a b b b -> b a b b a c b
5.36/2.16	by OverlapClosure OC 2"a b b -> b a b a
5.36/2.16	by OverlapClosure OC 3"a b b -> b a c c b a
5.36/2.16	by OverlapClosure OC 3"a b b -> b a c b c b a
5.36/2.16	by OverlapClosure OC 2"a b -> b a c a
5.36/2.16	by OverlapClosure OC 3"a b -> b a c b a
5.36/2.16	by original rule (OC 1)""b -> 
5.36/2.16	by original rule (OC 1)"""a b -> b c b a
5.36/2.16	by OverlapClosure OC 3"a b -> b a c b a
5.36/2.16	by original rule (OC 1)""a -> 
5.36/2.16	by original rule (OC 1)""""b -> 
5.36/2.16	by original rule (OC 1)"""c c -> 
5.36/2.16	by original rule (OC 1)"""a b -> b a c b
5.36/2.16	by OverlapClosure OC 2"a b -> b a c b a
5.36/2.16	by original rule (OC 1)""a -> 
5.36/2.16	by original rule (OC 1)""""b -> 
5.36/2.16	by original rule (OC 1)"""c c -> 
5.36/2.16	by original rule (OC 1)"""b -> 
5.36/2.16	by original rule (OC 1)"""a b -> b a c b
5.36/2.16	by OverlapClosure OC 2"a b -> b a c b a
5.36/2.16	by original rule (OC 1)""a -> 
5.36/2.16	by original rule (OC 1)""""a -> 
5.36/2.16	by original rule (OC 1)"
5.36/2.16	
5.36/2.16	----------------------------------------
5.36/2.16	
5.36/2.16	(2)
5.36/2.16	NO
5.36/2.21	EOF