3.11/1.54	NO
3.11/1.55	proof of /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml
3.11/1.55	# AProVE Commit ID: 48fb2092695e11cc9f56e44b17a92a5f88ffb256 marcel 20180622 unpublished dirty
3.11/1.55	
3.11/1.55	
3.11/1.55	Termination w.r.t. Q of the given QTRS could be disproven:
3.11/1.55	
3.11/1.55	(0) QTRS
3.11/1.55	(1) NonTerminationProof [COMPLETE, 0 ms]
3.11/1.55	(2) NO
3.11/1.55	
3.11/1.55	
3.11/1.55	----------------------------------------
3.11/1.55	
3.11/1.55	(0)
3.11/1.55	Obligation:
3.11/1.55	Q restricted rewrite system:
3.11/1.55	The TRS R consists of the following rules:
3.11/1.55	
3.11/1.55	   a(a(a(x1))) -> a(b(b(x1)))
3.11/1.55	   b(a(b(x1))) -> a(b(a(x1)))
3.11/1.55	
3.11/1.55	Q is empty.
3.11/1.55	
3.11/1.55	----------------------------------------
3.11/1.55	
3.11/1.55	(1) NonTerminationProof (COMPLETE)
3.11/1.55	We used the non-termination processor [OPPELT08] to show that the SRS problem is infinite.
3.11/1.55	
3.11/1.55	Found the self-embedding DerivationStructure: 
3.11/1.55	"a a a a b a -> a a a a b a"
3.11/1.55	a a a a b a -> a a a a b a
3.11/1.55	by OverlapClosure OC 2"a a a a b a -> a a a b a b
3.11/1.55	by OverlapClosure OC 3"a a a a b a -> a a b a b b
3.11/1.55	by OverlapClosure OC 2"a a a a b -> a a b a a
3.11/1.55	by OverlapClosure OC 3"a a a a b -> a b a b a
3.11/1.55	by OverlapClosure OC 2"a a a -> a b b
3.11/1.55	by original rule (OC 1)""b a b -> a b a
3.11/1.55	by original rule (OC 1)"""b a b -> a b a
3.11/1.55	by original rule (OC 1)"""a a a -> a b b
3.11/1.55	by original rule (OC 1)"""b a b -> a b a
3.11/1.55	by original rule (OC 1)"""b a b -> a b a
3.11/1.55	by original rule (OC 1)"
3.11/1.55	
3.11/1.55	----------------------------------------
3.11/1.55	
3.11/1.55	(2)
3.11/1.55	NO
3.24/1.59	EOF