3.34/1.56	NO
3.34/1.57	proof of /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml
3.34/1.57	# AProVE Commit ID: 48fb2092695e11cc9f56e44b17a92a5f88ffb256 marcel 20180622 unpublished dirty
3.34/1.57	
3.34/1.57	
3.34/1.57	Termination w.r.t. Q of the given QTRS could be disproven:
3.34/1.57	
3.34/1.57	(0) QTRS
3.34/1.57	(1) NonTerminationProof [COMPLETE, 0 ms]
3.34/1.57	(2) NO
3.34/1.57	
3.34/1.57	
3.34/1.57	----------------------------------------
3.34/1.57	
3.34/1.57	(0)
3.34/1.57	Obligation:
3.34/1.57	Q restricted rewrite system:
3.34/1.57	The TRS R consists of the following rules:
3.34/1.57	
3.34/1.57	   c(a(b(a(x1)))) -> a(b(a(b(c(c(a(x1)))))))
3.34/1.57	
3.34/1.57	Q is empty.
3.34/1.57	
3.34/1.57	----------------------------------------
3.34/1.57	
3.34/1.57	(1) NonTerminationProof (COMPLETE)
3.34/1.57	We used the non-termination processor [OPPELT08] to show that the SRS problem is infinite.
3.34/1.57	
3.34/1.57	Found the self-embedding DerivationStructure: 
3.34/1.57	"c a b a b a b a -> a b a b c a b a b a b a b c c a b c c a"
3.34/1.57	c a b a b a b a -> a b a b c a b a b a b a b c c a b c c a
3.34/1.57	by OverlapClosure OC 2"c a b a -> a b a b c c a
3.34/1.57	by original rule (OC 1)""c a b a b a -> a b a b a b a b c c a b c c a
3.34/1.57	by OverlapClosure OC 3"c a b a b a -> a b a b c a b a b c c a
3.34/1.57	by OverlapClosure OC 2"c a b a -> a b a b c c a
3.34/1.57	by original rule (OC 1)""c a b a -> a b a b c c a
3.34/1.57	by original rule (OC 1)"""c a b a -> a b a b c c a
3.34/1.57	by original rule (OC 1)""
3.34/1.57	
3.34/1.57	----------------------------------------
3.34/1.57	
3.34/1.57	(2)
3.34/1.57	NO
3.50/1.62	EOF