3.45/1.81	NO
3.45/1.82	proof of /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml
3.45/1.82	# AProVE Commit ID: 48fb2092695e11cc9f56e44b17a92a5f88ffb256 marcel 20180622 unpublished dirty
3.45/1.82	
3.45/1.82	
3.45/1.82	Termination w.r.t. Q of the given QTRS could be disproven:
3.45/1.82	
3.45/1.82	(0) QTRS
3.45/1.82	(1) NonTerminationProof [COMPLETE, 0 ms]
3.45/1.82	(2) NO
3.45/1.82	
3.45/1.82	
3.45/1.82	----------------------------------------
3.45/1.82	
3.45/1.82	(0)
3.45/1.82	Obligation:
3.45/1.82	Q restricted rewrite system:
3.45/1.82	The TRS R consists of the following rules:
3.45/1.82	
3.45/1.82	   c(b(a(b(a(x1))))) -> a(b(a(b(a(b(c(b(c(x1)))))))))
3.45/1.82	
3.45/1.82	Q is empty.
3.45/1.82	
3.45/1.82	----------------------------------------
3.45/1.82	
3.45/1.82	(1) NonTerminationProof (COMPLETE)
3.45/1.82	We used the non-termination processor [OPPELT08] to show that the SRS problem is infinite.
3.45/1.82	
3.45/1.82	Found the self-embedding DerivationStructure: 
3.45/1.82	"c b a b a b a b a b a b a -> a b a b a b c b a b a b a b a b a b a b c b c b a b c b c"
3.45/1.82	c b a b a b a b a b a b a -> a b a b a b c b a b a b a b a b a b a b c b c b a b c b c
3.45/1.82	by OverlapClosure OC 2"c b a b a -> a b a b a b c b c
3.45/1.82	by original rule (OC 1)""c b a b a b a b a -> a b a b a b a b a b a b c b c b a b c b c
3.45/1.82	by OverlapClosure OC 3"c b a b a b a b a -> a b a b a b c b a b a b a b c b c
3.45/1.82	by OverlapClosure OC 2"c b a b a -> a b a b a b c b c
3.45/1.82	by original rule (OC 1)""c b a b a -> a b a b a b c b c
3.45/1.82	by original rule (OC 1)"""c b a b a -> a b a b a b c b c
3.45/1.82	by original rule (OC 1)""
3.45/1.82	
3.45/1.82	----------------------------------------
3.45/1.82	
3.45/1.82	(2)
3.45/1.82	NO
3.70/2.84	EOF