5.17/2.23 YES 5.52/2.30 proof of /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml 5.52/2.30 # AProVE Commit ID: 48fb2092695e11cc9f56e44b17a92a5f88ffb256 marcel 20180622 unpublished dirty 5.52/2.30 5.52/2.30 5.52/2.30 Termination w.r.t. Q of the given QTRS could be proven: 5.52/2.30 5.52/2.30 (0) QTRS 5.52/2.30 (1) QTRSRRRProof [EQUIVALENT, 43 ms] 5.52/2.30 (2) QTRS 5.52/2.30 (3) RisEmptyProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] 5.52/2.30 (4) YES 5.52/2.30 5.52/2.30 5.52/2.30 ---------------------------------------- 5.52/2.30 5.52/2.30 (0) 5.52/2.30 Obligation: 5.52/2.30 Q restricted rewrite system: 5.52/2.30 The TRS R consists of the following rules: 5.52/2.30 5.52/2.30 a(a(x1)) -> b(c(x1)) 5.52/2.30 b(b(x1)) -> c(d(x1)) 5.52/2.30 b(x1) -> a(x1) 5.52/2.30 c(c(x1)) -> d(f(x1)) 5.52/2.30 d(d(x1)) -> f(f(f(x1))) 5.52/2.30 d(x1) -> b(x1) 5.52/2.30 f(f(x1)) -> g(a(x1)) 5.52/2.30 g(g(x1)) -> a(x1) 5.52/2.30 5.52/2.30 Q is empty. 5.52/2.30 5.52/2.30 ---------------------------------------- 5.52/2.30 5.52/2.30 (1) QTRSRRRProof (EQUIVALENT) 5.52/2.30 Used ordering: 5.52/2.30 Polynomial interpretation [POLO]: 5.52/2.30 5.52/2.30 POL(a(x_1)) = 155 + x_1 5.52/2.30 POL(b(x_1)) = 162 + x_1 5.52/2.30 POL(c(x_1)) = 147 + x_1 5.52/2.30 POL(d(x_1)) = 176 + x_1 5.52/2.30 POL(f(x_1)) = 117 + x_1 5.52/2.30 POL(g(x_1)) = 78 + x_1 5.52/2.30 With this ordering the following rules can be removed by the rule removal processor [LPAR04] because they are oriented strictly: 5.52/2.30 5.52/2.30 a(a(x1)) -> b(c(x1)) 5.52/2.30 b(b(x1)) -> c(d(x1)) 5.52/2.30 b(x1) -> a(x1) 5.52/2.30 c(c(x1)) -> d(f(x1)) 5.52/2.30 d(d(x1)) -> f(f(f(x1))) 5.52/2.30 d(x1) -> b(x1) 5.52/2.30 f(f(x1)) -> g(a(x1)) 5.52/2.30 g(g(x1)) -> a(x1) 5.52/2.30 5.52/2.30 5.52/2.30 5.52/2.30 5.52/2.30 ---------------------------------------- 5.52/2.30 5.52/2.30 (2) 5.52/2.30 Obligation: 5.52/2.30 Q restricted rewrite system: 5.52/2.30 R is empty. 5.52/2.30 Q is empty. 5.52/2.30 5.52/2.30 ---------------------------------------- 5.52/2.30 5.52/2.30 (3) RisEmptyProof (EQUIVALENT) 5.52/2.30 The TRS R is empty. Hence, termination is trivially proven. 5.52/2.30 ---------------------------------------- 5.52/2.30 5.52/2.30 (4) 5.52/2.30 YES 5.88/2.37 EOF