3.13/1.57	NO
3.13/1.57	proof of /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml
3.13/1.57	# AProVE Commit ID: 48fb2092695e11cc9f56e44b17a92a5f88ffb256 marcel 20180622 unpublished dirty
3.13/1.57	
3.13/1.57	
3.13/1.57	Termination w.r.t. Q of the given QTRS could be disproven:
3.13/1.57	
3.13/1.57	(0) QTRS
3.13/1.57	(1) NonTerminationProof [COMPLETE, 0 ms]
3.13/1.57	(2) NO
3.13/1.57	
3.13/1.57	
3.13/1.57	----------------------------------------
3.13/1.57	
3.13/1.57	(0)
3.13/1.57	Obligation:
3.13/1.57	Q restricted rewrite system:
3.13/1.57	The TRS R consists of the following rules:
3.13/1.57	
3.13/1.57	   a(a(b(b(x1)))) -> b(b(b(b(b(a(a(a(a(a(x1))))))))))
3.13/1.57	
3.13/1.57	Q is empty.
3.13/1.57	
3.13/1.57	----------------------------------------
3.13/1.57	
3.13/1.57	(1) NonTerminationProof (COMPLETE)
3.13/1.57	We used the non-termination processor [OPPELT08] to show that the SRS problem is infinite.
3.13/1.57	
3.13/1.57	Found the self-embedding DerivationStructure: 
3.13/1.57	"a a b b b b -> b b b b b a a a b b b b b a a a a a"
3.13/1.57	a a b b b b -> b b b b b a a a b b b b b a a a a a
3.13/1.57	by OverlapClosure OC 2"a a b b -> b b b b b a a a a a
3.13/1.57	by original rule (OC 1)""a a b b -> b b b b b a a a a a
3.13/1.57	by original rule (OC 1)"
3.13/1.57	
3.13/1.57	----------------------------------------
3.13/1.57	
3.13/1.57	(2)
3.13/1.57	NO
3.13/1.60	EOF