256.60/66.04	NO
256.72/66.04	proof of /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml
256.72/66.04	# AProVE Commit ID: 48fb2092695e11cc9f56e44b17a92a5f88ffb256 marcel 20180622 unpublished dirty
256.72/66.04	
256.72/66.04	
256.72/66.04	Termination w.r.t. Q of the given QTRS could be disproven:
256.72/66.04	
256.72/66.04	(0) QTRS
256.72/66.04	(1) NonTerminationProof [COMPLETE, 10.1 s]
256.72/66.04	(2) NO
256.72/66.04	
256.72/66.04	
256.72/66.04	----------------------------------------
256.72/66.04	
256.72/66.04	(0)
256.72/66.04	Obligation:
256.72/66.04	Q restricted rewrite system:
256.72/66.04	The TRS R consists of the following rules:
256.72/66.04	
256.72/66.04	   a(a(b(b(x1)))) -> b(b(b(a(a(a(x1))))))
256.72/66.04	   a(x1) -> x1
256.72/66.04	
256.72/66.04	Q is empty.
256.72/66.04	
256.72/66.04	----------------------------------------
256.72/66.04	
256.72/66.04	(1) NonTerminationProof (COMPLETE)
256.72/66.04	We used the non-termination processor [OPPELT08] to show that the SRS problem is infinite.
256.72/66.04	
256.72/66.04	Found the self-embedding DerivationStructure: 
256.72/66.04	"a a b b a b b b b b b a b b b -> b b b b b b b b b a a b b a b b b b b b a b b b a a a"
256.72/66.04	a a b b a b b b b b b a b b b -> b b b b b b b b b a a b b a b b b b b b a b b b a a a
256.72/66.04	by OverlapClosure OC 2"a a b b a b b b b b b a b b -> b b b b b b b b b a a b b a b b b b b b a a a b
256.72/66.04	by OverlapClosure OC 3"a a b b a b b b b b b a b b -> b b b b b b b b b a a b b a b b b a a b b b
256.72/66.04	by OverlapClosure OC 2"a a b b a b b b b b b -> b b b b b b b b b a a b b a b b b a a a
256.72/66.04	by OverlapClosure OC 2"a a b b a b b b b -> b b b b b b b b b a a b b a a a
256.72/66.04	by OverlapClosure OC 3"a a b b a b b b b -> b b b b b b a a b b b b a a a
256.72/66.04	by OverlapClosure OC 3"a a b b a b b b b -> b b b b b b a a a b b b b a a a
256.72/66.04	by OverlapClosure OC 2"a a b b a b b -> b b b b b b a a a b a a
256.72/66.04	by OverlapClosure OC 3"a a b b a b b -> b b b a a b b b a a
256.72/66.04	by OverlapClosure OC 2"a a b b -> b b b a a a
256.72/66.04	by original rule (OC 1)""a a b b -> b b b a a
256.72/66.04	by OverlapClosure OC 2"a a b b -> b b b a a a
256.72/66.04	by original rule (OC 1)""a -> 
256.72/66.04	by original rule (OC 1)""""a a b b -> b b b a a a
256.72/66.04	by original rule (OC 1)"""a a b b -> b b b a a a
256.72/66.04	by original rule (OC 1)"""a -> 
256.72/66.04	by original rule (OC 1)"""a a b b -> b b b a a
256.72/66.04	by OverlapClosure OC 2"a a b b -> b b b a a a
256.72/66.04	by original rule (OC 1)""a -> 
256.72/66.04	by original rule (OC 1)""""a a b b -> b b b a a a
256.72/66.04	by original rule (OC 1)"""a a b b -> b b b
256.72/66.04	by OverlapClosure OC 2"a a b b -> b b b a
256.72/66.04	by OverlapClosure OC 2"a a b b -> b b b a a
256.72/66.04	by OverlapClosure OC 2"a a b b -> b b b a a a
256.72/66.04	by original rule (OC 1)""a -> 
256.72/66.04	by original rule (OC 1)"""a -> 
256.72/66.04	by original rule (OC 1)"""a -> 
256.72/66.04	by original rule (OC 1)""""a a b b -> b b b a a a
256.72/66.04	by original rule (OC 1)"""a a b b -> b b b a a a
256.72/66.04	by original rule (OC 1)"
256.72/66.04	
256.72/66.04	----------------------------------------
256.72/66.04	
256.72/66.04	(2)
256.72/66.04	NO
256.76/66.21	EOF