7.46/2.80 NO 7.84/2.88 proof of /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml 7.84/2.88 # AProVE Commit ID: 48fb2092695e11cc9f56e44b17a92a5f88ffb256 marcel 20180622 unpublished dirty 7.84/2.88 7.84/2.88 7.84/2.88 Termination w.r.t. Q of the given QTRS could be disproven: 7.84/2.88 7.84/2.88 (0) QTRS 7.84/2.88 (1) NonTerminationProof [COMPLETE, 710 ms] 7.84/2.88 (2) NO 7.84/2.88 7.84/2.88 7.84/2.88 ---------------------------------------- 7.84/2.88 7.84/2.88 (0) 7.84/2.88 Obligation: 7.84/2.88 Q restricted rewrite system: 7.84/2.88 The TRS R consists of the following rules: 7.84/2.88 7.84/2.88 a(a(a(x1))) -> c(c(b(x1))) 7.84/2.88 b(b(b(x1))) -> c(c(c(x1))) 7.84/2.88 c(c(c(x1))) -> a(b(b(x1))) 7.84/2.88 7.84/2.88 Q is empty. 7.84/2.88 7.84/2.88 ---------------------------------------- 7.84/2.88 7.84/2.88 (1) NonTerminationProof (COMPLETE) 7.84/2.88 We used the non-termination processor [OPPELT08] to show that the SRS problem is infinite. 7.84/2.88 7.84/2.88 Found the self-embedding DerivationStructure: 7.84/2.88 "a a a b b b b -> a a a b b b b" 7.84/2.88 a a a b b b b -> a a a b b b b 7.84/2.88 by OverlapClosure OC 3"a a a b b b b -> a a c c c b b 7.84/2.88 by OverlapClosure OC 3"a a a b b b b -> a a b b b b b 7.84/2.88 by OverlapClosure OC 3"a a a b b b b -> a b b b b b b 7.84/2.88 by OverlapClosure OC 3"a a a b b b b -> c c c b b b b 7.84/2.88 by OverlapClosure OC 3"a a a b b b b -> c a a a b b b 7.84/2.88 by OverlapClosure OC 3"a a a b b b b -> c a a b b b b 7.84/2.88 by OverlapClosure OC 3"a a a b b b b -> c a b b b b b 7.84/2.88 by OverlapClosure OC 3"a a a b b b b -> c c c c b b b 7.84/2.88 by OverlapClosure OC 2"a a a -> c c b 7.84/2.88 by original rule (OC 1)""b b b b b -> c c b b b 7.84/2.88 by OverlapClosure OC 2"b b b -> c c c 7.84/2.88 by original rule (OC 1)""c c c b b -> c c b b b 7.84/2.88 by OverlapClosure OC 3"c c c b b -> a a a b b 7.84/2.88 by OverlapClosure OC 2"c c c -> a b b 7.84/2.88 by original rule (OC 1)""b b b b -> a a b b 7.84/2.88 by OverlapClosure OC 2"b b b -> a b b 7.84/2.88 by OverlapClosure OC 2"b b b -> c c c 7.84/2.88 by original rule (OC 1)""c c c -> a b b 7.84/2.88 by original rule (OC 1)"""b b b -> a b b 7.84/2.88 by OverlapClosure OC 2"b b b -> c c c 7.84/2.88 by original rule (OC 1)""c c c -> a b b 7.84/2.88 by original rule (OC 1)"""""a a a -> c c b 7.84/2.88 by original rule (OC 1)"""""c c c -> a b b 7.84/2.88 by original rule (OC 1)"""b b b -> a b b 7.84/2.88 by OverlapClosure OC 2"b b b -> c c c 7.84/2.88 by original rule (OC 1)""c c c -> a b b 7.84/2.88 by original rule (OC 1)""""b b b -> a b b 7.84/2.88 by OverlapClosure OC 2"b b b -> c c c 7.84/2.88 by original rule (OC 1)""c c c -> a b b 7.84/2.88 by original rule (OC 1)""""a a a -> c c b 7.84/2.88 by original rule (OC 1)"""c c c -> a b b 7.84/2.88 by original rule (OC 1)"""b b b -> a b b 7.84/2.88 by OverlapClosure OC 2"b b b -> c c c 7.84/2.88 by original rule (OC 1)""c c c -> a b b 7.84/2.88 by original rule (OC 1)""""b b b -> c c c 7.84/2.88 by original rule (OC 1)"""c c c -> a b b 7.84/2.88 by original rule (OC 1)" 7.84/2.88 7.84/2.88 ---------------------------------------- 7.84/2.88 7.84/2.88 (2) 7.84/2.88 NO 8.15/2.96 EOF