22.06/6.49 YES 22.06/6.51 proof of /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml 22.06/6.51 # AProVE Commit ID: 48fb2092695e11cc9f56e44b17a92a5f88ffb256 marcel 20180622 unpublished dirty 22.06/6.51 22.06/6.51 22.06/6.51 Termination w.r.t. Q of the given QTRS could be proven: 22.06/6.51 22.06/6.51 (0) QTRS 22.06/6.51 (1) QTRS Reverse [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] 22.06/6.51 (2) QTRS 22.06/6.51 (3) FlatCCProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] 22.06/6.51 (4) QTRS 22.06/6.51 (5) RootLabelingProof [EQUIVALENT, 2 ms] 22.06/6.51 (6) QTRS 22.06/6.51 (7) DependencyPairsProof [EQUIVALENT, 14 ms] 22.06/6.51 (8) QDP 22.06/6.51 (9) DependencyGraphProof [EQUIVALENT, 8 ms] 22.06/6.51 (10) QDP 22.06/6.51 (11) QDPOrderProof [EQUIVALENT, 82 ms] 22.06/6.51 (12) QDP 22.06/6.51 (13) QDPOrderProof [EQUIVALENT, 71 ms] 22.06/6.51 (14) QDP 22.06/6.51 (15) PisEmptyProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] 22.06/6.51 (16) YES 22.06/6.51 22.06/6.51 22.06/6.51 ---------------------------------------- 22.06/6.51 22.06/6.51 (0) 22.06/6.51 Obligation: 22.06/6.51 Q restricted rewrite system: 22.06/6.51 The TRS R consists of the following rules: 22.06/6.51 22.06/6.51 a(a(a(a(x1)))) -> b(a(a(a(x1)))) 22.06/6.51 b(b(a(b(x1)))) -> a(a(b(b(x1)))) 22.06/6.51 a(a(b(a(x1)))) -> a(a(a(b(x1)))) 22.06/6.51 22.06/6.51 Q is empty. 22.06/6.51 22.06/6.51 ---------------------------------------- 22.06/6.51 22.06/6.51 (1) QTRS Reverse (EQUIVALENT) 22.06/6.51 We applied the QTRS Reverse Processor [REVERSE]. 22.06/6.51 ---------------------------------------- 22.06/6.51 22.06/6.51 (2) 22.06/6.51 Obligation: 22.06/6.51 Q restricted rewrite system: 22.06/6.51 The TRS R consists of the following rules: 22.06/6.51 22.06/6.51 a(a(a(a(x1)))) -> a(a(a(b(x1)))) 22.06/6.51 b(a(b(b(x1)))) -> b(b(a(a(x1)))) 22.06/6.51 a(b(a(a(x1)))) -> b(a(a(a(x1)))) 22.06/6.51 22.06/6.51 Q is empty. 22.06/6.51 22.06/6.51 ---------------------------------------- 22.06/6.51 22.06/6.51 (3) FlatCCProof (EQUIVALENT) 22.06/6.51 We used flat context closure [ROOTLAB] 22.06/6.51 As Q is empty the flat context closure was sound AND complete. 22.06/6.51 22.06/6.51 ---------------------------------------- 22.06/6.51 22.06/6.51 (4) 22.06/6.51 Obligation: 22.06/6.51 Q restricted rewrite system: 22.06/6.51 The TRS R consists of the following rules: 22.06/6.51 22.06/6.51 a(a(a(a(x1)))) -> a(a(a(b(x1)))) 22.06/6.51 b(a(b(b(x1)))) -> b(b(a(a(x1)))) 22.06/6.51 a(a(b(a(a(x1))))) -> a(b(a(a(a(x1))))) 22.06/6.51 b(a(b(a(a(x1))))) -> b(b(a(a(a(x1))))) 22.06/6.51 22.06/6.51 Q is empty. 22.06/6.51 22.06/6.51 ---------------------------------------- 22.06/6.51 22.06/6.51 (5) RootLabelingProof (EQUIVALENT) 22.06/6.51 We used plain root labeling [ROOTLAB] with the following heuristic: 22.06/6.51 LabelAll: All function symbols get labeled 22.06/6.51 22.06/6.51 As Q is empty the root labeling was sound AND complete. 22.06/6.51 22.06/6.51 ---------------------------------------- 22.06/6.51 22.06/6.51 (6) 22.06/6.51 Obligation: 22.06/6.51 Q restricted rewrite system: 22.06/6.51 The TRS R consists of the following rules: 22.06/6.51 22.06/6.51 a_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(x1)))) -> a_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(x1)))) 22.06/6.51 a_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(x1)))) -> a_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(x1)))) 22.06/6.51 b_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(x1)))) -> b_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(x1)))) 22.06/6.51 b_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(x1)))) -> b_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(x1)))) 22.06/6.51 a_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(x1))))) -> a_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(x1))))) 22.06/6.51 a_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(x1))))) -> a_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(x1))))) 22.06/6.51 b_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(x1))))) -> b_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(x1))))) 22.06/6.51 b_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(x1))))) -> b_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(x1))))) 22.06/6.51 22.06/6.51 Q is empty. 22.06/6.51 22.06/6.51 ---------------------------------------- 22.06/6.51 22.06/6.51 (7) DependencyPairsProof (EQUIVALENT) 22.06/6.51 Using Dependency Pairs [AG00,LPAR04] we result in the following initial DP problem. 22.06/6.51 ---------------------------------------- 22.06/6.51 22.06/6.51 (8) 22.06/6.51 Obligation: 22.06/6.51 Q DP problem: 22.06/6.51 The TRS P consists of the following rules: 22.06/6.51 22.06/6.51 A_{A_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(x1)))) -> A_{A_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(x1)))) 22.06/6.51 A_{A_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(x1)))) -> A_{A_1}(a_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(x1))) 22.06/6.51 A_{A_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(x1)))) -> B_{A_1}(x1) 22.06/6.51 A_{A_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(x1)))) -> A_{A_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(x1)))) 22.06/6.51 A_{A_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(x1)))) -> A_{A_1}(a_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(x1))) 22.06/6.51 B_{A_1}(a_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(x1)))) -> B_{A_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(x1))) 22.06/6.51 B_{A_1}(a_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(x1)))) -> A_{A_1}(a_{a_1}(x1)) 22.06/6.51 B_{A_1}(a_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(x1)))) -> A_{A_1}(x1) 22.06/6.51 B_{A_1}(a_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(x1)))) -> B_{A_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(x1))) 22.06/6.51 B_{A_1}(a_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(x1)))) -> A_{A_1}(a_{b_1}(x1)) 22.06/6.51 A_{A_1}(a_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(x1))))) -> B_{A_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(x1)))) 22.06/6.51 A_{A_1}(a_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(x1))))) -> A_{A_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(x1))) 22.06/6.51 A_{A_1}(a_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(x1))))) -> B_{A_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(x1)))) 22.06/6.51 A_{A_1}(a_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(x1))))) -> A_{A_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(x1))) 22.06/6.51 B_{A_1}(a_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(x1))))) -> B_{A_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(x1)))) 22.06/6.51 B_{A_1}(a_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(x1))))) -> A_{A_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(x1))) 22.06/6.51 B_{A_1}(a_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(x1))))) -> B_{A_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(x1)))) 22.06/6.51 B_{A_1}(a_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(x1))))) -> A_{A_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(x1))) 22.06/6.51 22.06/6.51 The TRS R consists of the following rules: 22.06/6.51 22.06/6.51 a_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(x1)))) -> a_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(x1)))) 22.06/6.51 a_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(x1)))) -> a_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(x1)))) 22.06/6.51 b_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(x1)))) -> b_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(x1)))) 22.06/6.51 b_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(x1)))) -> b_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(x1)))) 22.06/6.51 a_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(x1))))) -> a_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(x1))))) 22.06/6.51 a_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(x1))))) -> a_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(x1))))) 22.06/6.51 b_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(x1))))) -> b_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(x1))))) 22.06/6.51 b_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(x1))))) -> b_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(x1))))) 22.06/6.51 22.06/6.51 Q is empty. 22.06/6.51 We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains. 22.06/6.51 ---------------------------------------- 22.06/6.51 22.06/6.51 (9) DependencyGraphProof (EQUIVALENT) 22.06/6.51 The approximation of the Dependency Graph [LPAR04,FROCOS05,EDGSTAR] contains 1 SCC with 2 less nodes. 22.06/6.51 ---------------------------------------- 22.06/6.51 22.06/6.51 (10) 22.06/6.51 Obligation: 22.06/6.51 Q DP problem: 22.06/6.51 The TRS P consists of the following rules: 22.06/6.51 22.06/6.51 A_{A_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(x1)))) -> A_{A_1}(a_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(x1))) 22.06/6.51 A_{A_1}(a_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(x1))))) -> B_{A_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(x1)))) 22.06/6.51 B_{A_1}(a_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(x1)))) -> B_{A_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(x1))) 22.06/6.51 B_{A_1}(a_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(x1)))) -> A_{A_1}(a_{a_1}(x1)) 22.06/6.51 A_{A_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(x1)))) -> A_{A_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(x1)))) 22.06/6.51 A_{A_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(x1)))) -> B_{A_1}(x1) 22.06/6.51 B_{A_1}(a_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(x1)))) -> A_{A_1}(x1) 22.06/6.51 A_{A_1}(a_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(x1))))) -> A_{A_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(x1))) 22.06/6.51 A_{A_1}(a_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(x1))))) -> B_{A_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(x1)))) 22.06/6.51 B_{A_1}(a_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(x1)))) -> B_{A_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(x1))) 22.06/6.51 B_{A_1}(a_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(x1)))) -> A_{A_1}(a_{b_1}(x1)) 22.06/6.51 A_{A_1}(a_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(x1))))) -> A_{A_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(x1))) 22.06/6.51 B_{A_1}(a_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(x1))))) -> B_{A_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(x1)))) 22.06/6.51 B_{A_1}(a_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(x1))))) -> A_{A_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(x1))) 22.06/6.51 B_{A_1}(a_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(x1))))) -> B_{A_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(x1)))) 22.06/6.51 B_{A_1}(a_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(x1))))) -> A_{A_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(x1))) 22.06/6.51 22.06/6.51 The TRS R consists of the following rules: 22.06/6.51 22.06/6.51 a_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(x1)))) -> a_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(x1)))) 22.06/6.51 a_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(x1)))) -> a_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(x1)))) 22.06/6.51 b_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(x1)))) -> b_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(x1)))) 22.06/6.51 b_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(x1)))) -> b_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(x1)))) 22.06/6.51 a_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(x1))))) -> a_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(x1))))) 22.06/6.51 a_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(x1))))) -> a_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(x1))))) 22.06/6.51 b_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(x1))))) -> b_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(x1))))) 22.06/6.51 b_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(x1))))) -> b_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(x1))))) 22.06/6.51 22.06/6.51 Q is empty. 22.06/6.51 We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains. 22.06/6.51 ---------------------------------------- 22.06/6.51 22.06/6.51 (11) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT) 22.06/6.51 We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04,JAR06]. 22.06/6.51 22.06/6.51 22.06/6.51 The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted. 22.06/6.51 22.06/6.51 A_{A_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(x1)))) -> A_{A_1}(a_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(x1))) 22.06/6.51 A_{A_1}(a_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(x1))))) -> B_{A_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(x1)))) 22.06/6.51 B_{A_1}(a_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(x1)))) -> B_{A_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(x1))) 22.06/6.51 B_{A_1}(a_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(x1)))) -> A_{A_1}(a_{a_1}(x1)) 22.06/6.51 A_{A_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(x1)))) -> B_{A_1}(x1) 22.06/6.51 B_{A_1}(a_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(x1)))) -> A_{A_1}(x1) 22.06/6.51 A_{A_1}(a_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(x1))))) -> A_{A_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(x1))) 22.06/6.51 A_{A_1}(a_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(x1))))) -> B_{A_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(x1)))) 22.06/6.51 B_{A_1}(a_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(x1)))) -> B_{A_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(x1))) 22.06/6.51 B_{A_1}(a_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(x1)))) -> A_{A_1}(a_{b_1}(x1)) 22.06/6.51 A_{A_1}(a_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(x1))))) -> A_{A_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(x1))) 22.06/6.51 B_{A_1}(a_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(x1))))) -> B_{A_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(x1)))) 22.06/6.51 B_{A_1}(a_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(x1))))) -> A_{A_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(x1))) 22.06/6.51 B_{A_1}(a_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(x1))))) -> B_{A_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(x1)))) 22.06/6.51 B_{A_1}(a_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(x1))))) -> A_{A_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(x1))) 22.06/6.51 The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly. 22.06/6.52 Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [POLO]: 22.06/6.52 22.06/6.52 POL(A_{A_1}(x_1)) = x_1 22.06/6.52 POL(B_{A_1}(x_1)) = x_1 22.06/6.52 POL(a_{a_1}(x_1)) = 1 + x_1 22.06/6.52 POL(a_{b_1}(x_1)) = 1 + x_1 22.06/6.52 POL(b_{a_1}(x_1)) = 1 + x_1 22.06/6.52 POL(b_{b_1}(x_1)) = 1 + x_1 22.06/6.52 22.06/6.52 The following usable rules [FROCOS05] with respect to the argument filtering of the ordering [JAR06] were oriented: 22.06/6.52 22.06/6.52 b_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(x1)))) -> b_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(x1)))) 22.06/6.52 b_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(x1)))) -> b_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(x1)))) 22.06/6.52 b_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(x1))))) -> b_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(x1))))) 22.06/6.52 b_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(x1))))) -> b_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(x1))))) 22.06/6.52 a_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(x1)))) -> a_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(x1)))) 22.06/6.52 a_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(x1)))) -> a_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(x1)))) 22.06/6.52 a_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(x1))))) -> a_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(x1))))) 22.06/6.52 a_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(x1))))) -> a_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(x1))))) 22.06/6.52 22.06/6.52 22.06/6.52 ---------------------------------------- 22.06/6.52 22.06/6.52 (12) 22.06/6.52 Obligation: 22.06/6.52 Q DP problem: 22.06/6.52 The TRS P consists of the following rules: 22.06/6.52 22.06/6.52 A_{A_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(x1)))) -> A_{A_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(x1)))) 22.06/6.52 22.06/6.52 The TRS R consists of the following rules: 22.06/6.52 22.06/6.52 a_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(x1)))) -> a_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(x1)))) 22.06/6.52 a_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(x1)))) -> a_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(x1)))) 22.06/6.52 b_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(x1)))) -> b_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(x1)))) 22.06/6.52 b_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(x1)))) -> b_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(x1)))) 22.06/6.52 a_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(x1))))) -> a_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(x1))))) 22.06/6.52 a_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(x1))))) -> a_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(x1))))) 22.06/6.52 b_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(x1))))) -> b_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(x1))))) 22.06/6.52 b_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(x1))))) -> b_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(x1))))) 22.06/6.52 22.06/6.52 Q is empty. 22.06/6.52 We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains. 22.06/6.52 ---------------------------------------- 22.06/6.52 22.06/6.52 (13) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT) 22.06/6.52 We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04,JAR06]. 22.06/6.52 22.06/6.52 22.06/6.52 The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted. 22.06/6.52 22.06/6.52 A_{A_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(x1)))) -> A_{A_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(x1)))) 22.06/6.52 The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly. 22.06/6.52 Used ordering: Polynomial Order [NEGPOLO,POLO] with Interpretation: 22.06/6.52 22.06/6.52 POL( A_{A_1}_1(x_1) ) = max{0, x_1 - 2} 22.06/6.52 POL( a_{b_1}_1(x_1) ) = max{0, 2x_1 - 2} 22.06/6.52 POL( b_{a_1}_1(x_1) ) = 0 22.06/6.52 POL( b_{b_1}_1(x_1) ) = max{0, -2} 22.06/6.52 POL( a_{a_1}_1(x_1) ) = x_1 + 1 22.06/6.52 22.06/6.52 The following usable rules [FROCOS05] with respect to the argument filtering of the ordering [JAR06] were oriented: 22.06/6.52 22.06/6.52 b_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(x1)))) -> b_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(x1)))) 22.06/6.52 b_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(x1)))) -> b_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(x1)))) 22.06/6.52 b_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(x1))))) -> b_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(x1))))) 22.06/6.52 b_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(x1))))) -> b_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(x1))))) 22.06/6.52 a_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(x1))))) -> a_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(x1))))) 22.06/6.52 a_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(x1))))) -> a_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(x1))))) 22.06/6.52 22.06/6.52 22.06/6.52 ---------------------------------------- 22.06/6.52 22.06/6.52 (14) 22.06/6.52 Obligation: 22.06/6.52 Q DP problem: 22.06/6.52 P is empty. 22.06/6.52 The TRS R consists of the following rules: 22.06/6.52 22.06/6.52 a_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(x1)))) -> a_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(x1)))) 22.06/6.52 a_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(x1)))) -> a_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(x1)))) 22.06/6.52 b_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(x1)))) -> b_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(x1)))) 22.06/6.52 b_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(x1)))) -> b_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(x1)))) 22.06/6.52 a_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(x1))))) -> a_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(x1))))) 22.06/6.52 a_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(x1))))) -> a_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(x1))))) 22.06/6.52 b_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(x1))))) -> b_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(x1))))) 22.06/6.52 b_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(x1))))) -> b_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(x1))))) 22.06/6.52 22.06/6.52 Q is empty. 22.06/6.52 We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains. 22.06/6.52 ---------------------------------------- 22.06/6.52 22.06/6.52 (15) PisEmptyProof (EQUIVALENT) 22.06/6.52 The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain. 22.06/6.52 ---------------------------------------- 22.06/6.52 22.06/6.52 (16) 22.06/6.52 YES 22.43/6.58 EOF