3.22/1.66	NO
3.22/1.67	proof of /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml
3.22/1.67	# AProVE Commit ID: 48fb2092695e11cc9f56e44b17a92a5f88ffb256 marcel 20180622 unpublished dirty
3.22/1.67	
3.22/1.67	
3.22/1.67	Termination w.r.t. Q of the given QTRS could be disproven:
3.22/1.67	
3.22/1.67	(0) QTRS
3.22/1.67	(1) NonTerminationProof [COMPLETE, 0 ms]
3.22/1.67	(2) NO
3.22/1.67	
3.22/1.67	
3.22/1.67	----------------------------------------
3.22/1.67	
3.22/1.67	(0)
3.22/1.67	Obligation:
3.22/1.67	Q restricted rewrite system:
3.22/1.67	The TRS R consists of the following rules:
3.22/1.67	
3.22/1.67	   a(b(b(x1))) -> b(b(a(a(x1))))
3.22/1.67	   a(a(x1)) -> b(x1)
3.22/1.67	
3.22/1.67	Q is empty.
3.22/1.67	
3.22/1.67	----------------------------------------
3.22/1.67	
3.22/1.67	(1) NonTerminationProof (COMPLETE)
3.22/1.67	We used the non-termination processor [OPPELT08] to show that the SRS problem is infinite.
3.22/1.67	
3.22/1.67	Found the self-embedding DerivationStructure: 
3.22/1.67	"a b b b b b b -> b b a b b b b b b"
3.22/1.67	a b b b b b b -> b b a b b b b b b
3.22/1.67	by OverlapClosure OC 2"a b b -> b b a a
3.22/1.67	by original rule (OC 1)""a b b b b -> b b b b b b
3.22/1.67	by OverlapClosure OC 3"a b b b b -> b b b b a a b
3.22/1.67	by OverlapClosure OC 3"a b b b b -> b b a b b b
3.22/1.67	by OverlapClosure OC 2"a b b -> b b a a
3.22/1.67	by original rule (OC 1)""a b b -> b b b
3.22/1.67	by OverlapClosure OC 2"a b b -> b b a a
3.22/1.67	by original rule (OC 1)""a a -> b
3.22/1.67	by original rule (OC 1)""""a b b -> b b a a
3.22/1.67	by original rule (OC 1)"""a a -> b
3.22/1.67	by original rule (OC 1)""
3.22/1.67	
3.22/1.67	----------------------------------------
3.22/1.67	
3.22/1.67	(2)
3.22/1.67	NO
3.40/1.70	EOF