3.32/1.56	NO
3.32/1.57	proof of /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml
3.32/1.57	# AProVE Commit ID: 48fb2092695e11cc9f56e44b17a92a5f88ffb256 marcel 20180622 unpublished dirty
3.32/1.57	
3.32/1.57	
3.32/1.57	Termination w.r.t. Q of the given QTRS could be disproven:
3.32/1.57	
3.32/1.57	(0) QTRS
3.32/1.57	(1) NonTerminationProof [COMPLETE, 0 ms]
3.32/1.57	(2) NO
3.32/1.57	
3.32/1.57	
3.32/1.57	----------------------------------------
3.32/1.57	
3.32/1.57	(0)
3.32/1.57	Obligation:
3.32/1.57	Q restricted rewrite system:
3.32/1.57	The TRS R consists of the following rules:
3.32/1.57	
3.32/1.57	   b(b(b(x1))) -> a(a(x1))
3.32/1.57	   a(a(x1)) -> b(a(b(x1)))
3.32/1.57	
3.32/1.57	Q is empty.
3.32/1.57	
3.32/1.57	----------------------------------------
3.32/1.57	
3.32/1.57	(1) NonTerminationProof (COMPLETE)
3.32/1.57	We used the non-termination processor [OPPELT08] to show that the SRS problem is infinite.
3.32/1.57	
3.32/1.57	Found the self-embedding DerivationStructure: 
3.32/1.57	"a a b b a b b a -> b a a b b a b b a b"
3.32/1.57	a a b b a b b a -> b a a b b a b b a b
3.32/1.57	by OverlapClosure OC 2"a a b b a b b -> b a a b b a b a
3.32/1.57	by OverlapClosure OC 2"a a -> b a b
3.32/1.57	by original rule (OC 1)""b b b a b b -> a b b a b a
3.32/1.57	by OverlapClosure OC 2"b b b -> a a
3.32/1.57	by original rule (OC 1)""a a b b -> b b a b a
3.32/1.57	by OverlapClosure OC 3"a a b b -> b a a a
3.32/1.57	by OverlapClosure OC 2"a a -> b a b
3.32/1.57	by original rule (OC 1)""b b b -> a a
3.32/1.57	by original rule (OC 1)"""a a -> b a b
3.32/1.57	by original rule (OC 1)"""""a a -> b a b
3.32/1.57	by original rule (OC 1)"
3.32/1.57	
3.32/1.57	----------------------------------------
3.32/1.57	
3.32/1.57	(2)
3.32/1.57	NO
3.41/1.87	EOF