53.22/14.30 YES 53.50/14.31 proof of /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml 53.50/14.31 # AProVE Commit ID: 48fb2092695e11cc9f56e44b17a92a5f88ffb256 marcel 20180622 unpublished dirty 53.50/14.31 53.50/14.31 53.50/14.31 Termination of the given RelTRS could be proven: 53.50/14.31 53.50/14.31 (0) RelTRS 53.50/14.31 (1) RelTRS S Cleaner [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] 53.50/14.31 (2) RelTRS 53.50/14.31 (3) RelTRS Reverse [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] 53.50/14.31 (4) RelTRS 53.50/14.31 (5) RelTRSRRRProof [EQUIVALENT, 2910 ms] 53.50/14.31 (6) RelTRS 53.50/14.31 (7) RelTRSRRRProof [EQUIVALENT, 3 ms] 53.50/14.31 (8) RelTRS 53.50/14.31 (9) RIsEmptyProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] 53.50/14.31 (10) YES 53.50/14.31 53.50/14.31 53.50/14.31 ---------------------------------------- 53.50/14.31 53.50/14.31 (0) 53.50/14.31 Obligation: 53.50/14.31 Relative term rewrite system: 53.50/14.31 The relative TRS consists of the following R rules: 53.50/14.31 53.50/14.31 b(b(b(x1))) -> c(a(a(x1))) 53.50/14.31 b(b(c(x1))) -> b(b(b(x1))) 53.50/14.31 53.50/14.31 The relative TRS consists of the following S rules: 53.50/14.31 53.50/14.31 a(b(a(x1))) -> a(b(a(x1))) 53.50/14.31 c(c(a(x1))) -> c(c(c(x1))) 53.50/14.31 c(a(a(x1))) -> b(a(b(x1))) 53.50/14.31 c(a(c(x1))) -> b(a(c(x1))) 53.50/14.31 53.50/14.31 53.50/14.31 ---------------------------------------- 53.50/14.31 53.50/14.31 (1) RelTRS S Cleaner (EQUIVALENT) 53.50/14.31 We have deleted all rules from S that have the shape t -> t: 53.50/14.31 53.50/14.31 a(b(a(x1))) -> a(b(a(x1))) 53.50/14.31 53.50/14.31 53.50/14.31 ---------------------------------------- 53.50/14.31 53.50/14.31 (2) 53.50/14.31 Obligation: 53.50/14.31 Relative term rewrite system: 53.50/14.31 The relative TRS consists of the following R rules: 53.50/14.31 53.50/14.31 b(b(b(x1))) -> c(a(a(x1))) 53.50/14.31 b(b(c(x1))) -> b(b(b(x1))) 53.50/14.31 53.50/14.31 The relative TRS consists of the following S rules: 53.50/14.31 53.50/14.31 c(c(a(x1))) -> c(c(c(x1))) 53.50/14.31 c(a(a(x1))) -> b(a(b(x1))) 53.50/14.31 c(a(c(x1))) -> b(a(c(x1))) 53.50/14.31 53.50/14.31 53.50/14.31 ---------------------------------------- 53.50/14.31 53.50/14.31 (3) RelTRS Reverse (EQUIVALENT) 53.50/14.31 We have reversed the following relative TRS [REVERSE]: 53.50/14.31 The set of rules R is 53.50/14.31 b(b(b(x1))) -> c(a(a(x1))) 53.50/14.31 b(b(c(x1))) -> b(b(b(x1))) 53.50/14.31 53.50/14.31 The set of rules S is 53.50/14.31 c(c(a(x1))) -> c(c(c(x1))) 53.50/14.31 c(a(a(x1))) -> b(a(b(x1))) 53.50/14.31 c(a(c(x1))) -> b(a(c(x1))) 53.50/14.31 53.50/14.31 We have obtained the following relative TRS: 53.50/14.31 The set of rules R is 53.50/14.31 b(b(b(x1))) -> a(a(c(x1))) 53.50/14.31 c(b(b(x1))) -> b(b(b(x1))) 53.50/14.31 53.50/14.31 The set of rules S is 53.50/14.31 a(c(c(x1))) -> c(c(c(x1))) 53.50/14.31 a(a(c(x1))) -> b(a(b(x1))) 53.50/14.31 c(a(c(x1))) -> c(a(b(x1))) 53.50/14.31 53.50/14.31 53.50/14.31 ---------------------------------------- 53.50/14.31 53.50/14.31 (4) 53.50/14.31 Obligation: 53.50/14.31 Relative term rewrite system: 53.50/14.31 The relative TRS consists of the following R rules: 53.50/14.31 53.50/14.31 b(b(b(x1))) -> a(a(c(x1))) 53.50/14.31 c(b(b(x1))) -> b(b(b(x1))) 53.50/14.31 53.50/14.31 The relative TRS consists of the following S rules: 53.50/14.31 53.50/14.31 a(c(c(x1))) -> c(c(c(x1))) 53.50/14.31 a(a(c(x1))) -> b(a(b(x1))) 53.50/14.31 c(a(c(x1))) -> c(a(b(x1))) 53.50/14.31 53.50/14.31 53.50/14.31 ---------------------------------------- 53.50/14.31 53.50/14.31 (5) RelTRSRRRProof (EQUIVALENT) 53.50/14.31 We used the following monotonic ordering for rule removal: 53.50/14.31 Matrix interpretation [MATRO] to (N^6, +, *, >=, >) : 53.50/14.31 53.50/14.31 <<< 53.50/14.31 POL(b(x_1)) = [[0], [0], [0], [0], [0], [0]] + [[1, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0], [1, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0], [0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 1], [0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 1], [0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 1], [1, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0]] * x_1 53.50/14.31 >>> 53.50/14.31 53.50/14.31 <<< 53.50/14.31 POL(a(x_1)) = [[0], [0], [0], [0], [0], [0]] + [[1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0], [1, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0], [0, 0, 0, 1, 1, 0], [0, 0, 0, 1, 1, 0], [0, 1, 0, 1, 0, 0], [1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0]] * x_1 53.50/14.31 >>> 53.50/14.31 53.50/14.31 <<< 53.50/14.31 POL(c(x_1)) = [[0], [0], [1], [0], [0], [1]] + [[1, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0], [0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 1], [1, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0], [1, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0], [0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 1], [1, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0]] * x_1 53.50/14.31 >>> 53.50/14.31 53.50/14.31 With this ordering the following rules can be removed [MATRO] because they are oriented strictly: 53.50/14.31 Rules from R: 53.50/14.31 none 53.50/14.31 Rules from S: 53.50/14.31 53.50/14.31 a(c(c(x1))) -> c(c(c(x1))) 53.50/14.31 53.50/14.31 53.50/14.31 53.50/14.31 53.50/14.31 ---------------------------------------- 53.50/14.31 53.50/14.31 (6) 53.50/14.31 Obligation: 53.50/14.31 Relative term rewrite system: 53.50/14.31 The relative TRS consists of the following R rules: 53.50/14.31 53.50/14.31 b(b(b(x1))) -> a(a(c(x1))) 53.50/14.31 c(b(b(x1))) -> b(b(b(x1))) 53.50/14.31 53.50/14.31 The relative TRS consists of the following S rules: 53.50/14.31 53.50/14.31 a(a(c(x1))) -> b(a(b(x1))) 53.50/14.31 c(a(c(x1))) -> c(a(b(x1))) 53.50/14.31 53.50/14.31 53.50/14.31 ---------------------------------------- 53.50/14.31 53.50/14.31 (7) RelTRSRRRProof (EQUIVALENT) 53.50/14.31 We used the following monotonic ordering for rule removal: 53.50/14.31 Knuth-Bendix order [KBO] with precedence:c_1 > b_1 > a_1 53.50/14.31 53.50/14.31 and weight map: 53.50/14.31 53.50/14.31 b_1=2 53.50/14.31 a_1=1 53.50/14.31 c_1=4 53.50/14.31 53.50/14.31 The variable weight is 1With this ordering the following rules can be removed [MATRO] because they are oriented strictly: 53.50/14.31 Rules from R: 53.50/14.31 53.50/14.31 b(b(b(x1))) -> a(a(c(x1))) 53.50/14.31 c(b(b(x1))) -> b(b(b(x1))) 53.50/14.31 Rules from S: 53.50/14.31 53.50/14.31 a(a(c(x1))) -> b(a(b(x1))) 53.50/14.31 c(a(c(x1))) -> c(a(b(x1))) 53.50/14.31 53.50/14.31 53.50/14.31 53.50/14.31 53.50/14.31 ---------------------------------------- 53.50/14.31 53.50/14.31 (8) 53.50/14.31 Obligation: 53.50/14.31 Relative term rewrite system: 53.50/14.31 R is empty. 53.50/14.31 S is empty. 53.50/14.31 53.50/14.31 ---------------------------------------- 53.50/14.31 53.50/14.31 (9) RIsEmptyProof (EQUIVALENT) 53.50/14.31 The TRS R is empty. Hence, termination is trivially proven. 53.50/14.31 ---------------------------------------- 53.50/14.31 53.50/14.31 (10) 53.50/14.31 YES 53.60/14.40 EOF