132.52/34.29 YES 132.95/34.39 proof of /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml 132.95/34.39 # AProVE Commit ID: 48fb2092695e11cc9f56e44b17a92a5f88ffb256 marcel 20180622 unpublished dirty 132.95/34.39 132.95/34.39 132.95/34.39 Termination of the given RelTRS could be proven: 132.95/34.39 132.95/34.39 (0) RelTRS 132.95/34.39 (1) RelTRS Reverse [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] 132.95/34.39 (2) RelTRS 132.95/34.39 (3) FlatCCProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] 132.95/34.39 (4) RelTRS 132.95/34.39 (5) RootLabelingProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] 132.95/34.39 (6) RelTRS 132.95/34.39 (7) RelTRSRRRProof [EQUIVALENT, 520 ms] 132.95/34.39 (8) RelTRS 132.95/34.39 (9) SIsEmptyProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] 132.95/34.39 (10) QTRS 132.95/34.39 (11) QTRSRRRProof [EQUIVALENT, 11 ms] 132.95/34.39 (12) QTRS 132.95/34.39 (13) DependencyPairsProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] 132.95/34.39 (14) QDP 132.95/34.39 (15) DependencyGraphProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] 132.95/34.39 (16) QDP 132.95/34.39 (17) QDPSizeChangeProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] 132.95/34.39 (18) YES 132.95/34.39 132.95/34.39 132.95/34.39 ---------------------------------------- 132.95/34.39 132.95/34.39 (0) 132.95/34.39 Obligation: 132.95/34.39 Relative term rewrite system: 132.95/34.39 The relative TRS consists of the following R rules: 132.95/34.39 132.95/34.39 c(c(b(x1))) -> b(b(b(x1))) 132.95/34.39 c(a(c(x1))) -> b(a(a(x1))) 132.95/34.39 c(c(c(x1))) -> a(a(b(x1))) 132.95/34.39 c(b(c(x1))) -> c(b(b(x1))) 132.95/34.39 c(a(c(x1))) -> b(b(c(x1))) 132.95/34.39 c(b(c(x1))) -> c(c(b(x1))) 132.95/34.39 132.95/34.39 The relative TRS consists of the following S rules: 132.95/34.39 132.95/34.39 a(b(b(x1))) -> b(a(c(x1))) 132.95/34.39 132.95/34.39 132.95/34.39 ---------------------------------------- 132.95/34.39 132.95/34.39 (1) RelTRS Reverse (EQUIVALENT) 132.95/34.39 We have reversed the following relative TRS [REVERSE]: 132.95/34.39 The set of rules R is 132.95/34.39 c(c(b(x1))) -> b(b(b(x1))) 132.95/34.39 c(a(c(x1))) -> b(a(a(x1))) 132.95/34.39 c(c(c(x1))) -> a(a(b(x1))) 132.95/34.39 c(b(c(x1))) -> c(b(b(x1))) 132.95/34.39 c(a(c(x1))) -> b(b(c(x1))) 132.95/34.39 c(b(c(x1))) -> c(c(b(x1))) 132.95/34.39 132.95/34.39 The set of rules S is 132.95/34.39 a(b(b(x1))) -> b(a(c(x1))) 132.95/34.39 132.95/34.39 We have obtained the following relative TRS: 132.95/34.39 The set of rules R is 132.95/34.39 b(c(c(x1))) -> b(b(b(x1))) 132.95/34.39 c(a(c(x1))) -> a(a(b(x1))) 132.95/34.39 c(c(c(x1))) -> b(a(a(x1))) 132.95/34.39 c(b(c(x1))) -> b(b(c(x1))) 132.95/34.39 c(a(c(x1))) -> c(b(b(x1))) 132.95/34.39 c(b(c(x1))) -> b(c(c(x1))) 132.95/34.39 132.95/34.39 The set of rules S is 132.95/34.39 b(b(a(x1))) -> c(a(b(x1))) 132.95/34.39 132.95/34.39 132.95/34.39 ---------------------------------------- 132.95/34.39 132.95/34.39 (2) 132.95/34.39 Obligation: 132.95/34.39 Relative term rewrite system: 132.95/34.39 The relative TRS consists of the following R rules: 132.95/34.39 132.95/34.39 b(c(c(x1))) -> b(b(b(x1))) 132.95/34.39 c(a(c(x1))) -> a(a(b(x1))) 132.95/34.39 c(c(c(x1))) -> b(a(a(x1))) 132.95/34.39 c(b(c(x1))) -> b(b(c(x1))) 132.95/34.39 c(a(c(x1))) -> c(b(b(x1))) 132.95/34.39 c(b(c(x1))) -> b(c(c(x1))) 132.95/34.39 132.95/34.39 The relative TRS consists of the following S rules: 132.95/34.39 132.95/34.39 b(b(a(x1))) -> c(a(b(x1))) 132.95/34.39 132.95/34.39 132.95/34.39 ---------------------------------------- 132.95/34.39 132.95/34.39 (3) FlatCCProof (EQUIVALENT) 132.95/34.39 We used flat context closure [ROOTLAB] 132.95/34.39 132.95/34.39 ---------------------------------------- 132.95/34.39 132.95/34.39 (4) 132.95/34.39 Obligation: 132.95/34.39 Relative term rewrite system: 132.95/34.39 The relative TRS consists of the following R rules: 132.95/34.39 132.95/34.39 b(c(c(x1))) -> b(b(b(x1))) 132.95/34.39 c(a(c(x1))) -> c(b(b(x1))) 132.95/34.39 b(c(a(c(x1)))) -> b(a(a(b(x1)))) 132.95/34.39 c(c(a(c(x1)))) -> c(a(a(b(x1)))) 132.95/34.39 a(c(a(c(x1)))) -> a(a(a(b(x1)))) 132.95/34.39 b(c(c(c(x1)))) -> b(b(a(a(x1)))) 132.95/34.39 c(c(c(c(x1)))) -> c(b(a(a(x1)))) 132.95/34.39 a(c(c(c(x1)))) -> a(b(a(a(x1)))) 132.95/34.39 b(c(b(c(x1)))) -> b(b(b(c(x1)))) 132.95/34.39 c(c(b(c(x1)))) -> c(b(b(c(x1)))) 132.95/34.39 a(c(b(c(x1)))) -> a(b(b(c(x1)))) 132.95/34.39 b(c(b(c(x1)))) -> b(b(c(c(x1)))) 132.95/34.39 c(c(b(c(x1)))) -> c(b(c(c(x1)))) 132.95/34.39 a(c(b(c(x1)))) -> a(b(c(c(x1)))) 132.95/34.39 132.95/34.39 The relative TRS consists of the following S rules: 132.95/34.39 132.95/34.39 b(b(b(a(x1)))) -> b(c(a(b(x1)))) 132.95/34.39 c(b(b(a(x1)))) -> c(c(a(b(x1)))) 132.95/34.39 a(b(b(a(x1)))) -> a(c(a(b(x1)))) 132.95/34.39 132.95/34.39 132.95/34.39 ---------------------------------------- 132.95/34.39 132.95/34.39 (5) RootLabelingProof (EQUIVALENT) 132.95/34.39 We used plain root labeling [ROOTLAB] with the following heuristic: 132.95/34.39 LabelAll: All function symbols get labeled 132.95/34.39 132.95/34.39 132.95/34.39 ---------------------------------------- 132.95/34.39 132.95/34.39 (6) 132.95/34.39 Obligation: 132.95/34.39 Relative term rewrite system: 132.95/34.39 The relative TRS consists of the following R rules: 132.95/34.39 132.95/34.39 b_{c_1}(c_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(x1))) -> b_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(x1))) 132.95/34.39 b_{c_1}(c_{c_1}(c_{c_1}(x1))) -> b_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(b_{c_1}(x1))) 132.95/34.39 b_{c_1}(c_{c_1}(c_{a_1}(x1))) -> b_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(x1))) 132.95/34.39 c_{a_1}(a_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(x1))) -> c_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(x1))) 132.95/34.39 c_{a_1}(a_{c_1}(c_{c_1}(x1))) -> c_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(b_{c_1}(x1))) 132.95/34.39 c_{a_1}(a_{c_1}(c_{a_1}(x1))) -> c_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(x1))) 132.95/34.39 b_{c_1}(c_{a_1}(a_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(x1)))) -> b_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(x1)))) 132.95/34.39 b_{c_1}(c_{a_1}(a_{c_1}(c_{c_1}(x1)))) -> b_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(b_{c_1}(x1)))) 132.95/34.39 b_{c_1}(c_{a_1}(a_{c_1}(c_{a_1}(x1)))) -> b_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(x1)))) 132.95/34.39 c_{c_1}(c_{a_1}(a_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(x1)))) -> c_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(x1)))) 132.95/34.39 c_{c_1}(c_{a_1}(a_{c_1}(c_{c_1}(x1)))) -> c_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(b_{c_1}(x1)))) 132.95/34.39 c_{c_1}(c_{a_1}(a_{c_1}(c_{a_1}(x1)))) -> c_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(x1)))) 132.95/34.39 a_{c_1}(c_{a_1}(a_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(x1)))) -> a_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(x1)))) 132.95/34.39 a_{c_1}(c_{a_1}(a_{c_1}(c_{c_1}(x1)))) -> a_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(b_{c_1}(x1)))) 132.95/34.39 a_{c_1}(c_{a_1}(a_{c_1}(c_{a_1}(x1)))) -> a_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(x1)))) 132.95/34.39 b_{c_1}(c_{c_1}(c_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(x1)))) -> b_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(x1)))) 132.95/34.39 b_{c_1}(c_{c_1}(c_{c_1}(c_{c_1}(x1)))) -> b_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{c_1}(x1)))) 132.95/34.39 b_{c_1}(c_{c_1}(c_{c_1}(c_{a_1}(x1)))) -> b_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(x1)))) 132.95/34.39 c_{c_1}(c_{c_1}(c_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(x1)))) -> c_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(x1)))) 132.95/34.39 c_{c_1}(c_{c_1}(c_{c_1}(c_{c_1}(x1)))) -> c_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{c_1}(x1)))) 132.95/34.39 c_{c_1}(c_{c_1}(c_{c_1}(c_{a_1}(x1)))) -> c_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(x1)))) 132.95/34.39 a_{c_1}(c_{c_1}(c_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(x1)))) -> a_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(x1)))) 132.95/34.39 a_{c_1}(c_{c_1}(c_{c_1}(c_{c_1}(x1)))) -> a_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{c_1}(x1)))) 132.95/34.39 a_{c_1}(c_{c_1}(c_{c_1}(c_{a_1}(x1)))) -> a_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(x1)))) 132.95/34.39 b_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(b_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(x1)))) -> b_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(b_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(x1)))) 132.95/34.39 b_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(b_{c_1}(c_{c_1}(x1)))) -> b_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(b_{c_1}(c_{c_1}(x1)))) 132.95/34.39 b_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(b_{c_1}(c_{a_1}(x1)))) -> b_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(b_{c_1}(c_{a_1}(x1)))) 132.95/34.39 c_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(b_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(x1)))) -> c_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(b_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(x1)))) 132.95/34.39 c_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(b_{c_1}(c_{c_1}(x1)))) -> c_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(b_{c_1}(c_{c_1}(x1)))) 132.95/34.39 c_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(b_{c_1}(c_{a_1}(x1)))) -> c_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(b_{c_1}(c_{a_1}(x1)))) 132.95/34.39 a_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(b_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(x1)))) -> a_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(b_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(x1)))) 132.95/34.39 a_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(b_{c_1}(c_{c_1}(x1)))) -> a_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(b_{c_1}(c_{c_1}(x1)))) 132.95/34.39 a_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(b_{c_1}(c_{a_1}(x1)))) -> a_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(b_{c_1}(c_{a_1}(x1)))) 132.95/34.39 b_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(b_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(x1)))) -> b_{b_1}(b_{c_1}(c_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(x1)))) 132.95/34.39 b_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(b_{c_1}(c_{c_1}(x1)))) -> b_{b_1}(b_{c_1}(c_{c_1}(c_{c_1}(x1)))) 132.95/34.39 b_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(b_{c_1}(c_{a_1}(x1)))) -> b_{b_1}(b_{c_1}(c_{c_1}(c_{a_1}(x1)))) 132.95/34.39 c_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(b_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(x1)))) -> c_{b_1}(b_{c_1}(c_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(x1)))) 132.95/34.39 c_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(b_{c_1}(c_{c_1}(x1)))) -> c_{b_1}(b_{c_1}(c_{c_1}(c_{c_1}(x1)))) 132.95/34.39 c_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(b_{c_1}(c_{a_1}(x1)))) -> c_{b_1}(b_{c_1}(c_{c_1}(c_{a_1}(x1)))) 132.95/34.39 a_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(b_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(x1)))) -> a_{b_1}(b_{c_1}(c_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(x1)))) 132.95/34.39 a_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(b_{c_1}(c_{c_1}(x1)))) -> a_{b_1}(b_{c_1}(c_{c_1}(c_{c_1}(x1)))) 132.95/34.39 a_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(b_{c_1}(c_{a_1}(x1)))) -> a_{b_1}(b_{c_1}(c_{c_1}(c_{a_1}(x1)))) 132.95/34.39 132.95/34.39 The relative TRS consists of the following S rules: 132.95/34.39 132.95/34.39 b_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(x1)))) -> b_{c_1}(c_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(x1)))) 132.95/34.39 b_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{c_1}(x1)))) -> b_{c_1}(c_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(b_{c_1}(x1)))) 132.95/34.39 b_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(x1)))) -> b_{c_1}(c_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(x1)))) 132.95/34.39 c_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(x1)))) -> c_{c_1}(c_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(x1)))) 132.95/34.39 c_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{c_1}(x1)))) -> c_{c_1}(c_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(b_{c_1}(x1)))) 132.95/34.39 c_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(x1)))) -> c_{c_1}(c_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(x1)))) 132.95/34.39 a_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(x1)))) -> a_{c_1}(c_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(x1)))) 132.95/34.39 a_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{c_1}(x1)))) -> a_{c_1}(c_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(b_{c_1}(x1)))) 132.95/34.39 a_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(x1)))) -> a_{c_1}(c_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(x1)))) 132.95/34.39 132.95/34.39 132.95/34.39 ---------------------------------------- 132.95/34.39 132.95/34.39 (7) RelTRSRRRProof (EQUIVALENT) 132.95/34.39 We used the following monotonic ordering for rule removal: 132.95/34.39 Polynomial interpretation [POLO]: 132.95/34.39 132.95/34.39 POL(a_{a_1}(x_1)) = 1 + 2*x_1 132.95/34.39 POL(a_{b_1}(x_1)) = 2*x_1 132.95/34.39 POL(a_{c_1}(x_1)) = 3 + x_1 132.95/34.39 POL(b_{a_1}(x_1)) = 1 + 2*x_1 132.95/34.39 POL(b_{b_1}(x_1)) = 2*x_1 132.95/34.39 POL(b_{c_1}(x_1)) = 3 + x_1 132.95/34.39 POL(c_{a_1}(x_1)) = 4*x_1 132.95/34.39 POL(c_{b_1}(x_1)) = 4*x_1 132.95/34.39 POL(c_{c_1}(x_1)) = 4 + 2*x_1 132.95/34.39 With this ordering the following rules can be removed [MATRO] because they are oriented strictly: 132.95/34.39 Rules from R: 132.95/34.39 132.95/34.39 b_{c_1}(c_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(x1))) -> b_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(x1))) 132.95/34.39 b_{c_1}(c_{c_1}(c_{c_1}(x1))) -> b_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(b_{c_1}(x1))) 132.95/34.39 b_{c_1}(c_{c_1}(c_{a_1}(x1))) -> b_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(x1))) 132.95/34.39 c_{a_1}(a_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(x1))) -> c_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(x1))) 132.95/34.39 c_{a_1}(a_{c_1}(c_{c_1}(x1))) -> c_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(b_{c_1}(x1))) 132.95/34.39 c_{a_1}(a_{c_1}(c_{a_1}(x1))) -> c_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(x1))) 132.95/34.39 b_{c_1}(c_{a_1}(a_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(x1)))) -> b_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(x1)))) 132.95/34.39 b_{c_1}(c_{a_1}(a_{c_1}(c_{c_1}(x1)))) -> b_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(b_{c_1}(x1)))) 132.95/34.39 b_{c_1}(c_{a_1}(a_{c_1}(c_{a_1}(x1)))) -> b_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(x1)))) 132.95/34.39 c_{c_1}(c_{a_1}(a_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(x1)))) -> c_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(x1)))) 132.95/34.39 c_{c_1}(c_{a_1}(a_{c_1}(c_{c_1}(x1)))) -> c_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(b_{c_1}(x1)))) 132.95/34.39 c_{c_1}(c_{a_1}(a_{c_1}(c_{a_1}(x1)))) -> c_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(x1)))) 132.95/34.39 a_{c_1}(c_{a_1}(a_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(x1)))) -> a_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(x1)))) 132.95/34.39 a_{c_1}(c_{a_1}(a_{c_1}(c_{c_1}(x1)))) -> a_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(b_{c_1}(x1)))) 132.95/34.39 a_{c_1}(c_{a_1}(a_{c_1}(c_{a_1}(x1)))) -> a_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(x1)))) 132.95/34.39 b_{c_1}(c_{c_1}(c_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(x1)))) -> b_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(x1)))) 132.95/34.39 b_{c_1}(c_{c_1}(c_{c_1}(c_{c_1}(x1)))) -> b_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{c_1}(x1)))) 132.95/34.39 b_{c_1}(c_{c_1}(c_{c_1}(c_{a_1}(x1)))) -> b_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(x1)))) 132.95/34.39 c_{c_1}(c_{c_1}(c_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(x1)))) -> c_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(x1)))) 132.95/34.39 a_{c_1}(c_{c_1}(c_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(x1)))) -> a_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(x1)))) 132.95/34.39 a_{c_1}(c_{c_1}(c_{c_1}(c_{c_1}(x1)))) -> a_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{c_1}(x1)))) 132.95/34.39 a_{c_1}(c_{c_1}(c_{c_1}(c_{a_1}(x1)))) -> a_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(x1)))) 132.95/34.39 b_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(b_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(x1)))) -> b_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(b_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(x1)))) 132.95/34.39 b_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(b_{c_1}(c_{c_1}(x1)))) -> b_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(b_{c_1}(c_{c_1}(x1)))) 132.95/34.39 b_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(b_{c_1}(c_{a_1}(x1)))) -> b_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(b_{c_1}(c_{a_1}(x1)))) 132.95/34.39 c_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(b_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(x1)))) -> c_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(b_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(x1)))) 132.95/34.39 c_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(b_{c_1}(c_{c_1}(x1)))) -> c_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(b_{c_1}(c_{c_1}(x1)))) 132.95/34.39 c_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(b_{c_1}(c_{a_1}(x1)))) -> c_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(b_{c_1}(c_{a_1}(x1)))) 132.95/34.39 a_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(b_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(x1)))) -> a_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(b_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(x1)))) 132.95/34.39 a_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(b_{c_1}(c_{c_1}(x1)))) -> a_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(b_{c_1}(c_{c_1}(x1)))) 132.95/34.39 a_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(b_{c_1}(c_{a_1}(x1)))) -> a_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(b_{c_1}(c_{a_1}(x1)))) 132.95/34.39 b_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(b_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(x1)))) -> b_{b_1}(b_{c_1}(c_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(x1)))) 132.95/34.39 b_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(b_{c_1}(c_{c_1}(x1)))) -> b_{b_1}(b_{c_1}(c_{c_1}(c_{c_1}(x1)))) 132.95/34.39 b_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(b_{c_1}(c_{a_1}(x1)))) -> b_{b_1}(b_{c_1}(c_{c_1}(c_{a_1}(x1)))) 132.95/34.39 a_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(b_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(x1)))) -> a_{b_1}(b_{c_1}(c_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(x1)))) 132.95/34.39 a_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(b_{c_1}(c_{c_1}(x1)))) -> a_{b_1}(b_{c_1}(c_{c_1}(c_{c_1}(x1)))) 132.95/34.39 a_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(b_{c_1}(c_{a_1}(x1)))) -> a_{b_1}(b_{c_1}(c_{c_1}(c_{a_1}(x1)))) 132.95/34.39 Rules from S: 132.95/34.39 132.95/34.39 b_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(x1)))) -> b_{c_1}(c_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(x1)))) 132.95/34.39 b_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{c_1}(x1)))) -> b_{c_1}(c_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(b_{c_1}(x1)))) 132.95/34.39 b_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(x1)))) -> b_{c_1}(c_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(x1)))) 132.95/34.39 c_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(x1)))) -> c_{c_1}(c_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(x1)))) 132.95/34.39 c_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{c_1}(x1)))) -> c_{c_1}(c_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(b_{c_1}(x1)))) 132.95/34.39 c_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(x1)))) -> c_{c_1}(c_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(x1)))) 132.95/34.39 a_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(x1)))) -> a_{c_1}(c_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(x1)))) 132.95/34.39 a_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{c_1}(x1)))) -> a_{c_1}(c_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(b_{c_1}(x1)))) 132.95/34.39 a_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(x1)))) -> a_{c_1}(c_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(x1)))) 132.95/34.39 132.95/34.39 132.95/34.39 132.95/34.39 132.95/34.39 ---------------------------------------- 132.95/34.39 132.95/34.39 (8) 132.95/34.39 Obligation: 132.95/34.39 Relative term rewrite system: 132.95/34.39 The relative TRS consists of the following R rules: 132.95/34.39 132.95/34.39 c_{c_1}(c_{c_1}(c_{c_1}(c_{c_1}(x1)))) -> c_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{c_1}(x1)))) 132.95/34.39 c_{c_1}(c_{c_1}(c_{c_1}(c_{a_1}(x1)))) -> c_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(x1)))) 132.95/34.39 c_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(b_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(x1)))) -> c_{b_1}(b_{c_1}(c_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(x1)))) 132.95/34.39 c_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(b_{c_1}(c_{c_1}(x1)))) -> c_{b_1}(b_{c_1}(c_{c_1}(c_{c_1}(x1)))) 132.95/34.39 c_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(b_{c_1}(c_{a_1}(x1)))) -> c_{b_1}(b_{c_1}(c_{c_1}(c_{a_1}(x1)))) 132.95/34.39 132.95/34.39 S is empty. 132.95/34.39 132.95/34.39 ---------------------------------------- 132.95/34.39 132.95/34.39 (9) SIsEmptyProof (EQUIVALENT) 132.95/34.39 The TRS S is empty. Hence, termination of R/S is equivalent to termination of R. 132.95/34.39 ---------------------------------------- 132.95/34.39 132.95/34.39 (10) 132.95/34.39 Obligation: 132.95/34.39 Q restricted rewrite system: 132.95/34.39 The TRS R consists of the following rules: 132.95/34.39 132.95/34.39 c_{c_1}(c_{c_1}(c_{c_1}(c_{c_1}(x1)))) -> c_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{c_1}(x1)))) 132.95/34.39 c_{c_1}(c_{c_1}(c_{c_1}(c_{a_1}(x1)))) -> c_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(x1)))) 132.95/34.39 c_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(b_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(x1)))) -> c_{b_1}(b_{c_1}(c_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(x1)))) 132.95/34.39 c_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(b_{c_1}(c_{c_1}(x1)))) -> c_{b_1}(b_{c_1}(c_{c_1}(c_{c_1}(x1)))) 132.95/34.39 c_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(b_{c_1}(c_{a_1}(x1)))) -> c_{b_1}(b_{c_1}(c_{c_1}(c_{a_1}(x1)))) 132.95/34.39 132.95/34.39 Q is empty. 132.95/34.39 132.95/34.39 ---------------------------------------- 132.95/34.39 132.95/34.39 (11) QTRSRRRProof (EQUIVALENT) 132.95/34.39 Used ordering: 132.95/34.39 Polynomial interpretation [POLO]: 132.95/34.39 132.95/34.39 POL(a_{a_1}(x_1)) = x_1 132.95/34.39 POL(a_{c_1}(x_1)) = x_1 132.95/34.39 POL(b_{a_1}(x_1)) = x_1 132.95/34.39 POL(b_{c_1}(x_1)) = x_1 132.95/34.39 POL(c_{a_1}(x_1)) = x_1 132.95/34.39 POL(c_{b_1}(x_1)) = x_1 132.95/34.39 POL(c_{c_1}(x_1)) = 1 + x_1 132.95/34.39 With this ordering the following rules can be removed by the rule removal processor [LPAR04] because they are oriented strictly: 132.95/34.39 132.95/34.39 c_{c_1}(c_{c_1}(c_{c_1}(c_{c_1}(x1)))) -> c_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{c_1}(x1)))) 132.95/34.39 c_{c_1}(c_{c_1}(c_{c_1}(c_{a_1}(x1)))) -> c_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(x1)))) 132.95/34.39 132.95/34.39 132.95/34.39 132.95/34.39 132.95/34.39 ---------------------------------------- 132.95/34.39 132.95/34.39 (12) 132.95/34.39 Obligation: 132.95/34.39 Q restricted rewrite system: 132.95/34.39 The TRS R consists of the following rules: 132.95/34.39 132.95/34.39 c_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(b_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(x1)))) -> c_{b_1}(b_{c_1}(c_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(x1)))) 132.95/34.39 c_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(b_{c_1}(c_{c_1}(x1)))) -> c_{b_1}(b_{c_1}(c_{c_1}(c_{c_1}(x1)))) 132.95/34.39 c_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(b_{c_1}(c_{a_1}(x1)))) -> c_{b_1}(b_{c_1}(c_{c_1}(c_{a_1}(x1)))) 132.95/34.39 132.95/34.39 Q is empty. 132.95/34.39 132.95/34.39 ---------------------------------------- 132.95/34.39 132.95/34.39 (13) DependencyPairsProof (EQUIVALENT) 132.95/34.39 Using Dependency Pairs [AG00,LPAR04] we result in the following initial DP problem. 132.95/34.39 ---------------------------------------- 132.95/34.39 132.95/34.39 (14) 132.95/34.39 Obligation: 132.95/34.39 Q DP problem: 132.95/34.39 The TRS P consists of the following rules: 132.95/34.39 132.95/34.39 C_{C_1}(c_{b_1}(b_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(x1)))) -> C_{C_1}(c_{b_1}(x1)) 132.95/34.39 C_{C_1}(c_{b_1}(b_{c_1}(c_{c_1}(x1)))) -> C_{C_1}(c_{c_1}(x1)) 132.95/34.39 C_{C_1}(c_{b_1}(b_{c_1}(c_{a_1}(x1)))) -> C_{C_1}(c_{a_1}(x1)) 132.95/34.39 132.95/34.39 The TRS R consists of the following rules: 132.95/34.39 132.95/34.39 c_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(b_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(x1)))) -> c_{b_1}(b_{c_1}(c_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(x1)))) 132.95/34.39 c_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(b_{c_1}(c_{c_1}(x1)))) -> c_{b_1}(b_{c_1}(c_{c_1}(c_{c_1}(x1)))) 132.95/34.39 c_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(b_{c_1}(c_{a_1}(x1)))) -> c_{b_1}(b_{c_1}(c_{c_1}(c_{a_1}(x1)))) 132.95/34.39 132.95/34.39 Q is empty. 132.95/34.39 We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains. 132.95/34.39 ---------------------------------------- 132.95/34.39 132.95/34.39 (15) DependencyGraphProof (EQUIVALENT) 132.95/34.39 The approximation of the Dependency Graph [LPAR04,FROCOS05,EDGSTAR] contains 1 SCC with 1 less node. 132.95/34.39 ---------------------------------------- 132.95/34.39 132.95/34.39 (16) 132.95/34.39 Obligation: 132.95/34.39 Q DP problem: 132.95/34.39 The TRS P consists of the following rules: 132.95/34.39 132.95/34.39 C_{C_1}(c_{b_1}(b_{c_1}(c_{c_1}(x1)))) -> C_{C_1}(c_{c_1}(x1)) 132.95/34.39 C_{C_1}(c_{b_1}(b_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(x1)))) -> C_{C_1}(c_{b_1}(x1)) 132.95/34.39 132.95/34.39 The TRS R consists of the following rules: 132.95/34.39 132.95/34.39 c_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(b_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(x1)))) -> c_{b_1}(b_{c_1}(c_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(x1)))) 132.95/34.39 c_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(b_{c_1}(c_{c_1}(x1)))) -> c_{b_1}(b_{c_1}(c_{c_1}(c_{c_1}(x1)))) 132.95/34.39 c_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(b_{c_1}(c_{a_1}(x1)))) -> c_{b_1}(b_{c_1}(c_{c_1}(c_{a_1}(x1)))) 132.95/34.39 132.95/34.39 Q is empty. 132.95/34.39 We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains. 132.95/34.39 ---------------------------------------- 132.95/34.39 132.95/34.39 (17) QDPSizeChangeProof (EQUIVALENT) 132.95/34.39 By using the subterm criterion [SUBTERM_CRITERION] together with the size-change analysis [AAECC05] we have proven that there are no infinite chains for this DP problem. 132.95/34.39 132.95/34.39 From the DPs we obtained the following set of size-change graphs: 132.95/34.39 *C_{C_1}(c_{b_1}(b_{c_1}(c_{c_1}(x1)))) -> C_{C_1}(c_{c_1}(x1)) 132.95/34.39 The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1 132.95/34.39 132.95/34.39 132.95/34.39 *C_{C_1}(c_{b_1}(b_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(x1)))) -> C_{C_1}(c_{b_1}(x1)) 132.95/34.39 The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1 132.95/34.39 132.95/34.39 132.95/34.39 ---------------------------------------- 132.95/34.39 132.95/34.39 (18) 132.95/34.39 YES 133.11/36.98 EOF