14.98/4.68 YES 15.25/4.69 proof of /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml 15.25/4.69 # AProVE Commit ID: 48fb2092695e11cc9f56e44b17a92a5f88ffb256 marcel 20180622 unpublished dirty 15.25/4.69 15.25/4.69 15.25/4.69 Termination of the given RelTRS could be proven: 15.25/4.69 15.25/4.69 (0) RelTRS 15.25/4.69 (1) RelTRS Reverse [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] 15.25/4.69 (2) RelTRS 15.25/4.69 (3) FlatCCProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] 15.25/4.69 (4) RelTRS 15.25/4.69 (5) RootLabelingProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] 15.25/4.69 (6) RelTRS 15.25/4.69 (7) RelTRSRRRProof [EQUIVALENT, 13 ms] 15.25/4.69 (8) RelTRS 15.25/4.69 (9) RelTRSRRRProof [EQUIVALENT, 9 ms] 15.25/4.69 (10) RelTRS 15.25/4.69 (11) RelTRSRRRProof [EQUIVALENT, 133 ms] 15.25/4.69 (12) RelTRS 15.25/4.69 (13) RelTRSRRRProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] 15.25/4.69 (14) RelTRS 15.25/4.69 (15) RIsEmptyProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] 15.25/4.69 (16) YES 15.25/4.69 15.25/4.69 15.25/4.69 ---------------------------------------- 15.25/4.69 15.25/4.69 (0) 15.25/4.69 Obligation: 15.25/4.69 Relative term rewrite system: 15.25/4.69 The relative TRS consists of the following R rules: 15.25/4.69 15.25/4.69 a(a(b(x1))) -> b(a(x1)) 15.25/4.69 c(b(x1)) -> b(a(b(x1))) 15.25/4.69 15.25/4.69 The relative TRS consists of the following S rules: 15.25/4.69 15.25/4.69 a(x1) -> a(c(a(x1))) 15.25/4.69 15.25/4.69 15.25/4.69 ---------------------------------------- 15.25/4.69 15.25/4.69 (1) RelTRS Reverse (EQUIVALENT) 15.25/4.69 We have reversed the following relative TRS [REVERSE]: 15.25/4.69 The set of rules R is 15.25/4.69 a(a(b(x1))) -> b(a(x1)) 15.25/4.69 c(b(x1)) -> b(a(b(x1))) 15.25/4.69 15.25/4.69 The set of rules S is 15.25/4.69 a(x1) -> a(c(a(x1))) 15.25/4.69 15.25/4.69 We have obtained the following relative TRS: 15.25/4.69 The set of rules R is 15.25/4.69 b(a(a(x1))) -> a(b(x1)) 15.25/4.69 b(c(x1)) -> b(a(b(x1))) 15.25/4.69 15.25/4.69 The set of rules S is 15.25/4.69 a(x1) -> a(c(a(x1))) 15.25/4.69 15.25/4.69 15.25/4.69 ---------------------------------------- 15.25/4.69 15.25/4.69 (2) 15.25/4.69 Obligation: 15.25/4.69 Relative term rewrite system: 15.25/4.69 The relative TRS consists of the following R rules: 15.25/4.69 15.25/4.69 b(a(a(x1))) -> a(b(x1)) 15.25/4.69 b(c(x1)) -> b(a(b(x1))) 15.25/4.69 15.25/4.69 The relative TRS consists of the following S rules: 15.25/4.69 15.25/4.69 a(x1) -> a(c(a(x1))) 15.25/4.69 15.25/4.69 15.25/4.69 ---------------------------------------- 15.25/4.69 15.25/4.69 (3) FlatCCProof (EQUIVALENT) 15.25/4.69 We used flat context closure [ROOTLAB] 15.25/4.69 15.25/4.69 ---------------------------------------- 15.25/4.69 15.25/4.69 (4) 15.25/4.69 Obligation: 15.25/4.69 Relative term rewrite system: 15.25/4.69 The relative TRS consists of the following R rules: 15.25/4.69 15.25/4.69 b(c(x1)) -> b(a(b(x1))) 15.25/4.69 b(b(a(a(x1)))) -> b(a(b(x1))) 15.25/4.69 a(b(a(a(x1)))) -> a(a(b(x1))) 15.25/4.69 c(b(a(a(x1)))) -> c(a(b(x1))) 15.25/4.69 15.25/4.69 The relative TRS consists of the following S rules: 15.25/4.69 15.25/4.69 a(x1) -> a(c(a(x1))) 15.25/4.69 15.25/4.69 15.25/4.69 ---------------------------------------- 15.25/4.69 15.25/4.69 (5) RootLabelingProof (EQUIVALENT) 15.25/4.69 We used plain root labeling [ROOTLAB] with the following heuristic: 15.25/4.69 LabelAll: All function symbols get labeled 15.25/4.69 15.25/4.69 15.25/4.69 ---------------------------------------- 15.25/4.69 15.25/4.69 (6) 15.25/4.69 Obligation: 15.25/4.69 Relative term rewrite system: 15.25/4.69 The relative TRS consists of the following R rules: 15.25/4.69 15.25/4.69 b_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(x1)) -> b_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(x1))) 15.25/4.69 b_{c_1}(c_{c_1}(x1)) -> b_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(b_{c_1}(x1))) 15.25/4.69 b_{c_1}(c_{a_1}(x1)) -> b_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(x1))) 15.25/4.69 b_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(x1)))) -> b_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(x1))) 15.25/4.69 b_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{c_1}(x1)))) -> b_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(b_{c_1}(x1))) 15.25/4.69 b_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(x1)))) -> b_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(x1))) 15.25/4.69 a_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(x1)))) -> a_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(x1))) 15.25/4.69 a_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{c_1}(x1)))) -> a_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(b_{c_1}(x1))) 15.25/4.69 a_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(x1)))) -> a_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(x1))) 15.25/4.69 c_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(x1)))) -> c_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(x1))) 15.25/4.69 c_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{c_1}(x1)))) -> c_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(b_{c_1}(x1))) 15.25/4.69 c_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(x1)))) -> c_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(x1))) 15.25/4.69 15.25/4.69 The relative TRS consists of the following S rules: 15.25/4.69 15.25/4.69 a_{b_1}(x1) -> a_{c_1}(c_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(x1))) 15.25/4.69 a_{c_1}(x1) -> a_{c_1}(c_{a_1}(a_{c_1}(x1))) 15.25/4.69 a_{a_1}(x1) -> a_{c_1}(c_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(x1))) 15.25/4.69 15.25/4.69 15.25/4.69 ---------------------------------------- 15.25/4.69 15.25/4.69 (7) RelTRSRRRProof (EQUIVALENT) 15.25/4.69 We used the following monotonic ordering for rule removal: 15.25/4.69 Polynomial interpretation [POLO]: 15.25/4.69 15.25/4.69 POL(a_{a_1}(x_1)) = 1 + x_1 15.25/4.69 POL(a_{b_1}(x_1)) = x_1 15.25/4.69 POL(a_{c_1}(x_1)) = x_1 15.25/4.69 POL(b_{a_1}(x_1)) = x_1 15.25/4.69 POL(b_{b_1}(x_1)) = x_1 15.25/4.69 POL(b_{c_1}(x_1)) = x_1 15.25/4.69 POL(c_{a_1}(x_1)) = x_1 15.25/4.69 POL(c_{b_1}(x_1)) = 1 + x_1 15.25/4.69 POL(c_{c_1}(x_1)) = x_1 15.25/4.69 With this ordering the following rules can be removed [MATRO] because they are oriented strictly: 15.25/4.69 Rules from R: 15.25/4.69 15.25/4.69 b_{c_1}(c_{b_1}(x1)) -> b_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(x1))) 15.25/4.69 b_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(x1)))) -> b_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(x1))) 15.25/4.69 b_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{c_1}(x1)))) -> b_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(b_{c_1}(x1))) 15.25/4.69 b_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(x1)))) -> b_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(x1))) 15.25/4.69 a_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(x1)))) -> a_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(x1))) 15.25/4.69 c_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(x1)))) -> c_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(x1))) 15.25/4.69 c_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{c_1}(x1)))) -> c_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(b_{c_1}(x1))) 15.25/4.69 c_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(x1)))) -> c_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(x1))) 15.25/4.69 Rules from S: 15.25/4.69 none 15.25/4.69 15.25/4.69 15.25/4.69 15.25/4.69 15.25/4.69 ---------------------------------------- 15.25/4.69 15.25/4.69 (8) 15.25/4.69 Obligation: 15.25/4.69 Relative term rewrite system: 15.25/4.69 The relative TRS consists of the following R rules: 15.25/4.69 15.25/4.69 b_{c_1}(c_{c_1}(x1)) -> b_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(b_{c_1}(x1))) 15.25/4.69 b_{c_1}(c_{a_1}(x1)) -> b_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(x1))) 15.25/4.69 a_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(x1)))) -> a_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(x1))) 15.25/4.69 a_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{c_1}(x1)))) -> a_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(b_{c_1}(x1))) 15.25/4.69 15.25/4.69 The relative TRS consists of the following S rules: 15.25/4.69 15.25/4.69 a_{b_1}(x1) -> a_{c_1}(c_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(x1))) 15.25/4.69 a_{c_1}(x1) -> a_{c_1}(c_{a_1}(a_{c_1}(x1))) 15.25/4.69 a_{a_1}(x1) -> a_{c_1}(c_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(x1))) 15.25/4.69 15.25/4.69 15.25/4.69 ---------------------------------------- 15.25/4.69 15.25/4.69 (9) RelTRSRRRProof (EQUIVALENT) 15.25/4.69 We used the following monotonic ordering for rule removal: 15.25/4.69 Polynomial interpretation [POLO]: 15.25/4.69 15.25/4.69 POL(a_{a_1}(x_1)) = x_1 15.25/4.69 POL(a_{b_1}(x_1)) = x_1 15.25/4.69 POL(a_{c_1}(x_1)) = x_1 15.25/4.69 POL(b_{a_1}(x_1)) = x_1 15.25/4.69 POL(b_{b_1}(x_1)) = x_1 15.25/4.69 POL(b_{c_1}(x_1)) = x_1 15.25/4.69 POL(c_{a_1}(x_1)) = x_1 15.25/4.69 POL(c_{c_1}(x_1)) = 1 + x_1 15.25/4.69 With this ordering the following rules can be removed [MATRO] because they are oriented strictly: 15.25/4.69 Rules from R: 15.25/4.69 15.25/4.69 b_{c_1}(c_{c_1}(x1)) -> b_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(b_{c_1}(x1))) 15.25/4.69 Rules from S: 15.25/4.69 none 15.25/4.69 15.25/4.69 15.25/4.69 15.25/4.69 15.25/4.69 ---------------------------------------- 15.25/4.69 15.25/4.69 (10) 15.25/4.69 Obligation: 15.25/4.69 Relative term rewrite system: 15.25/4.69 The relative TRS consists of the following R rules: 15.25/4.69 15.25/4.69 b_{c_1}(c_{a_1}(x1)) -> b_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(x1))) 15.25/4.69 a_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(x1)))) -> a_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(x1))) 15.25/4.69 a_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{c_1}(x1)))) -> a_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(b_{c_1}(x1))) 15.25/4.69 15.25/4.69 The relative TRS consists of the following S rules: 15.25/4.69 15.25/4.69 a_{b_1}(x1) -> a_{c_1}(c_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(x1))) 15.25/4.69 a_{c_1}(x1) -> a_{c_1}(c_{a_1}(a_{c_1}(x1))) 15.25/4.69 a_{a_1}(x1) -> a_{c_1}(c_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(x1))) 15.25/4.69 15.25/4.69 15.25/4.69 ---------------------------------------- 15.25/4.69 15.25/4.69 (11) RelTRSRRRProof (EQUIVALENT) 15.25/4.69 We used the following monotonic ordering for rule removal: 15.25/4.69 Matrix interpretation [MATRO] to (N^2, +, *, >=, >) : 15.25/4.69 15.25/4.69 <<< 15.25/4.69 POL(b_{c_1}(x_1)) = [[0], [0]] + [[1, 2], [0, 1]] * x_1 15.25/4.69 >>> 15.25/4.69 15.25/4.69 <<< 15.25/4.69 POL(c_{a_1}(x_1)) = [[0], [0]] + [[1, 0], [0, 1]] * x_1 15.25/4.69 >>> 15.25/4.69 15.25/4.69 <<< 15.25/4.69 POL(b_{a_1}(x_1)) = [[0], [0]] + [[1, 1], [0, 1]] * x_1 15.25/4.69 >>> 15.25/4.69 15.25/4.69 <<< 15.25/4.69 POL(a_{b_1}(x_1)) = [[0], [0]] + [[1, 0], [0, 1]] * x_1 15.25/4.69 >>> 15.25/4.69 15.25/4.69 <<< 15.25/4.69 POL(a_{a_1}(x_1)) = [[0], [2]] + [[1, 0], [0, 2]] * x_1 15.25/4.69 >>> 15.25/4.69 15.25/4.69 <<< 15.25/4.69 POL(b_{b_1}(x_1)) = [[0], [0]] + [[1, 0], [0, 0]] * x_1 15.25/4.69 >>> 15.25/4.69 15.25/4.69 <<< 15.25/4.69 POL(a_{c_1}(x_1)) = [[0], [0]] + [[1, 0], [0, 1]] * x_1 15.25/4.69 >>> 15.25/4.69 15.25/4.69 With this ordering the following rules can be removed [MATRO] because they are oriented strictly: 15.25/4.69 Rules from R: 15.25/4.69 15.25/4.69 a_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(x1)))) -> a_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(b_{b_1}(x1))) 15.25/4.69 a_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(a_{c_1}(x1)))) -> a_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(b_{c_1}(x1))) 15.25/4.69 Rules from S: 15.25/4.69 none 15.25/4.69 15.25/4.69 15.25/4.69 15.25/4.69 15.25/4.69 ---------------------------------------- 15.25/4.69 15.25/4.69 (12) 15.25/4.69 Obligation: 15.25/4.69 Relative term rewrite system: 15.25/4.69 The relative TRS consists of the following R rules: 15.25/4.69 15.25/4.69 b_{c_1}(c_{a_1}(x1)) -> b_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(x1))) 15.25/4.69 15.25/4.69 The relative TRS consists of the following S rules: 15.25/4.69 15.25/4.69 a_{b_1}(x1) -> a_{c_1}(c_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(x1))) 15.25/4.69 a_{c_1}(x1) -> a_{c_1}(c_{a_1}(a_{c_1}(x1))) 15.25/4.69 a_{a_1}(x1) -> a_{c_1}(c_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(x1))) 15.25/4.69 15.25/4.69 15.25/4.69 ---------------------------------------- 15.25/4.69 15.25/4.69 (13) RelTRSRRRProof (EQUIVALENT) 15.25/4.69 We used the following monotonic ordering for rule removal: 15.25/4.69 Polynomial interpretation [POLO]: 15.25/4.69 15.25/4.69 POL(a_{a_1}(x_1)) = x_1 15.25/4.69 POL(a_{b_1}(x_1)) = x_1 15.25/4.69 POL(a_{c_1}(x_1)) = x_1 15.25/4.69 POL(b_{a_1}(x_1)) = x_1 15.25/4.69 POL(b_{c_1}(x_1)) = 1 + x_1 15.25/4.69 POL(c_{a_1}(x_1)) = x_1 15.25/4.69 With this ordering the following rules can be removed [MATRO] because they are oriented strictly: 15.25/4.69 Rules from R: 15.25/4.69 15.25/4.69 b_{c_1}(c_{a_1}(x1)) -> b_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(b_{a_1}(x1))) 15.25/4.69 Rules from S: 15.25/4.69 none 15.25/4.69 15.25/4.69 15.25/4.69 15.25/4.69 15.25/4.69 ---------------------------------------- 15.25/4.69 15.25/4.69 (14) 15.25/4.69 Obligation: 15.25/4.69 Relative term rewrite system: 15.25/4.69 R is empty. 15.25/4.69 The relative TRS consists of the following S rules: 15.25/4.69 15.25/4.69 a_{b_1}(x1) -> a_{c_1}(c_{a_1}(a_{b_1}(x1))) 15.25/4.69 a_{c_1}(x1) -> a_{c_1}(c_{a_1}(a_{c_1}(x1))) 15.25/4.69 a_{a_1}(x1) -> a_{c_1}(c_{a_1}(a_{a_1}(x1))) 15.25/4.69 15.25/4.69 15.25/4.69 ---------------------------------------- 15.25/4.69 15.25/4.69 (15) RIsEmptyProof (EQUIVALENT) 15.25/4.69 The TRS R is empty. Hence, termination is trivially proven. 15.25/4.69 ---------------------------------------- 15.25/4.69 15.25/4.69 (16) 15.25/4.69 YES 15.25/4.72 EOF