22.82/6.87 WORST_CASE(Omega(n^1), O(n^1)) 22.82/6.88 proof of /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml 22.82/6.88 # AProVE Commit ID: 48fb2092695e11cc9f56e44b17a92a5f88ffb256 marcel 20180622 unpublished dirty 22.82/6.88 22.82/6.88 22.82/6.88 The Runtime Complexity (full) of the given CpxTRS could be proven to be BOUNDS(n^1, n^1). 22.82/6.88 22.82/6.88 (0) CpxTRS 22.82/6.88 (1) NestedDefinedSymbolProof [UPPER BOUND(ID), 0 ms] 22.82/6.88 (2) CpxTRS 22.82/6.88 (3) RelTrsToTrsProof [UPPER BOUND(ID), 0 ms] 22.82/6.88 (4) CpxTRS 22.82/6.88 (5) CpxTrsMatchBoundsTAProof [FINISHED, 149 ms] 22.82/6.88 (6) BOUNDS(1, n^1) 22.82/6.88 (7) RelTrsToDecreasingLoopProblemProof [LOWER BOUND(ID), 0 ms] 22.82/6.88 (8) TRS for Loop Detection 22.82/6.88 (9) DecreasingLoopProof [LOWER BOUND(ID), 0 ms] 22.82/6.88 (10) BEST 22.82/6.88 (11) proven lower bound 22.82/6.88 (12) LowerBoundPropagationProof [FINISHED, 0 ms] 22.82/6.88 (13) BOUNDS(n^1, INF) 22.82/6.88 (14) TRS for Loop Detection 22.82/6.88 22.82/6.88 22.82/6.88 ---------------------------------------- 22.82/6.88 22.82/6.88 (0) 22.82/6.88 Obligation: 22.82/6.88 The Runtime Complexity (full) of the given CpxTRS could be proven to be BOUNDS(n^1, n^1). 22.82/6.88 22.82/6.88 22.82/6.88 The TRS R consists of the following rules: 22.82/6.88 22.82/6.88 active(U11(tt, M, N)) -> mark(U12(tt, M, N)) 22.82/6.88 active(U12(tt, M, N)) -> mark(s(plus(N, M))) 22.82/6.88 active(U21(tt, M, N)) -> mark(U22(tt, M, N)) 22.82/6.88 active(U22(tt, M, N)) -> mark(plus(x(N, M), N)) 22.82/6.88 active(plus(N, 0)) -> mark(N) 22.82/6.88 active(plus(N, s(M))) -> mark(U11(tt, M, N)) 22.82/6.88 active(x(N, 0)) -> mark(0) 22.82/6.88 active(x(N, s(M))) -> mark(U21(tt, M, N)) 22.82/6.88 active(U11(X1, X2, X3)) -> U11(active(X1), X2, X3) 22.82/6.88 active(U12(X1, X2, X3)) -> U12(active(X1), X2, X3) 22.82/6.88 active(s(X)) -> s(active(X)) 22.82/6.88 active(plus(X1, X2)) -> plus(active(X1), X2) 22.82/6.88 active(plus(X1, X2)) -> plus(X1, active(X2)) 22.82/6.88 active(U21(X1, X2, X3)) -> U21(active(X1), X2, X3) 22.82/6.88 active(U22(X1, X2, X3)) -> U22(active(X1), X2, X3) 22.82/6.88 active(x(X1, X2)) -> x(active(X1), X2) 22.82/6.88 active(x(X1, X2)) -> x(X1, active(X2)) 22.82/6.88 U11(mark(X1), X2, X3) -> mark(U11(X1, X2, X3)) 22.82/6.88 U12(mark(X1), X2, X3) -> mark(U12(X1, X2, X3)) 22.82/6.88 s(mark(X)) -> mark(s(X)) 22.82/6.88 plus(mark(X1), X2) -> mark(plus(X1, X2)) 22.82/6.88 plus(X1, mark(X2)) -> mark(plus(X1, X2)) 22.82/6.88 U21(mark(X1), X2, X3) -> mark(U21(X1, X2, X3)) 22.82/6.88 U22(mark(X1), X2, X3) -> mark(U22(X1, X2, X3)) 22.82/6.88 x(mark(X1), X2) -> mark(x(X1, X2)) 22.82/6.88 x(X1, mark(X2)) -> mark(x(X1, X2)) 22.82/6.88 proper(U11(X1, X2, X3)) -> U11(proper(X1), proper(X2), proper(X3)) 22.82/6.88 proper(tt) -> ok(tt) 22.82/6.88 proper(U12(X1, X2, X3)) -> U12(proper(X1), proper(X2), proper(X3)) 22.82/6.88 proper(s(X)) -> s(proper(X)) 22.82/6.88 proper(plus(X1, X2)) -> plus(proper(X1), proper(X2)) 22.82/6.88 proper(U21(X1, X2, X3)) -> U21(proper(X1), proper(X2), proper(X3)) 22.82/6.88 proper(U22(X1, X2, X3)) -> U22(proper(X1), proper(X2), proper(X3)) 22.82/6.88 proper(x(X1, X2)) -> x(proper(X1), proper(X2)) 22.82/6.88 proper(0) -> ok(0) 22.82/6.88 U11(ok(X1), ok(X2), ok(X3)) -> ok(U11(X1, X2, X3)) 22.82/6.88 U12(ok(X1), ok(X2), ok(X3)) -> ok(U12(X1, X2, X3)) 22.82/6.88 s(ok(X)) -> ok(s(X)) 22.82/6.88 plus(ok(X1), ok(X2)) -> ok(plus(X1, X2)) 22.82/6.88 U21(ok(X1), ok(X2), ok(X3)) -> ok(U21(X1, X2, X3)) 22.82/6.88 U22(ok(X1), ok(X2), ok(X3)) -> ok(U22(X1, X2, X3)) 22.82/6.88 x(ok(X1), ok(X2)) -> ok(x(X1, X2)) 22.82/6.88 top(mark(X)) -> top(proper(X)) 22.82/6.88 top(ok(X)) -> top(active(X)) 22.82/6.88 22.82/6.88 S is empty. 22.82/6.88 Rewrite Strategy: FULL 22.82/6.88 ---------------------------------------- 22.82/6.88 22.82/6.88 (1) NestedDefinedSymbolProof (UPPER BOUND(ID)) 22.82/6.88 The following defined symbols can occur below the 0th argument of top: proper, active 22.82/6.88 The following defined symbols can occur below the 0th argument of proper: proper, active 22.82/6.88 The following defined symbols can occur below the 0th argument of active: proper, active 22.82/6.88 22.82/6.88 Hence, the left-hand sides of the following rules are not basic-reachable and can be removed: 22.82/6.88 active(U11(tt, M, N)) -> mark(U12(tt, M, N)) 22.82/6.88 active(U12(tt, M, N)) -> mark(s(plus(N, M))) 22.82/6.88 active(U21(tt, M, N)) -> mark(U22(tt, M, N)) 22.82/6.88 active(U22(tt, M, N)) -> mark(plus(x(N, M), N)) 22.82/6.88 active(plus(N, 0)) -> mark(N) 22.82/6.88 active(plus(N, s(M))) -> mark(U11(tt, M, N)) 22.82/6.88 active(x(N, 0)) -> mark(0) 22.82/6.88 active(x(N, s(M))) -> mark(U21(tt, M, N)) 22.82/6.88 active(U11(X1, X2, X3)) -> U11(active(X1), X2, X3) 22.82/6.88 active(U12(X1, X2, X3)) -> U12(active(X1), X2, X3) 22.82/6.88 active(s(X)) -> s(active(X)) 22.82/6.88 active(plus(X1, X2)) -> plus(active(X1), X2) 22.82/6.88 active(plus(X1, X2)) -> plus(X1, active(X2)) 22.82/6.88 active(U21(X1, X2, X3)) -> U21(active(X1), X2, X3) 22.82/6.88 active(U22(X1, X2, X3)) -> U22(active(X1), X2, X3) 22.82/6.88 active(x(X1, X2)) -> x(active(X1), X2) 22.82/6.88 active(x(X1, X2)) -> x(X1, active(X2)) 22.82/6.88 proper(U11(X1, X2, X3)) -> U11(proper(X1), proper(X2), proper(X3)) 22.82/6.88 proper(U12(X1, X2, X3)) -> U12(proper(X1), proper(X2), proper(X3)) 22.82/6.88 proper(s(X)) -> s(proper(X)) 22.82/6.88 proper(plus(X1, X2)) -> plus(proper(X1), proper(X2)) 22.82/6.88 proper(U21(X1, X2, X3)) -> U21(proper(X1), proper(X2), proper(X3)) 22.82/6.88 proper(U22(X1, X2, X3)) -> U22(proper(X1), proper(X2), proper(X3)) 22.82/6.88 proper(x(X1, X2)) -> x(proper(X1), proper(X2)) 22.82/6.88 22.82/6.88 ---------------------------------------- 22.82/6.88 22.82/6.88 (2) 22.82/6.88 Obligation: 22.82/6.88 The Runtime Complexity (full) of the given CpxTRS could be proven to be BOUNDS(1, n^1). 22.82/6.88 22.82/6.88 22.82/6.88 The TRS R consists of the following rules: 22.82/6.88 22.82/6.88 U11(mark(X1), X2, X3) -> mark(U11(X1, X2, X3)) 22.82/6.88 U12(mark(X1), X2, X3) -> mark(U12(X1, X2, X3)) 22.82/6.88 s(mark(X)) -> mark(s(X)) 22.82/6.88 plus(mark(X1), X2) -> mark(plus(X1, X2)) 22.82/6.88 plus(X1, mark(X2)) -> mark(plus(X1, X2)) 22.82/6.88 U21(mark(X1), X2, X3) -> mark(U21(X1, X2, X3)) 22.82/6.88 U22(mark(X1), X2, X3) -> mark(U22(X1, X2, X3)) 22.82/6.88 x(mark(X1), X2) -> mark(x(X1, X2)) 22.82/6.88 x(X1, mark(X2)) -> mark(x(X1, X2)) 22.82/6.88 proper(tt) -> ok(tt) 22.82/6.88 proper(0) -> ok(0) 22.82/6.88 U11(ok(X1), ok(X2), ok(X3)) -> ok(U11(X1, X2, X3)) 22.82/6.88 U12(ok(X1), ok(X2), ok(X3)) -> ok(U12(X1, X2, X3)) 22.82/6.88 s(ok(X)) -> ok(s(X)) 22.82/6.88 plus(ok(X1), ok(X2)) -> ok(plus(X1, X2)) 22.82/6.88 U21(ok(X1), ok(X2), ok(X3)) -> ok(U21(X1, X2, X3)) 22.82/6.88 U22(ok(X1), ok(X2), ok(X3)) -> ok(U22(X1, X2, X3)) 22.82/6.88 x(ok(X1), ok(X2)) -> ok(x(X1, X2)) 22.82/6.88 top(mark(X)) -> top(proper(X)) 22.82/6.88 top(ok(X)) -> top(active(X)) 22.82/6.88 22.82/6.88 S is empty. 22.82/6.88 Rewrite Strategy: FULL 22.82/6.88 ---------------------------------------- 22.82/6.88 22.82/6.88 (3) RelTrsToTrsProof (UPPER BOUND(ID)) 22.82/6.88 transformed relative TRS to TRS 22.82/6.88 ---------------------------------------- 22.82/6.88 22.82/6.88 (4) 22.82/6.88 Obligation: 22.82/6.88 The Runtime Complexity (full) of the given CpxTRS could be proven to be BOUNDS(1, n^1). 22.82/6.88 22.82/6.88 22.82/6.88 The TRS R consists of the following rules: 22.82/6.88 22.82/6.88 U11(mark(X1), X2, X3) -> mark(U11(X1, X2, X3)) 22.82/6.88 U12(mark(X1), X2, X3) -> mark(U12(X1, X2, X3)) 22.82/6.88 s(mark(X)) -> mark(s(X)) 22.82/6.88 plus(mark(X1), X2) -> mark(plus(X1, X2)) 22.82/6.88 plus(X1, mark(X2)) -> mark(plus(X1, X2)) 22.82/6.88 U21(mark(X1), X2, X3) -> mark(U21(X1, X2, X3)) 22.82/6.88 U22(mark(X1), X2, X3) -> mark(U22(X1, X2, X3)) 22.82/6.88 x(mark(X1), X2) -> mark(x(X1, X2)) 22.82/6.88 x(X1, mark(X2)) -> mark(x(X1, X2)) 22.82/6.88 proper(tt) -> ok(tt) 22.82/6.88 proper(0) -> ok(0) 22.82/6.88 U11(ok(X1), ok(X2), ok(X3)) -> ok(U11(X1, X2, X3)) 22.82/6.88 U12(ok(X1), ok(X2), ok(X3)) -> ok(U12(X1, X2, X3)) 22.82/6.88 s(ok(X)) -> ok(s(X)) 22.82/6.88 plus(ok(X1), ok(X2)) -> ok(plus(X1, X2)) 22.82/6.88 U21(ok(X1), ok(X2), ok(X3)) -> ok(U21(X1, X2, X3)) 22.82/6.88 U22(ok(X1), ok(X2), ok(X3)) -> ok(U22(X1, X2, X3)) 22.82/6.88 x(ok(X1), ok(X2)) -> ok(x(X1, X2)) 22.82/6.88 top(mark(X)) -> top(proper(X)) 22.82/6.88 top(ok(X)) -> top(active(X)) 22.82/6.88 22.82/6.88 S is empty. 22.82/6.88 Rewrite Strategy: FULL 22.82/6.88 ---------------------------------------- 22.82/6.88 22.82/6.88 (5) CpxTrsMatchBoundsTAProof (FINISHED) 22.82/6.88 A linear upper bound on the runtime complexity of the TRS R could be shown with a Match-Bound[TAB_LEFTLINEAR,TAB_NONLEFTLINEAR] (for contructor-based start-terms) of 2. 22.82/6.88 22.82/6.88 The compatible tree automaton used to show the Match-Boundedness (for constructor-based start-terms) is represented by: 22.82/6.88 final states : [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9] 22.82/6.88 transitions: 22.82/6.88 mark0(0) -> 0 22.82/6.88 tt0() -> 0 22.82/6.88 ok0(0) -> 0 22.82/6.88 00() -> 0 22.82/6.88 active0(0) -> 0 22.82/6.88 U110(0, 0, 0) -> 1 22.82/6.88 U120(0, 0, 0) -> 2 22.82/6.88 s0(0) -> 3 22.82/6.88 plus0(0, 0) -> 4 22.82/6.88 U210(0, 0, 0) -> 5 22.82/6.88 U220(0, 0, 0) -> 6 22.82/6.88 x0(0, 0) -> 7 22.82/6.88 proper0(0) -> 8 22.82/6.88 top0(0) -> 9 22.82/6.88 U111(0, 0, 0) -> 10 22.82/6.88 mark1(10) -> 1 22.82/6.88 U121(0, 0, 0) -> 11 22.82/6.88 mark1(11) -> 2 22.82/6.88 s1(0) -> 12 22.82/6.88 mark1(12) -> 3 22.82/6.88 plus1(0, 0) -> 13 22.82/6.88 mark1(13) -> 4 22.82/6.88 U211(0, 0, 0) -> 14 22.82/6.88 mark1(14) -> 5 22.82/6.88 U221(0, 0, 0) -> 15 22.82/6.88 mark1(15) -> 6 22.82/6.88 x1(0, 0) -> 16 22.82/6.88 mark1(16) -> 7 22.82/6.88 tt1() -> 17 22.82/6.88 ok1(17) -> 8 22.82/6.88 01() -> 18 22.82/6.88 ok1(18) -> 8 22.82/6.88 U111(0, 0, 0) -> 19 22.82/6.88 ok1(19) -> 1 22.82/6.88 U121(0, 0, 0) -> 20 22.82/6.88 ok1(20) -> 2 22.82/6.88 s1(0) -> 21 22.82/6.88 ok1(21) -> 3 22.82/6.88 plus1(0, 0) -> 22 22.82/6.88 ok1(22) -> 4 22.82/6.88 U211(0, 0, 0) -> 23 22.82/6.88 ok1(23) -> 5 22.82/6.88 U221(0, 0, 0) -> 24 22.82/6.88 ok1(24) -> 6 22.82/6.88 x1(0, 0) -> 25 22.82/6.88 ok1(25) -> 7 22.82/6.88 proper1(0) -> 26 22.82/6.88 top1(26) -> 9 22.82/6.88 active1(0) -> 27 22.82/6.88 top1(27) -> 9 22.82/6.88 mark1(10) -> 10 22.82/6.88 mark1(10) -> 19 22.82/6.88 mark1(11) -> 11 22.82/6.88 mark1(11) -> 20 22.82/6.88 mark1(12) -> 12 22.82/6.88 mark1(12) -> 21 22.82/6.88 mark1(13) -> 13 22.82/6.88 mark1(13) -> 22 22.82/6.88 mark1(14) -> 14 22.82/6.88 mark1(14) -> 23 22.82/6.88 mark1(15) -> 15 22.82/6.88 mark1(15) -> 24 22.82/6.88 mark1(16) -> 16 22.82/6.88 mark1(16) -> 25 22.82/6.88 ok1(17) -> 26 22.82/6.88 ok1(18) -> 26 22.82/6.88 ok1(19) -> 10 22.82/6.88 ok1(19) -> 19 22.82/6.88 ok1(20) -> 11 22.82/6.88 ok1(20) -> 20 22.82/6.88 ok1(21) -> 12 22.82/6.88 ok1(21) -> 21 22.82/6.88 ok1(22) -> 13 22.82/6.88 ok1(22) -> 22 22.82/6.88 ok1(23) -> 14 22.82/6.88 ok1(23) -> 23 22.82/6.88 ok1(24) -> 15 22.82/6.88 ok1(24) -> 24 22.82/6.88 ok1(25) -> 16 22.82/6.88 ok1(25) -> 25 22.82/6.88 active2(17) -> 28 22.82/6.88 top2(28) -> 9 22.82/6.88 active2(18) -> 28 22.82/6.88 22.82/6.88 ---------------------------------------- 22.82/6.88 22.82/6.88 (6) 22.82/6.88 BOUNDS(1, n^1) 22.82/6.88 22.82/6.88 ---------------------------------------- 22.82/6.88 22.82/6.88 (7) RelTrsToDecreasingLoopProblemProof (LOWER BOUND(ID)) 22.82/6.88 Transformed a relative TRS into a decreasing-loop problem. 22.82/6.88 ---------------------------------------- 22.82/6.88 22.82/6.88 (8) 22.82/6.88 Obligation: 22.82/6.88 Analyzing the following TRS for decreasing loops: 22.82/6.88 22.82/6.88 The Runtime Complexity (full) of the given CpxTRS could be proven to be BOUNDS(n^1, n^1). 22.82/6.88 22.82/6.88 22.82/6.88 The TRS R consists of the following rules: 22.82/6.88 22.82/6.88 active(U11(tt, M, N)) -> mark(U12(tt, M, N)) 22.82/6.88 active(U12(tt, M, N)) -> mark(s(plus(N, M))) 22.82/6.88 active(U21(tt, M, N)) -> mark(U22(tt, M, N)) 22.82/6.88 active(U22(tt, M, N)) -> mark(plus(x(N, M), N)) 22.82/6.88 active(plus(N, 0)) -> mark(N) 22.82/6.88 active(plus(N, s(M))) -> mark(U11(tt, M, N)) 22.82/6.88 active(x(N, 0)) -> mark(0) 22.82/6.88 active(x(N, s(M))) -> mark(U21(tt, M, N)) 22.82/6.88 active(U11(X1, X2, X3)) -> U11(active(X1), X2, X3) 22.82/6.88 active(U12(X1, X2, X3)) -> U12(active(X1), X2, X3) 22.82/6.88 active(s(X)) -> s(active(X)) 22.82/6.88 active(plus(X1, X2)) -> plus(active(X1), X2) 22.82/6.88 active(plus(X1, X2)) -> plus(X1, active(X2)) 22.82/6.88 active(U21(X1, X2, X3)) -> U21(active(X1), X2, X3) 22.82/6.88 active(U22(X1, X2, X3)) -> U22(active(X1), X2, X3) 22.82/6.88 active(x(X1, X2)) -> x(active(X1), X2) 22.82/6.88 active(x(X1, X2)) -> x(X1, active(X2)) 22.82/6.88 U11(mark(X1), X2, X3) -> mark(U11(X1, X2, X3)) 22.82/6.88 U12(mark(X1), X2, X3) -> mark(U12(X1, X2, X3)) 22.82/6.88 s(mark(X)) -> mark(s(X)) 22.82/6.88 plus(mark(X1), X2) -> mark(plus(X1, X2)) 22.82/6.88 plus(X1, mark(X2)) -> mark(plus(X1, X2)) 22.82/6.88 U21(mark(X1), X2, X3) -> mark(U21(X1, X2, X3)) 22.82/6.88 U22(mark(X1), X2, X3) -> mark(U22(X1, X2, X3)) 22.82/6.88 x(mark(X1), X2) -> mark(x(X1, X2)) 22.82/6.88 x(X1, mark(X2)) -> mark(x(X1, X2)) 22.82/6.88 proper(U11(X1, X2, X3)) -> U11(proper(X1), proper(X2), proper(X3)) 22.82/6.88 proper(tt) -> ok(tt) 22.82/6.88 proper(U12(X1, X2, X3)) -> U12(proper(X1), proper(X2), proper(X3)) 22.82/6.88 proper(s(X)) -> s(proper(X)) 22.82/6.88 proper(plus(X1, X2)) -> plus(proper(X1), proper(X2)) 22.82/6.88 proper(U21(X1, X2, X3)) -> U21(proper(X1), proper(X2), proper(X3)) 22.82/6.88 proper(U22(X1, X2, X3)) -> U22(proper(X1), proper(X2), proper(X3)) 22.82/6.88 proper(x(X1, X2)) -> x(proper(X1), proper(X2)) 22.82/6.88 proper(0) -> ok(0) 22.82/6.88 U11(ok(X1), ok(X2), ok(X3)) -> ok(U11(X1, X2, X3)) 22.82/6.88 U12(ok(X1), ok(X2), ok(X3)) -> ok(U12(X1, X2, X3)) 22.82/6.88 s(ok(X)) -> ok(s(X)) 22.82/6.88 plus(ok(X1), ok(X2)) -> ok(plus(X1, X2)) 22.82/6.88 U21(ok(X1), ok(X2), ok(X3)) -> ok(U21(X1, X2, X3)) 22.82/6.88 U22(ok(X1), ok(X2), ok(X3)) -> ok(U22(X1, X2, X3)) 22.82/6.88 x(ok(X1), ok(X2)) -> ok(x(X1, X2)) 22.82/6.88 top(mark(X)) -> top(proper(X)) 22.82/6.88 top(ok(X)) -> top(active(X)) 22.82/6.88 22.82/6.88 S is empty. 22.82/6.88 Rewrite Strategy: FULL 22.82/6.88 ---------------------------------------- 22.82/6.88 22.82/6.88 (9) DecreasingLoopProof (LOWER BOUND(ID)) 22.82/6.88 The following loop(s) give(s) rise to the lower bound Omega(n^1): 22.82/6.88 22.82/6.88 The rewrite sequence 22.82/6.88 22.82/6.88 plus(X1, mark(X2)) ->^+ mark(plus(X1, X2)) 22.82/6.88 22.82/6.88 gives rise to a decreasing loop by considering the right hand sides subterm at position [0]. 22.82/6.88 22.82/6.88 The pumping substitution is [X2 / mark(X2)]. 22.82/6.88 22.82/6.88 The result substitution is [ ]. 22.82/6.88 22.82/6.88 22.82/6.88 22.82/6.88 22.82/6.88 ---------------------------------------- 22.82/6.88 22.82/6.88 (10) 22.82/6.88 Complex Obligation (BEST) 22.82/6.88 22.82/6.88 ---------------------------------------- 22.82/6.88 22.82/6.88 (11) 22.82/6.88 Obligation: 22.82/6.88 Proved the lower bound n^1 for the following obligation: 22.82/6.88 22.82/6.88 The Runtime Complexity (full) of the given CpxTRS could be proven to be BOUNDS(n^1, n^1). 22.82/6.88 22.82/6.88 22.82/6.88 The TRS R consists of the following rules: 22.82/6.88 22.82/6.88 active(U11(tt, M, N)) -> mark(U12(tt, M, N)) 22.82/6.88 active(U12(tt, M, N)) -> mark(s(plus(N, M))) 22.82/6.88 active(U21(tt, M, N)) -> mark(U22(tt, M, N)) 22.82/6.88 active(U22(tt, M, N)) -> mark(plus(x(N, M), N)) 22.82/6.88 active(plus(N, 0)) -> mark(N) 22.82/6.88 active(plus(N, s(M))) -> mark(U11(tt, M, N)) 22.82/6.88 active(x(N, 0)) -> mark(0) 22.82/6.88 active(x(N, s(M))) -> mark(U21(tt, M, N)) 22.82/6.88 active(U11(X1, X2, X3)) -> U11(active(X1), X2, X3) 22.82/6.88 active(U12(X1, X2, X3)) -> U12(active(X1), X2, X3) 22.82/6.88 active(s(X)) -> s(active(X)) 22.82/6.88 active(plus(X1, X2)) -> plus(active(X1), X2) 22.82/6.88 active(plus(X1, X2)) -> plus(X1, active(X2)) 22.82/6.88 active(U21(X1, X2, X3)) -> U21(active(X1), X2, X3) 22.82/6.88 active(U22(X1, X2, X3)) -> U22(active(X1), X2, X3) 22.82/6.88 active(x(X1, X2)) -> x(active(X1), X2) 22.82/6.88 active(x(X1, X2)) -> x(X1, active(X2)) 22.82/6.88 U11(mark(X1), X2, X3) -> mark(U11(X1, X2, X3)) 22.82/6.88 U12(mark(X1), X2, X3) -> mark(U12(X1, X2, X3)) 22.82/6.88 s(mark(X)) -> mark(s(X)) 22.82/6.88 plus(mark(X1), X2) -> mark(plus(X1, X2)) 22.82/6.88 plus(X1, mark(X2)) -> mark(plus(X1, X2)) 22.82/6.88 U21(mark(X1), X2, X3) -> mark(U21(X1, X2, X3)) 22.82/6.88 U22(mark(X1), X2, X3) -> mark(U22(X1, X2, X3)) 22.82/6.88 x(mark(X1), X2) -> mark(x(X1, X2)) 22.82/6.88 x(X1, mark(X2)) -> mark(x(X1, X2)) 22.82/6.88 proper(U11(X1, X2, X3)) -> U11(proper(X1), proper(X2), proper(X3)) 22.82/6.88 proper(tt) -> ok(tt) 22.82/6.88 proper(U12(X1, X2, X3)) -> U12(proper(X1), proper(X2), proper(X3)) 22.82/6.88 proper(s(X)) -> s(proper(X)) 22.82/6.88 proper(plus(X1, X2)) -> plus(proper(X1), proper(X2)) 22.82/6.88 proper(U21(X1, X2, X3)) -> U21(proper(X1), proper(X2), proper(X3)) 22.82/6.88 proper(U22(X1, X2, X3)) -> U22(proper(X1), proper(X2), proper(X3)) 22.82/6.88 proper(x(X1, X2)) -> x(proper(X1), proper(X2)) 22.82/6.88 proper(0) -> ok(0) 22.82/6.88 U11(ok(X1), ok(X2), ok(X3)) -> ok(U11(X1, X2, X3)) 22.82/6.88 U12(ok(X1), ok(X2), ok(X3)) -> ok(U12(X1, X2, X3)) 22.82/6.88 s(ok(X)) -> ok(s(X)) 22.82/6.88 plus(ok(X1), ok(X2)) -> ok(plus(X1, X2)) 22.82/6.88 U21(ok(X1), ok(X2), ok(X3)) -> ok(U21(X1, X2, X3)) 22.82/6.88 U22(ok(X1), ok(X2), ok(X3)) -> ok(U22(X1, X2, X3)) 22.82/6.88 x(ok(X1), ok(X2)) -> ok(x(X1, X2)) 22.82/6.88 top(mark(X)) -> top(proper(X)) 22.82/6.88 top(ok(X)) -> top(active(X)) 22.82/6.88 22.82/6.88 S is empty. 22.82/6.88 Rewrite Strategy: FULL 22.82/6.88 ---------------------------------------- 22.82/6.88 22.82/6.88 (12) LowerBoundPropagationProof (FINISHED) 22.82/6.88 Propagated lower bound. 22.82/6.88 ---------------------------------------- 22.82/6.88 22.82/6.88 (13) 22.82/6.88 BOUNDS(n^1, INF) 22.82/6.88 22.82/6.88 ---------------------------------------- 22.82/6.88 22.82/6.88 (14) 22.82/6.88 Obligation: 22.82/6.88 Analyzing the following TRS for decreasing loops: 22.82/6.88 22.82/6.88 The Runtime Complexity (full) of the given CpxTRS could be proven to be BOUNDS(n^1, n^1). 22.82/6.88 22.82/6.88 22.82/6.88 The TRS R consists of the following rules: 22.82/6.88 22.82/6.88 active(U11(tt, M, N)) -> mark(U12(tt, M, N)) 22.82/6.88 active(U12(tt, M, N)) -> mark(s(plus(N, M))) 22.82/6.88 active(U21(tt, M, N)) -> mark(U22(tt, M, N)) 22.82/6.88 active(U22(tt, M, N)) -> mark(plus(x(N, M), N)) 22.82/6.88 active(plus(N, 0)) -> mark(N) 22.82/6.88 active(plus(N, s(M))) -> mark(U11(tt, M, N)) 22.82/6.88 active(x(N, 0)) -> mark(0) 22.82/6.88 active(x(N, s(M))) -> mark(U21(tt, M, N)) 22.82/6.88 active(U11(X1, X2, X3)) -> U11(active(X1), X2, X3) 22.82/6.88 active(U12(X1, X2, X3)) -> U12(active(X1), X2, X3) 22.82/6.88 active(s(X)) -> s(active(X)) 22.82/6.88 active(plus(X1, X2)) -> plus(active(X1), X2) 22.82/6.88 active(plus(X1, X2)) -> plus(X1, active(X2)) 22.82/6.88 active(U21(X1, X2, X3)) -> U21(active(X1), X2, X3) 22.82/6.88 active(U22(X1, X2, X3)) -> U22(active(X1), X2, X3) 22.82/6.88 active(x(X1, X2)) -> x(active(X1), X2) 22.82/6.88 active(x(X1, X2)) -> x(X1, active(X2)) 22.82/6.88 U11(mark(X1), X2, X3) -> mark(U11(X1, X2, X3)) 22.82/6.88 U12(mark(X1), X2, X3) -> mark(U12(X1, X2, X3)) 22.82/6.88 s(mark(X)) -> mark(s(X)) 22.82/6.88 plus(mark(X1), X2) -> mark(plus(X1, X2)) 22.82/6.88 plus(X1, mark(X2)) -> mark(plus(X1, X2)) 22.82/6.88 U21(mark(X1), X2, X3) -> mark(U21(X1, X2, X3)) 22.82/6.88 U22(mark(X1), X2, X3) -> mark(U22(X1, X2, X3)) 22.82/6.88 x(mark(X1), X2) -> mark(x(X1, X2)) 22.82/6.88 x(X1, mark(X2)) -> mark(x(X1, X2)) 22.82/6.88 proper(U11(X1, X2, X3)) -> U11(proper(X1), proper(X2), proper(X3)) 22.82/6.88 proper(tt) -> ok(tt) 22.82/6.88 proper(U12(X1, X2, X3)) -> U12(proper(X1), proper(X2), proper(X3)) 22.82/6.88 proper(s(X)) -> s(proper(X)) 22.82/6.88 proper(plus(X1, X2)) -> plus(proper(X1), proper(X2)) 22.82/6.88 proper(U21(X1, X2, X3)) -> U21(proper(X1), proper(X2), proper(X3)) 22.82/6.88 proper(U22(X1, X2, X3)) -> U22(proper(X1), proper(X2), proper(X3)) 22.82/6.88 proper(x(X1, X2)) -> x(proper(X1), proper(X2)) 22.82/6.88 proper(0) -> ok(0) 22.82/6.88 U11(ok(X1), ok(X2), ok(X3)) -> ok(U11(X1, X2, X3)) 22.82/6.88 U12(ok(X1), ok(X2), ok(X3)) -> ok(U12(X1, X2, X3)) 22.82/6.88 s(ok(X)) -> ok(s(X)) 22.82/6.88 plus(ok(X1), ok(X2)) -> ok(plus(X1, X2)) 22.82/6.88 U21(ok(X1), ok(X2), ok(X3)) -> ok(U21(X1, X2, X3)) 22.82/6.88 U22(ok(X1), ok(X2), ok(X3)) -> ok(U22(X1, X2, X3)) 22.82/6.88 x(ok(X1), ok(X2)) -> ok(x(X1, X2)) 22.82/6.88 top(mark(X)) -> top(proper(X)) 22.82/6.88 top(ok(X)) -> top(active(X)) 22.82/6.88 22.82/6.88 S is empty. 22.82/6.88 Rewrite Strategy: FULL 22.93/6.93 EOF