3.09/1.92 WORST_CASE(NON_POLY, ?) 3.09/1.93 proof of /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml 3.09/1.93 # AProVE Commit ID: 48fb2092695e11cc9f56e44b17a92a5f88ffb256 marcel 20180622 unpublished dirty 3.09/1.93 3.09/1.93 3.09/1.93 The Runtime Complexity (full) of the given CpxTRS could be proven to be BOUNDS(INF, INF). 3.09/1.93 3.09/1.93 (0) CpxTRS 3.09/1.93 (1) RelTrsToDecreasingLoopProblemProof [LOWER BOUND(ID), 4 ms] 3.09/1.93 (2) TRS for Loop Detection 3.09/1.93 (3) InfiniteLowerBoundProof [FINISHED, 0 ms] 3.09/1.93 (4) BOUNDS(INF, INF) 3.09/1.93 3.09/1.93 3.09/1.93 ---------------------------------------- 3.09/1.93 3.09/1.93 (0) 3.09/1.93 Obligation: 3.09/1.93 The Runtime Complexity (full) of the given CpxTRS could be proven to be BOUNDS(INF, INF). 3.09/1.93 3.09/1.93 3.09/1.93 The TRS R consists of the following rules: 3.09/1.93 3.09/1.93 f -> f 3.09/1.93 3.09/1.93 S is empty. 3.09/1.93 Rewrite Strategy: FULL 3.09/1.93 ---------------------------------------- 3.09/1.93 3.09/1.93 (1) RelTrsToDecreasingLoopProblemProof (LOWER BOUND(ID)) 3.09/1.93 Transformed a relative TRS into a decreasing-loop problem. 3.09/1.93 ---------------------------------------- 3.09/1.93 3.09/1.93 (2) 3.09/1.93 Obligation: 3.09/1.93 Analyzing the following TRS for decreasing loops: 3.09/1.93 3.09/1.93 The Runtime Complexity (full) of the given CpxTRS could be proven to be BOUNDS(INF, INF). 3.09/1.93 3.09/1.93 3.09/1.93 The TRS R consists of the following rules: 3.09/1.93 3.09/1.93 f -> f 3.09/1.93 3.09/1.93 S is empty. 3.09/1.93 Rewrite Strategy: FULL 3.09/1.93 ---------------------------------------- 3.09/1.93 3.09/1.93 (3) InfiniteLowerBoundProof (FINISHED) 3.09/1.93 The following loop proves infinite runtime complexity: 3.09/1.93 3.09/1.93 The rewrite sequence 3.09/1.93 3.09/1.93 f ->^+ f 3.09/1.93 3.09/1.93 gives rise to a decreasing loop by considering the right hand sides subterm at position []. 3.09/1.93 3.09/1.93 The pumping substitution is [ ]. 3.09/1.93 3.09/1.93 The result substitution is [ ]. 3.09/1.93 3.09/1.93 3.09/1.93 3.09/1.93 3.09/1.93 ---------------------------------------- 3.09/1.93 3.09/1.93 (4) 3.09/1.93 BOUNDS(INF, INF) 3.09/1.96 EOF