2.58/1.27 NO 2.58/1.28 proof of /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml 2.58/1.28 # AProVE Commit ID: 48fb2092695e11cc9f56e44b17a92a5f88ffb256 marcel 20180622 unpublished dirty 2.58/1.28 2.58/1.28 2.58/1.28 Outermost Termination of the given OTRS could be disproven: 2.58/1.28 2.58/1.28 (0) OTRS 2.58/1.28 (1) OutermostNonTerminationProof [COMPLETE, 0 ms] 2.58/1.28 (2) NO 2.58/1.28 2.58/1.28 2.58/1.28 ---------------------------------------- 2.58/1.28 2.58/1.28 (0) 2.58/1.28 Obligation: 2.58/1.28 Term rewrite system R: 2.58/1.28 The TRS R consists of the following rules: 2.58/1.28 2.58/1.28 f(g(X), Y) -> f(X, f(g(X), Y)) 2.58/1.28 2.58/1.28 2.58/1.28 2.58/1.28 Outermost Strategy. 2.58/1.28 2.58/1.28 ---------------------------------------- 2.58/1.28 2.58/1.28 (1) OutermostNonTerminationProof (COMPLETE) 2.58/1.28 Term rewrite system R: 2.58/1.28 The TRS R consists of the following rules: 2.58/1.28 2.58/1.28 f(g(X), Y) -> f(X, f(g(X), Y)) 2.58/1.28 2.58/1.28 2.58/1.28 2.58/1.28 Outermost Strategy. 2.58/1.28 2.58/1.28 ---------- Loop: ---------- 2.58/1.28 2.58/1.28 f(g(X), Y) -> f(X, f(g(X), Y)) with rule f(g(X'), Y') -> f(X', f(g(X'), Y')) at position [] and matcher [X' / X, Y' / Y] 2.58/1.28 2.58/1.28 Now an instance of the first term with Matcher [ ] occurs in the last term at position [1]. 2.58/1.28 2.58/1.28 Context: f(X, []) 2.58/1.28 2.58/1.28 We used [THIEMANN_LOOPS_UNDER_STRATEGIES] to show that this Loop is an Outermost-Loop. 2.58/1.28 ---------------------------------------- 2.58/1.28 2.58/1.28 (2) 2.58/1.28 NO 2.58/1.31 EOF