2.48/1.43	NO
2.73/1.44	proof of /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml
2.73/1.44	# AProVE Commit ID: 48fb2092695e11cc9f56e44b17a92a5f88ffb256 marcel 20180622 unpublished dirty
2.73/1.44	
2.73/1.44	
2.73/1.44	Outermost Termination of the given OTRS could be disproven:
2.73/1.44	
2.73/1.44	(0) OTRS
2.73/1.44	(1) OutermostNonTerminationProof [COMPLETE, 0 ms]
2.73/1.44	(2) NO
2.73/1.44	
2.73/1.44	
2.73/1.44	----------------------------------------
2.73/1.44	
2.73/1.44	(0)
2.73/1.44	Obligation:
2.73/1.44	Term rewrite system R:
2.73/1.44	The TRS R consists of the following rules:
2.73/1.44	
2.73/1.44	   h(X) -> g(X)
2.73/1.44	   g(a) -> f(b)
2.73/1.44	   f(X) -> h(a)
2.73/1.44	   a -> b
2.73/1.44	
2.73/1.44	
2.73/1.44	
2.73/1.44	Outermost Strategy.
2.73/1.44	
2.73/1.44	----------------------------------------
2.73/1.44	
2.73/1.44	(1) OutermostNonTerminationProof (COMPLETE)
2.73/1.44	Term rewrite system R:
2.73/1.44	The TRS R consists of the following rules:
2.73/1.44	
2.73/1.44	   h(X) -> g(X)
2.73/1.44	   g(a) -> f(b)
2.73/1.44	   f(X) -> h(a)
2.73/1.44	   a -> b
2.73/1.44	
2.73/1.44	
2.73/1.44	
2.73/1.44	Outermost Strategy.
2.73/1.44	
2.73/1.44	---------- Loop: ----------
2.73/1.44	
2.73/1.44	g(a) -> f(b) with rule g(a) -> f(b) at position [] and matcher [ ]
2.73/1.44	
2.73/1.44	f(b) -> h(a) with rule f(X) -> h(a) at position [] and matcher [X / b]
2.73/1.44	
2.73/1.44	h(a) -> g(a) with rule h(X) -> g(X) at position [] and matcher [X / a]
2.73/1.44	
2.73/1.44	Now an instance of the first term with Matcher [ ] occurs in the last term at position [].
2.73/1.44	
2.73/1.44	Context: []
2.73/1.44	
2.73/1.44	We used [THIEMANN_LOOPS_UNDER_STRATEGIES] to show that this Loop is an Outermost-Loop.
2.73/1.44	----------------------------------------
2.73/1.44	
2.73/1.44	(2)
2.73/1.44	NO
2.75/1.48	EOF