2.59/1.26	NO
2.59/1.27	proof of /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml
2.59/1.27	# AProVE Commit ID: 48fb2092695e11cc9f56e44b17a92a5f88ffb256 marcel 20180622 unpublished dirty
2.59/1.27	
2.59/1.27	
2.59/1.27	Outermost Termination of the given OTRS could be disproven:
2.59/1.27	
2.59/1.27	(0) OTRS
2.59/1.27	(1) OutermostNonTerminationProof [COMPLETE, 0 ms]
2.59/1.27	(2) NO
2.59/1.27	
2.59/1.27	
2.59/1.27	----------------------------------------
2.59/1.27	
2.59/1.27	(0)
2.59/1.27	Obligation:
2.59/1.27	Term rewrite system R:
2.59/1.27	The TRS R consists of the following rules:
2.59/1.27	
2.59/1.27	   f(a, b, X) -> f(X, X, X)
2.59/1.27	   c -> a
2.59/1.27	   c -> b
2.59/1.27	
2.59/1.27	
2.59/1.27	
2.59/1.27	Outermost Strategy.
2.59/1.27	
2.59/1.27	----------------------------------------
2.59/1.27	
2.59/1.27	(1) OutermostNonTerminationProof (COMPLETE)
2.59/1.27	Term rewrite system R:
2.59/1.27	The TRS R consists of the following rules:
2.59/1.27	
2.59/1.27	   f(a, b, X) -> f(X, X, X)
2.59/1.27	   c -> a
2.59/1.27	   c -> b
2.59/1.27	
2.59/1.27	
2.59/1.27	
2.59/1.27	Outermost Strategy.
2.59/1.27	
2.59/1.27	---------- Loop: ----------
2.59/1.27	
2.59/1.27	f(c, c, c) -> f(c, b, c) with rule c -> b at position [1] and matcher [ ]
2.59/1.27	
2.59/1.27	f(c, b, c) -> f(a, b, c) with rule c -> a at position [0] and matcher [ ]
2.59/1.27	
2.59/1.27	f(a, b, c) -> f(c, c, c) with rule f(a, b, X) -> f(X, X, X) at position [] and matcher [X / c]
2.59/1.27	
2.59/1.27	Now an instance of the first term with Matcher [ ] occurs in the last term at position [].
2.59/1.27	
2.59/1.27	Context: []
2.59/1.27	
2.59/1.27	We used [THIEMANN_LOOPS_UNDER_STRATEGIES] to show that this Loop is an Outermost-Loop.
2.59/1.27	----------------------------------------
2.59/1.27	
2.59/1.27	(2)
2.59/1.27	NO
2.59/1.29	EOF