2.60/1.33	NO
2.60/1.34	proof of /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml
2.60/1.34	# AProVE Commit ID: 48fb2092695e11cc9f56e44b17a92a5f88ffb256 marcel 20180622 unpublished dirty
2.60/1.34	
2.60/1.34	
2.60/1.34	Outermost Termination of the given OTRS could be disproven:
2.60/1.34	
2.60/1.34	(0) OTRS
2.60/1.34	(1) OutermostNonTerminationProof [COMPLETE, 0 ms]
2.60/1.34	(2) NO
2.60/1.34	
2.60/1.34	
2.60/1.34	----------------------------------------
2.60/1.34	
2.60/1.34	(0)
2.60/1.34	Obligation:
2.60/1.34	Term rewrite system R:
2.60/1.34	The TRS R consists of the following rules:
2.60/1.34	
2.60/1.34	   f(g(x)) -> f(g(g(x)))
2.60/1.34	   g(g(g(x))) -> a
2.60/1.34	
2.60/1.34	
2.60/1.34	
2.60/1.34	Outermost Strategy.
2.60/1.34	
2.60/1.34	----------------------------------------
2.60/1.34	
2.60/1.34	(1) OutermostNonTerminationProof (COMPLETE)
2.60/1.34	Term rewrite system R:
2.60/1.34	The TRS R consists of the following rules:
2.60/1.34	
2.60/1.34	   f(g(x)) -> f(g(g(x)))
2.60/1.34	   g(g(g(x))) -> a
2.60/1.34	
2.60/1.34	
2.60/1.34	
2.60/1.34	Outermost Strategy.
2.60/1.34	
2.60/1.34	---------- Loop: ----------
2.60/1.34	
2.60/1.34	f(g(x)) -> f(g(g(x))) with rule f(g(x')) -> f(g(g(x'))) at position [] and matcher [x' / x]
2.60/1.34	
2.60/1.34	Now an instance of the first term with Matcher [x / g(x)] occurs in the last term at position [].
2.60/1.34	
2.60/1.34	Context: []
2.60/1.34	
2.60/1.34	We used [THIEMANN_LOOPS_UNDER_STRATEGIES] to show that this Loop is an Outermost-Loop.
2.60/1.34	----------------------------------------
2.60/1.34	
2.60/1.34	(2)
2.60/1.34	NO
2.89/1.36	EOF