4.74/2.19	NO
4.84/2.20	proof of /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.jar
4.84/2.20	# AProVE Commit ID: 48fb2092695e11cc9f56e44b17a92a5f88ffb256 marcel 20180622 unpublished dirty
4.84/2.20	
4.84/2.20	
4.84/2.20	termination of the given Bare JBC problem could be disproven:
4.84/2.20	
4.84/2.20	(0) Bare JBC problem
4.84/2.20	(1) BareJBCToJBCProof [EQUIVALENT, 95 ms]
4.84/2.20	(2) JBC problem
4.84/2.20	(3) JBCNonTerm [COMPLETE, 247 ms]
4.84/2.20	(4) NO
4.84/2.20	
4.84/2.20	
4.84/2.20	----------------------------------------
4.84/2.20	
4.84/2.20	(0)
4.84/2.20	Obligation:
4.84/2.20	need to prove termination of the following program:
4.84/2.20	public class NO_10 {
4.84/2.20	    public static void main(String args[]) {
4.84/2.20		int j = 100;
4.84/2.20		for (int i = 0; i < j; i++) j++;
4.84/2.20	    }
4.84/2.20	}
4.84/2.20	
4.84/2.20	
4.84/2.20	----------------------------------------
4.84/2.20	
4.84/2.20	(1) BareJBCToJBCProof (EQUIVALENT)
4.84/2.20	initialized classpath
4.84/2.20	----------------------------------------
4.84/2.20	
4.84/2.20	(2)
4.84/2.20	Obligation:
4.84/2.20	need to prove termination of the following program:
4.84/2.20	public class NO_10 {
4.84/2.20	    public static void main(String args[]) {
4.84/2.20		int j = 100;
4.84/2.20		for (int i = 0; i < j; i++) j++;
4.84/2.20	    }
4.84/2.20	}
4.84/2.20	
4.84/2.20	
4.84/2.20	----------------------------------------
4.84/2.20	
4.84/2.20	(3) JBCNonTerm (COMPLETE)
4.84/2.20	Reached a loop using the following run: 
4.84/2.20	
4.84/2.20	0:<NO_10.main||0: push 100|| - || ->
4.84/2.20	YES:  (JL1)
4.84/2.20	1:<NO_10.main||2: store INT to #1|| - ||100>
4.84/2.20	YES:  (JL1)
4.84/2.20	2:<NO_10.main||3: push 0||#1: 100|| ->
4.84/2.20	YES:  (JL1)
4.84/2.20	3:<NO_10.main||4: store INT to #2||#1: 100||0>
4.84/2.20	YES:  (JL1)
4.84/2.20	4:<NO_10.main||5: load INT #2||#1: 100, #2: 0|| ->
4.84/2.20	YES:  (JL1)
4.84/2.20	Start state of loop: 
4.84/2.20	
4.84/2.20	[o16(lv_0_0)]
4.84/2.20	<NO_10.main||5: load INT #2||#1: i21, #2: i22|| ->
4.84/2.20		o16([java.lang.String...]): Object() -->{java.lang.Object...}
4.84/2.20		i21: [100,+inf)(l4)
4.84/2.20		i22: [0,+inf)(l4)
4.84/2.20	YES:  (JL1)
4.84/2.20	
4.84/2.20	
4.84/2.20	In the loop head node, references [i22, i21] were interesting.
4.84/2.20	
4.84/2.20	All methods calls in the loop body are side-effect free, hence they can be ignored.
4.84/2.20	
4.84/2.20	By SMT, we could prove
4.84/2.20	
4.84/2.20	((100 <= initial_i21 and 0 <= initial_i22) and (((path1_i27 = (path1_i21 + 1) and path1_i28 = (path1_i22 + 1) and path1_i27 = res_i21 and path1_i28 = res_i22 and path1_i21 = initial_i21 and path1_i22 = initial_i22) and (path1_i22 < path1_i21 and path1_i22 < path1_i21)) and ((res1_i27 = (res1_i21 + 1) and res1_i28 = (res1_i22 + 1) and res_i21 = res1_i21 and res_i22 = res1_i22) and !(res1_i22 < res1_i21 and res1_i22 < res1_i21))))
4.84/2.20	
4.84/2.20	to be UNSAT. Consequently, the loop will not terminate.
4.84/2.20	----------------------------------------
4.84/2.20	
4.84/2.20	(4)
4.84/2.20	NO
4.86/2.23	EOF