7.84/3.54 YES 9.07/3.97 proof of /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.hs 9.07/3.97 # AProVE Commit ID: 48fb2092695e11cc9f56e44b17a92a5f88ffb256 marcel 20180622 unpublished dirty 9.07/3.97 9.07/3.97 9.07/3.97 H-Termination with start terms of the given HASKELL could be proven: 9.07/3.97 9.07/3.97 (0) HASKELL 9.07/3.97 (1) BR [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] 9.07/3.97 (2) HASKELL 9.07/3.97 (3) COR [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] 9.07/3.97 (4) HASKELL 9.07/3.97 (5) Narrow [SOUND, 0 ms] 9.07/3.97 (6) QDP 9.07/3.97 (7) QDPSizeChangeProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] 9.07/3.97 (8) YES 9.07/3.97 9.07/3.97 9.07/3.97 ---------------------------------------- 9.07/3.97 9.07/3.97 (0) 9.07/3.97 Obligation: 9.07/3.97 mainModule Main 9.07/3.97 module Main where { 9.07/3.97 import qualified Prelude; 9.07/3.97 } 9.07/3.97 9.07/3.97 ---------------------------------------- 9.07/3.97 9.07/3.97 (1) BR (EQUIVALENT) 9.07/3.97 Replaced joker patterns by fresh variables and removed binding patterns. 9.07/3.97 ---------------------------------------- 9.07/3.97 9.07/3.97 (2) 9.07/3.97 Obligation: 9.07/3.97 mainModule Main 9.07/3.97 module Main where { 9.07/3.97 import qualified Prelude; 9.07/3.97 } 9.07/3.97 9.07/3.97 ---------------------------------------- 9.07/3.97 9.07/3.97 (3) COR (EQUIVALENT) 9.07/3.97 Cond Reductions: 9.07/3.97 The following Function with conditions 9.07/3.97 "undefined |Falseundefined; 9.07/3.97 " 9.07/3.97 is transformed to 9.07/3.97 "undefined = undefined1; 9.07/3.97 " 9.07/3.97 "undefined0 True = undefined; 9.07/3.97 " 9.07/3.97 "undefined1 = undefined0 False; 9.07/3.97 " 9.07/3.97 9.07/3.97 ---------------------------------------- 9.07/3.97 9.07/3.97 (4) 9.07/3.97 Obligation: 9.07/3.97 mainModule Main 9.07/3.97 module Main where { 9.07/3.97 import qualified Prelude; 9.07/3.97 } 9.07/3.97 9.07/3.97 ---------------------------------------- 9.07/3.97 9.07/3.97 (5) Narrow (SOUND) 9.07/3.97 Haskell To QDPs 9.07/3.97 9.07/3.97 digraph dp_graph { 9.07/3.97 node [outthreshold=100, inthreshold=100];1[label="foldr",fontsize=16,color="grey",shape="box"];1 -> 3[label="",style="dashed", color="grey", weight=3]; 9.07/3.97 3[label="foldr vx3",fontsize=16,color="grey",shape="box"];3 -> 4[label="",style="dashed", color="grey", weight=3]; 9.07/3.97 4[label="foldr vx3 vx4",fontsize=16,color="grey",shape="box"];4 -> 5[label="",style="dashed", color="grey", weight=3]; 9.07/3.97 5[label="foldr vx3 vx4 vx5",fontsize=16,color="burlywood",shape="triangle"];13[label="vx5/vx50 : vx51",fontsize=10,color="white",style="solid",shape="box"];5 -> 13[label="",style="solid", color="burlywood", weight=9]; 9.07/3.97 13 -> 6[label="",style="solid", color="burlywood", weight=3]; 9.07/3.97 14[label="vx5/[]",fontsize=10,color="white",style="solid",shape="box"];5 -> 14[label="",style="solid", color="burlywood", weight=9]; 9.07/3.97 14 -> 7[label="",style="solid", color="burlywood", weight=3]; 9.07/3.97 6[label="foldr vx3 vx4 (vx50 : vx51)",fontsize=16,color="black",shape="box"];6 -> 8[label="",style="solid", color="black", weight=3]; 9.07/3.97 7[label="foldr vx3 vx4 []",fontsize=16,color="black",shape="box"];7 -> 9[label="",style="solid", color="black", weight=3]; 9.07/3.97 8[label="vx3 vx50 (foldr vx3 vx4 vx51)",fontsize=16,color="green",shape="box"];8 -> 10[label="",style="dashed", color="green", weight=3]; 9.07/3.97 8 -> 11[label="",style="dashed", color="green", weight=3]; 9.07/3.97 9[label="vx4",fontsize=16,color="green",shape="box"];10[label="vx50",fontsize=16,color="green",shape="box"];11 -> 5[label="",style="dashed", color="red", weight=0]; 9.07/3.97 11[label="foldr vx3 vx4 vx51",fontsize=16,color="magenta"];11 -> 12[label="",style="dashed", color="magenta", weight=3]; 9.07/3.97 12[label="vx51",fontsize=16,color="green",shape="box"];} 9.07/3.97 9.07/3.97 ---------------------------------------- 9.07/3.97 9.07/3.97 (6) 9.07/3.97 Obligation: 9.07/3.97 Q DP problem: 9.07/3.97 The TRS P consists of the following rules: 9.07/3.97 9.07/3.97 new_foldr(vx3, vx4, :(vx50, vx51), h, ba) -> new_foldr(vx3, vx4, vx51, h, ba) 9.07/3.97 9.07/3.97 R is empty. 9.07/3.97 Q is empty. 9.07/3.97 We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains. 9.07/3.97 ---------------------------------------- 9.07/3.97 9.07/3.97 (7) QDPSizeChangeProof (EQUIVALENT) 9.07/3.97 By using the subterm criterion [SUBTERM_CRITERION] together with the size-change analysis [AAECC05] we have proven that there are no infinite chains for this DP problem. 9.07/3.97 9.07/3.97 From the DPs we obtained the following set of size-change graphs: 9.07/3.97 *new_foldr(vx3, vx4, :(vx50, vx51), h, ba) -> new_foldr(vx3, vx4, vx51, h, ba) 9.07/3.97 The graph contains the following edges 1 >= 1, 2 >= 2, 3 > 3, 4 >= 4, 5 >= 5 9.07/3.97 9.07/3.97 9.07/3.97 ---------------------------------------- 9.07/3.97 9.07/3.97 (8) 9.07/3.97 YES 9.29/4.00 EOF