7.93/3.52	YES
9.30/3.96	proof of /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.hs
9.30/3.96	# AProVE Commit ID: 48fb2092695e11cc9f56e44b17a92a5f88ffb256 marcel 20180622 unpublished dirty
9.30/3.96	
9.30/3.96	
9.30/3.96	H-Termination with start terms of the given HASKELL could be proven:
9.30/3.96	
9.30/3.96	(0) HASKELL
9.30/3.96	(1) BR [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms]
9.30/3.96	(2) HASKELL
9.30/3.96	(3) COR [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms]
9.30/3.96	(4) HASKELL
9.30/3.96	(5) Narrow [SOUND, 0 ms]
9.30/3.96	(6) QDP
9.30/3.96	(7) QDPSizeChangeProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms]
9.30/3.96	(8) YES
9.30/3.96	
9.30/3.96	
9.30/3.96	----------------------------------------
9.30/3.96	
9.30/3.96	(0)
9.30/3.96	Obligation:
9.30/3.96	mainModule Main 
9.30/3.96	module Main where {
9.30/3.96	import qualified Prelude;
9.30/3.96	}
9.30/3.96	
9.30/3.96	----------------------------------------
9.30/3.96	
9.30/3.96	(1) BR (EQUIVALENT)
9.30/3.96	Replaced joker patterns by fresh variables and removed binding patterns.
9.30/3.96	----------------------------------------
9.30/3.96	
9.30/3.96	(2)
9.30/3.96	Obligation:
9.30/3.96	mainModule Main 
9.30/3.96	module Main where {
9.30/3.96	import qualified Prelude;
9.30/3.96	}
9.30/3.96	
9.30/3.96	----------------------------------------
9.30/3.96	
9.30/3.96	(3) COR (EQUIVALENT)
9.30/3.96	Cond Reductions:
9.30/3.96	The following Function with conditions
9.30/3.96	"undefined |Falseundefined;
9.30/3.96	"
9.30/3.96	is transformed to
9.30/3.96	"undefined  = undefined1;
9.30/3.96	"
9.30/3.96	"undefined0 True = undefined;
9.30/3.96	"
9.30/3.96	"undefined1  = undefined0 False;
9.30/3.96	"
9.30/3.96	
9.30/3.96	----------------------------------------
9.30/3.96	
9.30/3.96	(4)
9.30/3.96	Obligation:
9.30/3.96	mainModule Main 
9.30/3.96	module Main where {
9.30/3.96	import qualified Prelude;
9.30/3.96	}
9.30/3.96	
9.30/3.96	----------------------------------------
9.30/3.96	
9.30/3.96	(5) Narrow (SOUND)
9.30/3.96	Haskell To QDPs
9.30/3.96	
9.30/3.96	digraph dp_graph {
9.30/3.96	node [outthreshold=100, inthreshold=100];1[label="showString",fontsize=16,color="grey",shape="box"];1 -> 3[label="",style="dashed", color="grey", weight=3];
9.30/3.96	3[label="showString vx3",fontsize=16,color="grey",shape="box"];3 -> 4[label="",style="dashed", color="grey", weight=3];
9.30/3.96	4[label="showString vx3 vx4",fontsize=16,color="black",shape="triangle"];4 -> 5[label="",style="solid", color="black", weight=3];
9.30/3.96	5[label="(++) vx3 vx4",fontsize=16,color="burlywood",shape="triangle"];12[label="vx3/vx30 : vx31",fontsize=10,color="white",style="solid",shape="box"];5 -> 12[label="",style="solid", color="burlywood", weight=9];
9.30/3.96	12 -> 6[label="",style="solid", color="burlywood", weight=3];
9.30/3.96	13[label="vx3/[]",fontsize=10,color="white",style="solid",shape="box"];5 -> 13[label="",style="solid", color="burlywood", weight=9];
9.30/3.96	13 -> 7[label="",style="solid", color="burlywood", weight=3];
9.30/3.96	6[label="(++) (vx30 : vx31) vx4",fontsize=16,color="black",shape="box"];6 -> 8[label="",style="solid", color="black", weight=3];
9.30/3.96	7[label="(++) [] vx4",fontsize=16,color="black",shape="box"];7 -> 9[label="",style="solid", color="black", weight=3];
9.30/3.96	8[label="vx30 : vx31 ++ vx4",fontsize=16,color="green",shape="box"];8 -> 10[label="",style="dashed", color="green", weight=3];
9.30/3.96	9[label="vx4",fontsize=16,color="green",shape="box"];10 -> 5[label="",style="dashed", color="red", weight=0];
9.30/3.96	10[label="vx31 ++ vx4",fontsize=16,color="magenta"];10 -> 11[label="",style="dashed", color="magenta", weight=3];
9.30/3.96	11[label="vx31",fontsize=16,color="green",shape="box"];}
9.30/3.96	
9.30/3.96	----------------------------------------
9.30/3.96	
9.30/3.96	(6)
9.30/3.96	Obligation:
9.30/3.96	Q DP problem:
9.30/3.96	The TRS P consists of the following rules:
9.30/3.96	
9.30/3.96	   new_psPs(:(vx30, vx31), vx4) -> new_psPs(vx31, vx4)
9.30/3.96	
9.30/3.96	R is empty.
9.30/3.96	Q is empty.
9.30/3.96	We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
9.30/3.96	----------------------------------------
9.30/3.96	
9.30/3.96	(7) QDPSizeChangeProof (EQUIVALENT)
9.30/3.96	By using the subterm criterion [SUBTERM_CRITERION] together with the size-change analysis [AAECC05] we have proven that there are no infinite chains for this DP problem. 
9.30/3.96	
9.30/3.96	From the DPs we obtained the following set of size-change graphs:
9.30/3.96	*new_psPs(:(vx30, vx31), vx4) -> new_psPs(vx31, vx4)
9.30/3.96	The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1, 2 >= 2
9.30/3.96	
9.30/3.96	
9.30/3.96	----------------------------------------
9.30/3.96	
9.30/3.96	(8)
9.30/3.96	YES
9.56/4.01	EOF