7.65/3.52 YES 9.32/4.00 proof of /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.hs 9.32/4.00 # AProVE Commit ID: 48fb2092695e11cc9f56e44b17a92a5f88ffb256 marcel 20180622 unpublished dirty 9.32/4.00 9.32/4.00 9.32/4.00 H-Termination with start terms of the given HASKELL could be proven: 9.32/4.00 9.32/4.00 (0) HASKELL 9.32/4.00 (1) BR [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] 9.32/4.00 (2) HASKELL 9.32/4.00 (3) COR [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] 9.32/4.00 (4) HASKELL 9.32/4.00 (5) Narrow [SOUND, 0 ms] 9.32/4.00 (6) QDP 9.32/4.00 (7) QDPSizeChangeProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] 9.32/4.00 (8) YES 9.32/4.00 9.32/4.00 9.32/4.00 ---------------------------------------- 9.32/4.00 9.32/4.00 (0) 9.32/4.00 Obligation: 9.32/4.00 mainModule Main 9.32/4.00 module Main where { 9.32/4.00 import qualified Prelude; 9.32/4.00 data List a = Cons a (List a) | Nil ; 9.32/4.00 9.32/4.00 data MyBool = MyTrue | MyFalse ; 9.32/4.00 9.32/4.00 foldr :: (b -> a -> a) -> a -> List b -> a; 9.32/4.00 foldr f z Nil = z; 9.32/4.00 foldr f z (Cons x xs) = f x (foldr f z xs); 9.32/4.00 9.32/4.00 or :: List MyBool -> MyBool; 9.32/4.00 or = foldr pePe MyFalse; 9.32/4.00 9.32/4.00 pePe :: MyBool -> MyBool -> MyBool; 9.32/4.00 pePe MyFalse x = x; 9.32/4.00 pePe MyTrue x = MyTrue; 9.32/4.00 9.32/4.00 } 9.32/4.00 9.32/4.00 ---------------------------------------- 9.32/4.00 9.32/4.00 (1) BR (EQUIVALENT) 9.32/4.00 Replaced joker patterns by fresh variables and removed binding patterns. 9.32/4.00 ---------------------------------------- 9.32/4.00 9.32/4.00 (2) 9.32/4.00 Obligation: 9.32/4.00 mainModule Main 9.32/4.00 module Main where { 9.32/4.00 import qualified Prelude; 9.32/4.00 data List a = Cons a (List a) | Nil ; 9.32/4.00 9.32/4.00 data MyBool = MyTrue | MyFalse ; 9.32/4.00 9.32/4.00 foldr :: (a -> b -> b) -> b -> List a -> b; 9.32/4.00 foldr f z Nil = z; 9.32/4.00 foldr f z (Cons x xs) = f x (foldr f z xs); 9.32/4.00 9.32/4.00 or :: List MyBool -> MyBool; 9.32/4.00 or = foldr pePe MyFalse; 9.32/4.00 9.32/4.00 pePe :: MyBool -> MyBool -> MyBool; 9.32/4.00 pePe MyFalse x = x; 9.32/4.00 pePe MyTrue x = MyTrue; 9.32/4.00 9.32/4.00 } 9.32/4.00 9.32/4.00 ---------------------------------------- 9.32/4.00 9.32/4.00 (3) COR (EQUIVALENT) 9.32/4.00 Cond Reductions: 9.32/4.00 The following Function with conditions 9.32/4.00 "undefined |Falseundefined; 9.32/4.00 " 9.32/4.00 is transformed to 9.32/4.00 "undefined = undefined1; 9.32/4.00 " 9.32/4.00 "undefined0 True = undefined; 9.32/4.00 " 9.32/4.00 "undefined1 = undefined0 False; 9.32/4.00 " 9.32/4.00 9.32/4.00 ---------------------------------------- 9.32/4.00 9.32/4.00 (4) 9.32/4.00 Obligation: 9.32/4.00 mainModule Main 9.32/4.00 module Main where { 9.32/4.00 import qualified Prelude; 9.32/4.00 data List a = Cons a (List a) | Nil ; 9.32/4.00 9.32/4.00 data MyBool = MyTrue | MyFalse ; 9.32/4.00 9.32/4.00 foldr :: (b -> a -> a) -> a -> List b -> a; 9.32/4.00 foldr f z Nil = z; 9.32/4.00 foldr f z (Cons x xs) = f x (foldr f z xs); 9.32/4.00 9.32/4.00 or :: List MyBool -> MyBool; 9.32/4.01 or = foldr pePe MyFalse; 9.32/4.01 9.32/4.01 pePe :: MyBool -> MyBool -> MyBool; 9.32/4.01 pePe MyFalse x = x; 9.32/4.01 pePe MyTrue x = MyTrue; 9.32/4.01 9.32/4.01 } 9.32/4.01 9.32/4.01 ---------------------------------------- 9.32/4.01 9.32/4.01 (5) Narrow (SOUND) 9.32/4.01 Haskell To QDPs 9.32/4.01 9.32/4.01 digraph dp_graph { 9.32/4.01 node [outthreshold=100, inthreshold=100];1[label="or",fontsize=16,color="grey",shape="box"];1 -> 3[label="",style="dashed", color="grey", weight=3]; 9.32/4.01 3[label="or vx3",fontsize=16,color="black",shape="triangle"];3 -> 4[label="",style="solid", color="black", weight=3]; 9.32/4.01 4[label="foldr pePe MyFalse vx3",fontsize=16,color="burlywood",shape="triangle"];16[label="vx3/Cons vx30 vx31",fontsize=10,color="white",style="solid",shape="box"];4 -> 16[label="",style="solid", color="burlywood", weight=9]; 9.32/4.01 16 -> 5[label="",style="solid", color="burlywood", weight=3]; 9.32/4.01 17[label="vx3/Nil",fontsize=10,color="white",style="solid",shape="box"];4 -> 17[label="",style="solid", color="burlywood", weight=9]; 9.32/4.01 17 -> 6[label="",style="solid", color="burlywood", weight=3]; 9.32/4.01 5[label="foldr pePe MyFalse (Cons vx30 vx31)",fontsize=16,color="black",shape="box"];5 -> 7[label="",style="solid", color="black", weight=3]; 9.32/4.01 6[label="foldr pePe MyFalse Nil",fontsize=16,color="black",shape="box"];6 -> 8[label="",style="solid", color="black", weight=3]; 9.32/4.01 7 -> 9[label="",style="dashed", color="red", weight=0]; 9.32/4.01 7[label="pePe vx30 (foldr pePe MyFalse vx31)",fontsize=16,color="magenta"];7 -> 10[label="",style="dashed", color="magenta", weight=3]; 9.32/4.01 8[label="MyFalse",fontsize=16,color="green",shape="box"];10 -> 4[label="",style="dashed", color="red", weight=0]; 9.32/4.01 10[label="foldr pePe MyFalse vx31",fontsize=16,color="magenta"];10 -> 11[label="",style="dashed", color="magenta", weight=3]; 9.32/4.01 9[label="pePe vx30 vx4",fontsize=16,color="burlywood",shape="triangle"];18[label="vx30/MyTrue",fontsize=10,color="white",style="solid",shape="box"];9 -> 18[label="",style="solid", color="burlywood", weight=9]; 9.32/4.01 18 -> 12[label="",style="solid", color="burlywood", weight=3]; 9.32/4.01 19[label="vx30/MyFalse",fontsize=10,color="white",style="solid",shape="box"];9 -> 19[label="",style="solid", color="burlywood", weight=9]; 9.32/4.01 19 -> 13[label="",style="solid", color="burlywood", weight=3]; 9.32/4.01 11[label="vx31",fontsize=16,color="green",shape="box"];12[label="pePe MyTrue vx4",fontsize=16,color="black",shape="box"];12 -> 14[label="",style="solid", color="black", weight=3]; 9.32/4.01 13[label="pePe MyFalse vx4",fontsize=16,color="black",shape="box"];13 -> 15[label="",style="solid", color="black", weight=3]; 9.32/4.01 14[label="MyTrue",fontsize=16,color="green",shape="box"];15[label="vx4",fontsize=16,color="green",shape="box"];} 9.32/4.01 9.32/4.01 ---------------------------------------- 9.32/4.01 9.32/4.01 (6) 9.32/4.01 Obligation: 9.32/4.01 Q DP problem: 9.32/4.01 The TRS P consists of the following rules: 9.32/4.01 9.32/4.01 new_foldr(Cons(vx30, vx31)) -> new_foldr(vx31) 9.32/4.01 9.32/4.01 R is empty. 9.32/4.01 Q is empty. 9.32/4.01 We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains. 9.32/4.01 ---------------------------------------- 9.32/4.01 9.32/4.01 (7) QDPSizeChangeProof (EQUIVALENT) 9.32/4.01 By using the subterm criterion [SUBTERM_CRITERION] together with the size-change analysis [AAECC05] we have proven that there are no infinite chains for this DP problem. 9.32/4.01 9.32/4.01 From the DPs we obtained the following set of size-change graphs: 9.32/4.01 *new_foldr(Cons(vx30, vx31)) -> new_foldr(vx31) 9.32/4.01 The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1 9.32/4.01 9.32/4.01 9.32/4.01 ---------------------------------------- 9.32/4.01 9.32/4.01 (8) 9.32/4.01 YES 9.32/4.05 EOF