YES Solver Timeout: 4 Global Timeout: 60 No parsing errors! Init Location: 0 Transitions: ~(1)) /\ (arg2 > ~(1)) /\ (undef1 > ~(1)) /\ (undef2 > ~(1)) /\ (arg1 > 0), par{arg1 -> undef1, arg2 -> undef2, arg3 -> undef3, arg4 -> (undef1 + undef2)}> ~(2)) /\ (arg2 > ~(2)), par{arg1 -> (arg1 + 1), arg2 -> (arg2 + 1), arg4 -> ((arg1 + 1) + (arg2 + 1))}> undef9, arg2 -> undef10, arg3 -> undef11, arg4 -> undef12}> Fresh variables: undef1, undef2, undef3, undef9, undef10, undef11, undef12, Undef variables: undef1, undef2, undef3, undef9, undef10, undef11, undef12, Abstraction variables: Exit nodes: Accepting locations: Asserts: Preprocessed LLVMGraph Init Location: 0 Transitions: ~(1)) /\ (undef10 > ~(1)) /\ (undef1 > ~(1)) /\ (undef2 > ~(1)) /\ (undef9 > 0)> ~(2)) /\ (arg2 > ~(2)), par{arg1 -> (arg1 + 1), arg2 -> (arg2 + 1), arg4 -> ((arg1 + 1) + (arg2 + 1))}> Fresh variables: undef1, undef2, undef3, undef9, undef10, undef11, undef12, Undef variables: undef1, undef2, undef3, undef9, undef10, undef11, undef12, Abstraction variables: Exit nodes: Accepting locations: Asserts: ************************************************************* ******************************************************************************************* *********************** WORKING TRANSITION SYSTEM (DAG) *********************** ******************************************************************************************* Init Location: 0 Graph 0: Transitions: Variables: Graph 1: Transitions: 1 + arg1, arg2 -> 1 + arg2, arg4 -> 2 + arg1 + arg2, rest remain the same}> Variables: arg1, arg2, arg3, arg4 Precedence: Graph 0 Graph 1 Map Locations to Subgraph: ( 0 , 0 ) ( 2 , 1 ) ******************************************************************************************* ******************************** CHECKING ASSERTIONS ******************************** ******************************************************************************************* Proving termination of subgraph 0 Proving termination of subgraph 1 Checking unfeasibility... Time used: 0.004521 Checking conditional termination of SCC {l2}... LOG: CALL solveLinear LOG: RETURN solveLinear - Elapsed time: 0.000835s LOG: CALL solveLinear LOG: RETURN solveLinear - Elapsed time: 0.002927s Trying to remove transition: 1 + arg1, arg2 -> 1 + arg2, arg4 -> 2 + arg1 + arg2, rest remain the same}> Solving with 1 template(s). LOG: CALL solveNonLinearGetFirstSolution LOG: RETURN solveNonLinearGetFirstSolution - Elapsed time: 0.024367s Time used: 0.02415 Solving with 1 template(s). LOG: CALL solveNonLinearGetFirstSolution LOG: RETURN solveNonLinearGetFirstSolution - Elapsed time: 0.014818s Time used: 0.014119 LOG: SAT solveNonLinear - Elapsed time: 0.014818s Cost: 0; Total time: 0.014119 Termination implied by a set of invariant(s): Invariant at l2: arg2 <= 1 + arg4 [ Invariant Graph ] Strengthening and disabling transitions... LOG: CALL solverLinear in Graph for feasibility LOG: RETURN solveLinear in Graph for feasibility Strengthening transition (result): 1 + arg1, arg2 -> 1 + arg2, arg4 -> 2 + arg1 + arg2, rest remain the same}> [ Termination Graph ] Strengthening and disabling transitions... LOG: CALL solverLinear in Graph for feasibility LOG: RETURN solveLinear in Graph for feasibility Strengthening transition (result): 1 + arg1, arg2 -> 1 + arg2, arg4 -> 2 + arg1 + arg2, rest remain the same}> Ranking function: -2*arg2 + 2*arg3 New Graphs: INVARIANTS: 2: arg2 <= 1 + arg4 , Quasi-INVARIANTS to narrow Graph: 2: Program Terminates