WORST_CASE(Omega(1),?) ### Pre-processing the ITS problem ### Initial linear ITS problem Start location: __init 0: f1_0_main_Load -> f161_0_main_LT : arg1'=arg1P_1, arg2'=arg2P_1, [ arg2>-1 && arg1P_1>-1 && arg1>0 ], cost: 1 1: f161_0_main_LT -> f212_0_main_LE : arg1'=arg1P_2, arg2'=arg2P_2, [ arg1>-1 && arg1==arg1P_2 && 1==arg2P_2 ], cost: 1 2: f212_0_main_LE -> f161_0_main_LT : arg1'=arg1P_3, arg2'=arg2P_3, [ arg2>=arg1 && -1+arg1==arg1P_3 ], cost: 1 3: f212_0_main_LE -> f212_0_main_LE : arg1'=arg1P_4, arg2'=arg2P_4, [ arg2>0 && arg2 f1_0_main_Load : arg1'=arg1P_5, arg2'=arg2P_5, [], cost: 1 Checking for constant complexity: The following rule is satisfiable with cost >= 1, yielding constant complexity: 4: __init -> f1_0_main_Load : arg1'=arg1P_5, arg2'=arg2P_5, [], cost: 1 Simplified all rules, resulting in: Start location: __init 0: f1_0_main_Load -> f161_0_main_LT : arg1'=arg1P_1, arg2'=arg2P_1, [ arg2>-1 && arg1P_1>-1 && arg1>0 ], cost: 1 1: f161_0_main_LT -> f212_0_main_LE : arg2'=1, [ arg1>-1 ], cost: 1 2: f212_0_main_LE -> f161_0_main_LT : arg1'=-1+arg1, arg2'=arg2P_3, [ arg2>=arg1 ], cost: 1 3: f212_0_main_LE -> f212_0_main_LE : arg2'=2*arg2, [ arg2>0 && arg2 f1_0_main_Load : arg1'=arg1P_5, arg2'=arg2P_5, [], cost: 1 ### Simplification by acceleration and chaining ### Accelerating simple loops of location 2. Accelerating the following rules: 3: f212_0_main_LE -> f212_0_main_LE : arg2'=2*arg2, [ arg2>0 && arg2 f161_0_main_LT : arg1'=arg1P_1, arg2'=arg2P_1, [ arg2>-1 && arg1P_1>-1 && arg1>0 ], cost: 1 1: f161_0_main_LT -> f212_0_main_LE : arg2'=1, [ arg1>-1 ], cost: 1 2: f212_0_main_LE -> f161_0_main_LT : arg1'=-1+arg1, arg2'=arg2P_3, [ arg2>=arg1 ], cost: 1 3: f212_0_main_LE -> f212_0_main_LE : arg2'=2*arg2, [ arg2>0 && arg2 f1_0_main_Load : arg1'=arg1P_5, arg2'=arg2P_5, [], cost: 1 Chained accelerated rules (with incoming rules): Start location: __init 0: f1_0_main_Load -> f161_0_main_LT : arg1'=arg1P_1, arg2'=arg2P_1, [ arg2>-1 && arg1P_1>-1 && arg1>0 ], cost: 1 1: f161_0_main_LT -> f212_0_main_LE : arg2'=1, [ arg1>-1 ], cost: 1 5: f161_0_main_LT -> f212_0_main_LE : arg2'=2, [ 1 f161_0_main_LT : arg1'=-1+arg1, arg2'=arg2P_3, [ arg2>=arg1 ], cost: 1 4: __init -> f1_0_main_Load : arg1'=arg1P_5, arg2'=arg2P_5, [], cost: 1 Eliminated locations (on linear paths): Start location: __init 1: f161_0_main_LT -> f212_0_main_LE : arg2'=1, [ arg1>-1 ], cost: 1 5: f161_0_main_LT -> f212_0_main_LE : arg2'=2, [ 1 f161_0_main_LT : arg1'=-1+arg1, arg2'=arg2P_3, [ arg2>=arg1 ], cost: 1 6: __init -> f161_0_main_LT : arg1'=arg1P_1, arg2'=arg2P_1, [ arg2P_5>-1 && arg1P_1>-1 && arg1P_5>0 ], cost: 2 Eliminated locations (on tree-shaped paths): Start location: __init 7: f161_0_main_LT -> f161_0_main_LT : arg1'=-1+arg1, arg2'=arg2P_3, [ arg1>-1 && 1>=arg1 ], cost: 2 8: f161_0_main_LT -> f161_0_main_LT : arg1'=-1+arg1, arg2'=arg2P_3, [ 1=arg1 ], cost: 3 6: __init -> f161_0_main_LT : arg1'=arg1P_1, arg2'=arg2P_1, [ arg2P_5>-1 && arg1P_1>-1 && arg1P_5>0 ], cost: 2 Accelerating simple loops of location 1. Simplified some of the simple loops (and removed duplicate rules). Accelerating the following rules: 7: f161_0_main_LT -> f161_0_main_LT : arg1'=-1+arg1, arg2'=arg2P_3, [ arg1>-1 && 1>=arg1 ], cost: 2 8: f161_0_main_LT -> f161_0_main_LT : arg1'=-1+arg1, arg2'=arg2P_3, [ 2-arg1==0 ], cost: 3 Accelerated rule 7 with metering function 1+arg1, yielding the new rule 9. Accelerated rule 8 with metering function -1+arg1, yielding the new rule 10. Removing the simple loops: 7 8. Accelerated all simple loops using metering functions (where possible): Start location: __init 9: f161_0_main_LT -> f161_0_main_LT : arg1'=-1, arg2'=arg2P_3, [ arg1>-1 && 1>=arg1 ], cost: 2+2*arg1 10: f161_0_main_LT -> f161_0_main_LT : arg1'=1, arg2'=arg2P_3, [ 2-arg1==0 ], cost: -3+3*arg1 6: __init -> f161_0_main_LT : arg1'=arg1P_1, arg2'=arg2P_1, [ arg2P_5>-1 && arg1P_1>-1 && arg1P_5>0 ], cost: 2 Chained accelerated rules (with incoming rules): Start location: __init 6: __init -> f161_0_main_LT : arg1'=arg1P_1, arg2'=arg2P_1, [ arg2P_5>-1 && arg1P_1>-1 && arg1P_5>0 ], cost: 2 11: __init -> f161_0_main_LT : arg1'=-1, arg2'=arg2P_3, [ arg1P_1>-1 && 1>=arg1P_1 ], cost: 4+2*arg1P_1 12: __init -> f161_0_main_LT : arg1'=1, arg2'=arg2P_3, [], cost: 5 Removed unreachable locations (and leaf rules with constant cost): Start location: __init 11: __init -> f161_0_main_LT : arg1'=-1, arg2'=arg2P_3, [ arg1P_1>-1 && 1>=arg1P_1 ], cost: 4+2*arg1P_1 ### Computing asymptotic complexity ### Fully simplified ITS problem Start location: __init 11: __init -> f161_0_main_LT : arg1'=-1, arg2'=arg2P_3, [ arg1P_1>-1 && 1>=arg1P_1 ], cost: 4+2*arg1P_1 Computing asymptotic complexity for rule 11 Could not solve the limit problem. Resulting cost 0 has complexity: Unknown Obtained the following overall complexity (w.r.t. the length of the input n): Complexity: Constant Cpx degree: 0 Solved cost: 1 Rule cost: 1 Rule guard: [] WORST_CASE(Omega(1),?)