WORST_CASE(INF,?)

### Pre-processing the ITS problem ###

Initial linear ITS problem
   Start location: __init
      0: f1_0_main_Load -> f362_0_gt_LE : arg1'=arg1P_1, arg2'=arg2P_1, arg3'=arg3P_1, arg4'=arg4P_1, arg5'=arg5P_1, [ arg2P_1>-1 && arg2>-1 && arg1P_1>-1 && arg1>0 && arg1P_1==arg3P_1 && arg2P_1==arg4P_1 && arg1P_1==arg5P_1 ], cost: 1
      1: f362_0_gt_LE -> f362_0_gt_LE : arg1'=arg1P_2, arg2'=arg2P_2, arg3'=arg3P_2, arg4'=arg4P_2, arg5'=arg5P_2, [ arg3>0 && arg4>0 && arg3==arg5 && arg1==arg1P_2 && arg2==arg2P_2 && -1+arg3==arg3P_2 && -1+arg4==arg4P_2 && -1+arg3==arg5P_2 ], cost: 1
      2: f362_0_gt_LE -> f362_0_gt_LE : arg1'=arg1P_3, arg2'=arg2P_3, arg3'=arg3P_3, arg4'=arg4P_3, arg5'=arg5P_3, [ arg3>0 && 0==arg4 && arg3==arg5 && arg1==arg1P_3 && 1+arg2==arg2P_3 && arg1==arg3P_3 && 1+arg2==arg4P_3 && arg1==arg5P_3 ], cost: 1
      3: __init -> f1_0_main_Load : arg1'=arg1P_4, arg2'=arg2P_4, arg3'=arg3P_4, arg4'=arg4P_4, arg5'=arg5P_4, [], cost: 1

Checking for constant complexity:
   The following rule is satisfiable with cost >= 1, yielding constant complexity:
      3: __init -> f1_0_main_Load : arg1'=arg1P_4, arg2'=arg2P_4, arg3'=arg3P_4, arg4'=arg4P_4, arg5'=arg5P_4, [], cost: 1

Simplified all rules, resulting in:
   Start location: __init
      0: f1_0_main_Load -> f362_0_gt_LE : arg1'=arg5P_1, arg2'=arg4P_1, arg3'=arg5P_1, arg4'=arg4P_1, arg5'=arg5P_1, [ arg4P_1>-1 && arg2>-1 && arg5P_1>-1 && arg1>0 ], cost: 1
      1: f362_0_gt_LE -> f362_0_gt_LE : arg3'=-1+arg3, arg4'=-1+arg4, arg5'=-1+arg3, [ arg3>0 && arg4>0 && arg3==arg5 ], cost: 1
      2: f362_0_gt_LE -> f362_0_gt_LE : arg2'=1+arg2, arg3'=arg1, arg4'=1+arg2, arg5'=arg1, [ arg3>0 && 0==arg4 && arg3==arg5 ], cost: 1
      3: __init -> f1_0_main_Load : arg1'=arg1P_4, arg2'=arg2P_4, arg3'=arg3P_4, arg4'=arg4P_4, arg5'=arg5P_4, [], cost: 1

### Simplification by acceleration and chaining ###

Accelerating simple loops of location 1.
   Accelerating the following rules:
      1: f362_0_gt_LE -> f362_0_gt_LE : arg3'=-1+arg3, arg4'=-1+arg4, arg5'=-1+arg3, [ arg3>0 && arg4>0 && arg3==arg5 ], cost: 1
      2: f362_0_gt_LE -> f362_0_gt_LE : arg2'=1+arg2, arg3'=arg1, arg4'=1+arg2, arg5'=arg1, [ arg3>0 && 0==arg4 && arg3==arg5 ], cost: 1

   Accelerated rule 1 with metering function arg4 (after adding arg3>=arg4), yielding the new rule 4.
   Accelerated rule 1 with metering function arg3 (after adding arg3<=arg4), yielding the new rule 5.
   Found no metering function for rule 2.
   Removing the simple loops: 1.

Accelerated all simple loops using metering functions (where possible):
   Start location: __init
      0: f1_0_main_Load -> f362_0_gt_LE : arg1'=arg5P_1, arg2'=arg4P_1, arg3'=arg5P_1, arg4'=arg4P_1, arg5'=arg5P_1, [ arg4P_1>-1 && arg2>-1 && arg5P_1>-1 && arg1>0 ], cost: 1
      2: f362_0_gt_LE -> f362_0_gt_LE : arg2'=1+arg2, arg3'=arg1, arg4'=1+arg2, arg5'=arg1, [ arg3>0 && 0==arg4 && arg3==arg5 ], cost: 1
      4: f362_0_gt_LE -> f362_0_gt_LE : arg3'=arg3-arg4, arg4'=0, arg5'=arg3-arg4, [ arg3>0 && arg4>0 && arg3==arg5 && arg3>=arg4 ], cost: arg4
      5: f362_0_gt_LE -> f362_0_gt_LE : arg3'=0, arg4'=-arg3+arg4, arg5'=0, [ arg3>0 && arg4>0 && arg3==arg5 && arg3<=arg4 ], cost: arg3
      3: __init -> f1_0_main_Load : arg1'=arg1P_4, arg2'=arg2P_4, arg3'=arg3P_4, arg4'=arg4P_4, arg5'=arg5P_4, [], cost: 1

Chained accelerated rules (with incoming rules):
   Start location: __init
      0: f1_0_main_Load -> f362_0_gt_LE : arg1'=arg5P_1, arg2'=arg4P_1, arg3'=arg5P_1, arg4'=arg4P_1, arg5'=arg5P_1, [ arg4P_1>-1 && arg2>-1 && arg5P_1>-1 && arg1>0 ], cost: 1
      6: f1_0_main_Load -> f362_0_gt_LE : arg1'=arg5P_1, arg2'=1, arg3'=arg5P_1, arg4'=1, arg5'=arg5P_1, [ arg2>-1 && arg1>0 && arg5P_1>0 ], cost: 2
      7: f1_0_main_Load -> f362_0_gt_LE : arg1'=arg5P_1, arg2'=arg4P_1, arg3'=-arg4P_1+arg5P_1, arg4'=0, arg5'=-arg4P_1+arg5P_1, [ arg2>-1 && arg1>0 && arg5P_1>0 && arg4P_1>0 && arg5P_1>=arg4P_1 ], cost: 1+arg4P_1
      8: f1_0_main_Load -> f362_0_gt_LE : arg1'=arg5P_1, arg2'=arg4P_1, arg3'=0, arg4'=arg4P_1-arg5P_1, arg5'=0, [ arg2>-1 && arg1>0 && arg5P_1>0 && arg4P_1>0 && arg5P_1<=arg4P_1 ], cost: 1+arg5P_1
      3: __init -> f1_0_main_Load : arg1'=arg1P_4, arg2'=arg2P_4, arg3'=arg3P_4, arg4'=arg4P_4, arg5'=arg5P_4, [], cost: 1

Removed unreachable locations (and leaf rules with constant cost):
   Start location: __init
      7: f1_0_main_Load -> f362_0_gt_LE : arg1'=arg5P_1, arg2'=arg4P_1, arg3'=-arg4P_1+arg5P_1, arg4'=0, arg5'=-arg4P_1+arg5P_1, [ arg2>-1 && arg1>0 && arg5P_1>0 && arg4P_1>0 && arg5P_1>=arg4P_1 ], cost: 1+arg4P_1
      8: f1_0_main_Load -> f362_0_gt_LE : arg1'=arg5P_1, arg2'=arg4P_1, arg3'=0, arg4'=arg4P_1-arg5P_1, arg5'=0, [ arg2>-1 && arg1>0 && arg5P_1>0 && arg4P_1>0 && arg5P_1<=arg4P_1 ], cost: 1+arg5P_1
      3: __init -> f1_0_main_Load : arg1'=arg1P_4, arg2'=arg2P_4, arg3'=arg3P_4, arg4'=arg4P_4, arg5'=arg5P_4, [], cost: 1

Eliminated locations (on tree-shaped paths):
   Start location: __init
      9: __init -> f362_0_gt_LE : arg1'=arg5P_1, arg2'=arg4P_1, arg3'=-arg4P_1+arg5P_1, arg4'=0, arg5'=-arg4P_1+arg5P_1, [ arg2P_4>-1 && arg1P_4>0 && arg5P_1>0 && arg4P_1>0 && arg5P_1>=arg4P_1 ], cost: 2+arg4P_1
     10: __init -> f362_0_gt_LE : arg1'=arg5P_1, arg2'=arg4P_1, arg3'=0, arg4'=arg4P_1-arg5P_1, arg5'=0, [ arg2P_4>-1 && arg1P_4>0 && arg5P_1>0 && arg4P_1>0 && arg5P_1<=arg4P_1 ], cost: 2+arg5P_1

### Computing asymptotic complexity ###

Fully simplified ITS problem
   Start location: __init
      9: __init -> f362_0_gt_LE : arg1'=arg5P_1, arg2'=arg4P_1, arg3'=-arg4P_1+arg5P_1, arg4'=0, arg5'=-arg4P_1+arg5P_1, [ arg2P_4>-1 && arg1P_4>0 && arg5P_1>0 && arg4P_1>0 && arg5P_1>=arg4P_1 ], cost: 2+arg4P_1
     10: __init -> f362_0_gt_LE : arg1'=arg5P_1, arg2'=arg4P_1, arg3'=0, arg4'=arg4P_1-arg5P_1, arg5'=0, [ arg2P_4>-1 && arg1P_4>0 && arg5P_1>0 && arg4P_1>0 && arg5P_1<=arg4P_1 ], cost: 2+arg5P_1

Computing asymptotic complexity for rule 9
   Simplified the guard:
      9: __init -> f362_0_gt_LE : arg1'=arg5P_1, arg2'=arg4P_1, arg3'=-arg4P_1+arg5P_1, arg4'=0, arg5'=-arg4P_1+arg5P_1, [ arg2P_4>-1 && arg1P_4>0 && arg4P_1>0 && arg5P_1>=arg4P_1 ], cost: 2+arg4P_1
   Solved the limit problem by the following transformations:
      Created initial limit problem:
      arg1P_4 (+/+!), 2+arg4P_1 (+), 1-arg4P_1+arg5P_1 (+/+!), arg4P_1 (+/+!), 1+arg2P_4 (+/+!) [not solved]

      removing all constraints (solved by SMT)
      resulting limit problem: [solved]

      applying transformation rule (C) using substitution {arg1P_4==n,arg4P_1==n,arg2P_4==n,arg5P_1==2*n}
      resulting limit problem:
      [solved]

   Solution:
      arg1P_4 / n
      arg4P_1 / n
      arg2P_4 / n
      arg5P_1 / 2*n
   Resulting cost 2+n has complexity: Unbounded

Found new complexity Unbounded.

Obtained the following overall complexity (w.r.t. the length of the input n):
   Complexity:  Unbounded
   Cpx degree:  Unbounded
   Solved cost: 2+n
   Rule cost:   2+arg4P_1
   Rule guard:  [ arg2P_4>-1 && arg1P_4>0 && arg4P_1>0 && arg5P_1>=arg4P_1 ]

WORST_CASE(INF,?)