WORST_CASE(Omega(1),?) ### Pre-processing the ITS problem ### Initial linear ITS problem Start location: l4 0: l0 -> l1 : i^0'=i^post_1, j^0'=j^post_1, n^0'=n^post_1, [ i^0<=j^0 && i^post_1==1+i^0 && j^0==j^post_1 && n^0==n^post_1 ], cost: 1 1: l0 -> l2 : i^0'=i^post_2, j^0'=j^post_2, n^0'=n^post_2, [ 1+j^0<=i^0 && j^post_2==1+j^0 && i^0==i^post_2 && n^0==n^post_2 ], cost: 1 3: l1 -> l0 : i^0'=i^post_4, j^0'=j^post_4, n^0'=n^post_4, [ 1+i^0<=n^0 && j^post_4==0 && i^0==i^post_4 && n^0==n^post_4 ], cost: 1 2: l2 -> l0 : i^0'=i^post_3, j^0'=j^post_3, n^0'=n^post_3, [ i^0==i^post_3 && j^0==j^post_3 && n^0==n^post_3 ], cost: 1 4: l3 -> l1 : i^0'=i^post_5, j^0'=j^post_5, n^0'=n^post_5, [ i^post_5==0 && j^0==j^post_5 && n^0==n^post_5 ], cost: 1 5: l4 -> l3 : i^0'=i^post_6, j^0'=j^post_6, n^0'=n^post_6, [ i^0==i^post_6 && j^0==j^post_6 && n^0==n^post_6 ], cost: 1 Checking for constant complexity: The following rule is satisfiable with cost >= 1, yielding constant complexity: 5: l4 -> l3 : i^0'=i^post_6, j^0'=j^post_6, n^0'=n^post_6, [ i^0==i^post_6 && j^0==j^post_6 && n^0==n^post_6 ], cost: 1 Simplified all rules, resulting in: Start location: l4 0: l0 -> l1 : i^0'=1+i^0, [ i^0<=j^0 ], cost: 1 1: l0 -> l2 : j^0'=1+j^0, [ 1+j^0<=i^0 ], cost: 1 3: l1 -> l0 : j^0'=0, [ 1+i^0<=n^0 ], cost: 1 2: l2 -> l0 : [], cost: 1 4: l3 -> l1 : i^0'=0, [], cost: 1 5: l4 -> l3 : [], cost: 1 ### Simplification by acceleration and chaining ### Eliminated locations (on linear paths): Start location: l4 0: l0 -> l1 : i^0'=1+i^0, [ i^0<=j^0 ], cost: 1 7: l0 -> l0 : j^0'=1+j^0, [ 1+j^0<=i^0 ], cost: 2 3: l1 -> l0 : j^0'=0, [ 1+i^0<=n^0 ], cost: 1 6: l4 -> l1 : i^0'=0, [], cost: 2 Accelerating simple loops of location 0. Accelerating the following rules: 7: l0 -> l0 : j^0'=1+j^0, [ 1+j^0<=i^0 ], cost: 2 Accelerated rule 7 with metering function i^0-j^0, yielding the new rule 8. Removing the simple loops: 7. Accelerated all simple loops using metering functions (where possible): Start location: l4 0: l0 -> l1 : i^0'=1+i^0, [ i^0<=j^0 ], cost: 1 8: l0 -> l0 : j^0'=i^0, [ 1+j^0<=i^0 ], cost: 2*i^0-2*j^0 3: l1 -> l0 : j^0'=0, [ 1+i^0<=n^0 ], cost: 1 6: l4 -> l1 : i^0'=0, [], cost: 2 Chained accelerated rules (with incoming rules): Start location: l4 0: l0 -> l1 : i^0'=1+i^0, [ i^0<=j^0 ], cost: 1 3: l1 -> l0 : j^0'=0, [ 1+i^0<=n^0 ], cost: 1 9: l1 -> l0 : j^0'=i^0, [ 1+i^0<=n^0 && 1<=i^0 ], cost: 1+2*i^0 6: l4 -> l1 : i^0'=0, [], cost: 2 Eliminated locations (on tree-shaped paths): Start location: l4 10: l1 -> l1 : i^0'=1+i^0, j^0'=0, [ 1+i^0<=n^0 && i^0<=0 ], cost: 2 11: l1 -> l1 : i^0'=1+i^0, j^0'=i^0, [ 1+i^0<=n^0 && 1<=i^0 ], cost: 2+2*i^0 6: l4 -> l1 : i^0'=0, [], cost: 2 Accelerating simple loops of location 1. Accelerating the following rules: 10: l1 -> l1 : i^0'=1+i^0, j^0'=0, [ 1+i^0<=n^0 && i^0<=0 ], cost: 2 11: l1 -> l1 : i^0'=1+i^0, j^0'=i^0, [ 1+i^0<=n^0 && 1<=i^0 ], cost: 2+2*i^0 Found no metering function for rule 10. Accelerated rule 11 with metering function n^0-i^0, yielding the new rule 12. Removing the simple loops: 11. Accelerated all simple loops using metering functions (where possible): Start location: l4 10: l1 -> l1 : i^0'=1+i^0, j^0'=0, [ 1+i^0<=n^0 && i^0<=0 ], cost: 2 12: l1 -> l1 : i^0'=n^0, j^0'=-1+n^0, [ 1+i^0<=n^0 && 1<=i^0 ], cost: n^0+(n^0-i^0)^2+2*i^0*(n^0-i^0)-i^0 6: l4 -> l1 : i^0'=0, [], cost: 2 Chained accelerated rules (with incoming rules): Start location: l4 6: l4 -> l1 : i^0'=0, [], cost: 2 13: l4 -> l1 : i^0'=1, j^0'=0, [ 1<=n^0 ], cost: 4 Removed unreachable locations (and leaf rules with constant cost): Start location: l4 ### Computing asymptotic complexity ### Fully simplified ITS problem Start location: l4 Obtained the following overall complexity (w.r.t. the length of the input n): Complexity: Constant Cpx degree: 0 Solved cost: 1 Rule cost: 1 Rule guard: [ i^0==i^post_6 && j^0==j^post_6 && n^0==n^post_6 ] WORST_CASE(Omega(1),?)