YES proof of prog.inttrs # AProVE Commit ID: 48fb2092695e11cc9f56e44b17a92a5f88ffb256 marcel 20180622 unpublished dirty Termination of the given IRSwT could be proven: (0) IRSwT (1) IRSFormatTransformerProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] (2) IRSwT (3) IRSwTTerminationDigraphProof [EQUIVALENT, 247 ms] (4) IRSwT (5) IntTRSCompressionProof [EQUIVALENT, 31 ms] (6) IRSwT (7) TempFilterProof [SOUND, 48 ms] (8) IntTRS (9) PolynomialOrderProcessor [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] (10) IntTRS (11) PolynomialOrderProcessor [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] (12) YES ---------------------------------------- (0) Obligation: Rules: f1_0_main_Load(arg1, arg2) -> f180_0_ack_GT(arg1P, arg2P) :|: 0 = arg2P && 0 = arg1P && 0 = arg2 && 0 <= arg1 - 1 f1_0_main_Load(x, x1) -> f180_0_ack_GT(x2, x3) :|: 0 = x2 && 1 = x1 && -1 <= x3 - 1 && 0 <= x - 1 f1_0_main_Load(x4, x5) -> f180_0_ack_GT(x6, x7) :|: 0 <= x4 - 1 && -1 <= x7 - 1 && 1 <= x5 - 1 && -1 <= x6 - 1 f180_0_ack_GT(x8, x9) -> f180_0_ack_GT(x10, x11) :|: x9 - 1 = x11 && 1 = x10 && 0 = x8 && x9 - 1 <= x9 - 1 && 0 <= x9 - 1 f180_0_ack_GT(x12, x13) -> f180_0_ack_GT(x14, x15) :|: x13 = x15 && x12 - 1 = x14 && 0 <= x13 - 1 && x13 - 1 <= x13 - 1 && 0 <= x12 - 1 f180_0_ack_GT(x16, x17) -> f180_0_ack_GT(x18, x19) :|: x17 - 1 = x19 && x17 - 1 <= x17 - 1 && 0 <= x18 - 1 && 0 <= x17 - 1 && 0 <= x16 - 1 __init(x20, x21) -> f1_0_main_Load(x22, x23) :|: 0 <= 0 Start term: __init(arg1, arg2) ---------------------------------------- (1) IRSFormatTransformerProof (EQUIVALENT) Reformatted IRS to match normalized format (transformed away non-linear left-hand sides, !=, / and %). ---------------------------------------- (2) Obligation: Rules: f1_0_main_Load(arg1, arg2) -> f180_0_ack_GT(arg1P, arg2P) :|: 0 = arg2P && 0 = arg1P && 0 = arg2 && 0 <= arg1 - 1 f1_0_main_Load(x, x1) -> f180_0_ack_GT(x2, x3) :|: 0 = x2 && 1 = x1 && -1 <= x3 - 1 && 0 <= x - 1 f1_0_main_Load(x4, x5) -> f180_0_ack_GT(x6, x7) :|: 0 <= x4 - 1 && -1 <= x7 - 1 && 1 <= x5 - 1 && -1 <= x6 - 1 f180_0_ack_GT(x8, x9) -> f180_0_ack_GT(x10, x11) :|: x9 - 1 = x11 && 1 = x10 && 0 = x8 && x9 - 1 <= x9 - 1 && 0 <= x9 - 1 f180_0_ack_GT(x12, x13) -> f180_0_ack_GT(x14, x15) :|: x13 = x15 && x12 - 1 = x14 && 0 <= x13 - 1 && x13 - 1 <= x13 - 1 && 0 <= x12 - 1 f180_0_ack_GT(x16, x17) -> f180_0_ack_GT(x18, x19) :|: x17 - 1 = x19 && x17 - 1 <= x17 - 1 && 0 <= x18 - 1 && 0 <= x17 - 1 && 0 <= x16 - 1 __init(x20, x21) -> f1_0_main_Load(x22, x23) :|: 0 <= 0 Start term: __init(arg1, arg2) ---------------------------------------- (3) IRSwTTerminationDigraphProof (EQUIVALENT) Constructed termination digraph! Nodes: (1) f1_0_main_Load(arg1, arg2) -> f180_0_ack_GT(arg1P, arg2P) :|: 0 = arg2P && 0 = arg1P && 0 = arg2 && 0 <= arg1 - 1 (2) f1_0_main_Load(x, x1) -> f180_0_ack_GT(x2, x3) :|: 0 = x2 && 1 = x1 && -1 <= x3 - 1 && 0 <= x - 1 (3) f1_0_main_Load(x4, x5) -> f180_0_ack_GT(x6, x7) :|: 0 <= x4 - 1 && -1 <= x7 - 1 && 1 <= x5 - 1 && -1 <= x6 - 1 (4) f180_0_ack_GT(x8, x9) -> f180_0_ack_GT(x10, x11) :|: x9 - 1 = x11 && 1 = x10 && 0 = x8 && x9 - 1 <= x9 - 1 && 0 <= x9 - 1 (5) f180_0_ack_GT(x12, x13) -> f180_0_ack_GT(x14, x15) :|: x13 = x15 && x12 - 1 = x14 && 0 <= x13 - 1 && x13 - 1 <= x13 - 1 && 0 <= x12 - 1 (6) f180_0_ack_GT(x16, x17) -> f180_0_ack_GT(x18, x19) :|: x17 - 1 = x19 && x17 - 1 <= x17 - 1 && 0 <= x18 - 1 && 0 <= x17 - 1 && 0 <= x16 - 1 (7) __init(x20, x21) -> f1_0_main_Load(x22, x23) :|: 0 <= 0 Arcs: (2) -> (4) (3) -> (4), (5), (6) (4) -> (5), (6) (5) -> (4), (5), (6) (6) -> (5), (6) (7) -> (1), (2), (3) This digraph is fully evaluated! ---------------------------------------- (4) Obligation: Termination digraph: Nodes: (1) f180_0_ack_GT(x8, x9) -> f180_0_ack_GT(x10, x11) :|: x9 - 1 = x11 && 1 = x10 && 0 = x8 && x9 - 1 <= x9 - 1 && 0 <= x9 - 1 (2) f180_0_ack_GT(x12, x13) -> f180_0_ack_GT(x14, x15) :|: x13 = x15 && x12 - 1 = x14 && 0 <= x13 - 1 && x13 - 1 <= x13 - 1 && 0 <= x12 - 1 (3) f180_0_ack_GT(x16, x17) -> f180_0_ack_GT(x18, x19) :|: x17 - 1 = x19 && x17 - 1 <= x17 - 1 && 0 <= x18 - 1 && 0 <= x17 - 1 && 0 <= x16 - 1 Arcs: (1) -> (2), (3) (2) -> (1), (2), (3) (3) -> (2), (3) This digraph is fully evaluated! ---------------------------------------- (5) IntTRSCompressionProof (EQUIVALENT) Compressed rules. ---------------------------------------- (6) Obligation: Rules: f180_0_ack_GT(x12:0, x13:0) -> f180_0_ack_GT(x12:0 - 1, x13:0) :|: x12:0 > 0 && x13:0 > 0 f180_0_ack_GT(x16:0, x17:0) -> f180_0_ack_GT(x18:0, x17:0 - 1) :|: x17:0 > 0 && x18:0 > 0 && x16:0 > 0 f180_0_ack_GT(cons_0, x9:0) -> f180_0_ack_GT(1, x9:0 - 1) :|: x9:0 > 0 && cons_0 = 0 ---------------------------------------- (7) TempFilterProof (SOUND) Used the following sort dictionary for filtering: f180_0_ack_GT(VARIABLE, INTEGER) Replaced non-predefined constructor symbols by 0. ---------------------------------------- (8) Obligation: Rules: f180_0_ack_GT(x12:0, x13:0) -> f180_0_ack_GT(c, x13:0) :|: c = x12:0 - 1 && (x12:0 > 0 && x13:0 > 0) f180_0_ack_GT(x16:0, x17:0) -> f180_0_ack_GT(x18:0, c1) :|: c1 = x17:0 - 1 && (x17:0 > 0 && x18:0 > 0 && x16:0 > 0) f180_0_ack_GT(c2, x9:0) -> f180_0_ack_GT(c3, c4) :|: c4 = x9:0 - 1 && (c3 = 1 && c2 = 0) && (x9:0 > 0 && cons_0 = 0) ---------------------------------------- (9) PolynomialOrderProcessor (EQUIVALENT) Found the following polynomial interpretation: [f180_0_ack_GT(x, x1)] = -1 + x1 The following rules are decreasing: f180_0_ack_GT(x16:0, x17:0) -> f180_0_ack_GT(x18:0, c1) :|: c1 = x17:0 - 1 && (x17:0 > 0 && x18:0 > 0 && x16:0 > 0) f180_0_ack_GT(c2, x9:0) -> f180_0_ack_GT(c3, c4) :|: c4 = x9:0 - 1 && (c3 = 1 && c2 = 0) && (x9:0 > 0 && cons_0 = 0) The following rules are bounded: f180_0_ack_GT(x12:0, x13:0) -> f180_0_ack_GT(c, x13:0) :|: c = x12:0 - 1 && (x12:0 > 0 && x13:0 > 0) f180_0_ack_GT(x16:0, x17:0) -> f180_0_ack_GT(x18:0, c1) :|: c1 = x17:0 - 1 && (x17:0 > 0 && x18:0 > 0 && x16:0 > 0) f180_0_ack_GT(c2, x9:0) -> f180_0_ack_GT(c3, c4) :|: c4 = x9:0 - 1 && (c3 = 1 && c2 = 0) && (x9:0 > 0 && cons_0 = 0) ---------------------------------------- (10) Obligation: Rules: f180_0_ack_GT(x12:0, x13:0) -> f180_0_ack_GT(c, x13:0) :|: c = x12:0 - 1 && (x12:0 > 0 && x13:0 > 0) ---------------------------------------- (11) PolynomialOrderProcessor (EQUIVALENT) Found the following polynomial interpretation: [f180_0_ack_GT(x, x1)] = x The following rules are decreasing: f180_0_ack_GT(x12:0, x13:0) -> f180_0_ack_GT(c, x13:0) :|: c = x12:0 - 1 && (x12:0 > 0 && x13:0 > 0) The following rules are bounded: f180_0_ack_GT(x12:0, x13:0) -> f180_0_ack_GT(c, x13:0) :|: c = x12:0 - 1 && (x12:0 > 0 && x13:0 > 0) ---------------------------------------- (12) YES