YES
proof of prog.inttrs
# AProVE Commit ID: 48fb2092695e11cc9f56e44b17a92a5f88ffb256 marcel 20180622 unpublished dirty


Termination of the given IRSwT could be proven:

(0) IRSwT
(1) IRSFormatTransformerProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms]
(2) IRSwT
(3) IRSwTTerminationDigraphProof [EQUIVALENT, 132 ms]
(4) IRSwT
(5) IntTRSCompressionProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms]
(6) IRSwT
(7) TempFilterProof [SOUND, 54 ms]
(8) IntTRS
(9) PolynomialOrderProcessor [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms]
(10) IntTRS
(11) PolynomialOrderProcessor [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms]
(12) YES


----------------------------------------

(0)
Obligation:
Rules:
f1_0_main_Load(arg1, arg2) -> f161_0_main_LT(arg1P, arg2P) :|: 0 <= arg1 - 1 && -1 <= arg1P - 1 && -1 <= arg2 - 1
f161_0_main_LT(x, x1) -> f212_0_main_LE(x2, x3) :|: 1 = x3 && x = x2 && -1 <= x - 1
f212_0_main_LE(x4, x5) -> f161_0_main_LT(x6, x7) :|: x4 - 1 = x6 && x4 <= x5
f212_0_main_LE(x8, x9) -> f212_0_main_LE(x10, x11) :|: 2 * x9 = x11 && x8 = x10 && x9 <= x8 - 1 && 0 <= x9 - 1
__init(x12, x13) -> f1_0_main_Load(x14, x15) :|: 0 <= 0
Start term: __init(arg1, arg2)

----------------------------------------

(1) IRSFormatTransformerProof (EQUIVALENT)
Reformatted IRS to match normalized format (transformed away non-linear left-hand sides, !=, / and %).
----------------------------------------

(2)
Obligation:
Rules:
f1_0_main_Load(arg1, arg2) -> f161_0_main_LT(arg1P, arg2P) :|: 0 <= arg1 - 1 && -1 <= arg1P - 1 && -1 <= arg2 - 1
f161_0_main_LT(x, x1) -> f212_0_main_LE(x2, x3) :|: 1 = x3 && x = x2 && -1 <= x - 1
f212_0_main_LE(x4, x5) -> f161_0_main_LT(x6, x7) :|: x4 - 1 = x6 && x4 <= x5
f212_0_main_LE(x8, x9) -> f212_0_main_LE(x10, x11) :|: 2 * x9 = x11 && x8 = x10 && x9 <= x8 - 1 && 0 <= x9 - 1
__init(x12, x13) -> f1_0_main_Load(x14, x15) :|: 0 <= 0
Start term: __init(arg1, arg2)

----------------------------------------

(3) IRSwTTerminationDigraphProof (EQUIVALENT)
Constructed termination digraph!
Nodes:
(1) f1_0_main_Load(arg1, arg2) -> f161_0_main_LT(arg1P, arg2P) :|: 0 <= arg1 - 1 && -1 <= arg1P - 1 && -1 <= arg2 - 1
(2) f161_0_main_LT(x, x1) -> f212_0_main_LE(x2, x3) :|: 1 = x3 && x = x2 && -1 <= x - 1
(3) f212_0_main_LE(x4, x5) -> f161_0_main_LT(x6, x7) :|: x4 - 1 = x6 && x4 <= x5
(4) f212_0_main_LE(x8, x9) -> f212_0_main_LE(x10, x11) :|: 2 * x9 = x11 && x8 = x10 && x9 <= x8 - 1 && 0 <= x9 - 1
(5) __init(x12, x13) -> f1_0_main_Load(x14, x15) :|: 0 <= 0

Arcs:
(1) -> (2)
(2) -> (3), (4)
(3) -> (2)
(4) -> (3), (4)
(5) -> (1)

This digraph is fully evaluated!
----------------------------------------

(4)
Obligation:

Termination digraph:
Nodes:
(1) f161_0_main_LT(x, x1) -> f212_0_main_LE(x2, x3) :|: 1 = x3 && x = x2 && -1 <= x - 1
(2) f212_0_main_LE(x4, x5) -> f161_0_main_LT(x6, x7) :|: x4 - 1 = x6 && x4 <= x5
(3) f212_0_main_LE(x8, x9) -> f212_0_main_LE(x10, x11) :|: 2 * x9 = x11 && x8 = x10 && x9 <= x8 - 1 && 0 <= x9 - 1

Arcs:
(1) -> (2), (3)
(2) -> (1)
(3) -> (2), (3)

This digraph is fully evaluated!

----------------------------------------

(5) IntTRSCompressionProof (EQUIVALENT)
Compressed rules.
----------------------------------------

(6)
Obligation:
Rules:
f212_0_main_LE(x10:0, x9:0) -> f212_0_main_LE(x10:0, 2 * x9:0) :|: x9:0 > 0 && x9:0 <= x10:0 - 1
f212_0_main_LE(x4:0, x5:0) -> f212_0_main_LE(x4:0 - 1, 1) :|: x5:0 >= x4:0 && x4:0 > 0

----------------------------------------

(7) TempFilterProof (SOUND)
Used the following sort dictionary for filtering: 
f212_0_main_LE(INTEGER, VARIABLE)
Replaced non-predefined constructor symbols by 0.
----------------------------------------

(8)
Obligation:
Rules:
f212_0_main_LE(x10:0, x9:0) -> f212_0_main_LE(x10:0, c) :|: c = 2 * x9:0 && (x9:0 > 0 && x9:0 <= x10:0 - 1)
f212_0_main_LE(x4:0, x5:0) -> f212_0_main_LE(c1, c2) :|: c2 = 1 && c1 = x4:0 - 1 && (x5:0 >= x4:0 && x4:0 > 0)

----------------------------------------

(9) PolynomialOrderProcessor (EQUIVALENT)
Found the following polynomial interpretation:
[f212_0_main_LE(x, x1)] = x

The following rules are decreasing:
f212_0_main_LE(x4:0, x5:0) -> f212_0_main_LE(c1, c2) :|: c2 = 1 && c1 = x4:0 - 1 && (x5:0 >= x4:0 && x4:0 > 0)
The following rules are bounded:
f212_0_main_LE(x10:0, x9:0) -> f212_0_main_LE(x10:0, c) :|: c = 2 * x9:0 && (x9:0 > 0 && x9:0 <= x10:0 - 1)
f212_0_main_LE(x4:0, x5:0) -> f212_0_main_LE(c1, c2) :|: c2 = 1 && c1 = x4:0 - 1 && (x5:0 >= x4:0 && x4:0 > 0)

----------------------------------------

(10)
Obligation:
Rules:
f212_0_main_LE(x10:0, x9:0) -> f212_0_main_LE(x10:0, c) :|: c = 2 * x9:0 && (x9:0 > 0 && x9:0 <= x10:0 - 1)

----------------------------------------

(11) PolynomialOrderProcessor (EQUIVALENT)
Found the following polynomial interpretation:
[f212_0_main_LE(x, x1)] = -1 + x - x1

The following rules are decreasing:
f212_0_main_LE(x10:0, x9:0) -> f212_0_main_LE(x10:0, c) :|: c = 2 * x9:0 && (x9:0 > 0 && x9:0 <= x10:0 - 1)
The following rules are bounded:
f212_0_main_LE(x10:0, x9:0) -> f212_0_main_LE(x10:0, c) :|: c = 2 * x9:0 && (x9:0 > 0 && x9:0 <= x10:0 - 1)

----------------------------------------

(12)
YES