YES proof of prog.inttrs # AProVE Commit ID: 48fb2092695e11cc9f56e44b17a92a5f88ffb256 marcel 20180622 unpublished dirty Termination of the given IRSwT could be proven: (0) IRSwT (1) IRSFormatTransformerProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] (2) IRSwT (3) IRSwTTerminationDigraphProof [EQUIVALENT, 148 ms] (4) IRSwT (5) IntTRSCompressionProof [EQUIVALENT, 17 ms] (6) IRSwT (7) TempFilterProof [SOUND, 54 ms] (8) IntTRS (9) PolynomialOrderProcessor [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] (10) AND (11) IntTRS (12) PolynomialOrderProcessor [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] (13) YES (14) IntTRS (15) PolynomialOrderProcessor [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] (16) YES ---------------------------------------- (0) Obligation: Rules: f1_0_main_Load(arg1, arg2, arg3) -> f213_0_main_GE(arg1P, arg2P, arg3P) :|: 0 <= arg1 - 1 && -1 <= arg3P - 1 && -1 <= arg1P - 1 && -1 <= arg2 - 1 && -1 <= arg2P - 1 f213_0_main_GE(x, x1, x2) -> f213_0_main_GE(x3, x4, x5) :|: x2 = x5 && x1 = x4 && x + 1 = x3 && x <= x1 && x1 <= x2 - 1 f213_0_main_GE(x6, x7, x8) -> f213_0_main_GE(x9, x10, x11) :|: x8 = x11 && x7 + 1 = x10 && x6 = x9 && x7 <= x6 - 1 && x7 <= x8 - 1 __init(x12, x13, x14) -> f1_0_main_Load(x15, x16, x17) :|: 0 <= 0 Start term: __init(arg1, arg2, arg3) ---------------------------------------- (1) IRSFormatTransformerProof (EQUIVALENT) Reformatted IRS to match normalized format (transformed away non-linear left-hand sides, !=, / and %). ---------------------------------------- (2) Obligation: Rules: f1_0_main_Load(arg1, arg2, arg3) -> f213_0_main_GE(arg1P, arg2P, arg3P) :|: 0 <= arg1 - 1 && -1 <= arg3P - 1 && -1 <= arg1P - 1 && -1 <= arg2 - 1 && -1 <= arg2P - 1 f213_0_main_GE(x, x1, x2) -> f213_0_main_GE(x3, x4, x5) :|: x2 = x5 && x1 = x4 && x + 1 = x3 && x <= x1 && x1 <= x2 - 1 f213_0_main_GE(x6, x7, x8) -> f213_0_main_GE(x9, x10, x11) :|: x8 = x11 && x7 + 1 = x10 && x6 = x9 && x7 <= x6 - 1 && x7 <= x8 - 1 __init(x12, x13, x14) -> f1_0_main_Load(x15, x16, x17) :|: 0 <= 0 Start term: __init(arg1, arg2, arg3) ---------------------------------------- (3) IRSwTTerminationDigraphProof (EQUIVALENT) Constructed termination digraph! Nodes: (1) f1_0_main_Load(arg1, arg2, arg3) -> f213_0_main_GE(arg1P, arg2P, arg3P) :|: 0 <= arg1 - 1 && -1 <= arg3P - 1 && -1 <= arg1P - 1 && -1 <= arg2 - 1 && -1 <= arg2P - 1 (2) f213_0_main_GE(x, x1, x2) -> f213_0_main_GE(x3, x4, x5) :|: x2 = x5 && x1 = x4 && x + 1 = x3 && x <= x1 && x1 <= x2 - 1 (3) f213_0_main_GE(x6, x7, x8) -> f213_0_main_GE(x9, x10, x11) :|: x8 = x11 && x7 + 1 = x10 && x6 = x9 && x7 <= x6 - 1 && x7 <= x8 - 1 (4) __init(x12, x13, x14) -> f1_0_main_Load(x15, x16, x17) :|: 0 <= 0 Arcs: (1) -> (2), (3) (2) -> (2), (3) (3) -> (2), (3) (4) -> (1) This digraph is fully evaluated! ---------------------------------------- (4) Obligation: Termination digraph: Nodes: (1) f213_0_main_GE(x, x1, x2) -> f213_0_main_GE(x3, x4, x5) :|: x2 = x5 && x1 = x4 && x + 1 = x3 && x <= x1 && x1 <= x2 - 1 (2) f213_0_main_GE(x6, x7, x8) -> f213_0_main_GE(x9, x10, x11) :|: x8 = x11 && x7 + 1 = x10 && x6 = x9 && x7 <= x6 - 1 && x7 <= x8 - 1 Arcs: (1) -> (1), (2) (2) -> (1), (2) This digraph is fully evaluated! ---------------------------------------- (5) IntTRSCompressionProof (EQUIVALENT) Compressed rules. ---------------------------------------- (6) Obligation: Rules: f213_0_main_GE(x:0, x1:0, x2:0) -> f213_0_main_GE(x:0 + 1, x1:0, x2:0) :|: x2:0 - 1 >= x1:0 && x:0 <= x1:0 f213_0_main_GE(x6:0, x7:0, x11:0) -> f213_0_main_GE(x6:0, x7:0 + 1, x11:0) :|: x7:0 <= x11:0 - 1 && x7:0 <= x6:0 - 1 ---------------------------------------- (7) TempFilterProof (SOUND) Used the following sort dictionary for filtering: f213_0_main_GE(INTEGER, INTEGER, INTEGER) Replaced non-predefined constructor symbols by 0. ---------------------------------------- (8) Obligation: Rules: f213_0_main_GE(x:0, x1:0, x2:0) -> f213_0_main_GE(c, x1:0, x2:0) :|: c = x:0 + 1 && (x2:0 - 1 >= x1:0 && x:0 <= x1:0) f213_0_main_GE(x6:0, x7:0, x11:0) -> f213_0_main_GE(x6:0, c1, x11:0) :|: c1 = x7:0 + 1 && (x7:0 <= x11:0 - 1 && x7:0 <= x6:0 - 1) ---------------------------------------- (9) PolynomialOrderProcessor (EQUIVALENT) Found the following polynomial interpretation: [f213_0_main_GE(x, x1, x2)] = -x1 + x2 The following rules are decreasing: f213_0_main_GE(x6:0, x7:0, x11:0) -> f213_0_main_GE(x6:0, c1, x11:0) :|: c1 = x7:0 + 1 && (x7:0 <= x11:0 - 1 && x7:0 <= x6:0 - 1) The following rules are bounded: f213_0_main_GE(x:0, x1:0, x2:0) -> f213_0_main_GE(c, x1:0, x2:0) :|: c = x:0 + 1 && (x2:0 - 1 >= x1:0 && x:0 <= x1:0) ---------------------------------------- (10) Complex Obligation (AND) ---------------------------------------- (11) Obligation: Rules: f213_0_main_GE(x:0, x1:0, x2:0) -> f213_0_main_GE(c, x1:0, x2:0) :|: c = x:0 + 1 && (x2:0 - 1 >= x1:0 && x:0 <= x1:0) ---------------------------------------- (12) PolynomialOrderProcessor (EQUIVALENT) Found the following polynomial interpretation: [f213_0_main_GE(x, x1, x2)] = -x + x1 The following rules are decreasing: f213_0_main_GE(x:0, x1:0, x2:0) -> f213_0_main_GE(c, x1:0, x2:0) :|: c = x:0 + 1 && (x2:0 - 1 >= x1:0 && x:0 <= x1:0) The following rules are bounded: f213_0_main_GE(x:0, x1:0, x2:0) -> f213_0_main_GE(c, x1:0, x2:0) :|: c = x:0 + 1 && (x2:0 - 1 >= x1:0 && x:0 <= x1:0) ---------------------------------------- (13) YES ---------------------------------------- (14) Obligation: Rules: f213_0_main_GE(x6:0, x7:0, x11:0) -> f213_0_main_GE(x6:0, c1, x11:0) :|: c1 = x7:0 + 1 && (x7:0 <= x11:0 - 1 && x7:0 <= x6:0 - 1) ---------------------------------------- (15) PolynomialOrderProcessor (EQUIVALENT) Found the following polynomial interpretation: [f213_0_main_GE(x, x1, x2)] = x - x1 The following rules are decreasing: f213_0_main_GE(x6:0, x7:0, x11:0) -> f213_0_main_GE(x6:0, c1, x11:0) :|: c1 = x7:0 + 1 && (x7:0 <= x11:0 - 1 && x7:0 <= x6:0 - 1) The following rules are bounded: f213_0_main_GE(x6:0, x7:0, x11:0) -> f213_0_main_GE(x6:0, c1, x11:0) :|: c1 = x7:0 + 1 && (x7:0 <= x11:0 - 1 && x7:0 <= x6:0 - 1) ---------------------------------------- (16) YES