YES proof of prog.inttrs # AProVE Commit ID: 48fb2092695e11cc9f56e44b17a92a5f88ffb256 marcel 20180622 unpublished dirty Termination of the given IRSwT could be proven: (0) IRSwT (1) IRSFormatTransformerProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] (2) IRSwT (3) IRSwTTerminationDigraphProof [EQUIVALENT, 83 ms] (4) AND (5) IRSwT (6) IntTRSCompressionProof [EQUIVALENT, 35 ms] (7) IRSwT (8) TempFilterProof [SOUND, 15 ms] (9) IntTRS (10) PolynomialOrderProcessor [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] (11) YES (12) IRSwT (13) IntTRSCompressionProof [EQUIVALENT, 5 ms] (14) IRSwT (15) TempFilterProof [SOUND, 4 ms] (16) IntTRS (17) PolynomialOrderProcessor [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] (18) YES ---------------------------------------- (0) Obligation: Rules: f1_0_main_ConstantStackPush(arg1) -> f149_0_doSum_LT(arg1P) :|: 10 = arg1P f149_0_doSum_LT(x) -> f163_0_factorial_GT(x1) :|: x = x1 && -1 <= x - 1 f149_0_doSum_LT(x2) -> f149_0_doSum_LT(x3) :|: x2 - 1 = x3 && -1 <= x2 - 1 f163_0_factorial_GT(x4) -> f163_0_factorial_GT(x5) :|: x4 - 1 = x5 && x4 - 1 <= x4 - 1 && 0 <= x4 - 1 __init(x6) -> f1_0_main_ConstantStackPush(x7) :|: 0 <= 0 Start term: __init(arg1) ---------------------------------------- (1) IRSFormatTransformerProof (EQUIVALENT) Reformatted IRS to match normalized format (transformed away non-linear left-hand sides, !=, / and %). ---------------------------------------- (2) Obligation: Rules: f1_0_main_ConstantStackPush(arg1) -> f149_0_doSum_LT(arg1P) :|: 10 = arg1P f149_0_doSum_LT(x) -> f163_0_factorial_GT(x1) :|: x = x1 && -1 <= x - 1 f149_0_doSum_LT(x2) -> f149_0_doSum_LT(x3) :|: x2 - 1 = x3 && -1 <= x2 - 1 f163_0_factorial_GT(x4) -> f163_0_factorial_GT(x5) :|: x4 - 1 = x5 && x4 - 1 <= x4 - 1 && 0 <= x4 - 1 __init(x6) -> f1_0_main_ConstantStackPush(x7) :|: 0 <= 0 Start term: __init(arg1) ---------------------------------------- (3) IRSwTTerminationDigraphProof (EQUIVALENT) Constructed termination digraph! Nodes: (1) f1_0_main_ConstantStackPush(arg1) -> f149_0_doSum_LT(arg1P) :|: 10 = arg1P (2) f149_0_doSum_LT(x) -> f163_0_factorial_GT(x1) :|: x = x1 && -1 <= x - 1 (3) f149_0_doSum_LT(x2) -> f149_0_doSum_LT(x3) :|: x2 - 1 = x3 && -1 <= x2 - 1 (4) f163_0_factorial_GT(x4) -> f163_0_factorial_GT(x5) :|: x4 - 1 = x5 && x4 - 1 <= x4 - 1 && 0 <= x4 - 1 (5) __init(x6) -> f1_0_main_ConstantStackPush(x7) :|: 0 <= 0 Arcs: (1) -> (2), (3) (2) -> (4) (3) -> (2), (3) (4) -> (4) (5) -> (1) This digraph is fully evaluated! ---------------------------------------- (4) Complex Obligation (AND) ---------------------------------------- (5) Obligation: Termination digraph: Nodes: (1) f149_0_doSum_LT(x2) -> f149_0_doSum_LT(x3) :|: x2 - 1 = x3 && -1 <= x2 - 1 Arcs: (1) -> (1) This digraph is fully evaluated! ---------------------------------------- (6) IntTRSCompressionProof (EQUIVALENT) Compressed rules. ---------------------------------------- (7) Obligation: Rules: f149_0_doSum_LT(x2:0) -> f149_0_doSum_LT(x2:0 - 1) :|: x2:0 > -1 ---------------------------------------- (8) TempFilterProof (SOUND) Used the following sort dictionary for filtering: f149_0_doSum_LT(INTEGER) Replaced non-predefined constructor symbols by 0. ---------------------------------------- (9) Obligation: Rules: f149_0_doSum_LT(x2:0) -> f149_0_doSum_LT(c) :|: c = x2:0 - 1 && x2:0 > -1 ---------------------------------------- (10) PolynomialOrderProcessor (EQUIVALENT) Found the following polynomial interpretation: [f149_0_doSum_LT(x)] = x The following rules are decreasing: f149_0_doSum_LT(x2:0) -> f149_0_doSum_LT(c) :|: c = x2:0 - 1 && x2:0 > -1 The following rules are bounded: f149_0_doSum_LT(x2:0) -> f149_0_doSum_LT(c) :|: c = x2:0 - 1 && x2:0 > -1 ---------------------------------------- (11) YES ---------------------------------------- (12) Obligation: Termination digraph: Nodes: (1) f163_0_factorial_GT(x4) -> f163_0_factorial_GT(x5) :|: x4 - 1 = x5 && x4 - 1 <= x4 - 1 && 0 <= x4 - 1 Arcs: (1) -> (1) This digraph is fully evaluated! ---------------------------------------- (13) IntTRSCompressionProof (EQUIVALENT) Compressed rules. ---------------------------------------- (14) Obligation: Rules: f163_0_factorial_GT(x4:0) -> f163_0_factorial_GT(x4:0 - 1) :|: x4:0 > 0 ---------------------------------------- (15) TempFilterProof (SOUND) Used the following sort dictionary for filtering: f163_0_factorial_GT(INTEGER) Replaced non-predefined constructor symbols by 0. ---------------------------------------- (16) Obligation: Rules: f163_0_factorial_GT(x4:0) -> f163_0_factorial_GT(c) :|: c = x4:0 - 1 && x4:0 > 0 ---------------------------------------- (17) PolynomialOrderProcessor (EQUIVALENT) Found the following polynomial interpretation: [f163_0_factorial_GT(x)] = x The following rules are decreasing: f163_0_factorial_GT(x4:0) -> f163_0_factorial_GT(c) :|: c = x4:0 - 1 && x4:0 > 0 The following rules are bounded: f163_0_factorial_GT(x4:0) -> f163_0_factorial_GT(c) :|: c = x4:0 - 1 && x4:0 > 0 ---------------------------------------- (18) YES